The End of Framing as we Know it … and the Future of Media Effects

Mass Communication and Society

Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 7-23

  Cacciatore, Michael A ^a   Scheufele, Dietram A ^b   Iyengar, Shanto ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^c STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84952984188     PISSN: 15205436     EISSN: 15327825     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15205436.2015.1068811     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. J.R.Anderson, (1985). Cognitive psychology and its implications. New York, NY: Freeman.
2. J.N.Bailenson,, S.Iyengar,, N.Yee,, & N.A.Collins, (2008). Facial similarity between voters and candidates causes influence. Public Opinion Quarterly, 72, 935–961. doi:10.1093/poq/nfn064
3. W.L.Bennett,, & S.Iyengar, (2008). A new era of minimal effects? The changing foundations of political communication. Journal of Communication, 58, 707–731. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2008.00410.x
4. J.N.Capella,, & K.H.Jamieson, (1997). Spiral of cynicism: The press and the public good. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
5. A.M.Collins,, & E.F.Loftus, (1975). A spreading-activation theory of semantic processing. Psychological Review, 82, 407–428. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.82.6.407
6. A.M.Collins,, & M.R.Quillian, (1969). Retrieval time from semantic memory. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Memory, 8, 240–247.
7. A.Downs, (1972). Up and down with ecology: The issue attention cycle. Public Interest, 28, 38–50.
8. J.N.Druckman, (2001). The implications of framing effects for citizen competence. Political Behavior, 23, 225–256.
9. R.M.Entman, (1991). Framing United-States coverage of international news - contrasts in narratives of the KAL and Iran air incidents. Journal of Communication, 41(4), 6–27.
10. R.M.Entman, (1993). Framing: Towards clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication, 43(4), 51–58. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
11. M.M.Ferree,, W.A.Gamson,, J.Gerhards,, & D.Rucht, (2002). Shaping abortion discourse: Democracy and the public sphere in Germany and the United States. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
12. S.T.Fiske,, & S.E.Taylor, (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
13. W.A.Gamson, (1985). Goffman's legacy to political sociology. Theory and Society, 14, 605–622. doi:10.1007/bf00160018
14. W.A.Gamson, (1992). Talking politics. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
15. W.A.Gamson,, & A.Modigliani, (1987). The changing culture of affirmative action. In R.G.Braungart & M.M.Braungart (Eds.), Research in political sociology (pp. 137–177). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
16. W.A.Gamson,, & A.Modigliani, (1989). Media discourse and public opinion on nuclear power: A constructionist approach. American Journal of Sociology, 95, 1–37. doi:10.1086/229213
17. G.Gerbner,, & L.Gross, (1974). System of cultural indicators. Public Opinion Quarterly, 38, 460–461.
18. G.Gerbner,, L.Gross,, M.Morgan,, & N.Signorielli, (2002). Growing up with television: The cultivation perspective. In M.Morgan (Ed.), Against the mainstream: The selected works of George Gerbner (pp. 193–213). New York: Peter Lang.
19. T.Gitlin, (1980). The whole world is watching: Mass media in the making & unmaking of the new left. Berkeley: University of California Press.
20. E.Goffman, (1974). Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
21. R.Hastie,, & B.Park, (1986). The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the task is memory-based or on-line. Psychological Review, 93, 258–268. doi:10.1037//0033-295x.93.3.258
22. S.Issenberg, (2012). A more perfect union: How President Obama's campaign used big data to rally individual voters. MIT Technology Review. Retrieved from http://www.technologyreview.com/featuredstory/509026/how-obamas-team-used-big-data-to-rally-voters/
23. S.Iyengar, (1987). Television news and citizens’ explanations of national affairs. American Political Science Review, 81, 815–831. doi:10.2307/1962678
24. S.Iyengar, (2005). Speaking of value: the framing of American politics. The Forum, 3(3), 1–8. http://pcl.stanford.edu/common/docs/research/iyengar/2005/speaking.pdf
25. S.Iyengar,, & D.R.Kinder, (1987). News that matters: Television and American opinion. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
26. D.Kahneman, (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58, 697–720. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.58.9.697
27. D.Kahneman, (2011). Thinking, fast and slow. New York, NY: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
28. D.Kahneman,, & A.Tversky, (1979). Prospect theory: Analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291. doi:10.2307/1914185
29. D.Kahneman,, & A.Tversky, (1984). Choices, values, and frames. American Psychologist, 39, 341–350. doi:10.1037//0003-066x.39.4.341
30. E.Katz,, & P.F.Lazarsfeld, (1955). Personal influence. New York, NY: The Free Press.
31. S.-H.Kim,, D.A.Scheufele,, & J.Shanahan, (2002). Think about it this way: Attribute agenda-setting function of the press and the public's evaluation of a local issue. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 79, 7–25. doi:10.1177/107769900207900102
32. T.Kuhn, (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
