Feasibility evaluation of submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor for municipal secondary wastewater treatment

Desalination

Volumn 280, Issue 1-3, 2011, Pages 120-126

  Lin, Hongjun ^a   Chen, Jianrong ^a   Wang, Fangyuan ^a   Ding, Linxian ^a   Hong, Huachang ^a  

^a ZHEJIANG NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Capital costs; Municipal wastewater; Operation costs; Submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor

Indexed keywords

ANAEROBIC MEMBRANE BIOREACTOR; BIOGAS RECOVERY; CAPITAL COSTS; COD REMOVAL EFFICIENCY; COST ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC FEASIBILITIES; LABORATORY SCALE; MEMBRANE PARAMETERS; MEMBRANE PERFORMANCE; METHANE YIELD; MUNICIPAL WASTEWATERS; OPERATION COST; OPERATIONAL COSTS; SENSITIVE ANALYSIS; TECHNICAL FEASIBILITY; TOTAL LIFE; TOTAL LIFE CYCLE COSTS;

BIOCONVERSION; BIOGAS; BIOREACTORS; COST ACCOUNTING; COSTS; LIFE CYCLE; MEMBRANES; METHANE; WASTEWATER; WASTEWATER TREATMENT;

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS;

ANOXIC CONDITIONS; BIOREACTOR; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; MEMBRANE; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; WASTEWATER; WATER TREATMENT;

