Communication Technologies, the Internet, and Group Research

Blackwell Handbook of Social Psychology: Group Processes

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 557-573

  Hollingshead, Andrea B ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Communication systems; Communication technologies; Group research; Internet; Videoconferencing

Indexed keywords

EID: 84954100690     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1002/9780470998458.ch23     Document Type: Chapter

References (73)

1. Alexander, S. C., Wille, J., & Hollingshead, A. B. (in press). Support at your keyboard: A study of on-line support groups. In L. Frey (Ed.), Group communication in context (Vol. 2), Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Arrow, H. (1997). Stability, bistability, and instability in small group influence patterns. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 75-85.
3. Arrow, H., Berdahl, J. L., Bouas, K. S., Craig, K. M., Cummings, A., Lebie, L., McGrath, J. E., O'Connor, K. M., Rhoades, J. A., & Schlosser, A. (1996). Time, technology, and groups: An integration. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 4, 253-261.
4. Ballinger, B., & Yalom, I. (1995). Group therapy in practice. In B. M. Bongar & L. E. Beutler (Eds.), Comprehensive textbook of psychotherapy: Theory and practice (pp. 189-204). New York: Oxford University Press.
5. Bar, F., Borrus, M., & Hanson, W. (1998). Web portfolios: Leveraging intranets, extranets, and the Internet for strategic gain. Stanford University working paper.
6. Berdahl, J. L., & Craig, K. L. (1996). Equality of participation and influence in groups: The effects of communication medium and sex composition. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 4, 179-202.
7. Berger, J., & Zelditch, Jr., M. (1977). Status characteristics and social interaction: The statusorganizing process. In J. Berger, M. H. Fisek, R. Z. Norman, & M. Zelditch, Jr. (Eds.), Status characteristics and social interaction: An expectation-states approach (pp. 3-87). New York: Elsevier.
8. Bonito, J. A., & Hollingshead, A. B. (1997). Participation in small groups. Communication Yearbook, 20, 227-261.
9. Bouas, K. S., & Arrow, H. (1996). The development of group identity in face-to-face and computer- mediated groups with membership change. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 4, 153-178.
10. Clapper, D. L., McLean, E. R., & Watson, R. T. (1991). An experimental investigation of the effect of group decision support on normative influence in small groups. In J. I. De Gross, I. Benbasat, G. DeSanctis, & C. M. Beath (Eds.), Proceedings of the twelfth international conference on information systems (pp. 273-282), New York.
11. Daly, B. (1993). The influence of face-to-face versus computer-mediated communication channels on collective induction. Accounting, Management & Information Technology, 3(1), 1-22.
12. Davis, J. H., & Stasson, M. F. (1988). Small group performance: Past and present research trends.Advances in Group Processes, 5, 245-277.
13. Dubrovsky, V. J., Kiesler, S., & Sethna, B. N. (1991). The equalization phenomenon: Status effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision making groups. Human-Computer Interaction, 6, 119-146.
14. Gackenbach, J. (Ed.) (1999). Psychology and the Internet: Intrapersonal, interpersonal, and transpersonal implications. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
15. George, J., Easton, G., Nunamaker, J., & Northcraft, G. (1990). A study of collaborative group work with and without computer-based support. Information Systems Research, 1(4), 394-415.
16. Goodwin, M. H., & Goodwin, C. (1986). Gesture and coparticipation in the activity of searching for a word. Semiotica, 62, 51-75.
17. Grady, D. (1998). Faking pain and suffering in Internet support groups. New York Times, April 23, 1998 (D1).
18. Harvard Business Review (1997). Sharing knowledge through BP's virtual team network, 75, 152-153.
19. Harper, R. G., Wiens, A. N., & Matarazzo, J. D. (1978). Nonverbal communication: The state of the art. New York: Wiley.
20. Hiltz, S. R., Johnson, K., & Turoff, M. (1986). Experiments in group decision making, 1: Communications process and outcome in face-to-face vs. computerized conferences. Human Communication Research, 13, 225-252.
21. Hollingshead, A. B. (1996a). Information suppression and status persistence in group decision making: The effects of communication media. Human Communication Research, 23, 193-219.
