Participation in protected areas: A social network case study in catalonia, Spain

Ecology and Society

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2015, Pages

  Calvet Mir, Laura ^a,b   Maestre Andrés, Sara ^b   Molina, José Luis ^c   van den Bergh, Jeroen ^b,d,e  

^a UNIVERSITAT OBERTA DE CATALUNYA   (Spain)

^b INSTITUT DE CIÈNCIA I TECNOLOGIA AMBIENTALS   (Spain)

^c UNIVERSITAT AUTÒNOMA DE BARCELONA   (Spain)

^d INSTITUCIÓ CATALANA DE RECERCA I ESTUDIS AVANÇATS ICREA   (Spain)

^e VU UNIVERSITY AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Communication network; Natural resource governance; Resource management; Social network analysis; Stakeholder analysis

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION NETWORK; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; NATURAL RESOURCE; NETWORK ANALYSIS; PROTECTED AREA; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; SOCIAL NETWORK; STAKEHOLDER;

CATALONIA; SPAIN;

EID: 84953286950     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17083087     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5751/ES-07989-200445     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Adger, W. N. 2003. Social capital, collective action, and adaptation to climate change. Economic Geography 79:387-404. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2003.tb00220.x
2. Aguilar Cestero, R. 2012. Memòries d’una feixa. La urbanització d’un poble pagès de la Regió de Barcelona (Matadepera, 1931-1983). República de Paper. Ecos, Barcelona, Spain.
3. Barabási, A.-L. 2009. Scale-free networks: a decade and beyond. Science 325(5939):412-413. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1173299
4. Beilin, R., N. T. Reichelt, B. J. King, A. Long, and S. Cam. 2013. Transition landscapes and social networks: examining on-ground community resilience and its implications for policy settings in multiscalar systems. Ecology and Society 18(2):30. http://dx.doi.org/10.5751/es-05360-180230
5. Bessette, G. 2004. Involving the community. A guide to participatory development communication. International Development Research Centre, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada. [online] URL: http://www.idrc.ca/EN/Resources/Publications/openebooks/066-7/index.html
6. Blackstock, K. L., and C. Richards. 2007. Evaluating stakeholder involvement in river basin planning: a Scottish case study. Water Policy 9:493-512. http://dx.doi.org/10.2166/wp.2007.018
7. Bodin, Ö., B. I. Crona, and H. Ernstson. 2006. Social networks in natural resource management: what is there to learn from a structural perspective? Ecology and Society 11(2):2. http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss2/resp2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511894985
8. Bodin, Ö., and B. I. Crona. 2009. The role of social networks in natural resource governance: what relational patterns make a difference? Global Environmental Change 19:366-374.
9. Borgatti, S. P., and M. G. Everett. 2000. Models of core/periphery structures. Social Networks 21(4):311-410. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0378-8733(99)00019-2
10. Borgatti, S. P., M. G. Everett, and L. C. Freeman. 2010, 2002. Ucinet for Windows: software for social network analysis. Analytic Technologies, Harvard, Massachusetts, USA.
11. Borgatti, S. P., and P. C. Foster. 2003. The network paradigm in organizational research: a review and typology. Journal of Management 29(6):991-1013.
12. Borrini-Feyerabend, G., N. Dudley, T. Jaeger, B. Lassen, N. Pathak Broome, A. Phillips, and T. Sandwith. 2013. Governance of protected areas: from understanding to action. Best practice protected area guidelines. Series no. 20. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland. [online] URL: https://www.iucn.org/about/work/programmes/gpap_home/gpap_capacity2/gpap_bpg/?13678/Governance-of-Protected-Areas-From-understanding-to-action
13. Burroughs, R. 1999. When stakeholders choose: process, knowledge, and motivation in water quality decisions. Society and Natural Resources 12:797-809. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/089419­299279326
14. Burt, R. S. 2004. Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology 110(2):349-399. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/421787
15. Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD). 1992. Convention on biological diversity: text and annexes. Convention on Biological Diversity Interim Secretariat, Geneva, Switzerland.
16. Costenbader, E., and T. W. Valente. 2003. The stability of centrality measures when networks are sampled. Social Networks 25(4):283-307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0378-8733(03)00012-1
