Time will tell: Resource continuity bolsters ecosystem services

Trends in Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 30, Issue 9, 2015, Pages 524-530

  Schellhorn, Nancy A ^a   Gagic, Vesna ^a,b   Bommarco, Riccardo ^b  

^a CSIRO   (Australia)

^b SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Pest control; Pollination; Population dynamics; Resource chain

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL APPLICATION; COMMERCIAL SPECIES; ECOSYSTEM SERVICE; HABITAT CREATION; LIFE CYCLE; PEST CONTROL; POLLINATION; POPULATION DYNAMICS; RESEARCH METHOD; RESOURCE ASSESSMENT; STOCK ASSESSMENT;

AGRICULTURE; ANIMAL; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; LIFE CYCLE STAGE; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PROCEDURES; TIME FACTOR;

AGRICULTURE; ANIMALS; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ECOSYSTEM; LIFE CYCLE STAGES; POPULATION DYNAMICS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84952638523     PISSN: 01695347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tree.2015.06.007     Document Type: Review

References (60)

1. Bommarco R., et al. Ecological intensification: harnessing ecosystem services for food security. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2013, 28:230-238.
2. Kremen C., et al. Pollination and other ecosystem services produced by mobile organisms: a conceptual framework for the effects of land-use change. Ecol. Lett. 2007, 10:299-314.
3. Tscharntke T., et al. Landscape perspectives on agriculture intensification and biodiversity - ecosystem service management. Ecol. Lett. 2005, 8:857-874.
4. Schellhorn N.A., et al. Movement of entomophagous arthropods in agricultural landscape: links to pest suppression. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2014, 59:559-581.
5. Chaplin-Kramer R., et al. A meta-analysis of crop pest and natural enemy response to landscape complexity. Ecol. Lett. 2011, 14:922-932.
6. Garibaldi L.A., et al. Stability of pollination services decreases with isolation from natural areas despite honey bee visits. Ecol. Lett. 2011, 14:1062-1072.
7. Tscharntke T., et al. Conservation biological control and enemy diversity on a landscape scale. Biol. Control 2007, 43:294-309.
8. Schellhorn N.A., et al. Connecting scales: achieving in-field pest control from area wide and landscape ecology studies. Insect Sci. 2015, 22:35-51.
9. Winfree R., et al. Abundance of common species, not species richness, drives delivery of real-world ecosystem services. Ecol. Lett. 2015, 18:626-635.
10. Kleijn D., et al. Delivery of crop pollination services is an insufficient argument for wild pollinator conservation. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6:7417. 10.1038/ncoms8414.
11. Population Dynamics: New Approaches and Synthesis 1995, Academic Press. N. Cappuccino, P.W. Price (Eds.).
12. Peres C. Identifying keystone plant resources in tropical forests: the case of gums from Parkia pods. J. Trop. Ecol. 2000, 16:287-317.
13. Fahrig L., et al. Functional landscape heterogeneity and animal biodiversity in agricultural landscapes. Ecol. Lett. 2011, 14:101-112.
14. Vasseur C., et al. The cropping systems mosaic: how does the hidden heterogeneity of agricultural landscapes drive arthropod populations?. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2013, 166:3-14.
15. Dunning J.B., et al. Ecological processes that affect populations in landscapes. Oikos 1992, 65:169-175.
16. Wise D.H. Variable rates of maturation of the spider, Neriene radiata (Linyphia marginata). Am. Midl. Nat. 1976, 96:66-75.
17. Sota T. Long adult life span and polyphagy of a carabid beetle, Leptocarabus kumagaii in relation to reproduction and survival. Res. Popul. Ecol. 1984, 26:389-400.
18. Honěk A. Overwintering and annual changes of abundance of Coccinella septempunctata in Czechoslovakia (Coleoptera, Coccinellidae). Acta Entomol. Bohemoslov. 1989, 86:179-192.
19. Macfadyen S., et al. Early-season movement dynamics of phytophagous pest and natural enemies across a native vegetation-crop ecotone. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2015, 200:110-118.
20. Macfadyen S., et al. Linking landscape complexity and ecosystem services: measuring temporal change in plant productivity and arthropod communities across grain production landscapes. Ecol. Entomol. 2015, 10.1111/een.12213.
21. Williams N.M., et al. Landscape-scale resources promote colony growth but not reproductive performance of bumble bees. Ecology 2012, 93:1049-1058.
22. MacLeod A., et al. 'Beetle bands' as refuges for beneficial arthropods in farmland: long-term changes in predator communities and habitat. Agric. For. Entomol. 2004, 6:147-154.
23. Bommarco R. Feeding, reproduction and community impact of a predatory carabid in two agricultural habitats. Oikos 1999, 89:89-96.
24. Corbett A., Rosenheim J.A. Impact of a natural enemy overwintering refuge and its interaction with the surrounding landscape. Ecol. Entomol. 1996, 21:155-164.
25. Westphal C., et al. Mass flowering oilseed rape improves early colony growth but not sexual reproduction of bumblebees. J. Appl. Ecol. 2009, 46:187-193.
26. Rundlöf M., et al. Late-season mass-flowering red clover increases bumble bee queen and male densities. Biol. Conserv. 2014, 172:138-145.
27. Bischoff I. Population dynamics of the solitary digger bee Andrena vaga Panzer (Hymenoptera, Andrenidae) studies using mark-recapture and nest counts. Popul. Ecol. 2003, 45:197-204.
