The Construct Validity of the Dutch Personality Inventory for DSM-5 Personality Disorders (PID-5) in a Clinical Sample

Assessment

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 42-51

  Bastiaens, Tim ^a   Claes, Laurence ^b   Smits, Dirk ^b,c   De Clercq, Barbara ^d   De Fruyt, Filip ^d   Rossi, Gina ^e   Vanwalleghem, Dominique ^a   Vermote, Rudi ^a,b   Lowyck, Benedicte ^a,b   Claes, Stephan ^a,b   De Hert, Marc ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^c ODISEE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE   (Belgium)

^d GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^e VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL   (Belgium)

Author keywords

assessment; DSM 5; personality disorders; personality traits; PID 5

Indexed keywords

HUMAN; NETHERLANDS; PERSONALITY DISORDER; PERSONALITY TEST; PSYCHOLOGY; REPRODUCIBILITY; SOFTWARE; STANDARDS;

HUMANS; NETHERLANDS; PERSONALITY DISORDERS; PERSONALITY INVENTORY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84954131909     PISSN: 10731911     EISSN: 15523489     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1073191115575069     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. American Psychiatric Association. (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (4th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
2. American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.
3. J.L.AndersonM.SellbomR.M.BagbyL.C.QuiltyC.O.C.VeltriK.E.MarkonR.F.Krueger (2013). On the convergence between PSY-5 domains and PID-5 domains and facets: Implications for Assessment of DSM-5 personality traits. Assessment, 20, 286-294. doi:10.1177/1073191112471141
4. M.C.AshtonK.LeeR.E.de VriesJ.HendrickseM.Born (2012). The maladaptive personality traits of the personality inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) in relation to the HEXACO personality factors and schizotypy/dissociation. Journal of Personality Disorders, 26, 641-659. doi:10.1521/pedi.2012.26.5.641
5. T.AsparouhovB.Muthén (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 397-438. doi:10.1080/10705510903008204
6. D.L.Bandalos (2002). The Effects of Item Parceling on Goodness-of-Fit and Parameter Estimate Bias in Structural Equation Modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 78-102. doi:10.1207/S15328007SEM0901_5
7. D.L.Bandalos (2008). Is parceling really necessary? A comparison of results from item parceling and categorical variable methodology. Structural Equation Modeling, 15, 211-240. doi:10.1080/10705510801922340
8. A.BeauducelP.Yorck-Herzberg (2006). On the performance of maximum likelihood versus means and variance adjusted weighted least squares estimation in CFA. Structural Equation Modeling, 13, 186-203. doi:10.1207/s15328007sem1302_2
9. M.ChmielewskiM.BagbyK.MarkonA.J.RingA.G.Ryder (2014). Openness to experience, intellect, schizotypal personality disorder, and psychoticism: Resolving the controversy. Journal of Personality Disorders, 28, 1-17. doi:10.1521/pedi_2014_28_128
10. M.ChmielewskiD.Watson (2008). The heterogeneous structure of schizotypal personality disorder: Item-level factors of the schizotypal personality questionnaire and their associations with obsessive-compulsive disorder symptoms, dissociative tendencies, and normal personality. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 117, 364-376. doi:10.1037/0021-843X.117.2.364
11. P.CostaA.TerraccianoR.R.McCrae (2001). Gender differences in personality traits across cultures: Robust and surprising findings. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 322-331. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.2.322
12. P.T.CostaR.R.McCrae (1992). The five-factor model of personality and its relevance to personality disorders. Journal of Personality Disorders, 6, 343-359. doi:10.1521/pedi.1992.6.4.343
13. B.De ClercqF.De FruytI.MervieldeB.KruegerK.Markon (2011). Official Dutch translation of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5). Unpublished manuscript.
14. F.De FruytB.De ClercqM.De BolleB.WilleK.MarkonR.F.Krueger (2013). General and maladaptive traits in a five-factor framework for DSM-5 in a university student sample. Assessment, 20, 295-307. doi:10.1177/1073191113475808
15. M.B.DonnellanR.E.Lucas (2008). Age differences in the big five across the life span: Evidence from two national samples. Psychology and Aging, 23, 558-566. doi:10.1037/a0012897
