How heterogeneous are adolescents’ preferences for natural and semi-natural riverscapes as recreational settings?

Landscape Research

Volumn 41, Issue 5, 2016, Pages 555-568

  Eder, Renate ^a   Arnberger, Arne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NATURAL RESOURCES AND LIFE SCIENCES   (Austria)

Author keywords

adolescents; Aesthetics; cultural ecosystem services; Danube Floodplains; discrete choice experiment; past experience

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENCE; DISCRETE CHOICE ANALYSIS; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; ESTHETICS; FLOODPLAIN; PREFERENCE BEHAVIOR; RECREATIONAL MANAGEMENT;

AUSTRIA; DANUBE FLOODPLAINS NATIONAL PARK;

ALGAE;

EID: 84953263824     PISSN: 01426397     EISSN: 14699710     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01426397.2015.1117063     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. A.Arnberger,, T.Aikoh,, R.Eder,, Y.Shoji,, & T.Mieno, (2010). How many people should be in the urban forest? A comparison of trail preferences of Vienna and Sapporo forest visitor segments. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 9, 215–225.
2. A.Arnberger,, & R.Eder, (2011a). The influence of age on recreational trail preferences of urban green-space visitors: A discrete choice experiment with digitally calibrated images. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 54, 891–908.
3. A.Arnberger,, & R.Eder, (2011b). Exploring the heterogeneity of rural landscape preferences: An image-based latent class approach. Landscape Research, 36, 19–40.
4. T.C.Brown,, & T.C.Daniel, (1991). Landscape aesthetics of riparian environments: Relationship of flow quantity to scenic quality along a wild and scenic river. Water Resources Research, 27, 1787–1795.
5. A.Chin,, M.D.Daniels,, M.A.Urban,, H.Piegay,, K.J.Gregory,, W.Bigler,, … E.Wohl, (2008). Perceptions of wood in rivers and challenges for stream restoration in the United States. Environmental Management, 41, 893–903.
6. T.C.Daniel,, A.Muhar,, A.Arnberger,, O.Aznar,, J.W.Boyd,, K.M.A.Chan,, … A.von der Dunk, (2012). Contributions of cultural services to the ecosystem services agenda. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA, 109, 8812–8819. USA.
7. E.Dickinson, (2013). The misdiagnosis: Rethinking “Nature-deficit Disorder”. Environmental Communication, 7, 315–335.
8. R.Eder,, & A.Arnberger, (2012). The influence of place attachment and experience use history on perceived depreciative visitor behavior and crowding in an urban national park. Environmental Management, 50, 566–580.
9. K.-H.Erdmann,, J.Löfler,, & S.Roscher, (2008). Naturschutz im Kontext einer nachhaltigen Entwicklung—Ansätze, Konzepte, Strategien [Nature conservation in the context of sustainable development - approaches, concepts, strategies]. Naturschutz und Biologische Vielfalt, Heft 67, Bonn-Bad Godesberg: Bundesamt für Naturschutz.
10. W.E.Hammitt,, & C.McDonald, (1983). Past on-site experience and its relationship to managing river recreation resources. Forest Science, 29, 262–266.
11. K.A.Henderson,, & M.D.Bialeschki, (2005). Leisure and active lifestyles: Research reflections. Leisure Sciences, 27, 335–365.
12. D.A.Hensher,, J.M.Rose,, & W.H.Greene, (2005). Applied choice analysis: A primer. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
13. T.R.Herzog,, & A.G.Bryce, (2007). Mystery and preference in within-forest settings. Environment and Behavior, 39, 779–796.
14. B.Junker,, & M.Buchecker, (2008). Aesthetic preferences versus ecological objectives in river restorations. Landscape and Urban Planning, 85, 141–154.
15. P.H.KahnJr.,, & S.R.Kellert, (Eds.). (2002). Children and nature: Psychological, sociocultural, and evolutionary investigations. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16. R.Kaplan,, & S.Kaplan, (1989). The experience of nature: A psychological perspective. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
17. R.Kaplan,, & S.Kaplan, (2002). Adolescents and the natural environment: A time out? In P.H.KahnJr. & S.R.Kellert (Eds.), Children and nature: Psychological, sociocultural, and evolutionary investigations (pp. 227–257). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
