Risk-based safety analysis of well integrity operations

Safety Science

Volumn 84, Issue , 2016, Pages 149-160

  Abimbola, Majeed ^a   Khan, Faisal ^a   Khakzad, Nima ^b  

^a MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY OF NEWFOUNDLAND   (Canada)

^b DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Bayesian network analysis; Blowout; Cementing; Inherent safety techniques; Managed pressure drilling; Well integrity

Indexed keywords

BAYESIAN NETWORKS; BLOWOUTS; CEMENTING (SHAFTS); DRILLING; PETROLEUM RESERVOIR ENGINEERING; SAFETY ENGINEERING; WELL DRILLING; WELL LOGGING;

CEMENTING OPERATIONS; DIAGNOSTIC ANALYSIS; INHERENT SAFETY; LOGICAL RELATIONSHIPS; MANAGED PRESSURE DRILLING; OIL AND GAS RESERVOIR; RISK-BASED SAFETIES; VISUAL REPRESENTATIONS;

RISK ASSESSMENT;

ARTICLE; BAYES THEOREM; CASING DESIGN; CASING HANDLING; CONTROLLED STUDY; INFORMATION SCIENCE; LOGGING TOOL; OCCUPATIONAL HAZARD; OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY; OIL INDUSTRY; PHYSICAL PARAMETERS; PRESSURE DRILLING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROBABILITY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SLURRY FORMULATION; SURE PRESSURE; SWAB PRESSURE; WELL INTEGRITY OPERATION;

