Principles in evaluating cognitive rehabilitation research

Cognitive Neurorehabilitation

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 106-118

  Cicerone, Keith D ^a  

^a JFK JOHNSON REHABILITATION INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Neurology and clinical neuroscience; Neuropsychology

Indexed keywords

EID: 84954305100     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781316529898.009     Document Type: Chapter

References (58)

1. Atkins, D., Best, D., Briss, P. A. et al. (2004a). Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. British Medical Journal, 328, 1490-1497.
2. Atkins, D., Eccles, M., Flottorp, S. et al. (2004b). Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations I: critical appraisal of existing approaches. The GRADE Working Group. BMC Health Services Research, 4, 38-44.
3. Benson, K., & Hartz, A. J. (2000). A comparison of observational studies and randomized, controlled trials. New England Journal of Medicine, 342, 1878-1886.
4. Berg, I. J., Koning-Haanstra, M., & Deelman, B. G. (1991). Long-term effects of memory rehabilitation: a controlled study. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 1, 97-111.
5. Bonell, C., Oakley, A., Hargreaves, J., Strange, V., & Rees, R. (2006). Assessment of generalisability in trials of health interventions: suggested framework and systematic review. British Medical Journal, 333, 346-349.
6. Bowen, A., & Lincoln, N. B. (2007). Cognitive rehabilitation for spatial neglect following stroke (Review). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 2, 1-43.
7. Burgers, J. S., Grol, R. P. T. M., Zaat, J. O. M. et al. (2003). Characteristics of effective clinical guidelines for general practice. British Journal of General Practice, 53, 15-19.
8. Cabana, M. D., Rand, C. S., Powe, N. R. et al. (1999). Why don’t physicians follow clinical practice guidelines? A framework for improvement. Journal of the American Medical Association, 282, 1458-1465.
9. Campbell, M., Fitzpatrick, R., Haines, A. et al. (2000). Framework for design and evaluation of complex interventions to improve health. British Medical Journal, 321, 694-696.
10. Cappa, S. F., Benke, T., Clarke, S. et al. (2003). EFNS guidelines on cognitive rehabilitation: report of an EFNS task force. European Journal of Neurology, 10, 11-23.
11. Carney, N., Chesnut, R. M., Maynard, H. et al. (1999). Effect of cognitive rehabilitation on outcomes for persons with traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 14, 277-307.
12. Cicerone, K. D., Dahlberg, C., Kalmar, K. et al. (2000). Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: recommendations for clinical practice. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 81, 1596-1615.
13. Cicerone, K. D., Dahlberg, C., Malec, J. F. et al. (2005). Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: updated review of the literature from 1998 through 2002. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 86, 1681-1692.
14. Concato, J., Shah, N., & Horwitz, R. I. (2000). Randomized, controlled trials, observational studies, and the hierarchy of research designs. New England Journal of Medicine, 342, 1887-1892.
15. DeLisa, J. A. (1999). Issues and challenges for physiatry in the coming decade. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 80, 1-12.
16. Dickinson, K., Bunn, F., Wentz, R., Edwards, P., & Roberts, I. (2000). Size and quality of randomised controlled trials in head injury: review of published studies. British Medical Journal, 320, 1308-1311.
17. Dirette, D. K., Hinojosa, J., & Carnevale, G. J. (1999). Comparison of remedial and compensatory interventions for adults with acquired brain injuries. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 14, 595-601.
18. Ditto, P. H., & Lopez, D. F. (1992). Motivated skepticism: use of differential decision criteria for preferred and nonpreferred conclusions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 568-584.
19. Eddy, D. M. (1990). Practice policies: guidelines for methods. Journal of the American Medical Association, 263, 1839-1841.
20. Edlund, W., Gronseth, G., So, Y., & Franklin, G. (2005). Clinical Practice Guideline Process Manual. Saint Paul, MN: American Academy of Neurology.
21. Elstein, A. S., & Schwarz, A. (2002). Clinical problem solving and diagnostic decision making: selective review of the cognitive literature. British Medical Journal, 324, 729-732.
22. Evans, J. J., Wilson, B. A., Needham, P., & Brentnall, S. (2003). Who makes good use of memory aids? Results of a survey of people with acquired brain injury. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 9, 925-935.
23. Glenn, M. B., Yablon, S. A., Whyte, J., & Zafonte, R. (2001). Letter to the editor. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 16, vii-viii.
24. Gonzalez Rothi, L. J. (2006). Cognitive rehabilitation: the role of theoretical rationales and respect for the maturational process needed for our evidence. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 21, 194-197.
25. Gordon, W. A., Zafonte, R., Cicerone, K. et al. (2006). Traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: state of the science. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 85, 343-382.
26. Greener, J., Enderby, P., & Whurr, R. (1999). Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 4, 1-62.
27. Guyatt, G. H., Juniper, E. F., Walter, S. D., Griffith, L. E., & Goldstein, R. S. (1998). Interpreting treatment effects in randomised trials. British Medical Journal, 316, 690-693.
28. Hawe, P., Shiell, A., & Riley, T. (2004). Complex interventions: how "out of control" can a randomised controlled trial be? British Medical Journal, 328, 1561-1563.
