Techniques for the practical collection of environmental DNA: filter selection, preservation, and extraction

Limnology

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 23-32

  Minamoto, Toshifumi ^a,b   Naka, Takafumi ^c   Moji, Kazuhiko ^b,d   Maruyama, Atsushi ^c  

^a KOBE UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR HUMANITY AND NATURE   (Japan)

^c RYUKOKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^d NAGASAKI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

DNA extraction; Environmental DNA; Fish; Quantitative PCR

Indexed keywords

DNA; ETHANOL; EXTRACTION METHOD; FISH; PHENOL; PRECIPITATION (CHEMISTRY); ULTRAFILTRATION;

CYPRINUS CARPIO;

EID: 84952299016     PISSN: 14398621     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10201-015-0457-4     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Brook BW, O’Grady JJ, Chapman AP, Burgman MA, Akçakaya HR, Frankham R (2000) Predictive accuracy of population viability analysis in conservation biology. Nature 404(6776):385–387. doi:10.1038/35006050
2. Deiner K, Altermatt F (2014) Transport distance of invertebrate environmental DNA in a natural river. PLoS One 9(2):e88786. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0088786
3. Deiner K, Walser J-C, Mächler E, Altermatt F (2015) Choice of capture and extraction methods affect detection of freshwater biodiversity from environmental DNA. Biol Conserv 183:53–63. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2014.11.018
4. Dejean T, Valentini A, Duparc A, Pellier-Cuit S, Pompanon F, Taberlet P, Miaud C (2011) Persistence of environmental DNA in freshwater ecosystems. PLoS One 6(8):e23398. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0023398
5. Dejean T, Valentini A, Miquel C, Taberlet P, Bellemain E, Miaud C (2012) Improved detection of an alien invasive species through environmental DNA barcoding: the example of the American bullfrog Lithobates catesbeianus. J Appl Ecol 49(4):953–959. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02171.x
6. Doi H, Takahara T, Minamoto T, Matsuhashi S, Uchii K, Yamanaka H (2015a) Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (PCR) outperforms real-time PCR in the detection of environmental DNA from an invasive fish species. Environ Sci Technol 49(9):5601–5608. doi:10.1021/acs.est.5b00253
7. Doi H, Uchii K, Takahara T, Matsuhashi S, Yamanaka H, Minamoto T (2015b) Use of droplet digital PCR for estimation of fish abundance and biomass in environmental DNA surveys. PLoS One 10(3):e0122763. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0122763
8. Dunnett CW (1964) New tables for multiple comparisons with a control. Biometrics 20(3):482–491
9. Eichmiller JJ, Bajer PG, Sorensen PW (2014) The relationship between the distribution of common carp and their environmental DNA in a small lake. PLoS One 9(11):e112611. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0112611
10. Ficetola GF, Miaud C, Pompanon F, Taberlet P (2008) Species detection using environmental DNA from water samples. Biol Lett 4(4):423–425. doi:10.1098/Rsbl.2008.0118
11. Foote AD, Thomsen PF, Sveegaard S, Wahlberg M, Kielgast J, Kyhn LA, Salling AB, Galatius A, Orlando L, Gilbert MTP (2012) Investigating the potential use of environmental DNA (eDNA) for genetic monitoring of marine mammals. PLoS One 7(8):e41781. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0041781
12. Fukumoto S, Ushimaru A, Minamoto T (2015) A basin-scale application of environmental DNA assessment for rare endemic species and closely related exotic species in rivers: a case study of giant salamanders in Japan. J Appl Ecol 52(2):358–365. doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12392
13. Goldberg CS, Pilliod DS, Arkle RS, Waits LP (2011) Molecular detection of vertebrates in stream water: a demonstration using Rocky Mountain tailed frogs and Idaho giant salamanders. PLoS One 6(7):e22746. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0022746
14. Hajibabaei M, Spall J, Shokralla S, van Konynenburg S (2012) Assessing biodiversity of a freshwater benthic macroinvertebrate community through non-destructive environmental barcoding of DNA from preservative ethanol. BMC Ecol 12(1):28. doi:10.1186/1472-6785-12-28
15. Honjo MN, Minamoto T, Matsui K, Uchii K, Yamanaka H, Suzuki AA, Kohmatsu Y, Iida T, Kawabata Z (2010) Quantification of cyprinid herpesvirus-3 in environmental water by using an external standard virus. Appl Environ Microb 76:161–168. doi:10.1128/AEM.02011-09
16. Janosik AM, Johnston CE (2015) Environmental DNA as an effective tool for detection of imperiled fishes. Environ Biol Fishes. doi:10.1007/s10641-015-0405-5
