68Ga-PSMA-11 dynamic PET/CT imaging in biochemical relapse of prostate cancer

European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging

Volumn 43, Issue 7, 2016, Pages 1288-1299

  Sachpekidis, C ^a   Eder, M ^a   Kopka, K ^a   Mier, W ^b   Hadaschik, B A ^c   Haberkorn, U ^a,b   Dimitrakopoulou Strauss, A ^a  

^a GERMAN CANCER RESEARCH CENTER DKFZ   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL HEIDELBERG   (Germany)

Author keywords

68Ga PSMA ligand PET CT; Prostate cancer recurrence; Prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA); PSA; Two tissue compartment model

Indexed keywords

GALLIUM 68; PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN; PROSTATE SPECIFIC MEMBRANE ANTIGEN; EDETIC ACID; GLU-NH-CO-NH-LYS-(AHX)-((68)GA(HBED-CC)); GLUTAMATE CARBOXYPEPTIDASE II; GLUTAMATE CARBOXYPEPTIDASE II, HUMAN; MEMBRANE ANTIGEN; OLIGOPEPTIDE;

ABDOMEN; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BIOCHEMICAL RECURRENCE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARTMENT MODEL; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DRUG ACCUMULATION; DRUG DISTRIBUTION; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MALE; PELVIS; PET-CT SCANNER; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PROSTATE CANCER; WHOLE BODY CT; WHOLE BODY PET; ANALOGS AND DERIVATIVES; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; METABOLISM; MIDDLE AGED; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY-COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PROSTATE TUMOR; RECURRENT DISEASE; WHOLE BODY IMAGING;

AGED; ANTIGENS, SURFACE; EDETIC ACID; GLUTAMATE CARBOXYPEPTIDASE II; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OLIGOPEPTIDES; PELVIS; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RECURRENCE; WHOLE BODY IMAGING;

