Biological lignocellulose solubilization: Comparative evaluation of biocatalysts and enhancement via cotreatment

Biotechnology for Biofuels

Volumn 9, Issue 1, 2016, Pages

  Paye, Julie M D ^a,b   Guseva, Anna ^a,b   Hammer, Sarah K ^a,b   Gjersing, Erica ^b,c   Davis, Mark F ^b,c   Davison, Brian H ^b   Olstad, Jessica ^b,c   Donohoe, Bryon S ^b,c   Nguyen, Thanh Yen ^b,d   Wyman, Charles E ^b,d   Pattathil, Sivakumar ^b,e   Hahn, Michael G ^b,e   Lynd, Lee R ^a,b  

^a DARTMOUTH COLLEGE   (United States)

^b OAK RIDGE NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^c NATIONAL RENEWABLE ENERGY LABORATORY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Biological solubilization; Cotreatment; Lignocellulose

Indexed keywords

BACTERIA; BALL MILLING; BIOCATALYSTS; BIOMASS; CARBOHYDRATES; CELLULOSE; CELLULOSIC ETHANOL; CLOSTRIDIUM; COST EFFECTIVENESS; ENZYMES; FEEDSTOCKS; FERMENTATION; FERTILIZERS; FUNGI; LIGNIN; MILLING (MACHINING); PARTICLE SIZE; PLANTS (BOTANY); SACCHARIFICATION;

BIOLOGICAL SOLUBILIZATION; CLOSTRIDIUM CELLULOLYTICUM; CLOSTRIDIUM THERMOCELLUM; CO TREATMENTS; COST-EFFECTIVE PRODUCTION; LIGNOCELLULOSE; SIMULTANEOUS SACCHARIFICATION AND FERMENTATION; THERMOCHEMICAL PRETREATMENT;

SOLUBILITY;

BIOFUEL; BIOMASS; CATALYST; CELLULOSE; SOLUBILIZATION;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); CALDICELLULOSIRUPTOR; CLOSTRIDIUM; CLOSTRIDIUM CELLULOLYTICUM; CLOSTRIDIUM THERMOCELLUM; EQUIDAE; PANICUM VIRGATUM; POPULUS;