22. Hollingshead, A. B. (1996b). The rank order effect: Decision procedure, communication technology and group decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 68(3), 1-13.
23. Hollingshead, A. B. (1998a). Retrieval processes in transactive memory systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 659-671.
24. Hollingshead, A. B. (1998b). Distributed knowledge and transactive processes in groups. In M. A. Neale, E. A. Mannix, & D. H. Gruenfeld (Eds.), Research on managing groups and teams (Vol. 1, pp. 103-123). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
25. Hollingshead, A. B. (in press). Truth and deception in computer-mediated groups. To appear in M. A. Neale, E. A. Mannix, & T. Griffith (Eds.), Research in managing groups and teams (Vol. 3: Technology and teams) Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
26. Hollingshead, A. B., & McGrath, J. E. (1995). Computer-assisted groups: A critical review of the empirical research. In R. A. Guzzo & E. Salas (Eds.), Team effectiveness and decision making in organizations (pp. 46-78). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
27. Hollingshead, A. B., McGrath, J. E., & O'Connor, K. M. (1993). Group task performance and communication technology: A longitudinal study of computer-mediated versus face-to-face work groups. Small Group Research, 24, 307-333.
28. Humphreys, P., & Berger, J. (1981). Theoretical consequences of the status characteristics formulation.American Journal of Sociology, 86, 953-983.
29. Jessup, L. M., & Valacich, J. E. (Eds.) (1993). Group support systems: New perspectives. New York: Macmillan.
30. Jones, S. G. (Ed.) (1995). Cybersociety: Computer-mediated communication and community. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31. Jones, S. G. (Ed.) (1997). Virtual culture: Identity and communication in cybersociety. London: Sage.
32. Jones, S. G. (Ed.) (1998). Cybersociety 2.0: Revisiting computer-mediated communication and community. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
33. Katz, A. (1993). Self-help in America: A social movement perspective. New York: Twayne.
34. Kiesler, S. (Ed.) (1997). Culture of the Internet. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
35. Kiesler, S., & Sproull, L. (1992). Group decision making and technology. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 52, 96-123.
36. Kiesler, S., Siegel, J., & McGuire, T. W. (1984). Social psychological aspects of computermediated communication. American Psychologist, 39, 1123-1134.
37. Kollock, P., & Smith, M. (Eds.) (1998). Communities in cyberspace. London: Routledge.
38. Latané, B., & Bourgeois, M. J. (1996). Experimental evidence for dynamic social impact: The emergence of subcultures in electronic groups. Journal of Communication, 46, 35-47.
39. Latané, B., & L'Herrou, T. (1996). Spatial clustering in the conformity game: Dynamic social impact in electronic groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 1218-1230.
40. Lea, M., & Spears, R. (1991). Computer-mediated communication, de-individuation, and group decision making. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 34, 283-301.
41. McGrath, J. E. (1984). Groups, interaction, and performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
42. McGrath, J. E., Arrow, H., Gruenfeld, D. H., Hollingshead, A. B., & O'Connor, K. M. (1993). Groups, tasks, technology, and time: An integration. Small Group Research, 24, 406-420.
43. McGrath, J. E., & Hollingshead, A. B. (1993). Putting the "G" Back in GSS: Some theoretical issues about dynamic processes in groups with technological enhancements. In L. M. Jessup & J. E. Valacich (Eds.), Group support systems: New perspectives. New York: Macmillan.
44. McGrath, J. E., & Hollingshead, A.B. (1994). Groups interacting with technology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
45. McKenna, K. Y., & Bargh, J. A. (1998). Coming out in the age of the Internet: Identity "demarginalization" through virtual group participation. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology, 75, 681-694.
46. McLaughlin, M. L., Osborn, K. K., & Smith, C. B. (1995). Standards of conduct on usenet. In S. E. Jones (Ed.), CyberSociety: Computer-mediated communication and community (pp. 90-111). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
47. McLeod, P. L. (1992). An assessment of the experimental literature on the electronic support of group work: Results of a meta-analysis. Human Computer Interaction, 7(3), 257-280.