17. Jerde CL, Mahon AR, Chadderton WL, Lodge DM (2011) “Sight-unseen” detection of rare aquatic species using environmental DNA. Conserv Lett 4(2):150–157. doi:10.1111/J.1755-263x.2010.00158.X
18. Krebs C (1978) Ecology: The Experimental analysis of distribution and abundance, 2nd Edn. Harper and Row, New York
19. Lowe S, Browne M, Boudjelas S, DePoorter M (2000) 100 of the world’s worst invasive alien species: a selection from the global invasive species database. 1–12
20. Lydolph MC, Jacobsen J, Arctander P, Gilbert MTP, Gilichinsky DA, Hansen AJ, Willerslev E, Lange L (2005) Beringian paleoecology inferred from permafrost-preserved fungal DNA. Appl Environ Microb 71(2):1012–1017. doi:10.1128/Aem.71.2.1012-1017.2005
21. Maruyama A, Nakamura K, Ymanaka H, Kondoh M, Minamoto T (2014) The release rate of environmental DNA from juvenile and adult fish. PLoS One 9(12):e114639. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0114639
22. Minamoto T, Honjo MN, Kawabata Z (2009) Seasonal distribution of cyprinid herpesvirus 3 in Lake Biwa. Appl Environ Microb 75:6900–6904. doi:10.1128/AEM.01411-09
23. Minamoto T, Yamanaka H, Takahara T, Honjo MN, Kawabata Z (2012) Surveillance of fish species composition using environmental DNA. Limnology 13(2):193–197. doi:10.1007/S10201-011-0362-4
24. Nathan LM, Simmons M, Wegleitner BJ, Jerde CL, Mahon AR (2014) Quantifying environmental DNA signals for aquatic invasive species across multiple detection platforms. Environ Sci Technol 48(21):12800–12806. doi:10.1021/es5034052
25. Olson ZH, Briggler JT, Williams RN (2012) An eDNA approach to detect eastern hellbenders (Cryptobranchus a. alleganiensis) using samples of water. Wildlife Research 39(7):629–636. doi:10.1071/WR12114
26. Pilliod DS, Goldberg CS, Arkle RS, Waits LP (2013) Estimating occupancy and abundance of stream amphibians using environmental DNA from filtered water samples. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 70(8):1123–1130. doi:10.1139/cjfas-2013-0047
27. R Development Core Team (2011) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna
28. Renshaw MA, Olds BP, Jerde CL, McVeigh MM, Lodge DM (2015) The room temperature preservation of filtered environmental DNA samples and assimilation into a phenol-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol DNA extraction. Mol Ecol Resour 15(1):168–176. doi:10.1111/1755-0998.12281
29. Sogin ML, Morrison HG, Huber JA, Welch DM, Huse SM, Neal PR, Arrieta JM, Herndl GJ (2006) Microbial diversity in the deep sea and the underexplored “rare biosphere”. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 103(32):12115–12120. doi:10.1073/pnas.0605127103
30. Taberlet P, Coissac E, Hajibabaei M, Rieseberg LH (2012) Environmental DNA. Mol Ecol 21(8):1789–1793. doi:10.1111/J.1365-294x.2012.05542.X
31. Takahara T, Minamoto T, Doi H (2013) Using environmental DNA to estimate the distribution of an invasive fish species in ponds. PLoS One 8(2):e56584. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0056584
32. Takahara T, Minamoto T, Yamanaka H, Doi H, Kawabata Z (2012) Estimation of fish biomass using environmental DNA. PLoS One 7(4):e35868. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0035868
33. Takahara T, Minamoto T, Doi H (2015) Effects of sample processing on the detection rate of environmental DNA from the Common Carp (Cyprinus carpio). Biol Conserv 183:64–69. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2014.11.014
34. Thomsen PF, Kielgast J, Iversen LL, Moller PR, Rasmussen M, Willerslev E (2012a) Detection of a diverse marine fish fauna using environmental DNA from seawater samples. PLoS One 7(8):e41732. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0041732
35. Thomsen PF, Kielgast JOS, Iversen LL, Wiuf C, Rasmussen M, Gilbert MTP, Orlando L, Willerslev E (2012b) Monitoring endangered freshwater biodiversity using environmental DNA. Mol Ecol 21(11):2565–2573
36. Treguier A, Paillisson J-M, Dejean T, Valentini A, Schlaepfer MA, Roussel J-M (2014) Environmental DNA surveillance for invertebrate species: advantages and technical limitations to detect invasive crayfish Procambarus clarkii in freshwater ponds. J Appl Ecol 51:871–879. doi:10.1111/1365-2664.12262
37. Turner CR, Barnes MA, Xu CCY, Jones SE, Jerde CL, Lodge DM (2014) Particle size distribution and optimal capture of aqueous macrobial eDNA. Method Ecol Evol 5:676–684. doi:10.1111/2041-210X.12206
38. Uchii K, Telschow A, Minamoto T, Yamanaka H, Honjo MN, Matsui K, Kawabata Z (2011) Transmission dynamics of an emerging infectious disease in wildlife through host reproductive cycles. The ISME Journal 5:244. doi:10.1038/ismej.2010.123