28. Rosenheim J. Higher-order predators and the regulation of insect herbivore populations. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 1998, 43:421-447.
29. Bianchi F.J.J.A., et al. Habitat functionality for the ecosystem service of pest control: reproduction and feeding sites of pests and natural enemies. Agric. For. Entomol. 2013, 15:12-23.
30. Parry H.R., et al. Plant composition modulates arthropod pest and predator abundance: evidence for culling exotics and planting natives. Basic Appl. Ecol. 2015, Published online May 23, 2015. 10.1016/j.baae.2015.05.005.
31. Southwood T.R.E. Habitat, the templet for ecological strategies?. J. Anim. Ecol. 1977, 46:337-365.
32. Lake P.S., et al. Linking ecological theory with stream restoration. Freshw. Biol. 2007, 52:597-615.
33. Grimm V., et al. META-X: generic software for metapopulation viability analysis. Biodivers. Conserv. 2004, 13:165-188.
34. Banks J.E., et al. Deconstructing the surrogate species concept: a life history approach to the protection of ecosystem services. Ecol. Appl. 2014, 24:770-778.
35. Kleyer M., et al. Assessing species and community functional responses to environmental gradients: which multivariate methods?. J. Veget. Sci. 2012, 23:805-821.
36. Gagic V., et al. Functional identity and diversity of animals predict ecosystem functioning better than species-based indices. Proc. R. Soc. B 2015, 282:20142620.
37. Thomas C.D., Kunin W.E. The spatial structure of populations. J. Anim. Ecol. 1999, 68:647-657.
38. Jonsson M., et al. Ecological production functions for biological control services in agricultural landscapes. Methods Ecol. Evol. 2014, 5:243-252.
39. Lonsdorf E., et al. Modelling pollination services across agricultural landscapes. Ann. Bot. 2009, 103:1589-1600.
40. McIntyre S., et al. Principles for sustaining grazing in Eucalypt woodlands: landscape-scale indicators and the search for thresholds. Management for Sustainable Ecosystems 2000, 92-100. QLD Centre for Conservation Biology, University of QLD. P. Hale (Ed.).
41. Tscharntke T., et al. Set-aside management: how do succession, sowing patterns and landscape context affect biodiversity?. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2011, 143:37-44.
42. Kremen C., et al. The area requirements of an ecosystem service: crop pollination by native bee communities in California. Ecol. Lett. 2004, 7:1109-1119.
43. Hanski I. Habitat loss, the dynamics of biodiversity, and a perspective on conservation. AMBIO 2011, 40:248-255.
44. Welch K.D., Hardwood J.D. Temporal dynamics in natural enemy-pest interactions in a changing environment. Biol. Control 2014, 75:18-27.
45. Veres A., et al. Does landscape composition affect pest abundance and their control by natural enemies? A review. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2013, 166:110-117.
46. Kennedy C.M., et al. A global quantitative synthesis of local and landscape effects on wild bee pollinators in agro-ecosystems. Ecol. Lett. 2013, 16:584-599.
47. Winfree R., et al. Native pollinators in anthropogenic habitats. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2011, 42:1-22.
48. Mandelik Y., et al. Complementary habitat use by wild bees in agro-natural landscapes. Ecol. Appl. 2012, 22:1535-1546.
49. Costamagna A.C., et al. Landscape-scale pest suppression is mediated by timing of predator arrival. Ecol. Appl. 2015, 25:1114-1130.
50. Persson A.S., Smith H.G. Seasonal persistence of bumblebee populations is affected by landscape context. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2010, 105:201-209.
51. Batáry P., et al. Responses of plant, insect and spider biodiversity to local and landscape scale management intensity in cereal crops and grasslands. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2012, 146:130-136.
52. Andrade T.O., et al. Winter host exploitation influences fitness trains in a parasitoid. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 2013, 147:167-174.
53. Plećaš M., et al. Landscape composition and configuration influence cereal aphid-parasitiod-hyperparasitoid interactions and biological control differently across years. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2014, 183:1-10.
54. Rusch A., et al. Flow and stability of natural pest control services depends on complexity and crop rotation at the landscape scale. J. Appl. Ecol. 2013, 50:345-354.
55. Gonthier D.J., et al. Biodiversity conservation in agriculture requires a multi-scale approach. Proc. R. Soc. B 2014, 281:20141358.
56. Puech C., et al. Organic vs. conventional farming dichotomy: does it make sense for natural enemies?. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2014, 194:48-57.
57. Rusch A., et al. Management intensity at field and landscape level affects the structure of generalist predator communities. Oecologia 2014, 175:971-983.
58. Sarthou J.P., et al. Local more than landscape parameters structure natural enemy communities during their overwintering in semi-natural habitats. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2014, 194:17-28.
59. Gabriel D., et al. Scale matters: the impact of organic farming on biodiversity at different spatial scales. Ecol. Lett. 2010, 13:858-869.
60. Andersson G.K.S., et al. Effects of farming intensity, crop rotation and landscape heterogeneity on field bean pollination. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 2014, 184:145-148.