Presenting concerns and surgical management of secondary rhinoplasty

Aesthetic Surgery Journal

Volumn 35, Issue 2, 2015, Pages 137-144

  Nassab, Reza ^a   Matti, Basim ^a  

^a CROMWELL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NOSE MALFORMATION; NOSE RECONSTRUCTION; NOSE SEPTUM DEVIATION; NOSTRIL ASYMMETRY; OVERRESECTION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SECONDARY RHINOPLASTY; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; ADOLESCENT; CONGENITAL MALFORMATION; MIDDLE AGED; NOSE; NOSE DEFORMITIES, ACQUIRED; NOSE SEPTUM; PROCEDURES; REOPERATION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NASAL SEPTUM; NOSE; NOSE DEFORMITIES, ACQUIRED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RHINOPLASTY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84952716439     PISSN: 1090820X     EISSN: 1527330X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/asj/sju026     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. British Association of Aesthetic Plastic Surgeons. Annual BAAPS audit. http://baaps.org.uk/about-us/audit.
2. Hellings PW, Trenite GJN. Long-term patient satisfaction after revision rhinoplasty. The Laryngoscope 2007;117: 985-989.
3. Constantian MB. Differing characteristics in 100 consecutive secondary rhinoplasty patients following closed versus open surgical approaches. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109(6):2097-2111.
4. Daniel RK. Middle Eastern rhinoplasty in the United States: Part II. Secondary rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:1640-1648.
5. Guyuron B, Bokhari F. Patient satisfaction following rhi-noplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1996;20(2):153-157.
6. Warner J, Gutowski K, Shama L, Marcus B. National interdisciplinary rhinoplasty surgery. Aesthet Surg J. 2009;29: 295-301.
7. Lee M, Zwiebel S, Guyuron B. Frequency of the preoperative flaws and commonly required maneuvers to correct them: A guide to reducing the revision rhinoplasty rate. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;132: 769-776.
8. Yu K, Kim A, Pearlman SJ. Functional and aesthetic concerns of patients seeking revision rhinoplasty. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2010;12:291-297.
9. Chauhan N, Alexander AJ, Sepehr A, et al. Patient complaints with primary versus revision rhinoplasty: Analysis and practice implications. Aesthet Surg J. 2011; 31:775-780.
10. Foda HM. Rhinoplasty for the multiply revised nose. Am J Otolaryngol. 2005;26(1):28-34.
11. Won T-B, Jin H-R. Revision rhinoplasty in Asians. Ann Plast Surg. 2010;65:379-384.
12. Rohrich RJ, Muzaffar AR, Janis JE. Component dorsal hump reduction: The importance of maintaining dorsal aesthetic lines in rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004; 114:1298-1308.
13. rd ed. Boca Raton: Taylor and Francis Group, 2014.
14. Constantian MB. Four common anatomic variants that predispose to unfavorable rhinoplasty results: A study based on 150 consecutive secondary rhinoplasties. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105:316-331.
15. rd ed. Boca Raton: Taylor and Francis Group, 2014.
16. Rohrich RJ, Hoxworth RE, Kurkjian TJ. The role of the columellar strut in rhinoplasty: Indications and rationale. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;129:118e-125e.