Infertility, gamete donation and relatedness in British South Asian communities

Relatedness in Assisted Reproduction: Families, Origins and Identities

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 232-250

  Hudson, Nicky ^a   Culley, Lorraine ^a  

^a DE MONTFORT UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84954194392     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9781139814737     Document Type: Chapter

References (52)

1. Ali, N., Kalra, V.S. and Sayyid, S. (eds.) (2006). A Postcolonial People: South Asians in Britain. London: C. Hurst and Co.
2. Becker, G., Butler, A. and Nachtigall, R. (2005). ‘Resemblance talk: a challenge for parents whose children were conceived with donor gametes in the US’. Social Science and Medicine, 61, 1300-9.
3. Bestard, J. (2004). ‘Kinship and the new genetics: the changing meaning of biogenetic substance’. Social Anthropology, 12, 253-63.
4. Blyth, E. and Landau, R. (2009). Faith and Fertility: Attitudes Towards Reproductive Practices in Different Religions from Ancient to Modern Times. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
5. Brah, A. (1996). Cartographies of Diaspora: Contesting Identities. London: Routledge.
6. Cepaitiene, A. (2012). ‘Imagining assisted reproductive technologies: family, kinship and “local thinking” in Lithuania’, in J. Edwards and C. Salazar (eds.), European Kinship in the Age of Biotechnology. New York: Berghahn Books.
7. Clarke, M. (2011). Islam and New Kinship: Reproductive Technology and the Shariah in Lebanon. New York: Berghahn Books.
8. Culley, L. andDemaine, J. (2006). ‘Race and ethnicity in United Kingdom public policy: education and health’ in E. Rata and R. Openshaw (eds.), Public Policy and Ethnicity. The Politics of Ethnic Boundary Making. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
9. Culley, L. and Hudson, N. (2006). ‘Diverse bodies and disrupted reproduction: infertility and minority ethnic communities in the UK’. International Journal of Diversity in Organisations, Communities and Nations, 5, 117-26.
10. Culley, L. and Hudson, N. (2007). ‘Public understandings of science: British South Asian men’s perceptions of third party assisted conception’. The International Journal of Interdisciplinary Social Sciences, 2, 79-86.
11. Culley, L. and Hudson, N. (2009). ‘Commonalities, differences and possibilities: culture and infertility in British South Asian communities’, in L. Culley, N. Hudson and F. van Rooij (eds.), Marginalized Reproduction: Ethnicity, Infertility and New Reproductive Technologies. London: Earthscan.
12. Culley, L. and Hudson, N. (2009). ‘Constructing relatedness: ethnicity, gender and third party assisted conception in the UK’. Current Sociology, 57, 257-75.
13. Culley, L., Hudson, N. and Rapport, F. (2007). ‘Using focus groups with minority ethnic communities: researching infertility in British South Asian communities’. Qualitative Health Research, 17, 102-12.
14. Culley, L., Hudson, N. and Rapport, F. (2013). ‘Assisted conception and South Asian communities in the UK: public perceptions of the use of donor gametes in infertility treatment’. Human Fertility, 16, 48-53.
15. Culley, L., Hudson, N. and van Rooij, F. (eds.) (2009). Marginalized Reproduction: Ethnicity, Infertility and New Reproductive Technologies. London: Earth- scan.
16. Culley, L., Rapport, F., Katbamna, S., Johnson, M. et al. (2004). A Study of the Provision of Infertility Services to South Asian Communities. Leicester: De Montfort University.
17. Culley, L., Hudson, N., Rapport, F., Johnson, M. et al. (2006). Public Perceptions of Gamete Donation in British South Asian Communities: Report on ESRC Study. Leicester: De Montfort University.
18. Culley, L., Hudson, N., Rapport, F., Katbamna, S. et al. (2006). ‘British South Asian communities and infertility services’. Human Fertility, 9, 37-45.
19. Culley, L., Hudson, N., Rapport, F., Katbamna, S. (2007). ‘“I know about one treatment where they keep the egg somewhere”: British South Asian community understandings of infertility and its treatment’. Diversity in Health and Social Care, 4,113-21.
20. Edwards, J. (2012). ‘Introduction: the matter in kinship’, in J. Edwards and C. Salazar (eds.), European Kinship in the Age of Biotechnology. New York: Berghahn Books.
21. Edwards, J. and Strathern, M. (2000). ‘Including our own’, in J. Carsten (ed.), Cultures of Relatedness: New Approaches to the Study of Kinship. Cambridge University Press.
22. Edwards, J., Franklin, S., Hirsch, E., Price, F. et al. (eds.) (1999). Technologies of Procreation: Kinship in the Age of Assisted Conception (second ed.). Manchester University Press.
23. Fenton, S. (1999). Ethnicity: Racism, Class and Culture. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.