18. A.D.A.M.Kemperman,, & H.J.P.Timmermans, (2006). Heterogeneity in urban park use of aging visitors: A latent class analysis. Leisure Science, 28, 57–71.
19. K.Korpela, (1992). Adolescents’ favourite places and environmental self-regulation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 12, 249–258.
20. K.Korpela,, M.Kyttä,, & T.Hartig, (2002). Restorative experience, self-regulation and children’s place preferences. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 22, 387–398.
21. R.Louv, (2008). Last child in the woods—Saving our children from nature-deficit disorder. Chapel Hill, NC: Algonquin Books of Chapel Hill.
22. J.J.Louviere,, D.A.Hensher,, & J.D.Swait, (2000). Stated choice methods—Analysis and application. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. K.Lückmann,, V.Lagemann,, & S.Menzel, (2013). Landscape assessment and evaluation of young people: Comparing nature-orientated habitat and engineered habitat preferences. Environment and Behavior, 45, 86–112.
24. R.E.Manning, (1999). Studies in outdoor recreation––Search and research for satisfaction. Corvallis: Oregon State University Press.
25. M.J.Meitner, (2004). Scenic beauty of river views in the Grand Canyon: Relating perceptual judgments to locations. Landscape and Urban Planning, 68, 3–13.
26. J.I.Nassauer, (2004). Monitoring the success of metropolitan wetland restorations: Cultural sustainability and ecological function. Wetlands, 24, 756–765.
27. P.E.Owens,, & I.McKinnon, (2009). In pursuit of nature: The role of nature in adolescents’ lives. Journal of Developmental Processes, 4, 434–458.
28. O.R.W.Pergams,, & P.A.Zaradic, (2006). Is love of nature in the US becoming love of electronic media? 16-year downtrend in national park visits explained by watching movies, playing video games, internet use, and oil prices. Journal of Environmental Management, 80, 387–393.
29. Y.Pflüger,, A.Rackham,, & S.Larned, (2010). The aesthetic value of river flows: An assessment of flow preferences for large and small rivers. Landscape and Urban Planning, 95, 68–78.
30. H.Piégay,, K.J.Gregory,, V.Bondarev,, A.Chin,, N.Dalhstrom,, A.Elosegi,, … J.Zawiejska, (2005). Public perception as a barrier to introducing wood in rivers for restoration purposes. Environmental Management, 36, 665–674.
31. S.Sanon,, T.Hein,, W.Douven,, & P.Winkler, (2012). Quantifying ecosystem service trade-offs: The case of an urban floodplain in Vienna, Austria. Journal of Environmental Management, 111, 159–172.
32. B.Shelby,, & T.A.Heberlein, (1986). Carrying capacity in recreation settings. Corvallis: Oregon State University Press.
33. W.Stewart,, K.Larkin,, B.Orland,, & D.Anderson, (2003). Boater preferences for beach characteristics downstream from Glen Canyon Dam, Arizona. Journal of Environmental Management, 69, 201–211.
34. S.Tapsell,, S.Tunstall,, M.House,, J.Whomsley,, & P.Macnaghten, (2001). Growing up with rivers? Rivers in London children’s worlds. Area, 33, 177–189.
35. K.Tockner,, & J.A.Stanford, (2002). Riverine flood plains: Present state and future trends. Journal of Environmental Conservation, 29, 308–330.
36. S.Tunstall,, S.Tapsell,, & M.House, (2004). Children’s perceptions of river landscapes and play: What children’s photographs reveal. Landscape Research, 29, 181–204.
37. A.E.Van den Berg,, & S.L.Koole, (2006). New wilderness in the Netherlands: An investigation of visual preferences for nature development landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 78, 362–372.
38. J.K.Vermunt,, & J.Magidson, (2003). Latent gold choice user’s manual. Belmont, MA: Statistical Innovations.
39. J.Vesterinen,, E.Pouta,, A.Huhtala,, & M.Neuvonen, (2010). Impacts of changes in water quality on recreation behavior and benefits in Finland. Journal of Environmental Management, 91, 984–994.
40. C.Ward Thompson,, P.Aspinall,, S.Bell,, & C.Findlay, (2005). It gets you away from everyday life: Local woodlands and community use—What makes a difference? Landscape Research, 30, 109–146.
41. M.I.Wilson,, L.D.Robertson,, M.Daly,, & S.A.Walton, (1995). Effects of visual cues on assessment on water qualities. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 15, 53–63.