Tropospheric ozone reduces carbon assimilation in trees: Estimates from analysis of continuous flux measurements

Global Change Biology

Volumn 19, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 2427-2443

  Fares, Silvano ^a   Vargas, Rodrigo ^b   Detto, Matteo ^c   Goldstein, Allen H ^d   Karlik, John ^e   Paoletti, Elena ^f   Vitale, Marcello ^g  

^a ISTITUTO NAZIONALE DELLA NUTRIZIONE   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE   (United States)

^c SMITHSONIAN TROPICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Panama)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA COOPERATIVE EXTENSION   (United States)

^f CNR   (Italy)

^g SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

Author keywords

Citrus; Gross primary productivity; Mediterranean forest; Ozone concentration; Ozone damage; Pinus ponderosa; Stomatal deposition

Indexed keywords

CARBON; OZONE;

CARBON; CONCENTRATION (COMPOSITION); CONIFEROUS TREE; EVERGREEN TREE; FLUX MEASUREMENT; GRANGER CAUSALITY TEST; MEDITERRANEAN ENVIRONMENT; OZONE; PHYSIOLOGICAL RESPONSE; STOMATAL CONDUCTANCE; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS; TROPOSPHERE;

AIR POLLUTANT; ARTICLE; ATMOSPHERE; CITRUS; DRUG EFFECT; ECOSYSTEM; GROSS PRIMARY PRODUCTIVITY; ITALY; MEDITERRANEAN FOREST; METABOLISM; OZONE CONCENTRATION; OZONE DAMAGE; PLANT LEAF; PLANT STOMA; PONDEROSA PINE; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SEASON; STOMATAL DEPOSITION; TREE; UNITED STATES; WAVELET ANALYSIS;

CITRUS; GROSS PRIMARY PRODUCTIVITY; MEDITERRANEAN FOREST; OZONE CONCENTRATION; OZONE DAMAGE; PINUS PONDEROSA; STOMATAL DEPOSITION;

AIR POLLUTANTS; ATMOSPHERE; CALIFORNIA; CARBON; ECOSYSTEM; ITALY; OZONE; PLANT LEAVES; PLANT STOMATA; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SEASONS; TREES; WAVELET ANALYSIS;

CALIFORNIA; CENTRAL VALLEY [CALIFORNIA]; UNITED STATES;

CITRUS; CITRUS SINENSIS; PINUS PONDEROSA; QUERCUS;

