Adaptive condylar growth and mandibular remodelling changes with bionator therapy - An implant study

European Journal of Orthodontics

Volumn 26, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 515-522

  Araujo, Adriano M ^a   Buschang, Peter H ^b   Melo, Ana Claudia M ^a  

^a School of Dentistry of Araraquara   (Brazil)

^b BAYLOR COLLEGE OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BONE REMODELING; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MALE; MALOCCLUSION; MANDIBLE CONDYLE; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; ORTHODONTIC DEVICE; PHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;

ACTIVATOR APPLIANCES; BONE REMODELING; CEPHALOMETRY; CHILD; FEMALE; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MALOCCLUSION, ANGLE CLASS II; MANDIBULAR CONDYLE; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 16644365129     PISSN: 01415387     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/ejo/26.5.515     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Almeida M R A, Henriques J F C, Ursi W 2002 Comparative study of the Fränkel (FR-2) and bionator appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 121: 458-466
2. Ascher F 1977 The bionator. In: Graber T M, Newman B (eds) Removable orthodontic appliances. W B Saunders, Philadelphia, pp. 229-246
3. Baltromejus S, Rut S, Pancherz H 2002 Effective temporomandibular joint growth and chin position changes: activator versus Herbst treatment. A cephalometric roentgenographic study. European Journal of Orthodontics 24: 627-637
4. Baumrind S, Ben-Bassat Y, Korn E L, Bravo L A, Curry S 1992a Mandibular remodeling measured on cephalograms. 1. Osseous changes relative to superimposition on metallic implants. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 102: 134-142
5. Baumrind S, Ben-Bassat Y, Korn E L, Bravo L A, Curry S 1992b Mandibular remodeling measured on cephalograms. 2. A comparison of information from implant and anatomic best-fit superimpositions. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 102: 227-238
6. Birkebæk L, Melsen B, Terp S 1984 A laminagraphic study of the alterations in the temporo-mandibular joint following activator treatment. European Journal of Orthodontics 6: 257-266
7. Björk A 1969 Prediction of mandibular growth rotation. American Journal of Orthodontics 55: 585-599
8. Björk A, Skieller V 1972 Facial development and tooth eruption. An implant study at the age of puberty. American Journal of Orthodontics 62: 339-383
9. Buschang P H, Gandini Jr L G 2002 Mandibular skeletal growth and modelling between 10 and 15 years of age. European Journal of Orthodontics 24: 69-79
10. Buschang P H, Santos-Pinto A 1998 Condylar growth and glenoid fossa displacement during childhood and adolescence. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 113: 437-442
11. Buschang P H, Santos-Pinto A, Demirjian A 1999 Incremental growth charts for condylar growth between 6 and 16 years of age. European Journal of Orthodontics 21: 167-173
12. Croft R S, Buschang P H, English J D, Meyer R 1999 A cephalometric and tomographic evaluation of Herbst treatment in the mixed dentition. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 116: 435-443
13. Dahlberg G 1940 Statistical methods for medical and biological students. Interscience Publications, New York
14. Dibbets JMH 1990 Mandibular rotation and enlargement. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 98: 29-32
15. Enlow D H, Harris D B 1964 A study of the postnatal growth of the human mandible. American Journal of Orthodontics 50: 25-50
16. Ghafari J, Shofer F S, Jacobsson-Hunt U, Markowitz D L, Laster L L 1998 Headgear versus function regulator in the early treatment of Class II, division 1 malocclusion: a randomized clinical trial. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 113: 51-61
17. Hultgren B W, Isaacson R J, Erdman A G, Worms F W 1978 Mechanics, growth, and Class II corrections. American Journal of Orthodontics 74: 388-395
18. Illing H M, Morris D O, Lee R T 1998 A prospective evaluation of Bass, Bionator and Twin Block appliances. Part I - The hard tissues. European Journal of Orthodontics 20: 501-516
19. Jakobsson S-O, Paulin G 1990 The influence of activator treatment on skeletal growth in Angle Class II: 1 cases. A roentgenocephalometric study. European Journal of Orthodontics 12: 174-184
20. Keeling S D et al. 1998 Anteroposterior skeletal and dental changes after early Class II treatment with bionators and headgear. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 113: 40-50
21. Lavergne J, Gasson N 1976 A metal implant study of mandibular rotation. Angle Orthodontist 46: 144-150
22. Mathews J R, Ware W H 1978 Longitudinal mandibular growth in children with tantalum implants. American Journal of Orthodontics 74: 633-655
