Spatial analysis of condyle position according to sagittal skeletal relationship, assessed by cone beam computed tomography

Progress in Orthodontics

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 1-9

  Arieta Miranda, Jessica M ^a   Silva Valencia, Manuel ^a   Flores Mir, Carlos ^b   Paredes Sampen, Ney A ^a   Arriola Guillen, Luis E ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL MAYOR DE SAN MARCOS   (Peru)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

CBCT; Computed tomography; Condyle; Temporomandibular joint

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANGLE OF THE EMINENCE; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONDYLE POSITION; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; EMINENCE HEIGHT; FEMALE; GLENOID FOSSA PROSTHESIS; HUMAN; MALE; MANDIBLE CONDYLE; MUSCULOSKELETAL SYSTEM PARAMETERS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TEMPOROMANDIBULAR JOINT; YOUNG ADULT; ADOLESCENT; ANATOMIC LANDMARK; CEPHALOMETRY; IMAGE PROCESSING; MALOCCLUSION; MANDIBLE; MAXILLA; METHODOLOGY; NASAL BONE; RADIOGRAPHY; SPHENOID; TEMPORAL BONE; TOOTH OCCLUSION; VOMER;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ANATOMIC LANDMARKS; CEPHALOMETRY; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALOCCLUSION; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS I; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS II; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS III; MANDIBLE; MANDIBULAR CONDYLE; MAXILLA; NASAL BONE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPHENOID BONE; TEMPORAL BONE; VERTICAL DIMENSION; VOMER; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84891424001     PISSN: 17237785     EISSN: 21961042     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/2196-1042-14-36     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Ishibashi H, Takenoshita Y, Ishibashi K, Oka M. Age-related changes in the human mandibular condyle: a morphologic, radiologic and histologic study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 1995; 53(9):1016-23.
2. Yale SH, Allison BD, Hauptfuehrer JD. An epidemiological assessment of mandibular condyle morphology. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1966; 21(2):169-77.
3. Burke G, Major P, Glover K, Prasad N. Correlations between condylar characteristics and facial morphology in class II preadolescent patients. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1998; 114(3):328-36.
4. Kurusu A, Horiuchi M, Soma K. Relationship between occlusal force and mandibular condyle morphology. Angle Orthod. 2009; 79(6):1063-9.
5. Arnett GW, Milam SB, Gottesman L. Progressive mandibular retrusion idiopathic condylar resorption. Part II Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1996; 110(2):117-27.
6. Maglione H, Laraudo J, Zavaleta L. In: Dolor O, editor. Disfunción Craneomandibular: Afecciones de los Músculos Masticadores y de la Articulación Temporomandibular. Coyoacán: AMOLCA; 2008.
7. Schlueter B, Kim KB, Oliver D, Sortiropoulos G. Cone beam computed tomography 3D reconstruction of the mandibular condyle. Angle Orthodontist. 2008; 78(5):880-8.
8. Farman AG, Scarfe WC. The basics of maxillofacial cone beam computed tomography. Seminars in Orthodontics. 2009; 15:2-13.
9. Ludlow JB, Laster WS, See M, Bailey LJ, Hershey HG. Accuracy of measurements of mandibular anatomy in cone beam computed tomography images. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2007; 103(4):534-42.
10. Hussain AM, Packota G, Major PW, Flores-Mir C. Role of different imaging modalities in assessment of temporomandibular joint erosions and osteophytes: a systematic review. Dentomaxillofac Radiol. 2008; 37(2):63-71.
11. Tadej G, Engstrom C, Borrman H, Christiansen EL. Mandibular condyle morphology in relation to malocclusions in children. Angle Orthodontist. 1987; 59(3):187-94.
12. Katsavrias EG. Condyle and fossa shape in class II and class III skeletal patterns: a morphometric tomographic study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005; 128(3):337-46.
13. Rodrigues AF, Fraga MR, Vitral RW. Computed tomography evaluation of the temporomandibular joint in class II division 1 and class III malocclusion patients: condylar symmetry and condyle-fossa relationship. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009; 136:199-206.
14. Ricketts RM. Variations of the temporomandibular joint as revealed by cephalometric laminagraphy. Am J Orthodont. 1950; 36:877-97.
15. Ricketts RM. Various conditions of the temporomandibular joint as revealed by cephalometric laminagraphy. Angle Orthod. 1950; 22(2):98-115.
16. Brader AC, Allentown. The application of cephalometric laminagraphy to the studies of the frontal planes of the human head. Am J Orthodontics. 1949; 35:249-68.
17. Arieta JM, Silva M. Análisis de posicióncondilar en CBCT. Rev Ortodoncia UNMSM. 2011; 1:24-31.
18. Paredes NA, Silva M, Arieta JM, Arriola LE. Variación de posición condilar según patrón vertical. Ortodontia SPO. 2012; 45(5):555-62.
19. Pullinger AG, Hollender L. Variation in condyle-fossa relationships according to different methods of evaluation in tomograms. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1986; 62:719-27.
20. Rodrigues AF, Fraga MR, Vitral RW. Computed tomography evaluation of the temporomandibular joint in class I malocclusion patients: condylar symmetry and condyle-fossa relationship. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2009; 136(2):192-8.
21. Katsavrias EG. Changes in articular eminence inclination during the craniofacial growth period. Angle Orthod. 2002; 72:258-64.
22. Sülün T, Cemgil T, Duc JM, Rammelsberg P, Jäger L, Gernet W. Morphology of the mandibular fossa and inclination of the articular eminence in patients with internal derangement and in symptom-free volunteers. Oral Surg Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2001; 92(1):98-107.
23. Christiansen EL, Chant TT, Thompson JR, Hasso JR, Hinshaw D, Copp S. Computed tomography of the normal temporomandibular joint. Scand J Dent Res. 1987; 95:499-509.
24. Ricketts RM. Provocations and perceptions in cranio-facial orthopedics. Library of Congress Catalogue. 1989; 1(2):671-2.
25. Vitral RW, Telles C, Fraga M, Oliveira R, Tanaka O. Computed tomography evaluation of temporomandibular joint alterations in patients with class II division 1 subdivision malocclusions: condyle-fossa relationship. Am J Ortodoncia Dentofacial Orthop. 2004; 126:48-52.
26. Cohlmia JT, Ghosh J, Sinha PK, Nanda RS, Currier GF. Tomographic assessment of temporomandibular joints in patients with malocclusion. Angle Orthod. 1996; 66(1):27-36.