EID: 84954106360     PISSN: 16197070     EISSN: 16197089     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00259-015-3302-4     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Roehl KA, Han M, Ramos CG, Antenor JA, Catalona WJ. Cancer progression and survival rates following anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy in 3,478 consecutive patients: long- term results. J Urol. 2004;172:910–4.
2. Nguyen QN, Levy LB, Lee AK, Choi SS, Frank SJ, Pugh TJ, et al. Long-term outcomes for men with high-risk prostate cancer treated definitively with external beam radiotherapy with or without androgen deprivation. Cancer. 2013;119:3265–71.
3. Pound CR, Partin AW, Eisenberger MA, Chan DW, Pearson JD, Walsh PC. Natural history of progression after PSA elevation following radical prostatectomy. JAMA. 1999;281:1591–7.
4. Kamat AM, Rosser CJ, Levy LB, et al. Rise in serum PSA of 1.5 ng/mL above 24-month nadir after external beam radiotherapy is predictive of biochemical failure. Urology. 2004;63:1132–7.
5. Bott SR. Management of recurrent disease after radical prostatectomy. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2004;7:211–6.
6. Beer AJ, Eiber M, Souvatzoglou M, Schwaiger M, Krause BJ. Radionuclide and hybrid imaging of recurrent prostate cancer. Lancet Oncol. 2011;12:181–91.
7. Johnstone PA, Tarman GJ, Riffenburgh R, Rohde DC, Puckett ML, Kane CJ. Yield of imaging and scintigraphy assessing biochemical failure in prostate cancer patients. Urol Oncol. 1997;3:108–12.
8. Cher ML, Bianco Jr FJ, Lam JS, et al. Limited role of radionuclide bone scintigraphy in patients with prostate specific antigen elevations after radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 1998;160:1387–91.
9. Heinisch M, Dirisamer A, Loidl W, et al. Positron emission tomography/computed tomography with F-18-fluorocholine for restaging of prostate cancer patients: meaningful at PSA < 5 ng/ml? Mol Imaging Biol. 2006;8:43–8.
10. Krause BJ, Souvatzoglou M, Tuncel M, et al. The detection rate of [11C]choline-PET/CT depends on the serum PSA-value in patients with biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008;35:18–23.
11. Ceci F, Herrmann K, Castellucci P, et al. Impact of 11C-choline PET/CT on clinical decision making in recurrent prostate cancer: results from a retrospective two-centre trial. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;41:2222–31.
12. Schmid DT, John H, Zweifel R, et al. Fluorocholine PET/CT in patients with prostate cancer: initial experience. Radiology. 2005;235:623–8.
13. Vees H, Buchegger F, Albrecht S, et al. 18F-choline and/or 11C-acetate positron emission tomography: detection of residual or progressive subclinical disease at very low prostate-specific antigen values (<1 ng/mL) after radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2007;99:1415–20.
14. Igerc I, Kohlfürst S, Gallowitsch HJ, et al. The value of 18F-choline PET/CT in patients with elevated PSA-level and negative prostate needle biopsy for localisation of prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008;35:976–83.
15. Kwee SA, DeGrado T. Prostate biopsy guided by 18F-fluorocholine PET in men with persistently elevated PSA levels. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008;35:1567–9.
16. Husarik DB, Miralbell R, Dubs M, et al. Evaluation of [(18)F]-choline PET/CT for staging and restaging of prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008;35:253–63.
17. Afshar-Oromieh A, Malcher A, Eder M, et al. PET imaging with a [68Ga]gallium-labelled PSMA ligand for the diagnosis of prostate cancer: biodistribution in humans and first evaluation of tumour lesions. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013;40:486–95.
18. Afshar-Oromieh A, Avtzi E, Giesel FL, et al. The diagnostic value of PET/CT imaging with the (68)Ga-labelled PSMA ligand HBED-CC in the diagnosis of recurrent prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42:197–209.
19. Eiber M, Maurer T, Souvatzoglou M, et al. Evaluation of hybrid 68Ga-PSMA-ligand PET/CT in 248 patients with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. J Nucl Med. 2015;56:668–74.
20. Yu CY, Desai B, Ji L, Groshen S, Jadvar H. Comparative performance of PET tracers in biochemical recurrence of prostate cancer: a critical analysis of literature. Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;4:580–601.
21. Afshar-Oromieh A, Zechmann CM, Malcher A, et al. Comparison of PET imaging with a (68)Ga-labelled PSMA ligand and (18)F-choline-based PET/CT for the diagnosis of recurrent prostate cancer. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;41:11–20.
22. Morigi JJ, Stricker PD, van Leeuwen PJ, et al. Prospective comparison of 18F-fluoromethylcholine versus 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT in prostate cancer patients Who have rising PSA after curative treatment and Are being considered for targeted therapy. J Nucl Med. 2015;56:1185–90.
23. Silver DA, Pellicer I, Fair WR, Heston WD, Cordon-Cardo C. Prostate-specific membrane antigen expression in normal and malignant human tissues. Clin Cancer Res. 1997;3:81–5.
24. Osborne JR, Akhtar NH, Vallabhajosula S, Anand A, Deh K, Tagawa ST. Prostate-specific membrane antigen-based imaging. Urol Oncol. 2013;3:144–54.
25. Ghosh A, Heston WD. Tumor target prostate specific membrane antigen (PSMA) and its regulation in prostate cancer. J Cell Biochem. 2004;91:528–39.
26. Eder M, Eisenhut M, Babich J, Haberkorn U. PSMA as a target for radiolabelled small molecules. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013;40:819–23.
27. Epstein JI, Pizov G, Walsh PC. Correlation of pathologic findings with progression after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Cancer. 1993;71:3582–93.