16. L.R.FewJ.D.MillerA.O.RothbaumS.MellerJ.MaplesD.P.TerryJ..Mackillop (2013). Examination of the Section III DSM-5 diagnostic system for personality disorders in an outpatient clinical sample. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 122, 1057-1069. doi:10.1037/a0034878
17. M.B.FirstM.GibbonR.L.SpitzerJ.B.W.WilliamsL.S.Benjamin (1997). Structured clinical interview for DSM-IV Axis II disorders (SCID-II). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.
18. A.FossatiR.F.KruegerK.E.MarkonS.BorroniC.Maffei (2013). Reliability and validity of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5): Predicting DSM-IV personality disorders and psychopathy in community-dwelling Italian adults. Assessment, 20, 689-708. doi:10.1177/1073191113504984
19. W.L.GoreT.A.Widiger (2013). The DSM-5 dimensional trait model and five-factor models of general personality. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 122, 816-821.
20. A.R.HarknessJ.A.FinnJ.L.McNultyS.M.Shields (2012). The Personality Psychopathology—Five (PSY-5): Recent constructive replication and assessment literature review. Psychological Assessment, 24, 432-443. doi:10.1037/a0025830
21. A.R.HarknessJ.L.McNultyY.S.Ben-Porath (1995). The Personality Psychopathology Five (PSY-5): Constructs and MMPI-2 scales. Psychological Assessment, 7, 104-114. doi:10.1037/1040-3590.7.1.104
22. C.J.HopwoodK.M.ThomasK.E.MarkonA.G.C.WrightR.F.Krueger (2012). DSM-5 personality traits and DSM-IV personality disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 121, 424-432. doi:10.1037/a0026656
23. L.HuP.M.Bentler (1998). Fit indexes in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological Methods, 3, 424-453. doi:10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424
24. L.HuP.M.Bentler (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1-55. doi:10.1080/10705519909540118
25. I.KelleherM.Cannon (2011). Psychotic-like experiences in the general population: Characterizing a high-risk group for psychosis. Psychological Medicine, 41, 1-6. doi:10.1017/S0033291710001005
26. R.B.Kline (2005). Principles and practices of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: Guilford.
27. R.F.KruegerN.R.EatonL.A.ClarkD.WatsonK.E.MarkonJ.DerringerW.J.. Livesley (2011). Deriving an empirical structure of personality pathology for DSM-5. Journal of Personality Disorders, 25, 170-191. doi:10.1521/pedi.2011.25.2.170
28. R.F.KruegerJ.DerringerK.E.MarkonD.WatsonA.E.Skodol (2012). Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5. Psychological Medicine, 42, 1879-1890. doi:10.1017/S0033291711002674
29. R.F.KruegerK.E.Markon (2014). The role of the DSM-5 personality trait model in moving toward a quantitative and empirically based approach to classifying personality and psychopathology. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 10, 477-501. doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153732
30. R.F.KruegerJ.L.Tackett (2003). Personality and psychopathology: Working toward the bigger picture. Journal of Personality Disorders, 17, 109-128. doi:10.1521/pedi.17.2.109.23986
31. W.J.LivesleyD.N.Jackson (2009). Manual for the Dimensional Assessment of Personality Pathology—Basic Questionnaire (DAPP-BQ). Port Huron, MI: Sigma Press.
32. P.McGorryB.NelsonG.P.AmmingerA.BechdolfS.M.FranceyG.BergerA.R..Yung (2009). Intervention in individuals at ultra-high risk for psychosis: A review and future directions. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 70, 1206-1213.
33. C.P.McLeanE.R.Anderson (2009). Brave men and timid women? A review of the gender differences in fear and anxiety. Clinical Psychology Review, 29, 496-505. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2009.05.003
34. L.C.MoreyR.F.KruegerA.E.Skodol (2013). The hierarchical structure of clinician ratings of proposed DSM-5 pathological personality traits. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 122, 836-841. doi:10.1037/a0034003
35. L.K.MuthénB.O.Muthén (1998-2012). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Author.
36. R.L.PiedmontM.F.ShermanN.C.Sherman (2012). Maladaptively high and low openness: The case for experiential permeability. Journal of Personality, 80, 1641-1668. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2012.00777