17. Cummings, J. N., and R. Cross. 2003. Structural properties of work groups and their consequences for performance. Social Networks 25 (3):197-210. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0378-8733(02)00049-7
18. Davies, A. L, and R. M. White. 2012. Collaboration in natural resource governance: reconciling stakeholder expectations in deer management in Scotland. Journal of Environmental Management 112:160-169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.07.032
19. Diputació de Barcelona. 1997. Modificació del Pla Especial de Protecció del Medi Físic i del Paisatge de l’Espai Natural de Sant Llorenç del Munt i l’Obac. Text Normatiu Espai Natural Sant Llorenç del Munt i l'Obac. Diputació de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
20. Diputació de Barcelona. 2012. Memòria 2011 del Parc Natural de Sant Llorenç del Munt i l’Obac. Xarxa de Parcs Naturals, Barcelona, Spain.
21. Dudley, N. 2008. Guidelines for applying protected area management categories. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.
22. Ernstson, H. 2011. Transformative collective action: a network approach to transformative change in ecosystem based management. Pages 255-287 in Ö. Bodin and C. Prell, editors. Social networks and natural resource management: uncovering the social fabric of environmental governance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511894985.012
23. European Union. 2011. The EU biodiversity strategy to 2020. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg City, Luxembourg.
24. Freeman, R. E. 1984. Strategic management. A stakeholder approach. Basic Books, New York, New York, USA http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139192675
25. Fiorino, D. J. 1990. Citizen participation and environmental risk: a survey of institutional mechanisms. Science, Technology, and Human Values 15:226-243. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/016224399001500204
26. Fischer, F. 1993. Citizen participation and the democratization of policy expertise: from theoretical inquiry to practical cases. Policy Sciences 26:165-187. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00999715
27. French, J. R. P, and B. H. Raven. 1959. The bases of social power. Pages 150-167 in D. Cartwright, editor. Studies in social power. Institute of Social Research, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
28. Frooman, J. 1999. Stakeholder influence strategies. Academy of Management Review 24:191-205.
29. Graham, S. 2014. A new perspective on the trust power nexus from rural Australia. Journal of Rural Studies 36:87-98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2014.06.010
30. Grimble, R., and K. Wellard. 1997. Stakeholder methodologies in natural resource management: a review of concepts, contexts, experiences and opportunities. Agricultural Systems 55:173-193. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0308-521X(97)00006-1
31. Hernández-Jover, M., J. Gilmour, N. Schembri, T. Sysak, P. K. Holyoake, R. Beilin, and J.-A. L. M. L. Toribio. 2012. Use of stakeholder analysis to inform risk communication and extension strategies for improved biosecurity amongst small-scale pig producers. Preventive Veterinary Medicine 104:258-270. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2011.12.006
32. Ho, T. V. T., S. Woodley, A. Cottrell, and P. Valentine. 2014. A multilevel analytical framework for more effective governance in human-natural systems: a case study of marine protected areas in Vietnam. Ocean and Coastal Management 90:11-19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2013.12.015
33. Holling, C. S. 1978. Adaptive environmental assessment and management. John Wiley, New York, New York, USA.
34. Hoppe, R. 2010. Institutional constraints and practical problems in deliberative and participatory policy making. Policy and Politics 39:163-186. http://dx.doi.org/10.1332/030557310X519650
35. Hutton, J., W. M. Adams, and J. C. Murombedzi. 2005. Back to the barriers? Changing narratives in biodiversity conservation. Forum for Development Studies 2:341-370. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08039410.2005.9666319
36. International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). 1994. Guidelines for applying protected area management categories. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.
37. Leavitt, H. 1951. Some effects of certain communication patterns on group performance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology 46:38-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0057189