23. McNamara J A Jr 1984 Dentofacial adaptations in adult patients following functional regulator therapy. American Journal of Orthodontics 85: 57-71
24. McNamara J A Jr, Bryan F A 1987 Long-term mandibular adaptations to protrusive function: an experimental study in Macaca mulatta. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 92: 98-108
25. McNamara J A Jr, Howe R P, Dischinger T G 1990 A comparison of the Herbst and Fränkel appliances in the treatment of Class II malocclusion. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 98: 134-144
26. Mills J R E 1991 The effect of functional appliances on the skeletal pattern. British Journal of Orthodontics 18: 267-275
27. Mojdehi M, Buschang P H, English J D, Wolford L M 2001 Postsurgical growth changes in the mandible of adolescents with vertical maxillary excess growth pattern. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 119: 106-116
28. Nelson C, Harkness M, Herbison P 1993 Mandibular changes during functional appliance treatment. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 104: 153-161
29. Nielsen I L 1984 Facial growth during treatment with the function regulator appliance. American Journal of Orthodontics 85: 401-410
30. Ødegaard J 1970a Growth of the mandible studied with the aid of metal implant. American Journal of Orthodontics 57: 145-157
31. Ødegaard J 1970b Mandibular rotation studies with the aid of metal implants. American Journal of Orthodontics 58: 448-454
32. Op Heij D G, Callaert H, Opdebeeck H M 1989 The effect of the amount of protrusion built into the bionator on condylar growth and displacement: a clinical study. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 95: 401-409
33. Pancherz H, Hägg U 1985 Dentofacial orthopedics in relation to somatic maturation. An analysis of 70 consecutive cases treated with the Herbst appliance. American Journal of Orthodontics 88: 273-287
34. Pancherz H, Ruf S, Kohlhas P 1998 'Effective condylar growth' and chin position changes in Herbst treatment: a cephalometric roentgenographic long-term study. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 114: 437-446
35. Paulsen H U 1997 Morphological changes of the TMJ condyles of 100 patients treated with the Herbst appliance in the period of puberty to adulthood: a long-term radiographic study. European Journal of Orthodontics 19: 657-668
36. Petrovic A G, Stuzman J, Oudet C 1975 Control processes in the postnatal growth of the condylar cartilage of the mandible. In: McNamara J A (ed.) Determinants of mandibular form and growth. Monograph No. 4, Center for Human Growth and Development, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
37. Righellis E G 1983 Treatment effects of Fränkel, activator and extraoral traction appliances. Angle Orthodontist 53: 107-121
38. Ruf S, Pancherz H 1998a Long-term TMJ effects of Herbst treatment: a clinical and MRI study. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 114: 475-483
39. Ruf S, Pancherz H 1998b Temporomandibular joint growth adaptation in Herbst treatment: a prospective magnetic resonance imaging and cephalometric roentgenographic study. European Journal of Orthodontics 20: 375-388
40. Ruf S, Baltromejus S, Pancherz H 2001 Effective condylar growth and chin position changes in activator treatment: a cephalometric roentgenographic study. Angle Orthodontist 71: 4-11
41. Sarnat B G 1986 The growth pattern of the mandible: some reflections. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 90: 221-233
42. Solow B, Houston WJB 1988 Mandibular rotations: concepts and terminology. European Journal of Orthodontics 10: 177-179
43. Spady M, Buschang P H, Demirjian A, LaPalme, L 1992 Mandibular rotation and angular remodelling during childhood and adolescence. American Journal of Human Biology 4: 683-689
44. Toth L R, McNamara J A Jr 1999 Treatment effects produced by the twin-block appliance and the FR-2 appliance of Fränkel compared with an untreated Class II sample. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 116: 597-609
45. Vargervik K, Harvold E P 1985 Response to activator treatment in Class II malocclusions. American Journal of Orthodontics 88: 242-251
46. Williams S, Melsen B 1982a Condylar development and mandibular rotation and displacement during activator treatment: an implant study. American Journal of Orthodontics 81: 322-326
47. Williams S, Melsen B 1982b The interplay between sagittal and vertical growth factors. An implant study of activator treatment. American Journal of Orthodontics 81: 327-332
48. Woodside D G, Altuna G, Harvold E, Herbert M, Metaxas A 1983 Primate experiments in malocclusion and bone induction. American Journal of Orthodontics 83: 460-468