Do observers like curvature or do they dislike angularity?

British Journal of Psychology

Volumn 107, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 154-178

  Bertamini, Marco ^a   Palumbo, Letizia ^a   Gheorghes, Tamara Nicoleta ^a,b   Galatsidas, Mai ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

^b SHEFFIELD HALLAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Aesthetics; Complexity; Curvature; Visual preference

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CONCEPT FORMATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CONCEPT FORMATION; FEMALE; FORM PERCEPTION; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84953635734     PISSN: 00071269     EISSN: 20448295     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/bjop.12132     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Attneave, F. (1954). Some informational aspects of visual perception. Psychological Review, 61, 183-193. doi:10.1037/h0054663
2. Bar, M., & Neta, M. (2006). Humans prefer curved visual objects. Psychological Science, 17, 645-648. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01759.x
3. Bar, M., & Neta, M. (2007). Visual elements of subjective preference modulate amygdala activation. Neuropsychologia, 45, 2191-2200. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.03.008
4. Barlow, H. B., & Reeves, B. C. (1979). The versatility and absolute efficiency of detecting mirror symmetry in random dot displays. Vision Research, 19, 783-793. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(79)90154-8
5. Berlyne, D. E. (1970). Novelty, complexity, and hedonic value. Perception & Psychophysics, 8, 279-286. doi:10.3758/BF03212593
6. Bertamini, M., Helmy, M. S., & Bates, D. (2013). Attention is allocated preferentially to corners of surfaces (not just locations near a corner). Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 75, 1748-1760.
7. Bex, P. J., Simmers, A. J., & Dakin, S. C. (2001). Snakes and ladders: The role of temporal modulation in visual contour integration. Vision Research, 41, 3775-3782. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(01)00222-X
8. Birkhoff, G. D. (1932). Aesthetic measure. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9. Clottes, J. (2003). Chauvet cave: The art of earliest times. Salt Lake City, UT: University of Utah Press.
10. Cohen, E. H., & Singh, M. (2007). Geometric determinants of shape segmentation: Tests using segment identification. Vision Research, 47, 2825-2840. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2007.06.021
11. Cole, G. G., Skarratt, P. A., & Gellatly, A. R. H. (2007). Object and spatial representations in the corner enhancement effect. Perception & Psychophysics, 69, 400-412. doi:10.3758/BF03193761
12. De Haan, M., & Nelson, C. A. (1998). Discrimination and categorization of facial expressions of emotion during infancy. In A. Slater (Ed.), Perceptual development (pp. 287-306). Have, UK: Psychology Press.
13. De Houwer, J., Crombez, G., Baeyens, F., & Hermans, D. (2001). On the generality of the affective Simon effect. Cognition and Emotion, 15, 189-206.
14. De Winter, J., & Wagemans, J. (2006). Segmentation of object outlines into parts. A large-scale integrative study. Cognition, 25, 275-325.
15. De Winter, J., & Wagemans, J. (2008). Perceptual saliency of points along the contour of everyday objects: A large-scale study. Perception & Psychophysics, 70(1), 50-64.
16. Eysenck, H. J. (1941). The empirical determination of an aesthetic formula. Psychological Review, 48, 83-92. doi:10.1037/h0062483
17. Feldman, J., & Singh, M. (2005). Information along contours and object boundaries. Psychological Review, 112, 243-252. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.112.1.243
18. Field, D. J., Hayes, A., & Hess, R. F. (1993). Contour integration by the human visual system: Evidence for a local "association field". Vision Research, 33, 173-193. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(93)90156-Q
