Frequency of the preoperative flaws and commonly required maneuvers to correct them: A guide to reducing the revision rhinoplasty rate

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Volumn 132, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 769-776

  Lee, Michelle ^a   Zwiebel, Samantha ^a   Guyuron, Bahman ^a  

^a CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ANATOMY AND HISTOLOGY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NASAL SEPTAL PERFORATION; NOSE; NOSE RECONSTRUCTION; NOSE SEPTUM; PATHOLOGY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROCEDURES; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; YOUNG ADULT; ARTICLE; HISTOLOGY; METHODOLOGY; NOSE SEPTUM PERFORATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; STATISTICS;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NASAL SEPTAL PERFORATION; NASAL SEPTUM; NOSE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RHINOPLASTY; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84885477344     PISSN: 00321052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3182a01457     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Guyuron B. Dynamics in rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105:2257-2259.
2. Gunter JP, Rohrich RJ. External approach for secondary rhi-noplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1987;80:161-174.
3. Thomson C, Mendelsohn M. Reducing the incidence of revision rhinoplasty. J Otolaryngol. 2007;36:130-134.
4. Smith TW. As clay in the potter's hand: A review of 221 rhi-noplasties. Ohio State Med J. 1967;63:1055-1057.
5. Rees TD, Krupp S, Wood-Smith D. Secondary rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1970;46:332-340.
6. Ambro BT, Wright RJ. Psychological considerations in revision rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg. 2008;24:288-292.
7. Guyuron B, Bokhari F. Patient satisfaction following rhino-plasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1996;20:153-157.
8. Morrison CM, Rotemberg SC, Moreira-Gonzalez A, Zins JE. A survey of cosmetic surgery training in plastic surgery programs in the United States. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2008;122:1570-1578.
9. Constantian MB. What motivates secondary rhinoplasty? A study of 150 consecutive patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2012;130:667-678.
10. Yu K, Kim A, Pearlman SJ. Functional and aesthetic concerns of patients seeking revision rhinoplasty. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2010;12:291-297.
11. Foda HM. Rhinoplasty for the multiply revised nose. Am J Otolaryngol. 2005;26:28-34.
12. Guyuron B. Nasal osteotomy and airway changes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;102:856-860; discussion 861-863.
13. Constantian MB, Clardy RB. The relative importance of sep-tal and nasal valvular surgery in correcting airway obstruction in primary and secondary rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996;98:38-54; discussion 55.
14. Ponsky D, Eshraghi Y, Guyuron B. The frequency of surgical maneuvers during open rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126:240-244.
15. Kamer FM, McQuown SA. Revision rhinoplasty: Analysis and treatment. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1988;114:257-266.
16. Guyuron B, Behmand RA. Nasal tip sutures part II: The interplays. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;112:1130-1145; discussion 1146-1149.
17. Guyuron B, Uzzo CD, Scull H. A practical classification of septonasal deviation and an effective guide to septal surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;104:2202-2209; discussion 2210.
18. Constantian MB. The boxy nasal tip, the ball tip, and alar cartilage malposition: Variations on a theme. A study in 200 consecutive primary and secondary rhinoplasty patients. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;116:268-281.
19. Guyuron B. Alar rim deformities. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;107:856-863.
20. Gunter JP, Rohrich RJ, Friedman RM. Classifcation and correction of alar-columellar discrepancies in rhinoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996;97:643-648.
21. Rohrich RJ, Raniere J Jr, Ha RY. The alar contour graft: Correction and prevention of alar rim deformities in rhi-noplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109:2495-2505; discussion 2506.