Comparison of GlideScope video laryngoscopy and Macintosh laryngoscope in ear–nose and throat surgery

Irish Journal of Medical Science

Volumn 185, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 729-733

  Misirlioglu, G ^a   Sen, O ^a  

^a HASEKI EDUCATION AND RESEARCH HOSPITAL   (Turkey)

Author keywords

GlideScope video laryngoscope; Intubation duration; Intubation success; Macintosh laryngoscope

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; EAR NOSE THROAT SURGERY; ELECTIVE SURGERY; ENDOTRACHEAL INTUBATION; GENERAL ANESTHESIA; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; LARYNGOSCOPY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RIGID LARYNGOSCOPE; VIDEOLARYNGOSCOPE; AGED; BLOOD PRESSURE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEVICES; ENDOSCOPIC SURGERY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HEART RATE; LARYNGOSCOPE; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPERATION DURATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; STANDARDS;

ADULT; AGED; ANESTHESIA, GENERAL; BLOOD PRESSURE; ELECTIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HEART RATE; HUMANS; INTUBATION, INTRATRACHEAL; LARYNGOSCOPES; LARYNGOSCOPY; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPERATIVE TIME; OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; VIDEO-ASSISTED SURGERY;

EID: 84953266192     PISSN: 00211265     EISSN: 18634362     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11845-015-1393-3     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Rose DK, Cohen MM (1996) The incidence of airway problems depends on the definition used. Can J Anesth 43:30–34
2. Henderson J (2010) Airway management in the adult. In: Miller RD (ed) Miller’s anesthesia, vol. 2, 7th edn. Elsevier Churchill Livingstone, Philadelphia, pp 1573–1610
3. Bansal S, Pawar M (2002) Haemodynamic responses to laryngoscopy and intubation in patients with pregnancy-induced hypertension; effect of intravenous esmolol with or without lidocaine. İnt J Obstet Anesth 11:4–8
4. Hagberg CA, Vogt-Harenkamp CC (2007) Ianucci DG successful airway management of a patient with a known difficult airway with the direct coupler interface videolaryngoscope. J Clin Anesth 14:620–626
5. Miller RD, Eriksson LI, Fleisher L et al (2010) Miller’s Anesthesia, 7th edn. Churchill Livingstone, Elsevier
6. Mihai R, Blair E, Kay H, Cook TM (2008) A quantitative review and meta-analysis of performance of non-standard laryngoscopes and rigid fibre optic intubation aids. Anaesth 63:745–760
7. Choi GS, Lee EH, Lim CS, Yoon SH (2011) A comparative study on the usefulness of the GlideScope or Macintosh laryngoscope when intubating normal airways. Korean J Anesthesiol 60(5):339–343
8. Sakles JC, Rodgers R, Keim SM (2008) Optical and video laryngoscopes for emergency airway management. Intern Emerg Med 3:139–143
9. Merli G (2010) Videolaryngoscopy: is it only a change of view? Minerva Anestesiol 76:569–571
10. Nishikawa K, Matsuoka H, Saito S (2009) Tracheal intubation with the Pentax-AWS reduces changes of hemodynamic responses and bispectral index scores compared with the Macintosh laryngoscope. J Neurosurg Anesth 21:292–296
11. Xue FS, Zhang GH, Li XY, Sun HT, Li P, Li CW, Liu KP (2007) Comparison of hemodynamic responses to orotracheal intubation with the GlideScope videolaryngoscope and the Macintosh direct laryngoscope. J Clin Anesth 19:245–250
12. Carassiti M, Zanzonico R, Cecchini S, Silvestri S, Cataldo R, Agro FE (2012) Force and pressure distribution using Macintosh and GlideScope laryngoscopes in normal and difficult airways: a manikin study. Br J Anaesth 108(1):146–151
13. ® Videolaryngoscope versus direct Laryngoscope. Anesth Pain Med 5(2):e21836. doi:10.5812/aapm.21836 (Published online; PMCID: PMC4389105)
14. ®) video-laryngoscope in patients with untreated hypertension. Res Cardiovasc Med 3(2):e17598. doi:10.5812/cardiovascmed.17598
15. Pournajafian AR, Ghodraty MR, Faiz SH, Rahimzadeh P, Goodarzynejad H, Dogmehchi E (2014) Comparing GlideScope Video Laryngoscope and Macintosh Laryngoscope regarding hemodynamic responses during orotracheal intubation: a randomized controlled trial. Iran Red Crescent Med J 16(4):e12334. doi:10.5812/ircmj.12334
16. Nouruzi-Sedeh P, Schumann M, Groeben H (2009) Laryngoscopy via Macintosh blade versus GlideScope: success rate and time for endotracheal intubation in untrained medical personnel. Anesthesiology 110(1):32–37
17. Andersen LH, Rovsing L, Olsen KS (2011) GlideScope videolaryngoscope vs. Macintosh direct laryngoscope for intubation of morbidly obese patients: a randomized trial. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 55(9):1090–1097
18. Narang AT, Oldeg PF, Medzon R, Mahmood AR, Spector JA, Robinett DA (2009) Comparison of intubation success of video laryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy in the difficult airway using high-fidelity simulation. Simul Healthc 4(3):160–165
19. Serocki G, Bein B, Scholz J, Dörges V (2010) Management of the predicted difficult airway: a comparison of conventional blade laryngoscopy with video-assisted blade laryngoscopy and the GlideScope. Eur J Anaesthesiol 27(1):24–30
20. Choi GS, Lee EH, Lim CS, Yoon SH (2011) A comparative study on the usefulness of the Glidescope or Macintosh laryngoscope when intubating normal airways. Korean J Anesthesiol 60(5):339–343
21. Lim Y, Yeo SW (2005) A comparison of the GlideScope with the Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in patients with simulated difficult airway. Anaesth Intensiv Care 33(2):243–247
22. Sun DA, Warriner CB, Parsons DG, Klein R, Umedaly HS, Moult M (2005) The GlideScope Video Laryngoscope: randomized clinical trial in 200 patients. Br J Anaesth 94(381–84):50
23. Macnair D, Baraclough D, Wilson G, Bloch M, Engelhardt T (2009) Pediatric airway management: comparing the Berci-Kaplan Video Laryngoscope with direct laryngoscopy. Paediatr Anaesth 19:577–580
24. Donald EG, David L, James M (2012) GlideScope videolaryngoscopy versus direct laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation: a systemic review and meta-analysis. Can J Anesth 59:41–52