19. Friedenberg, J., & Bertamini, M. (2015). Contour variation and perceived attractiveness of polygon shape. Empirical Studies of the Arts. Manuscript submitted for publication.
20. Garavan, H., Pendergrass, J. C., Ross, T. J., Stein, E. A., & Risinger, R. C. (2001). Amygdala response to both positively and negatively valenced stimuli. Neuroreport, 12, 2779-2783. doi:10.1097/00001756-200108280-00036
21. Gómez-Puerto, G., Munar, E., Acedo, C., & Gomila, A. (2013). Is the human initial preference for rounded shapes universal? Preliminary results of an ongoing cross-cultural research. Perception, 42, ECVP Abstract Supplement, 102.
22. Gould, S. J. (1980). The panda's thumb. New York, NY: W. W. Norton.
23. Hevner, K. (1935). Experimental studies of the affective value of colors and lines. Journal of Applied Psychology, 19, 385-398. doi:10.1037/h0055538
24. Hoffman, D. D., & Richards, W. A. (1984). Parts of recognition. Cognition, 18, 65-96. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(84)90022-2
25. Hoffman, D. D., & Singh, M. (1997). Salience of visual parts. Cognition, 63, 29-78. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(96)00791-3
26. Hogarth, W. (1753). The analysis of beauty. London, UK: Reeves.
27. Jadva, V., Hines, M., & Golombok, S. (2010). Infants' preferences for toys, colors, and shapes: Sex differences and similarities. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 39, 1261-1273. doi:10.1007/s10508-010-9618-z
28. Kanizsa, G. (1979). Organization in vision. New York, NY: Praeger.
29. Kastl, A. J., & Child, I. L. (1968). Emotional meaning of four typographical variables. Journal of Applied Psychology, 52, 440-446. doi:10.1037/h0026506
30. Koffka, K. (1935). Principles of gestalt psychology. New York, NY: Harcourt.
31. Köhler, W. (1947). Gestalt psychology (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Liveright.
32. Krieglmeyer, R., & Deutsch, R. (2010). Comparing measures of approach-avoidance behaviour: The manikin task vs. two versions of the joystick task. Cognition & Emotion, 24, 810-828. doi:10.1080/02699930903047298
33. Lappänen, J. M., & Nelson, C. A. (2009). Tuning the developing brain to social signals of emotions. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10, 37-47. doi:10.1038/nrn2554
34. Larson, C. L., Aronoff, J., Sarinopoulos, I. C., & Zhu, D. C. (2009). Recognizing threat: A simple geometric shape activates neural circuitry for threat detection. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21, 1523-1535. doi:10.1162/jocn.2009.21111
35. Larson, C. L., Aronoff, J., & Stearns, J. (2007). The shape of threat: Simple geometric forms evoke rapid and sustained capture of attention. Emotion, 7, 526-534. doi:10.1037/1528-3542.7.3.526
36. Leder, H., & Carbon, C. C. (2005). Dimensions in appreciation of car interior design. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19, 603-618. doi:10.1002/acp.1088
37. Leder, H., Tinio, P. P., & Bar, M. (2011). Emotional valence modulates the preference for curved objects. Perception, 40, 649-655. doi:10.1068/p6845
38. Ledoux, J. (2003). The emotional brain, fear, and the amygdala. Cellular and Molecular Neurobiology, 23, 727-738.
39. Leyton, M. (1989). Inferring causal history from shape. Cognitive Science, 13, 357-387. doi:10.1016/0364-0213(89)90017-7
40. Lundhom, H. (1921). The affective tone of lines: Experimental researches. Psychological Review, 28, 43-60.
41. Makin, A. D. J., Pecchinenda, A., & Bertamini, M. (2012a). Implicit affective evaluation of visual symmetry. Emotion, 12, 1021-1030. doi:10.1037/a0026924
42. Makin, A. D. J., Pecchinenda, A., & Bertamini, M. (2012b). Grouping by closure influences subjective regularity and implicit preference. Iperception, 3, 519-527. doi:10.1068/i0538
43. Makin, A. D. J., Wilton, M., Pecchinenda, A., & Bertamini, M. (2012). Symmetry perception and affective responses: A combined EEG/EMG study. Neuropsychologia, 50, 3250-3261. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2012.10.003
44. Makovac, E., & Gerbino, W. (2010). Sound-shape congruency affects the multisensory response enhancement. Visual Cognition, 18, 133-137.
