Transformative collective action: A network approach to transformative change in ecosystem-based management

Social Networks and Natural Resource Management: Uncovering the Social Fabric of Environmental Governance

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 255-287

  Ernstson, Henrik ^a,b  

^a STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN   (South Africa)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84864037229     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511894985.012     Document Type: Chapter

References (47)

1. Ansell, C. K. (2003). Community embeddedness and collaborative governance in the San Francisco Bay Area environmental movement. In M. Diani and D. McAdam (Eds.), Social Movements and Networks-Relational Approaches to Collective Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 123-144.
2. Boorman, S. A. and H. C. White (1976). Social structure from multiple networks. II. Role structures. American Journal of Sociology, 81(6), 1384-1446.
3. Borgatti, S. P., A. Mehra, D. J. Brass and G. Labianca (2009). Network analysis in the social sciences. Science, 323, 892-895.
4. Burt, R. S. (1988). Some properties of structural equivalence measures derived from sociometric choice data. Social Networks, 10(1), 1-28.
5. Burt, R. S. (2005). Brokerage and Closure: An Introduction to Social Capital. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6. Christensen, N. L., A. M. Bartuska, J. H. Brown et al. (1996). The report of the Ecological Society of America Committee on the scientific basis for ecosys-tem management. Ecological Applications, 6, 665-690.
7. Degenne, A. and M. Forse (1999). Introducing Social Networks. London: Sage.
8. Diani, M. (1992). The concept of social movement. Sociological Review, 40,1-25.
9. Diani, M. (1995). Green Networks. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
10. Diani, M. (2002). Britain re-creates the social movement: Contentious (and not-so-contentious) networks in Glasgow. Conference paper presented at Contentious Politics and the Economic Opportunity Structure, University of Crete, Rhetimno, October 17-18.
11. Diani, M. (2003a). Introduction: Social movements, contentious actions, and social networks: ‘from metaphor to substance’? In M. Diani and D. McAdam (Eds.), Social Movements and Networks: Relational Approaches to Collective Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1-18.
12. Diani, M. (2003b). ‘Leaders’ or brokers? Positions and influence in social move-ment networks. In M. Diani and D. McAdam (Eds.), Social Movements and Networks: Relational Approaches to Collective Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 105-122.
13. Diani, M. and I. Bison (2004). Organizations, coalitions and movements. Theory and Society, 33, 281-309.
14. Emirbayer, M. andJ. Goodwin (1994). Network analysis, culture and the problem of agency. American Journal of Sociology, 99,1411-1454.
15. Emirbayer, M. and A. Mische (1998). What is agency? AmericanJournal of Sociology, 103(4), 962-1023.
16. Ernstson, H. (2008). In Rhizomia: Actors, networks and resilience in urban land-scapes. PhD thesis. Department of Systems Ecology, Stockholm University, Stockholm.
17. Ernstson, H. and S. Sorlin (2009). Weaving protective stories: Connective practices to articulate holistic values in Stockholm National Urban Park. Environment and Planning A, 41(6), 1460-1479.
18. Ernstson, H., S. Sorlin and T. Elmqvist (2008). Social movements and ecosystem services-the role of social network structure in protecting and managing urban green areas in Stockholm. Ecology and Society, 13(2), 39.
19. Folke, C., T. Hahn, P. Olsson and J. Norberg (2005). Adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 30, 441-473.
20. Frank, K. (2009). Quasi-ties: Directing resources to members of a collective. American Behavioral Scientist, 52(12), 1613-1645.
21. Granovetter, M. (1973). The strength of weak ties. American Journal of Sociology, 76(6), 1360-1380.
22. Gunderson, L. H. (1999). Resilience, flexibility and adaptive management: Anti-dotes for spurious certitude? Conservation Ecology, 3(1), 7.
23. Gunderson, L. H. and C. S. Holling (Eds.) (2002). Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems. Washington, DC: Island Press.