EID: 84954125352     PISSN: 17546834     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13068-015-0412-y     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Reese ET. History of cellulase program at US Army Natick development center. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1976;6:9-20.
2. Sternberg D. Production of cellulase by Trichoderma. Biotechnol Bioeng Symp. 1976;6:35-53.
3. Martinez D, Berka RM, Henrissat B, Saloheimo M, Arvas M, Baker SE, et al. Genome sequencing and analysis of the biomass-degrading fungus Trichoderma reesei (syn. Hypocrea jecorina). Nat Biotechnol. 2008;26(5):553-60. doi: 10.1038/Nbt1403.
4. Knappert D, Grethlein H, Converse A. Partial acid-hydrolysis of cellulosic materials as a pretreatment for enzymatic-hydrolysis. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1980;22(7):1449-63. doi: 10.1002/bit.260220711.
5. Lynd LR, Grethlein HE. Hydrolysis of dilute acid pretreated mixed hardwood and purified microcrystalline cellulose by cell-free broth from clostridium-thermocellum. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1987;29(1):92-100. doi: 10.1002/bit.260290114.
6. McLaughlin SB, Kszos LA. Development of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) as a bioenergy feedstock in the United States. Biomass Bioenerg. 2005;28(6):515-35. doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2004.05.006.
7. Wyman CE, Balan V, Dale BE, Elander RT, Falls M, Hames B, et al. Comparative data on effects of leading pretreatments and enzyme loadings and formulations on sugar yields from different switchgrass sources. Bioresource Technol. 2011;102(24):11052-62. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.06.069.
8. Elander RT, Dale BE, Holtzapple M, Ladisch MR, Lee YY, Mitchinson C, et al. Summary of findings from the Biomass Refining Consortium for Applied Fundamentals and Innovation (CAFI): corn stover pretreatment. Cellulose. 2009;16(4):649-59. doi: 10.1007/s10570-009-9308-y.
9. Johnson L, Harrison JH, Hunt C, Shinners K, Doggett CG, Sapienza D. Nutritive value of corn silage as affected by maturity and mechanical processing: a contemporary review. J Dairy Sci. 1999;82(12):2813-25.
10. Mellenberger RW, Satter LD, Millett MA, Baker AJ. An in-vitro technique for estimating digestibility of treated and untreated wood. J Anim Sci. 1970;30(6):1005-11.
11. Reid CSW, John A, Ulyatt MJ, Waghorn GC, Milligan LP. Chewing and the physical breakdown of feed in sheep. Ann Rech Vet. 1979;10(2-3):205-7.
12. Kennedy PM. Effect of rumination on reduction of particle-size of rumen digesta by cattle. Aust J Agr Res. 1985;36(6):819-28. doi: 10.1071/Ar9850819.
13. Kelsey RG, Shafizadeh F. Enhancement of cellulose accessibility and enzymatic-hydrolysis by simultaneous wet milling. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1980;22(5):1025-36. doi: 10.1002/bit.260220511.
14. Ryu SK, Lee JM. Bioconversion of waste cellulose by using an attrition bioreactor. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1983;25(1):53-65. doi: 10.1002/bit.260250106.
15. Neilson MJ, Kelsey RG, Shafizadeh F. Enhancement of enzymatic-hydrolysis by simultaneous attrition of cellulosic substrates. Biotechnol Bioeng. 1982;24(2):293-304. doi: 10.1002/bit.260240204.
16. Lee JM, Wolf JH. Continuous Attrition Bioreactor with Enzyme Recycling for the Bioconversion of Cellulose. Appl Biochem Biotech. 1988;18:203-15. doi: 10.1007/Bf02930826.
17. Scott CD and Davison BH. Attrition reactor system. US Patent Appl No 5,248,484. 28 Sept 1993.
18. Mais U, Esteghlalian AR, Saddler JN, Mansfield SD. Enhancing the enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulosic materials using simultaneous ball milling. Appl Biochem Biotech. 2002;98:815-32. doi: 10.1385/Abab:98-100:1-9:815.
19. Zhou JX, Chen D, Zhu YH, Liao HD, Yuan L, Chen ZH, et al. Simultaneous wet ball milling and mild acid hydrolysis of rice hull. J Chem Technol Biot. 2010;85(1):85-90. doi: 10.1002/Jctb.2270.
20. Sipponen MH, Laakso S, Baumberger S. Impact of ball milling on maize (Zea mays L.) stem structural Components and on enzymatic hydrolysis of carbohydrates. Ind Crop. Prod. 2014;61:130-6. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2014.06.052.
21. Kopp J, Muller J, Dichtl N, Schwedes J. Anaerobic digestion and dewatering characteristics of mechanically disintegrated excess sludge. Water Sci Technol. 1997;36(11):129-36. doi: 10.1016/S0273-1223(97)00694-X.
22. Wyman CE, Dale BE, Elander RT, Holtzapple M, Ladisch MR, Lee YY, et al. Comparative sugar recovery and fermentation data following pretreatment of poplar wood by leading technologies. Biotechnol Progr. 2009;25(2):333-9. doi: 10.1021/Bp.142.
23. Ng TK, Zeikus JG. comparison of extracellular cellulase activities of Clostridium-thermocellum-Lqri and Trichoderma-Reesei-Qm9414. Appl Environ Microb. 1981;42(2):231-40.
24. Johnson EA, Sakajoh M, Halliwell G, Madia A, Demain AL. Saccharification of complex cellulosic substrates by the cellulase system from Clostridium-thermocellum. Appl Environ Microb. 1982;43(5):1125-32.
25. Waeonukul R, Kosugi A, Tachaapaikoon C, Pason P, Ratanakhanokchai K, Prawitwong P, et al. Efficient saccharification of ammonia soaked rice straw by combination of Clostridium thermocellum cellulosome and Thermoanaerobacter brockii beta-glucosidase. Biores Technol. 2012;107:352-7. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.12.126.
26. Kanafusa-Shinkai S, Wakayama J, Tsukamoto K, Hayashi N, Miyazaki Y, Ohmori H, et al. Degradation of microcrystalline cellulose and non-pretreated plant biomass by a cell-free extracellular cellulase/hemicellulase system from the extreme thermophilic bacterium Caldicellulosiruptor bescii. J Biosci Bioeng. 2013;115(1):64-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2012.07.019.
27. Yang SJ, Kataeva I, Hamilton-Brehm SD, Engle NL, Tschaplinski TJ, Doeppke C, et al. efficient degradation of lignocellulosic plant biomass, without pretreatment, by the thermophilic anaerobe "Anaerocellum thermophilum" DSM 6725. Appl Environ Microb. 2009;75(14):4762-9. doi: 10.1128/Aem.00236-09.
