Long-term patient satisfaction after revision rhinoplasty

Laryngoscope

Volumn 117, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 985-989

  Hellings, Peter W ^a   Trenité, Gilbert J Nolst ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS LEUVEN   (Belgium)

^b ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Outcome; Revision; Rhinoplasty; Satisfaction

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; NETHERLANDS; NOSE RECONSTRUCTION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE;

ADULT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUESTIONNAIRES; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RHINOPLASTY; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 34249875421     PISSN: 0023852X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e31804f8152     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Meyer L, Jacobsson S. The predictive validity of psychosocial factors for patients' acceptance of rhinoplasty. Ann Plast Surg 1986;17:513-520.
2. Moses S, Last U, Mahler D. After aesthetic rhinoplasty: new looks and psychological outlooks on post-surgical satisfaction. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1984;8:213-217.
3. Wright MR. Management of patient dissatisfaction with results of cosmetic procedures. Arch Otolaryngol 1980;106:466-471.
4. Sheard C, Jones NS, Quraishi MS, Herbert M. A prospective study of the psychological effects of rhinoplasty. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 1996;21:232-236.
5. Tobin HA, Webster RC. The less-than-satisfactory rhinoplasty: comparison of patient and surgeon satisfaction. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1986;94:86-95.
6. Sporri S, Simmen D, Briner HR, Jones N. Objective assessment of tip projection and the nasolabial angle in rhinoplasty. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2004;6:295-298; discussion 299-300.
7. Freiberg A, Giguere D, Ross DC, Taylor JR, Bell T, Kerluke LD. Are patients satisfied with results from residents performing aesthetic surgery? Plast Reconstr Surg 1997;100:1824-1831; discussion 1832-1823.
8. Alsarraf R. Outcomes research in facial plastic surgery: a review and new directions. Aesthetic Plast Surg 2000;24:192-197.
9. Vuyk HD, Watts SJ, Vindayak B. Revision rhinoplasty: review of deformities, aetiology and treatment strategies. Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci 2000;25:476-481.
10. Foda HM. External rhinoplasty: a critical analysis of 500 cases. J Laryngol Otol 2003;117:473-477.
11. Bagal AA, Adamson PA. Revision rhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg 2002;18:233-244.
12. Alsarraf R, Larrabee WF Jr, Anderson S, Murakami CS, Johnson CM Jr. Measuring cosmetic facial plastic surgery outcomes: a pilot study. Arch Facial Plast Surg 2001;3:198-201.
13. Foda HM. Rhinoplasty for the multiply revised nose. Am J Otolaryngol 2005;26:28-34.
14. Guyuron B, Bokhari F. Patient satisfaction following rhinoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg 1996;20:153-157.
15. McKinney P, Cook JQ. A critical evaluation of 200 rhinoplasties. Ann Plast Surg 1981;7:357-361.