28. Freedland SJ, Sutter ME, Dorey F, Aronson WJ. Defining the ideal cutpoint for determining PSA recurrence after radical prostatectomy Prostate-specific antigen. Urology. 2003;61:365–9.
29. 68Ga-complex lipophilicity and the targeting property of a urea-based PSMA inhibitor for PET imaging. Bioconjug Chem. 2012;23:688–97.
30. Eder M, Neels O, Müller M, et al. Novel preclinical and radiopharmaceutical aspects of [68Ga]Ga-PSMA-HBED-CC: a New PET tracer for imaging of prostate cancer. Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2014;7:779–96.
31. Schumacher J, Maier-Borst W. A new 68Ge/68Ga radioisotope generator system for production of 68Ga in dilute HCL. Int J Appl Radiat Isot. 1981;32:31–6.
32. Schäfer M, Bauder-Wüst U, Leotta K, et al. A dimerized urea-based inhibitor of the prostate-specific membrane antigen for 68Ga-PET imaging of prostate cancer. EJNMMI Res. 2012;2:23.
33. Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A, Pan L, Strauss LG. Quantitative approaches of dynamic FDG-PET and PET/CT studies (dPET/CT) for the evaluation of oncological patients. Cancer Imaging. 2012;12:283–9.
34. Strauss LG, Conti PS. The applications of PET in clinical oncology. J Nucl Med. 1991;32:623–48.
35. Burger C, Buck A. Requirements and implementations of a flexible kinetic modeling tool. J Nucl Med. 1997;38:1818–23.
36. Mikolajczyk K, Szabatin M, Rudnicki P, Grodzki M, Burger C. A Java environment for medical image data analysis: initial application for brain PET quantitation. Med Inform. 1998;23:207–14.
37. Sokoloff L, Smith CB. Basic principles underlying radioisotopic methods for assay of biochemical processes in vivo. In: Greitz T, Ingvar DH, Widén L, editors. The metabolism of the human brain studied with positron emission tomography. New York: Raven Press; 1983. p. 123–48.
38. Miyazawa H, Osmont A, Petit-Taboué MC, et al. Determination of 18F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose rate constants in the anesthetized baboon brain with dynamic positron tomography. J Neurosci Methods. 1993;50:263–72.
39. Ohtake T, Kosaka N, Watanabe T, et al. Noninvasive method to obtain input function for measuring tissue glucose utilization of thoracic and abdominal organs. J Nucl Med. 1991;32:1432–8.
40. Strauss LG, Klippel S, Pan L, Schönleben K, Haberkorn U, Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A. Assessment of quantitative FDG PET data in primary colorectal tumours: which parameters are important with respect to tumour detection? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2007;34:868–77.
41. Koukouraki S, Strauss LG, Georgoulias V, et al. Evaluation of the pharmacokinetics of 68Ga-DOTATOC in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumours scheduled for 90Y-DOTATOC therapy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2006;33:460–6.
42. 3) and F-18 FDG PET in patients with recurrent gliomas and comparison to grading: preliminary results. Clin Nucl Med. 2011;36:101–8.
43. Galli G, Indovina L, Calcagni ML, Mansi L, Giordano A. The quantification with FDG as seen by a physician. Nucl Med Biol. 2013;40:720–30.
44. Guo N, Lang L, Gao H, Niu G, Kiesewetter DO, et al. Quantitative analysis and parametric imaging of 18F-labeled monomeric and dimeric RGD peptides using compartment model. Mol Imaging Biol. 2012;14:743–52.
45. Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A, Strauss LG, Burger C, Mikolajczyk K, Lehnert T, et al. On the fractal nature of positron emission tomography (PET) studies. World J Nucl Med. 2003;4:306–13.
46. 68Ga-PSMA PET/CT for restaging recurrent prostate cancer: which factors are associated with PET/CT detection rate? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42:1284–94.
47. Mannweiler S, Amersdorfer P, Trajanoski S, Terrett JA, King D, Mehes G. Heterogeneity of prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA) expression in prostate carcinoma with distant metastasis. Pathol Oncol Res. 2009;15:167–72.
48. Miyamoto DT, Sequist LV, Lee RJ. Circulating tumour cells-monitoring treatment response in prostate cancer. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2014;11:401–12.
49. Henze M, Dimitrakopoulou-Strauss A, Milker-Zabel S, et al. Characterization of 68Ga-DOTA-D-Phe1-Tyr3-octreotide kinetics in patients with meningiomas. J Nucl Med. 2005;46:763–9.
50. Zechmann CM, Afshar-Oromieh A, Armor T, et al. Radiation dosimetry and first therapy results with a (124)I/ (131)I-labeled small molecule (MIP-1095) targeting PSMA for prostate cancer therapy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;41:1280–92.
51. Benešová M, Schäfer M, Bauder-Wüst U, et al. Preclinical evaluation of a tailor-made DOTA-conjugated PSMA inhibitor with optimized linker moiety for imaging and endoradiotherapy of prostate cancer. J Nucl Med. 2015;56:914–20.
52. Afshar-Oromieh A, Hetzheim H, Kratochwil C, et al. The theranostic PSMA ligand PSMA-617 in the diagnosis of prostate cancer by PET/CT: Biodistribution in humans, radiation dosimetry, and first evaluation of tumor lesions. J Nucl Med. 2015;56:1697–705.
53. Dey P. Basic principles and applications of fractal geometry in pathology: a review. Anal Quant Cytol Histol. 2005;27:284–90.
54. Koukouraki S, Strauss LG, Georgoulias V, et al. Comparison of the pharmacokinetics of 68Ga-DOTATOC and [18F]FDG in patients with metastatic neuroendocrine tumours scheduled for 90Y-DOTATOC therapy. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2006;33:1115–22.
55. Sachpekidis C, Goldschmidt H, Hose D, et al. PET/CT studies of multiple myeloma using (18) F-FDG and (18) F-NaF: comparison of distribution patterns and tracers' pharmacokinetics. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;41:1343–53.