24. Hahn, T., P. Olsson, C. Folke and K. Johansson (2006). Trust-building, knowledge generation and organizational innovations: The role of a bridging organization for adaptive comanagement of a wetland landscape around Kristianstad, Sweden. Human Ecology, 34, 573-592.
25. Hanneman, R. A. and M. Riddle (2005). Introduction to Social Network Methods. Riverside, CA: University of California (published in digital form at http://faculty.ucr.edu/~hanneman/).
26. Holling, C. S. (1978). Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management. Caldwell, NJ: Blackburn Press.
27. Kingdon, J. W. (1995). Agenda, Alternatives, and Public Policies, 2nd Edition. New York, NY: Harper-Collins College Publishers.
28. Lofvenhaft, K. and C. Wikberger (1996). Biotopkarta och historisk landanvandn-ing (Biotope and historical land-use map). In Nationalstadsparkens ekologiska infrastruktur (The Ecological Infrastructure of the National Urban Park). Stockholm: SBK 1997: 98.
29. Marsden, P.V. (1990). Network data and measurement. AnnualReview of Sociology, 16, 435-463.
30. McCarthy, J. D. and M. N. Zald (1977). Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. American Journal of Sociology, 82(6), 1212-1241.
31. Melucci, A. (1996). Challenging Codes. Collective Action in the Information Age. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32. Mische, A. (2003). Cross-talk in movements: Reconceiving the culture-network link. In M. Diani and D. McAdam (Eds.), Social Movements and Networks: Relational Approaches to Collective Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 258-280.
33. Molm, L. D. (2003). Theoretical comparisons of forms of exchange. Sociological Theory, 21(1), 1-17.
34. Olsson, P., C. Folke and T. Hahn (2004). Social-ecological transformation for ecosystem management: The development of adaptive co-management of a wetland landscape in southern Sweden. Ecology and Society, 9(4), 2.
35. Olsson, P., C. Folke and T. P. Hughes (2008). Navigating the transition to ecosystem-based management of the Great Barrier Reef, Australia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 105(28), 9489-9494.
36. Olsson, P., L. H. Gunderson, S.R. Carpenter et al. (2006). Shooting the rapids: Navigating transitions to adaptive governance of social-ecological systems. Ecology and Society, 11(1), 18.
37. Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
38. Della Porta, D. and M. Diani (2006). Social Movements: An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
39. Rockstrom, J., W. Steffen, K. Noone et al. (2009). A safe operating space for humanity. Nature, 461, 472-475.
40. Sandstrom, A. and L. Carlsson (2008). The performance of policy networks: The relation between network structure and network performance. Policy Studies Journal, 36(4), 497-524.
41. Schneider, M., J. Scholz, M. Lubell, D. Mindruta and M. Edwardsen (2003). Building consensual institutions: Networks and the National Estuary Program. American Journal of Political Science, 47(1), 143-158.
42. Swyngedouw, E. (1999). Modernity and hybridity: Nature, regeneracionismo, and the production of the Spanish waterscape, 1890-1930. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 89(3), 443-465.
43. Wasserman, S. and K. Faust (1994). Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
45. Westley, F. (1995). Governing design: The management of social systems and ecosystem management. In L. H. Gunderson, C. S. Holling and S. S. Light (Eds.), Barriers and Bridges to the Renewal of Ecosystems and Institutions. New York, NY: Columbia University Press, pp. 391-427.
46. Westley, F., S. R. Carpenter, W. A. Brock, C. S. Holling and L. H. Gunderson (2002). Why systems of people and nature are not just social and ecological systems. In L. H. Gunderson and C. S. Holling (Eds.), Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems. Washington, DC: Island Press, pp. 103-120.
47. Zald, M. N. and J. D. McCarthy (1980). Social movement industries: Competition and cooperation among movement industries. In L. Kriesberg (Ed.), Research in Social Movements, Conflict, and Change, 3, Greenwich, CT: Jai Press, pp. 1-20.