Use of droplet digital PCR for estimation of fish abundance and biomass in environmental DNA surveys

PLoS ONE

Volumn 10, Issue 3, 2015, Pages

  Doi, Hideyuki ^a   Uchii, Kimiko ^a,b   Takahara, Teruhiko ^a   Matsuhashi, Saeko ^a   Yamanaka, Hiroki ^c   Minamoto, Toshifumi ^d  

^a HIROSHIMA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b OSAKA OHTANI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^c RYUKOKU UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^d KOBE UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA; ENVIRONMENTAL DNA; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; BIOMASS; CARP; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA DETERMINATION; DROPLET DIGITAL POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MEASUREMENT ACCURACY; MESOCOSM; NONHUMAN; PHASE PARTITIONING; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; POPULATION ABUNDANCE; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REACTION ANALYSIS; REAL TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; ANIMAL; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; PROCEDURES;

ANIMALIA; CYPRINIDAE;

ANIMALS; BIOMASS; CARPS; DNA; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; REAL-TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION;

EID: 84925778738     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122763     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Ficetola GF, Miaud C, Pompanon F, Taberlet P. Species detection using environmental DNA from water samples. Biol Lett. 2008; 4: 423-425. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2008.0118 PMID: 18400683
2. Goldberg CS, Pilliod DS, Arkle RS, Waits LP. Molecular detection of vertebrates in stream water: a demonstration using rocky mountain tailed frogs and Idaho giant salamanders. PLoS ONE. 2011; 6: e22746. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0022746 PMID: 21818382
3. Dejean T, Valentini A, Miquel C, Taberlet P, Bellemain E, Miaud C. Improved detection of an alien invasive species through environmental DNA barcoding: the example of the American bullfrog Lithobates catesbeianus. J Appl Ecol. 2012; 49: 953-959.
4. Minamoto T, Yamanaka H, Takahara T, Honjo MN, Kawabata Z. Surveillance of fish species composition using environmental DNA. Limnology. 2012; 13: 193-197.
5. Takahara T, Minamoto T, Yamanaka H, Doi H, Kawabata Z. Estimation of fish biomass using environmental DNA. PLoS ONE. 2012; 7: e35868. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035868 PMID: 22563411
6. Takahara T, Minamoto T, Doi H. Using environmental DNA to estimate the distribution of an invasive fish species in ponds. PLoS ONE. 2013; 8: e56584. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0056584 PMID: 23437177
7. Kelly RP, Port JA, Yamahara KM, Crowder LB. Using environmental DNA to census marine fishes in a large mesocosm. PLoS ONE. 2014; 9: e86175. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0086175 PMID: 24454960
8. Thomsen PF, Kielgast J, Iversen LL, Møller PR, Rasmussen M, Willerslev Eske. Detection of a diverse marine fish fauna using environmental DNA from seawater samples. PLoS ONE. 2012; 7: e41732. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0041732 PMID: 22952584
9. Takahara T, Minamoto T, Doi H. Effects of sample processing on the detection rate of environmental DNA from the Common Carp (Cyprinus carpio). Biol Conserv. 2015; 183:64-69.
10. Eichmiller JJ, Bajer PG, Sorensen PW. The relationship between the distribution of common carp and their environmental DNA in a small lake. PLoS ONE. 2014; 9, e112611. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone. 0112611 PMID: 25383965
11. Goldberg CS, Sepulveda A, Ray A, Baumgardt J, Waits LP. Environmental DNA as a new method for early detection of New Zealand mudsnails (Potamopyrgus antipodarum). Freshw Sci. 2013; 32: 792-800.
12. Thomsen PF, Kielgast J, Iversen LL, Wiuf C, Rasmussen M, Gilbert MTP, et al. Monitoring endangered freshwater biodiversity using environmental DNA. Mol Ecol. 2012; 21: 2565-2573. doi: 10.1111/j. 1365-294X.2011.05418.x PMID: 22151771