28. Kataeva I, Foston MB, Yang SJ, Pattathil S, Biswal AK, Poole FL, et al. Carbohydrate and lignin are simultaneously solubilized from unpretreated switchgrass by microbial action at high temperature. Energ Environ Sci. 2013;6(7):2186-95. doi: 10.1039/C3ee40932e.
29. Lu YP, Zhang YHP, Lynd LR. Enzyme-microbe synergy during cellulose hydrolysis by Clostridium thermocellum. P Natl Acad Sci USA. 2006;103(44):16165-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0605381103.
30. Reese ET. Enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose. Appl Microbiol. 1956;4(1):39-45.
31. Lynd LR, Weimer PJ, van Zyl WH, Pretorius IS. Microbial cellulose utilization: fundamentals and biotechnology. Microbiol Mol Biol R. 2002;66(3):506-77. doi: 10.1128/Mmbr.66.3.506-577.2002.
32. Yee KL, Rodriguez M, Tschaplinski TJ, Engle NL, Martin MZ, Fu CX, et al. Evaluation of the bioconversion of genetically modified switchgrass using simultaneous saccharification and fermentation and a consolidated bioprocessing approach. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2012;5:81. doi: 10.1186/1754-6834-5-81.
33. Shao X, DiMarco K, Richard TL, Lynd LR. Winter rye as a bioenergy feedstock: impact of crop maturity on composition, biological solubilization and potential revenue. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2015;8:35. doi: 10.1186/s13068-015-0225-z.
34. Shao XJ, Jin MJ, Guseva A, Liu CG, Balan V, Hogsett D, et al. Conversion for Avicel and AFEX pretreated corn stover by Clostridium thermocellum and simultaneous saccharification and fermentation: insights into microbial conversion of pretreated cellulosic biomass. Biores Technol. 2011;102(17):8040-5. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.05.021.
35. Izquierdo JA, Pattathil S, Guseva A, Hahn MG, Lynd LR. Comparative analysis of the ability of strains and to utilize hemicellulose and unpretreated plant material. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2014;7(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s13068-014-0136-4.
36. DeMartini JD, Pattathil S, Avci U, Szekalski K, Mazumder K, Hahn MG, et al. Application of monoclonal antibodies to investigate plant cell wall deconstruction for biofuels production. Energ Environ Sci. 2011;4(10):4332-9. doi: 10.1039/C1ee02112e.
37. Resch MG, Donohoe BS, Baker JO, Decker SR, Bayer EA, Beckham GT, et al. Fungal cellulases and complexed cellulosomal enzymes exhibit synergistic mechanisms in cellulose deconstruction. Energ Environ Sci. 2013;6(6):1858-67. doi: 10.1039/C3ee00019b.
38. Blumer-Schuette SE, Brown SD, Sander KB, Bayer EA, Kataeva I, Zurawski JV, et al. Thermophilic lignocellulose deconstruction. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2014;38(3):393-448. doi: 10.1111/1574-6976.12044.
39. Weimer PJ, Russell JB, Muck RE. Lessons from the cow: what the ruminant animal can teach us about consolidated bioprocessing of cellulosic biomass. Bioresour Technol. 2009;100(21):5323-31. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.04.075.
40. Zakaria MR, Hirata S, Hassan MA. Combined pretreatment using alkaline hydrothermal and ball milling to enhance enzymatic hydrolysis of oil palm mesocarp fiber. Bioresour Technol. 2014;169:236-43. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2014.06.095.
41. Maciel GE, Kolodziejski WL, Bertran MS, Dale BE. C-13 Nmr and Order in Cellulose. Macromolecules. 1982;15(2):686-7. doi: 10.1021/Ma00230a097.
42. Barakat A, de Vries H, Rouau X. Dry fractionation process as an important step in current and future lignocellulose biorefineries: a review. Bioresour Technol. 2013;134:362-73. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.01.169.
43. Kumar P, Barrett DM, Delwiche MJ, Stroeve P. Methods for pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass for efficient hydrolysis and biofuel production. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2009;48(8):3713-29. doi: 10.1021/ie801542g.
44. Reed PT, Izquierdo JA, Lynd LR. Cellulose fermentation by Clostridium thermocellum and a mixed consortium in an automated repetitive batch reactor. Bioresour Technol. 2014;155:50-6. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.12.051.
45. Holwerda EK, Hirst KD, Lynd LR. A defined growth medium with very low background carbon for culturing Clostridium thermocellum. J Ind Microbiol Biot. 2012;39(6):943-7. doi: 10.1007/s10295-012-1091-3.
46. Guedon E, Desvaux M, Payot S, Petitdemange H. Growth inhibition of Clostridium cellulolyticum by an inefficiently regulated carbon flow. Microbiology. 1999;145(Pt 8):1831-8.
47. Kadam KL, Newman MM. Development of a low-cost fermentation medium for ethanol production from biomass. Appl Microbiol Biot. 1997;47(6):625-9.
48. St Brice LA, Shao XJ, Izquierdo JA, Lynd LR. Optimization of affinity digestion for the isolation of cellulosomes from Clostridium Thermocellum. Prep Biochem. Biotech. 2014;44(2):206-16. doi: 10.1080/10826068.2013.829494.
49. Archambault-Leger V, Shao XJ, Lynd LR. Integrated analysis of hydrothermal flow through pretreatment. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2012;5:49. doi: 10.1186/1754-6834-5-49.
50. Garlock RJ, Balan V, Dale BE, Pallapolu VR, Lee YY, Kim Y, et al. Comparative material balances around pretreatment technologies for the conversion of switchgrass to soluble sugars. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102(24):11063-71. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2011.04.002.
51. Saeman JF, Bubl JL, Harris EE. Quantitative saccharification of wood and cellulose. Ind Eng Chem Anal Ed. 1945;17(1):35-7. doi: 10.1021/I560137a008.
52. Sluiter A, Hames B, Ruiz R, Scarlata C, Sluiter J, Templeton D et al. Determination of structural carbohydrates and lignin in biomass. 2008;NREL/TP-510-42618.
53. Donohoe BS, Ciesielski PN, Vinzant TB. Preservation and preparation of lignocellulosic biomass samples for multi-scale microscopy analysis. Methods Mol Biol. 2012;908:31-47. doi: 10.1007/978-1-61779-956-3-4.