45. Metzger, W. (1941). Psychologie: Die Entwicklung ihrer Grundannahmen seit der Einführung des Experiments [Psychology: The development of basic principles since the introduction of the experimental method]. Darmstadt, Germany: Verlag von Dr. Dietrich Steinkopff.
46. Milan, E., Iborra, O., de Cordoba, M. J., Juarez-Ramos, V., Artacho, M. R., & Rubio, J. L. (2013). The Kiki-Bouba effect a case of personification and ideaesthesia. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 20, 84-102.
47. Morris, J. S., Ohman, A., & Dolan, R. J. (1999). A subcortical pathway to the right amygdala mediating 'unseen fear'. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 96, 1680-1685. doi:10.1073/pnas.96.4.1680
48. Nadal, M., Munar, E., Marty, G., & Cela-Conde, C. J. (2010). Visual complexity and beauty appreciation: Explaining the divergence of results. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 28, 173-191. doi:10.2190/EM.28.2.d
49. Norman, J. F., Phillips, F., & Ross, H. E. (2001). Information concentration along the boundary contours of naturally shaped solid objects. Perception, 30, 1285-1294. doi:10.1068/p3272
50. Panksepp, J. (2008). Affective neuroscience: The foundations of human and animal emotions. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
51. Peirce, J. W. (2007). PsychoPy: Psychophysics software in Python. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 162(1), 8-13. doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2006.11.017
52. Penton-Voak, I. S., Jacobson, A., & Trivers, R. (2004). Populational differences in attractiveness judgments of male and female faces: Comparing British and Jamaican samples. Evolution and Human Behavior, 25, 355-370.
53. Perrett, D. I., Lee, K. J., Penton-Voak, I., Rowland, D., Yoshikawa, S., Burt, D. M., & Akamatsu, S. (1998). Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature, 394, 884-887.
54. Phillips, F., Norman, J. F., & Beers, A. M. (2010). Fechner's aesthetics revisited. Seeing and Perceiving, 23, 263-271. doi:10.1163/187847510X516412
55. Poffenberger, A. T., & Barrows, B. E. (1924). The feeling value of lines. Journal of Applied Psychology, 8, 187-205. doi:10.1037/h0073513
56. Quinn, P. C., Brown, C. R., & Streppa, M. L. (1997). Perceptual organization of complex visual configurations by young infants. Infant Behavior & Development, 20, 35-46. doi:10.1016/S0163-6383(97)90059-X
57. Ramachandran, V. S., & Hirstein, W. (1999). The science of art: A neurological theory of aesthetic experience. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6, 15-51.
58. Silvia, P. J., & Barona, C. M. (2009). Do people prefer curved objects? Angularity, expertise, and aesthetic preference. Empirical Studies of the Arts, 27(1), 25-42. doi:10.2190/EM.27.1.b
59. Vaish, A., Grossman, T., & Woodward, A. (2008). Not all emotions are created equal: The negativity bias in social-emotional development. Psychological Bulletin, 134, 383-403. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.134.3.383
60. van Tonder, G., & Spehar, B. (2013). The aesthetic appeal of visual qualities. In L. Albertazzi (Ed.), Handbook of experimental phenomenology: Visual perception of shape, space and appearance (pp. 395-414). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
61. Wagemans, J., Elder, J. H., Kubovy, M., Palmer, S. E., Peterson, M. A., Singh, M., & von der Heydt, R. (2012). A century of Gestalt psychology in visual perception: I. Perceptual grouping and figure-ground organization. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 1172-1217. doi:10.1037/a0029333
62. Winston, J. S., O'Doherty, J., Kilner, J. M., Perrett, D. I., & Dolan, R. J. (2007). Brain systems for assessing facial attractiveness. Neuropsychologia, 45, 195-206. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.05.009
63. Zeki, S. (1992). The visual image in mind and brain. Scientific American, 267, 42-51. doi:10.1038/scientificamerican0992-68
64. Zeki, S. (1999). Inner vision: An exploration of art and the brain. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.