EID: 84952682843     PISSN: 09257535     EISSN: 18791042     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.12.009     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Abimbola M., Khan F., Khakzad N. Dynamic safety risk analysis of offshore drilling. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 2014, 30:74-85.
2. Abimbola Majeed, Khan Faisal, Khakzad Nima, Butt Stephen Safety and risk analysis of managed pressure drilling operation using Bayesian network. Saf. Sci. 2015, 76:133-144. (Elsevier Ltd.). 10.1016/j.ssci.2015.01.010.
3. Abimbola, Majeed, Khan, Faisal, Garaniya, Vikram, Butt, Stephen, 2015b. Failure analysis of the tripping operation and its impact on well control. In: St. John's: proceedings of the 34th international conference on ocean, offshore and Arctic engineering.
4. Aven T., Nokland T.E. On the use of uncertainty importance measures in reliability and risk analysis. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2010, 95:127-133.
5. Bearfield G., Marsh W. Generalizing event trees using Bayesian networks with a case study of train derailment. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 2005, 3688:52-66.
6. Beltran, J.C., Lupo, C., Gallo, F., Duno, H., Medina, L., 2010. Managed Pressure Drilling Brings Added Value to Production Casings Cementing Operations Increasing Success Rates and Quality in HPHT Fractured Narrow Window Wells. SPE/IADC 130313, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
7. Birnbaum Z.W. On the importance of different components in a multicomponent system. Multivariate Analysis-II 1969, 581-592. Academic Press, New York. P.R. Krishnaiah (Ed.).
8. Bobbio A., Portinale L., Minichino M., Ciancamerla E. Improving the analysis of dependable systems by mapping fault trees into Bayesian networks. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2001, 71:249-260.
9. BOEMRE, 2011. Report Regarding the Causes of the April 20, 2010 Macondo Well Blowout. The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Regulation and Enforcement.
10. Borgonovo E., Apostolakis G.E., Tarantola S., Saltelli A. Comparison of global sensitivity analysis techniques and importance measures in PSA. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2003, 79:175-185.
11. BP, 2010. Deepwater Horizon Accident Investigation Report. BP.
12. CCR, 2011. Macondo - The Gulf Oil Disaster. National Commission on the BP Deepwater Oil Spill and Offshore Drilling. Chief Counsel's Report.
13. Cheok M.C., Parry G.W., Sherry R.R. Use of importance measures in risk-informed regulatory applications. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 1998, 60:213-226.
14. Crespo, Freddy, Ahmed, Ramadan, Enfis, Majed, Saasen, Arild, Amani, Mahmood, 2012. Surge-and-swab pressure predictions for yield-power-law drilling fluids. In: SPE Drilling & Completion, December 2012, pp. 574-585.
15. Curcuru G., Galante G.M., La Fata C.M. Epistemic uncertainty in fault tree analysis approached by the evidence theory. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 2012, 25(4):667-676.
16. Danenberger, E.P., 1993. Outer Continental Shelf Drilling Blowouts, 1971-1991. OTC 7248, Texas.
17. de Dianous V., Fievez C. ARAMIS project: a more explicit demonstration of risk control through the use of bow-tie diagrams and the evaluation of safety barrier performance. J. Hazard. Mater. 2006, 130:220-233.
18. Delvosalle C., Fievez C., Pipart A., Debray B. ARAMIS project: a comprehensive methodology for the identification of reference accident scenarios in process industries. J. Hazard. Mater. 2006, 130:200-219.
19. Deshpande A. Fuzzy fault tree analysis: revisited. Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manage. 2011, 2:3-13.
20. DHSG, 2011. Final Report on the Investigation of MAcondo Well Blowout. Deepwater Horizon Study Group.
21. Eslinger, K., Ure, D., Kutlay, S., 2004. Risk Management and Analysis of Driving Hazard Using Bow Tie Model. Alberta, SPE 86846.
22. Eskesen S.D., Tengborg P., Kampmann J., Veicherts T.H. Guidelines for tunneling risk management: international tunnelling association, working group no. 2. Tunn. Undergr. Space Technol. 2004, 19:217-237.
23. Ferdous R., Khan F., Sadiq R., Amyotte P., Veitch B. Analyzing system safety and risk under uncertainty using a bow-tie diagram: an innovative approach. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2013, 91(1-2):1-18.
24. Ferdous R., Khan F., Sadiq R., Amyotte P., Veitch B. Handling and updating uncertain information in bow-tie analysis. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 2012, 25(1):8-19.
25. Ferdous R., Khan F., Sadiq R., Amyotte P., Veitch B. Handling data uncertainties in event tree analysis. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2009, 87(5):283-292.
26. Fredericks P. Constant bottom-hole pressure with pressure as a primary control. Managed Pressure Drilling 2008, 81-107. Gulf Publishing Company, Houston, Texas. B. Rehm, J. Schubert, A. Haghshenas, A.S. Paknejad, J. Hughes (Eds.).
27. Grayson, B., Gans, A.H., 2012. Closed loop circulating systems enhance well control and efficiency with precise wellbore monitoring and management capabilities. SPE/IADC Managed Pressure Drilling and Underbalanced Operations. SPE, Milan, Italy, p. 12.
28. Izon, David, Danenberger, E.P., Mayes, Melinda. Absence of fatalities in blowouts encouraging in MMS study of OCS incidents 1992-2006. Drilling Contractor, July/August 2007, pp. 84-90.
29. Jensen F.V., Nielsen T.D. Bayesian Networks and Decision Graphs 2007, Springer, New York.
30. Khakzad N., Khan F., Amyotte P. Dynamic safety analysis of process systems by mapping bow-tie into bayesian network. Process Saf. Environ. 2013, 91(1-2):46-53.
31. Khakzad N., Khan F., Amyotte P. Quantitative risk analysis of offshore drilling operations: a Bayesian approach. Saf. Sci. 2013, 57:108-117.
32. Khakzad N., Khan F., Amyotte P. Safety analysis in process facilities: comparison of fault tree and Bayesian network approaches. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2011, 96:925-932.
33. Khakzad N., Khan F., Amyotte P. Dynamic risk analysis using bow-tie approach. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2012, 104:36-44.
34. Khan F.I., Amyotte P.R. How to make inherent safety practice a reality. Can. J. Chem. Eng. 2003, 81:2-16.
35. Khan F.I., Amyotte P.R. I2SI: a comprehensive quantitative tool for inherent safety and cost evaluation. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 2005, 18:310-326.
36. Khan F.I., Amyotte P.R. Integrated inherent safety index (I2SI): a tool for inherent safety evaluation. Process Saf. Prog. 2004, 23(2):136-148.
37. Kletz Trevor A., Amyotte Paul R. Process Plants: A Handbook for Inherent Safer Design 2010, Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton, Florida. second ed.
38. Markowski A.S., Kotynia A. "Bow-tie" model in layer of protection analysis. Process Saf. Environ. 2011, 89:205-213.
39. Neapolitan Richard E. Learning Bayesian Networks 2004, Prentice Hall Series, Chicago.
40. Neapolitan Richard E. Probabilistic Methods for Bioinformatics: with an Introduction to Bayesian Networks 2009, Morgan Kaufmann, Chicago.
41. NORSOK, 2004. Well Integrity in Drilling and Well Operations. NORSOK Standard D-010, third ed. Standards Norway, Lysaker.
42. Onisko Agnieszka, Druzdel Marek J., Wasyluk Hanna Learning Bayesian network parameters from small data sets: application of Noisy-OR gates. Int. J. Approx. Reason. 2001, 27:165-182.
43. Pearl J. Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems 1988, Morgan Kaufmann, San Mateo.
44. Purba J.H. A fuzzy-based reliability approach to evaluate basic events of fault tree analysis for nuclear power plant probabilistic safety assessment. Ann. Nucl. Energy 2014, 70:21-29.
45. Rathnayaka S., Khan F., Amyotte P. Risk-based process plant design considering inherent safety. Saf. Sci. 2014, 70:438-464.
46. Rathnayaka S., Khan F., Amyotte P. Accident modeling and risk assessment framework for safety critical decision-making: application to deepwater drilling operation. Proc. Inst. Mech. Eng., Part O: J. Risk Reliab. 2013, 227:86-105.
47. Si Shubin, Levitin Gregory, Dui Hongyan, Sun Shudong Component state-based integrated importance measure for multi-state systems. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2013, 116:75-83.
48. Skogdalen Jon Espen, Vinnem Jan Erik Combining precursor incidents investigations and QRA in oil and gas industry. Reliab. Eng. Syst. Saf. 2012, 101(May):48-58. (Elsevier). 10.1016/j.ress.2011.12.009.
49. Srinivasan R., Natarajan S. Developments in inherent safety: a review of the progress during 2001-2011 and opportunities ahead. Process Saf. Environ. Prot. 2012, 90(5):389-403.
50. Tian, Shifeng, Medley, George H., Stone, Charles R., 2009. Understanding yield point: Effect on pressure surges critical to managing deep, difficult MPD wells. Drilling Contractor, November 3.
51. Torstad, E., 2010. Closed Loop Systems Reduce the Probability of Loss of Well Control. DNV Presentation, September 30.
52. Wierenga P.C., et al. Application of the bow-tie model in medical safety risk analysis. Drug Saf. 2009, 32:663-673.