33. Z.Kunda, (1990). The case for motivated reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 108, 480–498. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480
34. P.Ladwig,, A.A.Anderson,, D.Brossard,, D.A.Scheufele,, & B.R.Shaw, (2010). Narrowing the nano discourse? Materials Today, 13(5), 52–54.
35. P.F.Lazarsfeld,, B.R.Berelson,, & H.Gaudet, (1948). The people's choice: How the voter makes up his mind in a presidential campaign (2nd ed.). New York: Duell, Sloan & Pearce.
36. R.Maddow, (2010). Theodore H. White lecture on press and politics [transcript]. Joan Shorenstein Center on the Press, Politics and Public Policy, Harvard University. Retrieved from http://www.hks.harvard.edu/presspol/prizes_lectures/th_white_lecture/transcripts/th_white_2010_maddow.pdf
37. H.Markus,, & R.B.Zajonc, (1985). The cognitive perspective in social psychology. In G.Lindzey & E.Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology: Vol. 2 special fields and applications (pp. 137–230). New York, NY: Random House.
38. M.E.McCombs, (2004). Setting the agenda: Mass media and public opinion. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
39. M.E.McCombs,, & S.L.Ghanem, (2001). The convergence of agenda setting and framing. In S.D.Reese O.H.Gandy, Jr. & A.E.Grant (Eds.), Framing public life: Perspectives on media and our understanding of the social world (pp. 67–82). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
40. M.E.McCombs,, & D.L.Shaw, (1972). The agenda-setting function of mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly, 36, 176–187.
41. D.McQuail, (2005). Mass communication theory (5th ed.). London, UK: Sage.
42. S.Messing,, & S.J.Westwood, (2012). Selective exposure in the age of social media: Endorsements trump partisan source affiliation when selecting news online. Communication Research, 41, 1042–1063. doi:10.1177/0093650212466406
43. M.Minsky, (1975). A framework for representing knowledge. In P.H.Winston (Ed.), The psychology of computer vision (pp. 211–277). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
44. E.Noelle-Neumann, (1973). Return to the concept of powerful mass media. Studies in Broadcasting, 9, 67–112.
45. E.Noelle-Neumann, (1974). The spiral of silence: A theory of public opinion. Journal of Communication, 24(2), 43–51.
46. E.Noelle-Neumann, (1984). The spiral of silence: Public opinion, our social skin. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
47. E.Pariser, (2011). The filter bubble: What the Internet is hiding from you. New York, NY: Penguin Press.
48. V.Price,, & D.Tewksbury, (1997). News values and public opinion: A theoretical account of media priming and framing. In G.A.Barrett & F.J.Boster (Eds.), Progress in communication sciences: Advances in persuasion (pp. 173–212). Greenwich, CT: Ablex.
49. V.Price,, D.Tewksbury,, & E.Powers, (1997). Switching trains of thought: The impact of news frames on readers’ cognitive responses. Communication Research, 24, 481–506. doi:10.1177/009365097024005002
50. R.Ratcliff,, & G.McKoon, (1988). A Retrieval theory of priming in memory. Psychological Review, 95, 385–408. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.95.3.385
51. D.E.Rumelhart, (1984). Schemata and the cognitive system. In J.R.S.Wyer & T.K.Srull (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (Vol. 1, pp. 161–188). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
52. R.C.Schank,, & R.P.Abelson, (1977). Scripts, plans, goals and understanding: An inquiry into human knowledge structures. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
53. D.A.Scheufele, (1999). Framing as a theory of media effects. Journal of Communication, 49, 103–122. doi:10.1093/joc/49.1.103
54. D.A.Scheufele, (2000). Agenda-setting, priming, and framing revisited: Another look at cognitive effects of political communication. Mass Communication & Society, 3, 297–316. doi:10.1207/s15327825mcs0323_07
55. D.A.Scheufele,, & S.Iyengar, (in press). The state of framing research: A call for new directions. In K.Kenski & K.H.Jamieson (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of political communication theories. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
56. D.A.Scheufele,, & M.C.Nisbet, (2012). Online news and the demise of political debate. In C.T.Salmon (Ed.), Communication yearbook (Vol. 36, pp. 45–53). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
57. D.A.Scheufele,, & D.Tewksbury, (2007). Framing, agenda setting, and priming: The evolution of three media effects models. Journal of Communication, 57(1), 9–20. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00326.x
58. C.Sunstein, (2007). Republic.com 2.0. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
59. E.Sweetser,, & G.Fauconnier, (1996). Cognitive links and domains: Basic aspects of mental space theory. In G.Fauconnier & E.Sweetser (Eds.), Spaces, worlds, and grammar (pp. 1–28). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
60. A.Tversky,, & D.Kahneman, (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 185, 1124–1131.
61. R.H.Wicks, (1992). Schema theory and measurement in mass communication research: Theoretical and methodological issues in news information processing. In S.A.Deetz (Ed.), Communication yearbook (Vol. 15, pp. 115–145). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
62. S.K.Yeo,, M.A.Xenos,, D.Brossard,, & D.A.Scheufele, (2015). Selecting our own science: How communication contexts and individual traits shape information seeking. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 658, 172–191. doi:10.1177/0002716214557782