EID: 84880131439     PISSN: 13541013     EISSN: 13652486     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/gcb.12222     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Arbaugh MJ, Miller PR, Caroll JJ, Takemoto B, Proctor T (1998) Relationships of ozone exposure to pine injury in the Sierra Nevada and San Bernardino mountains of California, USA. Environmental Pollution, 101, 291-301.
2. Blanken PD, Black TA, Yang PC et al. (1997) Energy balance and canopy conductance of a boreal aspen forest: partitioning overstory and understory components. Journal of Geophysical Research, 102, 915-927.
3. Breiman L (2001) Random forests. Machine Learning, 45, 5-32.
4. Breiman L, Friedman JH, Olshen RA, Stone CJ (1984) Classification and Regression Trees. Wadsworth & Brooks/Cole Advanced Books & Software, Monterey, CA.
5. 3 uptake to gene expression adjustment. Environmental Pollution, 157, 1461-1469.
6. Chameides WL, Lindsay RW, Richardson J, Kiang CS (1988) The role of biogenic hydrocarbons in urban photochemical smog: Atlanta as a case study. Science, 241, 1473-1475.
7. Cooper OR, Parrish DD, Stohl A et al. (2010) Increasing springtime ozone mixing ratios in the free troposphere over western North America. Nature, 463, 344-348.
8. De Marco A, Screpanti A, Paoletti E (2010) Geostatistics as a validation tool for setting ozone standards for durum wheat. Environmental Pollution, 158, 536-542.
9. Detto M, Baldocchi D, Katul G (2010) Scaling properties of biologically active scalar concentration fluctuations in the surface layer over a managed peatland. Boundary Layer Meteorology, 136, 407-430.
10. Detto M, Molini A, Katul G, Stoy P, Palmroth S, Baldocchi D (2012) Causality and persistence in ecological systems: a nonparametric spectral Granger causality approach. American Naturalist, 179, 524-535.
11. Emberson LD, Wieser G, Ashmore MR (2000) Modelling of stomatal conductance and ozone flux of Norway spruce: comparison with field data. Environmental Pollution, 109, 393-402.
12. EPA (2007) Review of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards for Ozone: Policy Assessment of Scientific and Technical Information. OAQPS Staff Paper. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, Durham NC. Publication No. EPA-452/R-07-003.
13. Fares S, Mereu S, Scarascia Mugnozza G et al. (2009) The ACCENT-VOCBAS field campaign on biosphere-atmosphere interactions in a Mediterranean ecosystem of Castelporziano (Rome): site characteristics, climatic and meteorological conditions, and eco-physiology of vegetation. Biogeosciences, 6, 1043-1058.
14. Fares S, McKay M, Holzinger R, Goldstein AH (2010a) Ozone fluxes in a Pinus ponderosa ecosystem are dominated by non-stomatal processes: evidence from long-term continuous measurements. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 150, 420-431.
15. Fares S, Goldstein A, Loreto F (2010b) Determinants of ozone fluxes and metrics for ozone risk assessment in plants. Journal of Experimental Botany, 61, 629-633.
16. Fares S, Weber R, Park J-H, Gentner D, Karlik J, Goldstein AH (2012) Ozone deposition to an orange orchard: partitioning between stomatal and non-stomatal sinks. Environmental Pollution, 169, 258-266.
17. Fares S, Matteucci G, Scarascia Mugnozza G et al. (2013) Testing of models of stomatal ozone fluxes with field measurements in a mixed Mediterranean forest. Atmospheric Environment, 67, 242-251.
18. Fowler D, Pilegaard K, Sutton M et al. (2009) Atmospheric composition change: ecosystems-atmosphere interactions. Atmospheric Environment, 43, 5193-5267.
19. Geider RJ, Delucia EH, Falkowski PG et al. (2001) Primary productivity of planet Earth: biological determinants and physical constraints in terrestrial and aquatic habitats. Global Change Biology, 7, 849-882.
20. Goldstein AH, Hultman NE, Fracheboud JM et al. (2000) Effects of climate variability on the carbon dioxide, water, and sensible heat fluxes above a ponderosa pine plantation in the Sierra Nevada (CA). Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 101, 113-129.
21. Grace J (2004) Understanding and managing the global carbon cycle. Journal of Ecology, 92, 189-202.
22. Granger CWJ (1969) Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica, 37, 424-438.
23. Grinsted A, Moore JC, Jevrejeva S (2004) Application of the cross wavelet transform and wavelet coherence to geophysical time series. Nonlinear Processes in Geophysics, 11, 561-566.
24. Hayes F, Mills G, Harmens H, Wyness K (2011) Within season and carry-over effects following exposure of grassland species mixtures to increasing background ozone. Environmental Pollution, 159, 2420-2426.
25. 2 fluxes and individual mycorrhizosphere components to photosynthesis. Biogeosciences, 9, 79-95.
26. Karlsson PE, Pleijel H, Pihl Karlsson G, Medin EL, Skärby L (2000) Simulations of stomatal conductance and ozone uptake to Norway spruce saplings in open-top chambers. Environmental Pollution, 109, 443-451.
27. Katul G, Lai CT, Schafer K, Vidakovic B, Albertson J, Ellsworth D, Oren R (2001) Multiscale analysis of vegetation surface fluxes: from seconds to years. Advances in Water Resources, 24, 1119-1132.
