Determinants of ozone fluxes and metrics for ozone risk assessment in plants

Journal of Experimental Botany

Volumn 61, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 629-633

  Fares, Silvano ^a,b   Goldstein, Allen ^b   Loreto, Francesco ^c  

^a CNR   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c INSTITUTE FOR SUSTAINABLE PLANT PROTECTION   (Italy)

Author keywords

Antioxidants; Ozone; Risk assessment; Volatile isoprenoids

Indexed keywords

OZONE;

ARTICLE; CIRCADIAN RHYTHM; DRUG EFFECT; ECOSYSTEM; METABOLISM; PLANT; RISK ASSESSMENT;

CIRCADIAN RHYTHM; ECOSYSTEM; OZONE; PLANTS; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 76549128140     PISSN: 00220957     EISSN: 14602431     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erp336     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Altimir N, Tuovinen JP, Vesala T, Kulmala M, Hari P. 2004. Measurements of ozone removal by Scots pine shoots: calibration of a stomatal uptake model including the non-stomatal component. Atmospheric Environment 38, 2387-2398.
2. Bouvier-Brown NC, Goldstein AH, Gilman JB, Kuster WC, de Gouw JA. 2009. In situ ambient quantification of monoterpenes, sesquiterpenes, and related oxygenated compounds during BEARPEX 2007: implications for gas and particle-phase chemistry. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics Discussion 9, 10235-10269.
3. Brasseur GP, Kiehl JT, Mü ller JF, Schneider T, Granier C, Tie XX, Hauglustaine D. 1998. Past and future changes in global tropospheric ozone: impact on radiative forcing. Geophysical Research Letters 25, 3807-3810.
4. Bussotti F, Cozzi A, Bettini D. 2003. Ozone like visibile foliar symptoms at the permanent monitoring plots of the CONECOFOR programme in Italy. Ozone and forest management in Italy. Second report of the Task Force on integrated and Combined (I&C) evaluation of the CONECOFOR programme. Annali Istituto Sperimentale per la Selvicoltura, Special Issue, Arezzo, 99-106.
5. Cheng L, Ma F. 2004. Diurnal operation of the xanthophyll cycle and the antioxidant system in apple peel. Journal of American Society of Horticultural Sciences 129, 313-320.
6. Cieslik SA. 2004. Ozone uptake by various surface types: a comparison between dose and exposure. New York: Pergamon-Elsevier Science Ltd., 2409-2420.
7. Dizengremel P, Le Thiec D, Bagard M, Jolivet Y. 2008. Ozone risk assessment for plants: central role of metabolism-dependent changes in reducing power. Environmental Pollution 156, 11-15.
8. Emberson LD, Ashmore MR, Cambridge HM, Simpson D, Tuovinen J. 2000. Modelling stomatal ozone flux across Europe. Environmental Pollution 109, 403-413.
9. Fares S, Loreto F, Kleist E, Wildt J. 2008. Stomatal uptake and stomatal deposition of ozone in isoprene and monoterpene emitting plants. Plant Biology 10, 44-54.
10. Fares S, Mereu S, Mugnozza GS, Vitale M, Manes F, Frattoni M, Ciccioli P, Gerosa G, Loreto F. 2009. The ACCENT-VOCBAS field campaign on biosphere-atmosphere interactions in a Mediterranean ecosystem of Castelporziano (Rome): site characteristics, climatic and meteorological conditions, and eco-physiology of vegetation. Biogeosciences 6, 1043-1058.
11. Gerosa G, Vitale M, Finco A, Manes F, Ballarin Denti A, Cieslik S. 2005. Ozone uptake by an evergreen Mediterranean forest (Quercus ilex). I. Micrometeorological flux measurements and flux partitioning. Atmospheric Environment 39, 3255-3266.
12. Guderian R, Tingey DT, Rabe R. 1985. Effects of photochemical oxidants on plants. In: Guderian R, ed. Air pollution by photochemical oxidants. Formation, transport, control and effects on plants. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 129-334.
13. Heath RL, Lefohn AS, Musselman RC. 2009. Temporal processes that contribute to nonlinearity in vegetation responses to ozone exposure and dose. Atmospheric Environment 43, 2919-2928.
14. Kangasjarvi J, Jaspers P, Kollist H. 2005. Signalling and cell death in ozone-exposed plants. Plant, Cell and Environment 28, 1021-1036
15. Kä renlampi L, Skä rby L, eds. 1996. Critical levels for ozone in Europe: testing and finalising the concepts. Finland: University of Kuopio.
16. Karlsson PE, Uddling J, Braun S, et al. 2004. New critical levels of ozone impact on trees based on AOT40 and leaf accumulated uptake of ozone. Atmospheric Environment 15, 2283-2294.