38. Marsden, P. V. 1990. Network data and measurement. Annual Review of Sociology 16:435-463. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.16.080190.002251
39. McNeely, J., editor. 1992. Parks for life: report of the IVth world congress on national parks and protected areas. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland.
40. Mcpherson, M., L. Smith-lovin, and J. M. Cook. 2001. Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology 27:415-444. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415
41. Newing, H. 2011. Conducting research in conservation: social science methods and practice. Routledge, London, UK.
42. Newman, M. E. J. 2003. The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Review 45(2):167-256. http://dx.doi.org/10.1137/s003614450342480
43. Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the commons: the evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
44. Ostrom, E. 2010. Analyzing collective action. Agricultural Economics 41:155-166. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2010.00497.x
45. Otero Armengol, I. 2010. The rural-urban socioecological transformation of Mediterranean mountain areas under global change. Local studies in Olzinelles and Matadepera (Barcelona Metropolitan Region). Dissertation. Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
46. Prell, C. 2011. Some basic structural characteristics of networks. Pages 29-43 in Ö. Bodin and C. Prell, editors. Social networks and natural resource management: uncovering the social fabric of environmental governance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511894985.003
47. Prell, C., K. Hubacek, C. Quinn, and M. Reed. 2008. ‘Who’s in the network?’ When stakeholders influence data analysis. Systemic Practice and Action Research 21:443-458. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11213-008-9105-9
48. Prell, C., K. Hubacek, and M. Reed. 2007. Stakeholder analysis and social network analysis in natural resource management. SRI Papers. University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
49. Prell, C., K. Hubacek, and M. Reed. 2009. Stakeholder analysis and social network analysis in natural resource management. Society and Natural Resources 22:501-518. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08941920802199202
50. Prell, C., M. Reed, L. Racin, and K. Hubacek. 2010. Competing structure, competing views: the role of formal and informal social structures in shaping stakeholder perceptions. Ecology and Society 15(4):34. [online] URL: http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol15/iss4/art34/
51. Prell, C., M. Reed, and K. Hubacek. 2011. Social network analysis for stakeholder selection and the links to social learning and adaptive co-management. Pages 95-118 in Ö. Bodin and C. Prell, editors. Social networks and natural resource management: uncovering the social fabric of environmental governance. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511894985.006
52. Reed, M. S. 2008. Stakeholder participation for environmental management: a literature review. Biological Conservation 141:2417-2431. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2008.07.014
53. Reed, M. S., A. Graves, N. Dandy, H. Posthumus, K. Hubacek, J. Morris, C. Prell, C. H. Quinn, and L. C. Stringer. 2009. Who’s in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. Journal of Environmental Management 90:1933-1949. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2009.01.001
54. Rishi, P. 2007. Joint forest management in India: an attitudinal analysis of stakeholders. Resources, Conservation and Recycling 51:345-354. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2006.10.009
55. Ruiz-Mallén, I., A. De la Peña, M. E. Méndez-Lopez, and L. Porter-Bolland. 2013. Local participation in community conservation: methodological contributions. Pages 117-133 in L. Porter-Bolland, I. Ruiz-Mallén, C. Camacho-Benavides, and S. R. McCandless, editors. Community action for conservation: Mexican experiences. Springer, Berlin, Germany. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7956-7_8
56. Vollan, B., 2008. Socio-ecological explanations for crowding-out effects from economic field experiments in southern Africa. Ecological Economics 67:560-573. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.01.015
57. Wasserman, S., and F. Faust. 1994. Social network analysis: methods and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511815478
58. Wesselink, A., J. Paavola, O. Fritsch, and O. Renn. 2011. Rationales for public participation in environmental policy and governance: practitioners’ perspectives. Environment and Planning A 43:2688-2704. http://dx.doi.org/10.1068/a44161