Heterogeneity in urban park use of aging visitors: A latent class analysis

Leisure Sciences

Volumn 28, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 57-71

  Kemperman, Astrid D A M ^a   Timmermans, Harry J P ^a  

^a EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Aging; Latent class model; Park preferences; Segments; Urban parks

Indexed keywords

AGING; GREENSPACE; RECREATIONAL ACTIVITY; RECREATIONAL FACILITY;

BENELUX; EINDHOVEN; EURASIA; EUROPE; NETHERLANDS; NORTH BRABANT; WESTERN EUROPE;

EID: 30844438545     PISSN: 01490400     EISSN: 15210588     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01490400500332710     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Boxall, P. and Adamowicz, W. (2002) Understanding heterogeneous preferences in random utility models: A latent class approach Environmental and Resource Economics., 23, pp. 421-446. [CSA]
2. Field, D. (2000) Social groups and parks: Leisure behavior in time and space Journal of Leisure Research, 32(1), pp. 27-31. [CSA]
3. Gardyn, R. (2001) The new family vacation American Demographics, 23(8), pp. 42-47. [CSA]
4. Gobster, P. (2002) Managing urban parks for a racially and ethnically diverse clientele Leisure Sciences., 24, pp. 143-159. [CROSSREF] [CSA]
5. Greene, W. (2001) Fixed and random effects in nonlinear models. Department of Economics.
6. Greene, W. and Hensher, D. (2002) A latent class model for discrete choice analysis: Contrast with mixed logit. The University of Sydney.
7. Gupta, S. and Chintagunta, P. (1994) On using demographic variables to determine segment membership in logit mixture models Journal of Marketing Research., 31, pp. 128-136. [CSA]
8. Jain, D. and Vilcassim, N. and Chintagunta, P. (1994) Random-coefficients logit brand-choice model applied to panel data Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 12(3), pp. 317-328. [CSA]
9. Kamakura, W. and Russell, G. (1989) A probabilistic choice model for market segmentation and elasticity structure Journal of Marketing Research., 26, pp. 379-390. [CSA]
10. McFadden, D. and Train, K. (2000) Mixed mnl models for discrete response Journal of Applied Econometrics, 15(5), pp. 447-470. [CROSSREF] [CSA]
11. McGuire, F. and O'Leary, J. and Dottavio, F. (1989) The importance of selected facilities, programs and services to older visitors to National Parks Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 7(3), pp. 1-8. [CSA]
12. Page, S. and Nielsen, K. and Goodenough, R. (1994) Managing urban parks: User perspectives and local leisure needs in the 1990's The Services Journal, 14(2), pp. 216-237. [CSA]
13. Payne, L. and Mowen, A. and Orsega-Smith, E. (2002) An examination of park preferences and behaviors among urban residents: The role of residential location, race and age Leisure Sciences., 24, pp. 181-198. [CROSSREF] [CSA]
14. Raymore, L. and Scott, D. (1998) The characteristics and activities of older visitors to a metropolitan park district Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 16(4), pp. 1-21. [CSA]
15. Revelt, D. and Train, K. (1998) Mixed logit with repeated choices: Households' choices of appliance efficiency level The Review of Economics and Statistics., 80, pp. 647-657. [CROSSREF] [CSA]
16. Robinson, J. and Godbey, G. (1997) Time for life: The surprising ways Americans use their time. University Park PA: The Pennsylvania State University Press.
17. Scott, D. (1997) Exploring time patterns in people's use of a metropolitan park district Leisure Sciences, 19(3), pp. 159-174. [CSA]
18. Swait, J. (1994) A structural equation model of latent segmentation and product choice for cross-sectional revealed preference data Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 1(2), pp. 77-89. [CROSSREF] [CSA]
19. Tinsley, H. and Tinsley, D. and Croskeys, C. (2002) Park usage, social milieu, and psychosocial benefits of park use reported by older urban park users from four ethnic groups Leisure Sciences., 24, pp. 199-218. [CROSSREF] [CSA]
20. Train, K. (1998) Recreation demand models with taste variation Land Economics, 74(2), pp. 230-239. [CSA]