17. Kontunen-Soppela S, Ossipov V, Ossipova S, Oksanen E. 2007. Shift in birch leaf metabolome and carbon allocation during long-term open-field ozone exposure. Global Change Biology 13, 1053-1067.
18. 3 loss to a forest, implying a source of aerosols and hydroxyl radicals to the atmosphere. Geophysical Research Letters 30, 1371.
19. Kurpius MR, McKay M, Goldstein AH. 2002. Annual ozone deposition to a Sierra Nevada ponderosa pine plantation. Atmospheric Environment 36, 4503-4515.
20. Loreto F, Ciccioli P, Brancaleoni E, Cecinato A, Frattoni M, Sharkey TD. 1996. Different sources of reduced carbon contribute to form three classes of terpenoid emitted by Quercus ilex L. leaves. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 93, 9966-9969.
21. Loreto F, Fares S. 2007. Is ozone flux inside leaves only a damage indicator? Clues from volatile isoprenoid studies. Plant Physiology 143, 1096-1100.
22. Loreto F, Sharkey TD. 1990. Looking for the causes of isoprene emission by plants: a survey in red oak leaves. Plant Physiology 93, 126.
23. Massman WJ. 2004. Toward an ozone standard to protect vegetation based on effective dose: a review of deposition resistances and a possible metric. Atmospheric Environment 38, 2323-2337.
24. Massman WJ, Musselman RC, Lefohn AS. 2000. A conceptual ozone dose-response model to develop a standard to protect vegetation. Atmospheric Environment 34, 745-759.
25. Musselman RC, Lefohn AS, Massman WJ, Heath RL. 2006. A critical review and analysis of the use of exposure-and flux-based ozone indices for predicting vegetation effects. Atmospheric Environment 40, 1869-1888.
26. Niinemets U, Loreto F, Reichstein M. 2004. Physiological and physicochemical controls on foliar volatile organic compound emissions. Trends in Plant Science 9, 180-186.
27. 2 and ozone. Global Change Biology 11, 732-748.
28. Paoletti E, Manning WJ. 2007. Toward a biologically significant and usable standard for ozone that will also protect plants. Environmental Pollution 150, 85-95.
29. Parrish DD, Millet DB, Goldstein AH. 2009. Increasing ozone concentrations in marine boundary layer air inflow at the west coasts of North America and Europe. Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics 9, 1303-1323.
30. Pelzer D, Polle A. 2001. Diurnal fluctuations of antioxidative systems in leaves of field-grown beech trees (Fagus sylvatica): responses to light and temperature. Physiologia Plantarum 111, 158-164.
31. 2 assimilation in leaves of Arbutus unedo L.: diurnal changes in photosynthetic capacity related to changes in temperature and humidity. Planta 168, 546-558.
32. Singsaas EL, Laporte MM, Shi JZ, Monson RK, Bowling DR, Johnson K, Lerdau MT, Jasentuliytana A, Sharkey TD. 1999. Kinetics of leaf temperature fluctuation affect isoprene emission from red oak (Quercus rubra) leaves. Tree Physiology 19, 917-924.
33. Tuovinen JP, Simpson D, Emberson L, Ashmore M, Gerosa G. 2007. Robustness of modelled ozone exposures and doses. Environmental Pollution 146, 578-586
34. UNECE. 2004. Revised manual on methodologies and criteria for mapping critical levels/loads and geographical areas where they are exceeded. www.icpmapping.org.
35. Velikova V, Edreva A, Loreto F. 2004. Endogenous isoprene protects Phragmites australis leaves against singlet oxygen. Physiologia Plantarum 122, 219-225.
36. Velikova V, Fares S, Loreto F. 2008. Isoprene and nitric oxide reduce damages in leaves exposed to oxidative stress. Plant, Cell and Environment 31, 1882-1894.
37. Velikova V, Pinelli P, Pasqualini S, Reale L, Ferranti F, Loreto F. 2005. Isoprene decreases the concentration of nitric oxide in leaves exposed to elevated ozone. New Phytologist 166, 419-426.
38. Vickers CE, Gershenzon J, Lerdau MT, Loreto F. 2009. A unified mechanism of action for isoprenoids in plant abiotic stress. Nature Chemical Biology 5, 283-291.
39. Vollenweider P, Gunthardt-Goerg MS. 2005. Diagnosis of abiotic and biotic stress factors using the visible symptoms in foliage. Environmental Pollution 137, 455-465.
40. Yamaji K, Julkunen-Tiitto R, Rousi M, Freiwald V, Oksanen E. 2003. Ozone exposure over two growing seasons alters root-to-shoot ratio and chemical composition of birch (Betula pendula Roth). Global Change Biology 9, 1363-1377.