Stomatal uptake of O3 in a Schima superba plantation in subtropical China derived from sap flow measurements

Science of the Total Environment

Volumn 545-546, Issue , 2016, Pages 465-475

  Niu, Junfeng ^a   Zhao, Ping ^a   Sun, Zhenwei ^a   Zhu, Liwei ^a   Ni, Guangyan ^a   Zeng, Xiaoping ^a   Zhang, Zhenzhen ^a   Zhao, Xiuhua ^a   Zhao, Peiqiang ^a   Gao, Jianguo ^a   Hu, Yanting ^a   Zeng, Xiaomin ^a   Ouyang, Lei ^a  

^a SOUTH CHINA INSTITUTE OF BOTANY   (China)

Author keywords

Ozone uptake; Risk assessment; Sap flow; Schima superba; Stomatal conductance

Indexed keywords

FORESTRY; OZONE; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK PERCEPTION;

ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; NATURAL CONDITIONS; OZONE UPTAKE; PIONEER TREE SPECIES; SAP FLOW; SAP FLOW MEASUREMENTS; SCHIMA SUPERBA; STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE;

FLOW MEASUREMENT;

BIOLOGICAL UPTAKE; EVERGREEN TREE; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FLOW MEASUREMENT; OZONE; PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAP FLOW; STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE;

CHINA;

SCHIMA SUPERBA;

AIR POLLUTANT; OZONE;

AIR POLLUTANT; CHINA; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; METABOLISM; PLANT STOMA; THEACEAE;

AIR POLLUTANTS; CHINA; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; OZONE; PLANT STOMATA; THEACEAE;

