Erratum to Power estimation and sample size determination for replication studies of genome-wide association studies [BMC Genomics, 17 Suppl 1, (2016) (3)];Power estimation and sample size determination for replication studies of genome-wide association studies

BMC Genomics

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2016, Pages

  Jiang, Wei ^a   Yu, Weichuan ^a  

^a HONG KONG UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

Empirical Bayes; Power; Replication study

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; BOOTSTRAPPING; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CROHN DISEASE; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; HYPERTENSION; INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; MONTE CARLO METHOD; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; POWER ANALYSIS; PROBABILITY; REPLICATION STUDY; RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS; SAMPLE SIZE; ALGORITHM; ALLELE; DIABETES MELLITUS; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION; GENETICS; GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN GENOME; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; VASCULAR DISEASE;

ALGORITHMS; ALLELES; ARTHRITIS, RHEUMATOID; BAYES THEOREM; CROHN DISEASE; DIABETES MELLITUS; GENETIC PREDISPOSITION TO DISEASE; GENOME, HUMAN; GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION STUDY; HUMANS; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; VASCULAR DISEASES;

EID: 84953857069     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712164     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12864-017-3482-3     Document Type: Erratum

References (25)

1. Hindorff LA, MacArthur J, Morales J, Junkins HA, Hall PN, Klemm AK, et al. A catalog of published genome-wide association studies. Available at: http://www.genome.gov/gwastudies/. Accessed [2015.05.28] (Web Resources).
2. Balding DJ. A tutorial on statistical methods for population association studies. Nat Rev Genet. 2006; 7(10):781-91.
3. NCI-NHGRI Working Group on Replication in Association Studies. Replicating genotype-phenotype associations. Nature. 2007; 447(7145):655-60.
4. Kraft P, Zeggini E, Ioannidis JP. Replication in genome-wide association studies. Stat Sci Rev J Inst Math Stat. 2009; 24(4):561.
5. Ioannidis JP. Why most discovered true associations are inflated. Epidemiology. 2008; 19(5):640-8.
6. Göring HH, Terwilliger JD, Blangero J. Large upward bias in estimation of locus-specific effects from genomewide scans. Am J Hum Genet. 2001; 69(6):1357-69.
7. Zöllner S, Pritchard JK. Overcoming the winner's curse: estimating penetrance parameters from case-control data. Am J Hum Genet. 2007; 80(4):605-15.
8. Zhong H, Prentice RL. Bias-reduced estimators and confidence intervals for odds ratios in genome-wide association studies. Biostatistics. 2008; 9(4):621-34.
9. Ghosh A, Zou F, Wright FA. Estimating odds ratios in genome scans: an approximate conditional likelihood approach. Am J Hum Genet. 2008; 82(5):1064-74.
10. Sun L, Dimitromanolakis A, Faye LL, Paterson AD, Waggott D, Bull SB. The DCCT/EDIC Research Group.: BR-squared: a practical solution to the winner's curse in genome-wide scans. Human genetics. 2011; 129(5):545-52.
11. Xu L, Craiu RV, Sun L. Bayesian methods to overcome the winner's curse in genetic studies. Ann Appl Stat. 2011; 5(1):201-31.
12. Ferguson JP, Cho JH, Yang C, Zhao H. Empirical Bayes correction for the winner's curse in genetic association studies. Genet Epidemiol. 2013; 37(1):60-8.
13. Wellcome Trust Case Control Consortium. Genome-wide association study of 14,000 cases of seven common diseases and 3,000 shared controls. Nature. 2007; 447(7145):661-78.
14. Woolf B. On estimating the relation between blood group and disease. Ann Hum Genet. 1955; 19(4):251-3.
15. Lecoutre B. Bayesian predictive procedure for designing and monitoring experiments. Bayesian Methods with Applications to Science, Policy and Official Statistics. Luxembourg: Eurostat; 2001, pp. 301-10.
16. Yang J, Benyamin B, McEvoy BP, Gordon S, Henders AK, Nyholt DR, et al. Common SNPs explain a large proportion of the heritability for human height. Nat Genet. 2010; 42(7):565-9.
17. Park J-H, Wacholder S, Gail MH, Peters U, Jacobs KB, Chanock SJ, et al. Estimation of effect size distribution from genome-wide association studies and implications for future discoveries. Nat Genet. 2010; 42(7):570-5.
18. Storey JD, Tibshirani R. Statistical significance for genomewide studies. Proc Natl Acad Sci. 2003; 100(16):9440-5.
19. Langaas M, Lindqvist BH, Ferkingstad E. Estimating the proportion of true null hypotheses, with application to DNA microarray data. J R Stat Soc Ser B (Stat Methodol). 2005; 67(4):555-72.
20. Jin J, Cai TT. Estimating the null and the proportion of nonnull effects in large-scale multiple comparisons. J Am Stat Assoc. 2007; 102(478):495-506.
21. Efron B. Local false discovery rates. Technical Report 2005-20B. Department of Statistics, Stanford University. 2005.
22. Mehta NN. Large-scale association analysis identifies 13 new susceptibility loci for coronary artery disease. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 2011; 4(3):327-9.
23. Morris AP, Voight BF, Teslovich TM, Ferreira T, Segré AV, Steinthorsdottir V, et al. Large-scale association analysis provides insights into the genetic architecture and pathophysiology of type 2 diabetes. Nat Genet. 2012; 44(9):981.
24. Bansal V, Libiger O, Torkamani A, Schork NJ. Statistical analysis strategies for association studies involving rare variants. Nat Rev Genet. 2010; 11(11):773-85.
25. Bishop CM. Pattern Recognition and Machine Learning. New York: Springer; 2006.