48. McLeod, P. L. (1996). New communication technologies for group research: Toward an integrative framework. In R. Hirokawa & M. S. Poole (Eds.), Communication and group decision making (2nd Ed., pp. 426-462). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
49. McLeod, P. L., Baron, R. S., Marti, M. W., & Kuh, Y. (1997). The eyes have it: Minority influence in face-to-face and computer-mediated group discussion. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82(5), 706-718.
50. McLeod, P. L., & Liker, J. K. (1992). Electronic meeting systems: Evidence from a low structure environment. Information Systems Research, 3, 195-223.
51. Melymuka, K. (1997). Virtual realities (virtual teams at ARCO Alaska). Computerworld, 31(Apr), 70-72.
52. Rice, R. E. (1984). Mediated group communication. In R. E. Rice & Associates (Eds.), The new media: Communication, research, and technology (pp. 129-154). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
53. Saunders, C., Robey, D., & Vaverek, K. (1994). The persistence of status differentials in computer conferencing. Human Communication Research, 20, 443-472.
54. Scherer, K. R., & Ekman, P. (1982). Methodological issues in studying nonverbal behavior. In K. R. Scherer & P. Ekman (Eds.), Handbook of methods in nonverbal behavior research (pp. 1-40). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
55. Schneider, J., & Cook, K. (1995). Status inconsistency and gender: combining revisited. Small Group Research, 26, 372-399.
56. Scott, C. R., & Easton, A. C. (1996). Examining equality of influence in group decision support system interaction. Small Group Research, 27, 360-382.
57. Siegel, J., Dubrovsky, V., Kiesler, S., & McGuire T. W. (1986). Group processes in computermediated communication. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 37, 157-187.
58. Spears, R., & Lea, M. (1992). Social influence and the influence of the "social" in computer-mediated communication. In M. Lea (Ed.), Contexts of computer-mediated communication (pp. 30-65). London: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.
59. Spears, R., & Lea, M. (1994). Panacea or panopticon? The hidden power in computer-mediated communication. Communication Research, 21, 427-459.
60. Sproull, L. S., & Kiesler, S. (1991). Connections: New ways of working in the networked organization.Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
61. Stasser, G., & Stewart, D. (1992). The discovery of hidden profiles by decision-making groups: Solving a problem versus making a judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 426-434.
62. Steiner, I. D. (1972). Group process and productivity. New York and London: Academic Press.
63. Straus, S. (1996). Getting a clue: The effects of communication media and information distribution on participation and performance in computer-mediated and face-to-face groups. Small Group Research, 27, 115-142.
64. Straus, S., & McGrath, J. E. (1994). Does the medium matter? The interaction of task type and technology on group performance and member reactions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 87-97.
65. Townsend, A. M., DeMarie, S. M., & Hendrickson, A. R. (1996). Are you ready for virtual teams? HRMagazine, 41, 122-126.
66. Walther, J. B. (1996). Computer-mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal, and hyperpersonal interaction. Communication Research, 3-43.
67. Walther, J. B., & Burgoon, J. K. (1992). Relational communication in computer-mediated interaction. Human Communication Research, 19, 50-88.
68. Watson, R., DeSanctis, G., & Poole, M. S. (1988). Using a GDSS to facilitate group consensus: Some intended and unintended consequences. MIS Quarterly, 12, 463-478.
69. Weisband, S. P. (1992). Group discussion and first advocacy effects in computer-mediated and face-to-face decision making groups. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 53, 352-380.
70. Weisband, S. P., Schneider, S. K., & Connolly, T. (1995). Electronic communication and social information: Status salience and status differences. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 1124-1151.
71. Wellman, B., & Gulia, M. (1998). Netsurfers don't ride alone: Virtual communities as communities.In P. Kollock & M. Smith (Eds.), Communities in cyberspace (pp. 163-170). London: Routledge.
72. Williams, E. (1977). Experimental comparisons of face-to-face and mediated communication: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 84(5), 963-976.
73. Zigurs, I., Poole, M. S., & DeSanctis, G. (1988). A study of influence in computer-mediated group decision making. MIS Quarterly, 12, 625-644.