13. Mächler E, Deiner K, Steinmann P, Altermatt F. Utility of environmental DNA for monitoring rare and indicator macroinvertebrate species. Freshw Sci. 2014; 33: 1174-1183.
14. Tréguier A, Paillisson JM, Dejean T, Valentini A, Schlaepfer MA, Roussel JM. Environmental DNA surveillance for invertebrate species: advantages and technical limitations to detect invasive crayfish Procambarus clarkii in freshwater ponds. J Appl Ecol. 2014; 51: 871-879.
15. Jane SF, Wilcox TM, McKelvey KS, Young MK, Schwartz MK, Lowe WH, et al. Distance, flow and PCR inhibition: eDNA dynamics in two headwater streams. Mol Ecol Resour. 2015; 15: 216-227. doi:10.1111/1755-0998.12285 PMID: 24890199
16. Pilliod DS, Goldberg CS, Arkle RS, Waits LP. Estimating occupancy and abundance of stream amphibians using environmental DNA from filtered water samples. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 2013; 70: 1123-1130.
17. Barnes MA, Turner CR, Jerde CL, Renshaw MA, Chadderton WL, Lodge EM. Environmental conditions influence eDNA persistence in aquatic systems. Environ Sci Technol. 2014; 48: 1819-1827. doi:10.1021/es404734p PMID: 24422450
18. Hayden RT, Gu Z, Ingersoll J, Abdul-Ali D, Shi L, Pounds S, et al. Comparison of droplet digital PCR to real-time PCR for quantitative detection of Cytomegalovirus. J Clin Microbiol. 2013; 51: 540-546. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02620-12 PMID: 23224089
19. Norton SE, Lechner JM, Williams T, Fernando MR. A stabilizing reagent prevents cell-free DNA contamination by cellular DNA in plasma during blood sample storage and shipping as determined by digital PCR. Clin Biochem. 2013; 46: 1561-1565. doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2013.06.002 PMID: 23769817
20. Hindson BJ, Ness KD, Masquelier DA, Belgrader P, Heredia NJ, Makarewicz AJ, et al. High-throughput droplet digital PCR system for absolute quantitation of DNA copy number. Anal Chem. 2011; 83: 8604-8610. doi: 10.1021/ac202028g PMID: 22035192
21. Miotke L, Lau BT, Rumma RT, Ji HP. High sensitivity detection and quantitation of DNA copy number and single nucleotide variants with single color droplet digital PCR. Anal Chem. 2014; 86: 2618-2624. doi: 10.1021/ac403843j PMID: 24483992
22. Hindson CM, Chevillet JR, Briggs HA, Gallichotte EN, Ruf IK, Hindson BJ, et al. Absolute quantification by droplet digital PCR versus analog real-time PCR. Nature Methods. 2013; 10: 1003-1005. doi:10.1038/nmeth.2633 PMID: 23995387
23. Strain MC, Lada SM, Luong T, Rought SE, Gianella S, Terry VH, et al. Highly precise measurement of HIV DNA by droplet digital PCR. PLoS ONE. 2013; 8: e55943. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0055943 PMID: 23573183
24. Kim TG, Jeong SY, Cho KS. Comparison of droplet digital PCR and quantitative real-time PCR for examining population dynamics of bacteria in soil. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014; 98: 6105-6113. doi: 10.1007/s00253-014-5794-4 PMID: 24831026
25. Nathan LR, Simmons MD, Wegleitner B, Jerde CL, Mahon A. Quantifying environmental DNA signals for aquatic invasive species across multiple detection platforms. Env Sci Tech. 2014; 48: 12800-12806.
26. R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. 2014 Available: http://www.r-project.org.
27. Turner CR, Barnes MA, Xu CCY, Jones SE, Jerde CL, Lodge DM. Particle size distribution and optimal capture of aqueous microbial eDNA. Methods Ecol Evol. 2014; 5: 676-684.
28. Hoshino T, Inagaki F. Molecular quantification of environmental DNA using microfluidics and digital PCR. Syst Appl Microbiol. 2012; 35: 390-395. doi: 10.1016/j.syapm.2012.06.006 PMID: 22840894
29. Taberlet P, Coissac E, Pompanon F, Brochmann C, Willerslev E. Towards next-generation biodiversity assessment using DNA metabarcoding. Mol Ecol. 2012; 21: 2045-2050. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-294X. 2012.05470.x PMID: 22486824
30. Thomsen PF, Willerslev E. Environmental DNA-an emerging tool in conservation for monitoring past and present biodiversity. Biol Conserv. 2015; 183: 4-18.