Object and spatial representations in the corner enhancement effect

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 69, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 400-412

  Cole, Geoff G ^a   Skarratt, Paul A ^b   Gellatly, Angus R H ^c  

^a DURHAM UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HULL   (United Kingdom)

^c OPEN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547440821     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193761     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. ABRAMS, R. A., & LAW, M. B. (2000). Object-based visual attention with endogenous orienting. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 818-833.
2. ATTNEAVE, F. (1954). Some informational aspects of visual perception. Psychological Review, 61, 183-193.
3. BAYLIS, G. C., & DRIVER, J. (1992). Visual parsing and response competition: The effect of grouping factors. Perception & Psychophysics, 51, 145-162.
4. BAYUS, G. C., & DRIVER, J. (1993). Visual attention and objects: Evidence for hierarchical coding of location. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 19, 451-470.
5. BERRY, G., & KLEIN, R. (1993). Does motion-induced grouping modulate the flanker compatibility effect? A failure to replicate Driver & Baylis. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 714-729.
6. BROADBENT, D. E. (1982). Task combination and selective intake of information Acta Psychologica, 50, 253-290.
7. CASTIELLO, U., & UMILTÀ, C. (1990). Size of the attentional focus and efficiency of processing. Acta Psychologica, 73, 195-209.
8. COLE, [G.], GELLATLY, A. [R. H.], & BLURTON, A. (2001). The effect of object onset on the distribution of visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 27, 1356-1368.
9. DOWNING, C. G., & PINKER, S. (1985). The spatial structure of visual attention. In M. I. Posner & O. S. M. Marin (Eds.), Attention and performance XI (pp. 171-187). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. DRIVER, J., & BAYLIS, G. C. (1989). Movement and visual attention: The spotlight metaphor breaks down. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 15, 448-456.
11. DUNCAN, J. (1984). Selective attention and the organization of visual information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113, 501-517.
12. EGLY, R., DRIVER, J., & RAFAL, R. D. (1994). Shifting visual attention between objects and locations: Evidence from normal and parietal lesion subjects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 161-177.
13. ERIKSEN, C. W., & ST. JAMES, J. D. (1986). Visual attention within and around the field of focal attention: A zoom lens model. Perception & Psychophysics, 40, 225-240.
14. ERIKSEN, C. W., & YEH, Y.-Y. (1985). Allocation of attention in the visual field. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 11, 583-597.
15. FRIESEN, C. K., RISTIC, J., & KINGSTONE, A. (2002). Attentional effects of counterpredictive gaze and arrow cues. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 30, 319-329.
16. HARMS, L., & BUNDESEN, C. (1983). Color segregation and selective attention in a nonsearch task. Perception & Psychophysics, 33, 11-19.
17. HEBB, D. O. (1949). The organization of behavior. A neuropsychological theory. New York: Wiley.
18. HOFFMAN, D. D., & SINGH, M. (1997). Salience of visual parts. Cognition, 63, 29-78.
19. HUGHES, H. C., & ZIMBA, L. D. (1985). Spatial maps of directed visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 11, 409-430.
20. JOLICŒUR, P., & INGLETON, M. (1991). Size invariance in curve tracing. Memory & Cognition, 19, 21-36.
21. JOLICŒUR, P., ULLMAN, S., & MACKAY, M. (1986). Curve tracing: A possible basic operation in the perception of spatial relations. Memory & Cognition, 14, 129-140.
22. JOLICŒUR, P., ULLMAN, S., & MACKAY, M. (1991). Visual curve tracing properties. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17, 997-1022.
23. KRAMER, A. F., & JACOBSON, A. (1991). Perceptual organization and focused attention: The role of objects and proximity in visual processing. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 267-284.
24. KRAMER, A. F., THAM, M.-P., & YEH, Y.-Y. (1991). Movement and focused attention: A failure to replicate. Perception & Psychophysics, 50, 537-546.
25. LABERGE, D., & BROWN, V. (1989). Theory of attentional operations in shape identification. Psychological Review, 96, 101-124.
26. MIYAUCHI, S., HIKOSAKA, O., & SHIMOJO, S. (1992). Visual attention field can be assessed by illusory line motion sensation. Investigative Ophthalmology & Visual Science, 33(Suppl.), 1262.
27. NEISSER, U. (1967). Cognitive psychology. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
28. RUDA, H. (1998). The warped geometry of visual space near a line assessed using a hyperacuity displacement task. Spatial Vision, 11, 401-419.
29. SANOCKI, T., & SELLERS, E. (2001). Shifting resources to recognize a forming object: Dependencies involving object properties. Visual Cognition, 8, 197-235.
30. SCHOLL, B. J. (2001). Objects and attention: The state of the art Cognition, 80, 1-46.
31. SHAW, M. L. (1984). Division of attention among spatial locations: A fundamental difference between detection of letters and detections of luminance increments. In H. Bouma & D. G. Bouwhuis (Eds.), Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 109-121). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
32. SHORE, D. I., SPENCE, C., & KLEIN, R. M. (2001). Visual prior entry. Psychological Science, 12, 205-212.
33. STEINMAN, B. A., STEINMAN, S. B., & LEHMKUHLE, S. (1995). Visual attention mechanisms show a center-surround organization. Vision Research, 35, 1859-1869.
34. STELMACH, L. B., & HERDMAN, C. M. (1991). Directed attention and perception of temporal order. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 17, 539-550.
35. SUZUKI, S., & CAVANAGH, P. (1997). Focused attention distorts visual space: An attentional repulsion effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 23, 443-463.
36. SUZUKI, S., & CAVANAGH, P. (1998). A shape-contrast effect for briefly presented stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 24, 1315-1341.
37. TITCHENER, E. B. (1908). Lectures on the elementary psychology of feeling and attention. New York: Macmillan.
38. TSAL, Y., & SHALEV, L. (1996). Inattention magnifies perceived length: The attentional receptive field hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 22, 233-243.
39. VAN SELST, M., & JOLICŒUR, P. (1995). Visual operations involved in within-figure processing. Visual Cognition, 2, 1-34.
40. VECERA, S. P. (1994). Grouped locations and object-based attention: Comment on Egly, Driver, and Rafal (1994). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 316-320.
41. VECERA, S. P., BEHRMANN, M., & MCGOLDRICK, J. (2000). Selective attention to the parts of an object. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 7, 301-308.
42. VECERA, S. P., & FARAH, M. J. (1994). Does visual attention select objects or locations? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 123, 146-160.
43. WONG, E., & WEISSTEIN, N. (1982). A new perceptual context-superiority effect: Line segments are more visible against a figure than against a ground. Science, 218, 587-589.
44. WONG, E., & WEISSTEIN, N. (1983). Sharp targets are detected better against a figure, and blurred targets are detected better against a background. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 9, 194-202.
45. YANTIS, S. (1998). The control of visual attention. In H. Pashler (Ed.), Attention (pp. 223-256). Hove, U.K.: Psychology Press.