EID: 84952836891     PISSN: 00489697     EISSN: 18791026     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.12.122     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. Bell D.M., Ward E.J., Oishi A.C., Oren R., Flikkema P.G., Clark J.S. A state-space modeling approach to estimating canopy conductance and associated uncertainties from sap flux density data. Tree Physiol. 2015, 35:792-802.
2. 3SE modelling of soil moisture to determine ozone flux to forest trees. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2012, 12:5537-5562.
3. Campbell G.S., Norman J.M. An Introduction to Environmental Biophysics 1998, Springer-Verlag, New York.
4. Clearwater M.J., Meinzer F.C., Andrade J.L., Goldstein G., Holbrook N.M. Potential errors in measurement of nonuniform sap flow using heat dissipation probes. Tree Physiol. 1999, 19:681-687.
5. Dizengremel P., Le Thiec D., Bagard M., Jolivet Y. Ozone risk assessment for plants: central role of metabolism-dependent changes in reducing power. Environ. Pollut. 2008, 156:11-15.
6. Emberson L.D., Ashmore M.R., Cambridge H.M., Simpson D., Tuovinen J.P. Modelling stomatal ozone flux across Europe. Environ. Pollut. 2000, 109:403-413.
7. Ewers B.E., Oren R. Analyses of assumptions and errors in the calculation of stomatal conductance from sap flux measurements. Tree Physiol. 2000, 20:579-589.
8. Fares S., Goldstein A., Loreto F. Determinants of ozone fluxes and metrics for ozone risk assessment in plants. J. Exp. Bot. 2010, 61:629-633.
9. Fares S., McKay M., Holzinger R., Goldstein A.H. Ozone fluxes in a Pinus ponderosa ecosystem are dominated by non-stomatal processes: evidence from long-term continuous measurements. Agr. Forest. Meteorol. 2010, 150:420-431.
10. Fares S., Matteucci G., Mugnozza G.S., Morani A., Calfapietra C., Salvatori E., et al. Testing of models of stomatal ozone fluxes with field measurements in a mixed Mediterranean forest. Atmos. Environ. 2013, 67:242-251.
11. Fares S., Vargas R., Detto M., Goldstein A.H., Karlik J., Paoletti E., et al. Tropospheric ozone reduces carbon assimilation in trees: estimates from analysis of continuous flux measurements. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2013, 19:2427-2443.
12. Fares S., Savi F., Muller J., Matteucci G., Paoletti E. Simultaneous measurements of above and below canopy ozone fluxes help partitioning ozone deposition between its various sinks in a Mediterranean Oak Forest. Agr. Forest. Meteorol. 2014, 198:181-191.
13. Feng Z., Tang H., Uddling J., Pleijel H., Kobayashi K., Zhu J., et al. A stomatal ozone flux-response relationship to assess ozone-induced yield loss of winter wheat in subtropical China. Environ. Pollut. 2012, 164:16-23.
14. Fowler D., Amann M., Anderson R., Ashmore M., Cox P., Depledge M., et al. Ground-level Ozone in the 21st Century: Future Trends, Impacts and Policy Implications 2008, The Royal Society, London.
15. Granier A. Evaluation of transpiration in a Douglas-fir stand by means of sap flow measurements. Tree Physiol. 1987, 3:309-319.
16. Grantz D.A. Diel trend in plant sensitivity to ozone: implications for exposure- and flux-based ozone metrics. Atmos. Environ. 2014, 98:571-580.
17. 3 uptake and drought stress effects on carbon acquisition of ponderosa pine in natural stands. New Phytol. 2002, 154:621-631.
18. Heath R.L., Lefohn A.S., Musselman R.C. Temporal processes that contribute to nonlinearity in vegetation responses to ozone exposure and dose. Atmos. Environ. 2009, 43:2919-2928.
19. Itahashi S., Uno I., Kim S. Seasonal source contributions of tropospheric ozone over East Asia based on CMAQ-HDDM. Atmos. Environ. 2013, 70:204-217.
20. Karlsson P.E., Braun S., Broadmeadow M., Elvira S., Emberson L., Gimeno B.S., et al. Risk assessments for forest trees: the performance of the ozone flux versus the AOT concepts. Environ. Pollut. 2007, 146:608-616.
21. Kinose Y., Azuchi F., Uehara Y., Kanomata T., Kobayashi A., Yamaguchi M., et al. Modeling of stomatal conductance to estimate stomatal ozone uptake by Fagus crenata, Quercus serrata, Quercus mongolica var. crispula and Betula platyphylla. Environ. Pollut. 2014, 194:235-245.