29. Hewitt, C., Hahn, S., Torgerson, D. J., Watson, J., & Bland, J. M. (2005). Adequacy and reporting of allocation concealment: review of recent trials published in four general medical journals. British Medical Journal, 330, 1057-1058.
30. Horwitz, R. I., Viscoli, C. M., Clemens, J. D., & Sadock, R. T. (1990). Developing improved observational methods for evaluating therapeutic effectiveness. American Journal of Medicine, 89, 630-638.
31. Johnston, M. V., Sherer, M., & Whyte, J. (2006). Applying evidence standards to rehabilitation research. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 85, 292-309.
32. Jutai, J. W., Bhogal, S. K., Foley, N. C. et al. (2003). Treatment of visual perceptual disorders post stroke. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation, 10, 77-106.
33. Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58, 697-720.
34. Kaschel, R., Della Sala, S., Cantagallo, A., Fahlböck, A., Laaksonen, R., & Kazen, M. (2002). Imagery mnemonics for the rehabilitation of memory: a randomised group controlled trial. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 12, 127-153.
35. Kunz, R., & Oxman, A. D. (1998). The unpredictability paradox: review of empirical comparisons of randomised and non-randomised clinical trials. British Medical Journal, 317, 1185-1190.
36. Lincoln, N. B., Majid, M. J., & Weyman, N. (2000). Cognitive rehabilitation for attention deficits following stroke (Review). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 4, 1-9.
37. Majid, M. J., Lincoln, N. B., & Weyman, N. (2000). Cognitive rehabilitation for memory deficits following stroke (Review). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 3, 1-9.
38. McCormack, J., & Greenhalgh, T. (2000). Seeing what you want to see in randomised controlled trials: versions and perversions of UKPDS data. British Medical Journal, 320, 1720-1723.
39. Milders, M. V., Berg, I. J., & Deelman, B. G. (1995). Fouryear follow-up of a controlled memory training study in closed-head injured patients. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 5, 223-238.
40. Moja, L. P., Telaro, E., D’Amico, R. et al. (2005). Assessment of methodological quality of primary studies by systematic reviews: results of the metaquality cross sectional study. British Medical Journal, 330, 1053-1057.
41. Page, S. J., Levine, P., Sisto, S., Bond, Q., & Johnston, M. V. (2002). Stroke patients’ and therapists’ opinions of constraint-induced movement therapy. Clinical Rehabilitation, 16, 55-60.
42. Pierce, S. R., & Buxbaum, L. J. (2002). Treatments of unilateral neglect: a review. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 83, 256-268.
43. Robey, R. R. (1998). A meta-analysis of clinical outcomes in the treatment of aphasia. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 41, 172-187.
44. Sackett, D. L., Richardson, W. S., Rosenberg, W., & Haynes, R. B. (2000). Evidence-based Medicine: How to Practice and Teach EBM. London, UK: Churchill Livingstone.
45. Salazar, A. M., Warden, D. L., Schwab, K. et al. (2000). Cognitive rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury: a randomized trial. Journal of the American Medical Association, 283, 3075-3081.
46. Schmitter-Edgecombe, M., Fahy, J. F., Whelan, J. P., & Long, C. J. (1995). Memory remediation after severe closed head injury: notebook training versus supportive therapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 484-489.
47. Schulz, K. F., Chalmers, I., Hayes, R. J., & Altman, D. G. (1995). Empirical-evidence of bias: dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. Journal of the American Medical Association, 273, 408-412.
48. Sohlberg, M. M., Avery, J., Kennedy, M., et al. (2003). Practice guidelines for direct attention training. Journal of Medical Speech-Language Pathology, 11, xix-xxxix.
49. Steultjens, E. M. J., Dekker, J., Bouter, L. M. et al. (2003). Occupational therapy for stroke patients: a systematic review. Stroke, 34, 676-687.
50. Tunis, S. R., Stryer, D. B., & Clancy, C. M. (2003). Practical clinical trials: increasing the value of clinical research for decision making in clinical and health policy. Journal of the American Medical Association, 290, 1624-1632.
51. Turner-Stokes, L., Disler, P. B., Nair, A., & Wade, D. T. (2005). Multi-disciplinary rehabilitation for acquired brain injury in adults of working age (Review). Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, 3, 1-30.
52. van Tulder, M. W., Assendelft, W. J. J., Koes, B. W., & Bouter, L. M. (1997). Method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group for Spinal Disorders. Spine, 22, 2323-2330.
53. van Tulder, M., Furlan, A., Bombardier, C., & Bouter, L. (2003). Updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group. Spine, 28, 1290-1299.
54. Whyte, J. (1997). Distinctive methodologic challenges. In M. J. Fuhrer (Ed.), Assessing Medical Rehabilitation Practices: The Promise of Outcome Research (pp. 43-59). London, UK: Paul H. Brookes.
55. Whyte, J. (2002). Traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: are there alternatives to randomized clinical trials? Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 83, 1320-1322.
56. Whyte, J., & Hart, T. (2003). It’s more than a black box; It’s a Russian Doll: defining rehabilitation treatments. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 82, 639-652.
57. Wolfson, A. M., Doctor, J. N., & Burns, S. P. (2000). Clinician judgments of functional outcomes: how bias and perceived accuracy affect rating. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 81, 1567-1574.
58. Woolf, S. H. (1992). Practice guidelines, a new reality in medicine. II. Methods of developing guidelines. Archives of Internal Medicine, 152, 946-952.