The development and preliminary validation of a rubric to assess medical students' written summary statements in virtual patient cases

Academic Medicine

Volumn 91, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 94-100

  Smith, Sherilyn ^a   Kogan, Jennifer R ^b   Berman, Norman B ^c,d   Dell, Michael S ^e   Brock, Douglas M ^a   Robins, Lynne S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^c DARTMOUTH MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^d MedU ^*  (United States)

^e CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDUCATION; FACTUAL DATABASE; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL STUDENT; PROBLEM BASED LEARNING; PROCEDURES; REPRODUCIBILITY; VALIDATION STUDY; WRITING;

DATABASES, FACTUAL; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, UNDERGRADUATE; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; HUMANS; PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; STUDENTS, MEDICAL; WRITING;

EID: 84952911895     PISSN: 10402446     EISSN: 1938808X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000800     Document Type: Review

References (33)

1. Durning SJ, Artino AR Jr, Schuwirth L, van der Vleuten C, Clarifying assumptions to enhance our understanding and assessment of clinical reasoning. Acad Med 2013 88 442 448
2. Bordage G, Brailovsky C, Carretier H, Page G, Content validation of key features on a national examination of clinical decision-making skills. Acad Med 1995 70 276 281
3. Charlin B, van der Vleuten C, Standardized assessment of reasoning in contexts of uncertainty: The script concordance approach. Eval Health Prof 2004 27 304 319
4. Lubarsky S, Dory V, Duggan P, Gagnon R, Charlin B, Script concordance testing: From theory to practice: AMEE guide no. 75. Med Teach 2013 35 184 193
5. Beullens J, Struyf E, Van Damme B, Do extended matching multiple-choice questions measure clinical reasoning? Med Educ 2005 39 410 417
6. Kogan JR, Shea JA, Psychometric characteristics of a write-up assessment form in a medicine core clerkship. Teach Learn Med 2005 17 101 106
7. Lewin LO, Beraho L, Dolan S, Millstein L, Bowman D, Interrater reliability of an oral case presentation rating tool in a pediatric clerkship. Teach Learn Med 2013 25 31 38
8. Bowen JL, Educational strategies to promote clinical diagnostic reasoning. N Engl J Med 2006 355 2217 2225
9. Alliance for Academic Internal Medicine. CDIM/SGIM core medicine clerkship curriculum guide: A resource for teachers and learners. Version 3.0. http://internalmedicine.med.sc.edu/students/docs/CDIMCurriculum.pdf. Published 2006. Revised 2014. Accessed May 7, 2015
10. Davenport C, Honigman B, Druck J, The 3-minute emergency medicine medical student presentation: A variation on a theme. Acad Emerg Med 2008 15 683 687
11. Bordage G, Connell KJ, Chang RW, Gecht MR, Sinacore JM, Assessing the semantic content of clinical case presentations: Studies of reliability and concurrent validity. Acad Med 1997 72 10 suppl 1 S37 S39
12. Schmidt HG, Rikers RM, How expertise develops in medicine: Knowledge encapsulation and illness script formation. Med Educ 2007 41 1133 1139
13. Ericsson KA, Deliberate practice and the acquisition and maintenance of expert performance in medicine and related domains. Acad Med 2004 79 10 suppl S70 S81
14. Kane M, Crooks T, Cohen A, Validating measures of performance. Educ Meas Issues Pract 1999 18 5 17
15. Messick S, Standards of validity and the validity of standards in performance assessment. Educ Meas Issues Pract 1995 14 5 8
16. van der Vleuten CP, Schuwirth LW, Assessing professional competence: From methods to programmes. Med Educ 2005 39 309 317
17. Cook DA, Beckman TJ, Current concepts in validity and reliability for psychometric instruments: Theory and application. Am J Med 2006 119 166.e7 166.e16
18. Downing SM, Validity: On meaningful interpretation of assessment data. Med Educ 2003 37 830 837
19. Berman NB, Fall LH, Chessman AW, A collaborative model for developing and maintaining virtual patients for medical education. Med Teach 2011 33 319 324
20. Pangaro L, A new vocabulary and other innovations for improving descriptive in-Training evaluations. Acad Med 1999 74 1203 1207
21. Schmidt HG, Norman GR, Boshuizen HP, A cognitive perspective on medical expertise: Theory and implication. Acad Med 1990 65 611 621
22. Boshuizen HPA, Schmidt HG, On the role of biomedical knowledge in clinical reasoning by experts, intermediates, and novices. Cogn Sci 1992 16 153 184
23. Bordage G, Lemieux M, Semantic structures and diagnostic thinking of experts and novices. Acad Med 1991 66 9 suppl S70 S72
24. Schön DA, The Reflective Practitioner: How Professionals Think in Action 1983 New York, NY Basic Books
25. Hsieh HF, Shannon SE, Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 2005 15 1277 1288
26. Nendaz MR, Bordage G, Promoting diagnostic problem representation. Med Educ 2002 36 760 766
27. Durning SJ, Artino A, Boulet J, The feasibility, reliability, and validity of a post-encounter form for evaluating clinical reasoning. Med Teach 2012 34 30 37
28. Boehler ML, Rogers DA, Schwind CJ, An investigation of medical student reactions to feedback: A randomised controlled trial. Med Educ 2006 40 746 749
29. Holmboe ES, Sherbino J, Long DM, Swing SR, Frank JR, The role of assessment in competency-based medical education. Med Teach 2010 32 676 682
30. Cook DA, Dupras DM, Beckman TJ, Thomas KG, Pankratz VS, Effect of rater training on reliability and accuracy of mini-CEX scores: A randomized, controlled trial. J Gen Intern Med 2009 24 74 79
31. Murphy KR, Cleveland JN, Skattebo AL, Kinney TB, Raters who pursue different goals give different ratings. J Appl Psychol 2004 89 158 164
32. Murad MH, Coto-Yglesias F, Varkey P, Prokop LJ, Murad AL, The effectiveness of self-directed learning in health professions education: A systematic review. Med Educ 2010 44 1057 1068
33. Messick S, Linn RL, Validity. Educational Measurement 1989 3rd ed. New York, NY American Council on Education