22. Kitao M., Komatsu M., Hoshika Y., Yazaki K., Yoshimura K., Fujii S., et al. Seasonal ozone uptake by a warm-temperate mixed deciduous and evergreen broadleaf forest in western Japan estimated by the Penman-Monteith approach combined with a photosynthesis-dependent stomatal model. Environ. Pollut. 2014, 184:457-463.
23. Laisk A., Kull O., Moldau H. Ozone concentration in leaf intercellular air spaces is close to zero. Plant Physiol. 1989, 90:1163-1167.
24. Lee J.-B., Cha J.-S., Hong S.-C., Choi J.-Y., Myoung J.-S., Park R.J., et al. Projections of summertime ozone concentration over East Asia under multiple IPCC SRES emission scenarios. Atmos. Environ. 2015, 106:335-346.
25. Logan J.A., Staehelin J., Megretskaia I.A., Cammas J.P., Thouret V., Claude H., et al. Changes in ozone over Europe: analysis of ozone measurements from sondes, regular aircraft (MOZAIC) and alpine surface sites. J. Geophys. Res.-Atmos. 2012, 117:23.
26. Massman W.J. Toward an ozone standard to protect vegetation based on effective dose: a review of deposition resistances and a possible metric. Atmos. Environ. 2004, 38:2323-2337.
27. Matyssek R., Wieser G., Nunn A.J., Kozovits A.R., Reiter I.M., Heerdt C., et al. Comparison between AOT40 and ozone uptake in forest trees of different species, age and site conditions. Atmos. Environ. 2004, 38:2271-2281.
28. Matyssek R., Sandermann H., Wieser G., Booker F., Cieslik S., Musselman R., et al. The challenge of making ozone risk assessment for forest trees more mechanistic. Environ. Pollut. 2008, 156:567-582.
29. Matyssek R., Wieser G., Ceulemans R., Rennenberg H., Pretzsch H., Haberer K., et al. Enhanced ozone strongly reduces carbon sink strength of adult beech (Fagus sylvatica)-resume from the free-air fumigation study at Kranzberg Forest. Environ. Pollut. 2010, 158:2527-2532.
30. 3 exposure?. Environ. Pollut. 2015, 196:518-526.
31. McLaughlin S.B., Shortle W.C., Smith K.T. Dendroecological applications in air pollution and environmental chemistry: research needs. Dendrochronologia 2002, 20:133-157.
32. McLaughlin S.B., Wullschleger S.D., Nosal M. Diurnal and seasonal changes in stem increment and water use by yellow poplar trees in response to environmental stress. Tree Physiol. 2003, 23:1125-1136.
33. McLaughlin S.B., Nosal M., Wullschleger S.D., Sun G. Interactive effects of ozone and climate on tree growth and water use in a southern Appalachian forest in the USA. New Phytol. 2007, 174:109-124.
34. Mei T.T., Zhao P., Wang Q., Cai X.A., Yu M.H., Zhu L.W., et al. Effects of tree diameter at breast height and soil moisture on transpiration of Schima superba based on sap flow pattern and normalization. The Journal of Applied Ecology 2010, 21:2457-2464.
35. Meinzer F.C., Goldstein G., Andrade J.L. Regulation of water flux through tropical forest canopy trees: do universal rules apply?. Tree Physiol. 2001, 21:19-26.
36. Mills G., Pleijel H., Büker P., Braun S., Emberson L.D., Harmens H., Hayes F., Simpson D., Grünhage L., Karlsson P.E., Danielsson H., Bermejo V., Gonzalez Fernandez I. Vegetation. Revision undertaken in Summer 2010 to include new flux-based critical levels and response functions for ozone. Mapping Manual 2004. International Cooperative Programme on Effects of Air Pollution on Natural Vegetation and Crops 2010.
37. Mills G., Pleijel H., Braun S., Bueker P., Bermejo V., Calvo E., et al. New stomatal flux-based critical levels for ozone effects on vegetation. Atmos. Environ. 2011, 45:5064-5068.
38. Montheith J.M.L., Unsworth M.H. Principles of Environmental Physics 1990, Edward Arnold, London.
39. Musselman R.C., Lefohn A.S., Massman W.J., Heath R.L. A critical review and analysis of the use of exposure- and flux-based ozone indices for predicting vegetation effects. Atmos. Environ. 2006, 40:1869-1888.
40. Nunn A.J., Wieser G., Metzger U., Loew M., Wipfler P., Haeberle K.-H., et al. Exemplifying whole-plant ozone uptake in adult forest trees of contrasting species and site condition. Environ. Pollut. 2008, 151:678-679.
41. 3 fluxes in a forest stand. Environ. Pollut. 2010, 158:2014-2022.
42. Oishi A.C., Oren R., Stoy P.C. Estimating components of forest evapotranspiration: a footprint approach for scaling sap flux measurements. Agr. Forest. Meteorol. 2008, 148:1719-1732.