28. Lasslop G, Reichstein M, Papale D et al. (2010) Separation of net ecosystem exchange into assimilation and respiration using a light response curve approach: critical issues and global evaluation. Global Change Biology, 16, 187-208.
29. Lombardozzi D, Levis S, Bonan G, Sparks JP (2012) Predicting photosynthesis and transpiration responses to ozone: decoupling modeled photosynthesis and stomatal conductance. Biogeosciences, 9, 3113-3313.
30. Manes F, Seufert G, Vitale M (1997) Ecophysiological studies of Mediterranean plant species at the Castelporziano estate. Atmospheric Environment, 31, 51-60.
31. Manes F, Vitale M, Donato E, Giannini M, Puppi G (2006) Different ability of three Mediterranean oak species to tolerate progressive dehydration stress. Photosynthetica, 44, 387-393.
32. Manes F, Vitale M, Fabi MA, De Santis F, Zona D (2007) Estimates of potential ozone stomatal uptake in mature trees of Quercus ilex in a Mediterranean climate. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 59, 235-241.
33. Manning WJ (2005) Establishing a cause and effect relationship for ambient ozone exposure and tree growth in the forest: progress and an experimental approach. Environmental Pollution, 137, 443-454.
34. 3 flux concept for European forest trees. Environmental Pollution, 146, 587-607.
35. McLaughlin SB, Nosal M, Wullschleger SD, Sun G (2007) Interactive effects of ozone and climate on tree growth and water use in a southern Appalachian forest in the USA. New Phytologist, 174, 109-124.
36. Mereu S, Salvatori E, Fusaro L, Gerosa G, Muys B, Manes F, Leuven KU (2009) An integrated approach shows different use of water resources from Mediterranean maquis species in a coastal dune ecosystem. Biogeosciences, 6, 2599-2610.
37. Mills G, Pleijel H, Braun S et al. (2011) New stomatal flux-based critical levels for ozone effects on vegetation. Atmospheric Environment, 45, 5064-5068.
38. Oksanen E, Saleem A (1999) Ozone exposure results in various carry-over effects and prolonged reduction in biomass in birch (Betula pendula Roth). Plant, Cell and Environment, 22, 1401-1411.
39. Olszyk DM, Takemoto BK, Kats G, Dawson PJ, Morrison CL, Wolf Preston J, Thompson CR (1992) Effects of open-top chambers on 'Valencia' orange trees. Journal of Environmental Quality, 21, 128-134.
40. Paoletti E (2006) Impact of ozone on Mediterranean forests: a review. Environmental Pollution, 144, 463-474.
41. 2 ameliorate tree response to ozone? A review on stomatal responses. Environmental Pollution, 137, 483-493.
42. Paoletti E, Grulke NE (2010) Ozone exposure and stomatal sluggishness in different plant physiognomic classes. Environmental Pollution, 158, 2664-2671.
43. Paoletti E, Manning WJ (2007) Toward a biologically significant and usable standard for ozone that will also protect plants. Environmental Pollution, 150, 85-95.
44. 3. Tree Physiology, 28, 243-254.
45. Samuelson L, Kelly JM (2001) Scaling ozone effects from seedlings to forest trees. Tansley Review 21. New Phytologist, 149, 21-41.
46. Torrence C, Compo GP (1998) A practical guide to wavelet analysis. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society, 79, 61-78.
47. UNECE (2011) Manual on Methodologies and Criteria for Modelling and Mapping Critical Loads & Levels and Air Pollution Effects, Risks and Trends. Convention on Long-range Transboundary Air Pollution. Available at: http://www.icpmapping.org (accessed November 2012).
48. 2 production as influenced by weather and vegetation. Global Change Biology, 16, 1589-1605.
49. 2 efflux: reconciling lags and observations. New Phytologist, 191, 1006-1017.
50. Vingarzan R (2004) A review of surface ozone background levels and trends. Atmospheric Environment, 38, 3431-3442.
51. Wittig VE, Ainsworth E, Long SP (2007) To what extent do current and projected increases in surface ozone affect photosynthesis and stomatal conductance of trees? A meta-analytic review of the last 3 decades of experiments. Plant, Cell and Environment, 30, 1150-1162.
52. Wittig VE, Ainsworth E, Naidu SL, Karnosky DF, Long SP (2009) Quantifying the impact of current and future tropospheric ozone on tree biomass, growth, physiology and biochemistry: a quantitative meta-analysis. Global Change Biology, 15, 396-424.
53. Wohlgemuth H, Mittelstrass K, Kschieschan S et al. (2002) Activation of an oxidative burst is a general feature of sensitive plants exposed to the air pollutant ozone. Plant, Cell and Environment, 25, 717-726.
54. Wolfe GM, Thornton JA, McKay M, Goldstein AH (2011) Forest-atmosphere exchange of ozone: sensitivity to very reactive biogenic VOC emissions and implications for in-canopy photochemistry. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics, 11, 7875-7891.
55. Yonekura T, Yoshidome M, Watanabe M, Honda Y, Ogiwara I, Izuta T (2004) Carry-over effects of ozone and water stress on leaf phenological characteristics and bud frost hardiness of Fagus crenata seedlings. Trees, 18, 581-588.
56. Zapletal M, Cudlín P, Chroust P et al. (2011) Ozone flux over a Norway spruce forest and correlation with net ecosystem production. Environmental Pollution, 159, 1024-1034.