EID: 80053326630     PISSN: 00119164     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2011.06.058     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Judd S. The status of membrane bioreactor technology. Trends Biotechnol. 2008, 26:109-116.
2. Verrecht B., Maere T., Nopens I., Brepols C., Judd S. The cost of a large-scale hollow fibre MBR. Water Res 2010.
3. Jefferson B., Laine A.L., Judd S.J., Stephenson T. Membrane bioreactors and their role in wastewater reuse Water Sci. Technol. 2000, 41:197-204.
4. Meng F.G., Yang F.L., Shi B.Q., Zhang H.M. A comprehensive study on membrane fouling in submerged membrane bioreactors operated under different aeration intensities. Sep Purif Technol 2008, 59:91-100.
5. Smith C., DiGregorio D., Talcott R. The use of ultrafiltration membranes for activated sludge separation. Proceedings of the 24th Annual Purdue Industrial Waste Conference 1969.
6. Harada H., Momonoi K., Yamazaki S., Takizawa S. Application of anaerobic-uf membrane reactor for treatment of a waste-water containing high-strength particulate organics. Water Sci. Technol. 1994, 30:307-319.
7. Beaubien A., Baty M., Jeannot F., Francoeur E., Manem J. Design and operation of anaerobic membrane bioreactors: development of a filtration testing strategy. J. Memb. Sci. 1996, 109:173-184.
8. Herrera-Robledo M., Morgan-Sagastume J.M., Noyola A. Biofouling and pollutant removal during long-term operation of an anaerobic membrane bioreactor treating municipal wastewater. Biofouling 2010, 26:23-30.
9. Lew B., Tarre S., Beliavski M., Dosoretz C., Green M. Anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) for domestic wastewater treatment. Desalination 2009, 243:251-257.
10. Baek S.H., Pagilla K.R., Kim H.J. Lab-scale study of an anaerobic membrane bioreactor (AnMBR) for dilute municipal wastewater treatment. Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 2010, 15:704-708.
11. Saddoud A., Ellouze M., Dhouib A., Sayadi S. Anaerobic membrane bioreactor treatment of domestic wastewater in Tunisia. Desalination 2007, 207:205-215.
12. An Y., Wang Z., Wu Z., Yang D., Zhou Q. Characterization of membrane foulants in an anaerobic non-woven fabric membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater treatment. Chem. Eng. J. 2009, 155:709-715.
13. Liao B.Q., Kraemer J.T., Bagley D.M. Anaerobic membrane bioreactors: applications and research directions. Crit. Rev. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2006, 36:489-530.
14. Choo K.-H., Lee C.-H. Hydrodynamic behavior of anaerobic biosolids during crossflow filtration in the membrane anaerobic bioreactor. Water Res. 1998, 32:3387-3397.
15. Lin H.J., Xie K., Mahendran B., Bagley D.M., Leung K.T., Liss S.N., Liao B.Q. Factors affecting sludge cake formation in a submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor. J Memb. Sci. 2010, 361:126-134.
16. Brockmann M., Seyfried C.F. Sludge activity under the conditions of crossflow microfiltration. Water Sci. Technol. 1997, 35:173-181.
17. Choo K.-H., Lee C.-H. Membrane fouling mechanisms in the membrane-coupled anaerobic bioreactor. Water Res. 1996, 30:1771-1780.
18. Hu A.Y., Stuckey D.C. Treatment of dilute wastewaters using a novel submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor. J. Environ. Eng. 2006, 132:190-198.
19. Huang Z., Ong S.L., Ng H.Y. Submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor for low-strength wastewater treatment: effect of HRT and SRT on treatment performance and membrane fouling. Water Res. 2011, 45:705-713.
20. Lin H., Liao B.-Q., Chen J., Gao W., Wang L., Wang F., Lu X. New insights into membrane fouling in a submerged anaerobic membrane bioreactor based on characterization of cake sludge and bulk sludge. Bioresour Technol. 2011, 102:2373-2379.
21. Jeison D., van Lier J.B. Feasibility of thermophilic anaerobic submerged membrane bioreactors (AnSMBR) for wastewater treatment. Desalination 2008, 231:227-235.
22. Vyrides I., Stuckey D.C. Saline sewage treatment using a submerged anaerobic membrane reactor (SAMBR): effects of activated carbon addition and biogas-sparging time. Water Res. 2009, 43:933-942.
23. Côté P., Masini M., Mourato D. Comparison of membrane options for water reuse and reclamation. Desalination 2004, 167:1-11.
24. Fletcher H., Mackley T., Judd S. The cost of a package plant membrane bioreactor. Water Res. 2007, 41:2627-2635.
25. Maurer M. Specific net present value: an improved method for assessing modularisation costs in water services with growing demand. Water Res. 2009, 43:2121-2130.
26. Verrecht B., Judd S., Guglielmi G., Brepols C., Mulder J.W. An aeration energy model for an immersed membrane bioreactor. Water Res. 2008, 42:4761-4770.
27. De Wilde W., Richard M., Lesjean B., Tazi-Pain A. Towards standardisation of MBR technology? A white paper analysing market expectations and technical potential for membrane bioreactor standardisation in Europe. MBR-Network, EU, Published within the framework of AMEDEUS 2007.
28. T. Maere, B. Verrecht, L. Benedetti, P.T. Pham, S. Judd, I. Nopens, Building a Benchmark Simulation Model to Compare Control Strategies for Membrane Bioreactors: BSM-MBR, in: 5th IWA Specialised Membrane Technology Conference for Water & Wastewater Treatment, Beijing, China., 2009.
29. Anderson G.K., Kasapgil B., Ince O. Microbial kinetics of a membrane anaerobic reactor system. Environ Technol 1996, 17:449-464.
30. Rossi L., Lubello C., Cammeli M., Griffini O. Ultrafiltration compared to traditional solid removal for drinking water treatment: design and economic analysise, 21179a. Proceeding for AWA Conference held in Melbourne, Australia 2002.
31. Stensel H.D., Strand S.E. Evaluation of Feasibility of Methods to Minimize Biomass Production from Biotreatment 2004, Biosolids & Residuals, IWA Publishing.
32. Brepols C., Drensla K., Janot A., Trimborn M., Engelhardt N. Strategies for chemical cleaning in large scale membrane bioreactors. Water Sci. Technol. 2008, 57:457-463.
33. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater 2005, APHA, American Public Health Association, American Water Works Association, Water Environmental Federation, Washington, USA. twentieth ed.
34. Álvarez J.A., Ruiz I., Gómez M., Presas J., Soto M. Start-up alternatives and performance of an UASB pilot plant treating diluted municipal wastewater at low temperature. Bioresour Technol 2006, 97:1640-1649.
35. Ho J., Sung S. Anaerobic membrane bioreactor treatment of synthetic municipal wastewater at ambient temperature. Water Environ. Res. 2009, 81:922-928.
36. Zheng X., Liu J. Dyeing and printing wastewater treatment using a membrane bioreactor with a gravity drain. Desalination 2006, 190:277-286.