24. Fenton, S. (2003). Ethnicity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
25. Franklin, S. and Ragone, H. (eds.) (1998). Reproducing Reproduction: Kinship, Power and Technological Innovation. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
26. Goldberg, D. (1993). Racist Culture. Philosophy and the Politics of Meaning. Oxford: Blackwell.
27. Haimes, E. (1993). ‘Issues of gender in gamete donation’. Social Science and Medicine, 36, 85-93.
28. Hall, S. (2000). ‘Conclusions: the multicultural question’, in B. Hesse (ed.), Un/settled Multiculturalisms: Diasporas, Entanglements, Translations. London: Zed Books.
29. Hudson, N. (2008). ‘Infertility in British South Asian communities: negotiating the community and the clinic’. Unpublished PhD thesis, De Montfort University.
30. Hudson, N., Culley, L., Rapport, F., Johnson, M. et al. (2009). ‘“Public” perceptions of gamete donation: a research review’. Public Understanding of Science, 18, 61-77.
31. Human Fertilisation and Embryology Authority (HFEA) (2011). A Review of the HFEA’s Sperm and Egg Donation Policies: 2011. Available at www.hfea.gov.uk/docs/2011-01-13_Donation_review_background.pdf.
32. Inhorn, M. (2005). ‘Fatwas and ARTs: IVF and gamete donation in Sunni v. Shi’a Islam’. Journal of Gender, Race and Justice, 9, 291-318.
33. Jenkins, R. (2008). Rethinking Ethnicity. Sage: London.
34. Kleinman, A. (1992). ‘Pain and resistance: the delegitimation and relegitimation of local worlds’, in M.J. Delvecchio-Good, P.E. Brodwin, B. J. Good and A. Kleinman (eds.), Pain as Human Experience: An Anthropological Perspective. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
35. Konrad, M. (2005). Nameless Relations: Anonymity, Melanesia, and Reproductive Gift Exchange Between British Ova Donors and Recipients. New York: Berghahn Books.
36. Mamo, L. (2005). ‘Biomedicalizing kinship: sperm banks and the creation of affinity-ties’. Science as Culture, 14, 237-64.
37. Miles, R. (1989). Racism. London: Routledge.
38. Modood, T. (2005). Multicultural Politics: Racism, Ethnicity and Muslims in Britain. Edinburgh University Press.
39. Nakano Glenn, E. (ed.) (2009). Shades of Difference: Why Skin Colour Matters. Stanford University Press.
40. Nash, C. (2004). ‘Genetic kinship’. Cultural Studies, 18, 1-33.
41. Nuffield Council on Bioethics (2013). Donor Conception: Ethical Aspects of Information Sharing. London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics.
42. Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2013). Statistical Bulletin: 2011 Census: Key Statistics for England and Wales, March 2011. Available at: www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/census/2011-census/key-statistics-for-local-authorities-in-england-and-wales/stb-2011-census-key-statistics-for-england-and-wales.html# tab—Ethnic-group.
43. Peach, C. (2006). ‘Demographics of BrAsian settlement, 1951-2001’, in N. Ali, V. S. Kalra and S. Sayeed (eds.), A Postcolonial People: South Asians in Britain. London: C. Hurst and Co.
44. Price, F. (1997). ‘Matchmaking in the clinic: gamete donation and the management of difference’, in A. Clarke and E. Parsons (eds.), Culture, Kinship and Genes: Towards Cross-Cultural Genetics. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
45. Quiroga, S. (2007). ‘Blood is thicker than water: policing donor insemination and the reproduction of whiteness’. Hypatia, 22, 143-61.
46. Ragone, H. (2000). ‘Of likeness and difference: how race is being transfigured by gestational surrogacy’, in H. Ragone and F. Winddance Twine (eds.), Ideologies and Technologies of Motherhood: Race, Class, Sexuality, Nationalism. London: Routledge.
47. Reissman, C.K. (2000). ‘Stigma and everyday practices: childless women in South India’. Gender and Society, 14, 111-35.
48. Smaje, C. (2000). ‘A place for race? Medical sociology and the critique of racial ideology’, in S. Williams, J. Gabe, and M. Calnan (eds.), Health, Medicine and Society: Key Theories, Future Agendas. London: Routledge.
49. Strathern, M. (1992). After Nature: English Kinship in the Late Twentieth Century. Cambridge University Press.
50. Thompson, C. (2009). ‘Skin tone and the persistence of biological race in egg donation for assisted conception’, in E. Nakano Glenn (ed.), Shades of Difference: Why Skin Colour Matters. Stanford University Press.
51. Tyler, K. (2005). ‘The genealogical imagination: the inheritance of interracial identities’. The Sociological Review, 53, 476-94.
52. Tyler, K. (2007). ‘Race, genetics and inheritance: reflections upon the birth of “Black” twins to a “White” IVF mother’, in P. Wade (ed.), Race, Ethnicity and Nation: Perspectives from Kinship and Genetics. New York: Berghahn Books.