43. Oren R., Sperry J.S., Katul G.G., Pataki D.E., Ewers B.E., Phillips N., et al. Survey and synthesis of intra- and interspecific variation in stomatal sensitivity to vapour pressure deficit. Plant Cell Environ. 1999, 22:1515-1526.
44. Paoletti E., Manning W.J. Toward a biologically significant and usable standard for ozone that will also protect plants. Environ. Pollut. 2007, 150:85-95.
45. Phillips N., Oren R. A comparison of daily representations of canopy conductance based on two conditional time-averaging methods and the dependence of daily conductance on environmental factors. Annales Des Sciences Forestieres 1998, 55:217-235.
46. Seok B., Helmig D., Ganzeveld L., Williams M.W., Vogel C.S. Dynamics of nitrogen oxides and ozone above and within a mixed hardwood forest in northern Michigan. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 2013, 13:7301-7320.
47. Sitch S., Cox P.M., Collins W.J., Huntingford C. Indirect radiative forcing of climate change through ozone effects on the land-carbon sink. Nature 2007, 448:791-794.
48. Tang H., Takigawa M., Liu G., Zhu J., Kobayashi K. A projection of ozone-induced wheat production loss in China and India for the years 2000 and 2020 with exposure-based and flux-based approaches. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2013, 19:2739-2752.
49. Tang H., Pang J., Zhang G., Takigawa M., Liu G., Zhu J., et al. Mapping ozone risks for rice in China for years 2000 and 2020 with flux-based and exposure-based doses. Atmos. Environ. 2014, 86:74-83.
50. Tausz M., Grulke N.E., Wieser G. Defense and avoidance of ozone under global change. Environ. Pollut. 2007, 147:525-531.
51. Tuzet A., Perrier A., Loubet B., Cellier P. Modelling ozone deposition fluxes: the relative roles of deposition and detoxification processes. Agr. Forest. Meteorol. 2011, 151:480-492.
52. Uddling J., Hogg A.J., Teclaw R.M., Carroll M.A., Ellsworth D.S. Stomatal uptake of O-3 in aspen and aspen-birch forests under free-air CO2 and O-3 enrichment. Environ. Pollut. 2010, 158:2023-2031.
53. UNECE Manual on Methodologies and Criteria for Modeling and Mapping Critical Loads & Levels and Air Pollution Effects, Risk and Trends 2004.
54. US EPA National ambient air quality standards for ozone: final rule. Fed. Regist. 1997, 62:38855-38896.
55. US EPA. Integrated Science Assessment of Ozone and Related Photochemical Oxidants (Final Report). In: Agency, U.S.E.P. (Ed.), 2013.
56. van Goethem T.M.W.J., Azevedo L.B., van Zelm R., Hayes F., Ashmore M.R., Huijbregts M.A.J. Plant species sensitivity distributions for ozone exposure. Environ. Pollut. 2013, 178:1-6.
57. Wang H., Zhou W., Wang X., Gao F., Zheng H., Tong L., et al. Ozone uptake by adult urban trees based on sap flow measurement. Environ. Pollut. 2012, 162:275-286.
58. Wieser G., Matyssek R., Kostner B., Oberhuber W. Quantifying ozone uptake at the canopy level of spruce, pine and larch trees at the alpine timberline: an approach based on sap flow measurement. Environ. Pollut. 2003, 126:5-8.
59. Wieser G., Luis V.C., Cuevas E. Quantification of ozone uptake at the stand level in a Pinus canariensis forest in Tenerife, Canary Islands: an approach based on sap flow measurements. Environ. Pollut. 2006, 140:383-386.
60. Wittig V.E., Ainsworth E.A., Naidu S.L., Karnosky D.F., Long S.P. Quantifying the impact of current and future tropospheric ozone on tree biomass, growth, physiology and biochemistry: a quantitative meta-analysis. Glob. Chang. Biol. 2009, 15:396-424.
61. Zhao X.-W., Zhao P., Zhu L.-W., Ni G.-Y., Zeng X.-P., Niu J.-F. Seasonal dynamics of night-time stem water recharge of Schima superba and its relation to tree architecture and leaf biomass. Chinese Journal of Plant Ecology 2013, 37:239-247.
62. Zhou C.-m., Zhao P., G-y N., Wang Q., X-p Z., Zhu L.-w., et al. Water recharge through nighttime stem sap flow of Schima superba in Guangzhou region of Guangdong Province, South China: affecting factors and contribution to transpiration. The Journal of Applied Ecology 2012, 23:1751-1757.
63. 2 efflux from stems of Schima superba trees. Trees-Structure and Function 2012, 26:535-542.