37. R.PukropI.SteinbringI.GentilC.SchulteR.LarstoneJ.W.Livesley (2009). Clinical validity of the dimensional assessment of personality pathology (DAPP) for psychiatric patients with and without a personality disorder diagnosis. Journal of Personality Disorders, 23, 572-586. doi:10.1521/pedi.2009.23.6.572
38. L.C.QuiltyL.AyearstM.ChmielewskiB.G.PollockR.M.Bagby (2013). The psychometric properties of the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 in an APA DSM-5 Field Trial sample. Assessment, 20, 362-369. doi:10.1177/1073191113486183
39. B.W.RobertsW.F.Del Vecchio (2000). The rank-order consistency of personality traits from childhood to old age: A quantitative review of longitudinal studies. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 3-25. doi:10.1037//0033-2909.126.1.3
40. A.G.RyderP.T.CostaM.Bagby (2007). Evaluation of the SCID II Personality Disorder Traits for DSM-IV: Coherence, discrimination, relations with general personality traits, and functional impairment. Journal of Personality Disorders, 21, 626-637. doi:10.1521/pedi.2007.21.6.626
41. D.B.Samuel (2011). Assessing personality in the DSM-5: The utility of bipolar constructs. Journal of Personality Assessment, 93, 390-397. doi:10.1080/00223891.2011.577476
42. D.B.SamuelC.J.HopwoodR.F.KruegerK.M.ThomasC.J.Ruggero (2013). Comparing methods for scoring personality disorder types using maladaptive traits in DSM-5. Assessment, 20, 353-361. doi:10.1177/1073191113486182
43. D.P.SchmittA.RealoM.VoracekJ.Allik (2008). Why can’t a man be more like a woman? Sex differences in Big Five Personality traits across 55 cultures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 168-182. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.94.1.168
44. J.L.TackettA.L.SilberschmidtR.F.KruegerS.R.Sponheim (2008). A dimensional model of personality disorder: Incorporating DSM cluster A characteristics. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 117, 454-459. doi:10.1037/1949-2715.S.1.27
45. K.M.ThomasM.M.YalchR.F.KruegerA.G.C.WrightK.E.MarkonC.J.Hopwood (2012). The convergent structure of DSM-5 personality trait facets and five-factor model trait domains. Assessment, 20, 308-311. doi:10.1177/1073191112457589
46. T.TrullC.A.Durrett (2005). Categorical and dimensional models of personality disorder. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 1, 355-380. doi:10.1146/annurev.clinpsy.1.102803.144009
47. J.Van den BroeckL.BastiaansenG.RossiE.DierckxB.De Clercq (2013). Age-neutrality of the trait facets proposed for personality disorders in DSM-5: A DIFAS analysis of the PID-5. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 35, 487-494. doi:10.1007/s10862-013-9364-3
48. J.Van den BroeckL.BastiaansenG.RossiE.DierckxB.De ClercqJ.Hofmans (2013). Hierarchical structure of maladaptive personality traits in older adults: Joint factor analysis of the PID-5 and the DAPP-BQ. Journal of Personality Disorders, 28, 198-211. doi:10.1521/pedi_2013_27_114
49. D.Van KampenE.De Beurs (2009). DAPP-BQ. Dimensionale assessment van persoonlijkheidspathologie inclusief screeningsversie. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Hogreve Uitgevers B.V.
50. D.WatsonS.M.StasikE.RoL.A.Clark (2013). Integrating normal and pathological personality: Relating the DSM-5 trait-dimensional model to general traits of personality. Assessment, 20, 312-326. doi:10.1177/1073191113485810
51. T.A.WidigerE.Simonsen (2005). Alternative dimensional models of personality disorder: Finding common ground. Journal of Personality Disorders, 19, 110-130. doi:10.1521/pedi.19.2.110.62628
52. A.G.C.WrightL.J.Simms (2014). On the structure of personality disorder traits: Conjoint analyses of the CAT-PD, PID-5, and NEO-PI-3 trait models. Personality Disorders, 5, 43-54. doi:10.1037/per0000037
53. A.G.C.WrightK.M.ThomasC.J.HopwoodK.E.MarkonA.L.PincusR.F.Krueger (2012). The hierarchical structure of DSM-5 pathological personality traits. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 121, 951-957. doi:10.1037/a0027669
54. J.ZimmermanD.AltensteinT.KriegerM.G.HoltforthJ.PretschJ.AlexopoulosD.. Leising (2014). The structure and correlates of self-reported DSM-5 maladaptive personality traits: Findings from two German-speaking samples. Journal of Personality Disorders, 28, 1-23. doi:10.1521/pedi_2014_28_130ααα