No evidence of somatotopic place of articulation feature mapping in motor cortex during passive speech perception

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 1231-1240

  Arsenault, Jessica S ^a,b   Buchsbaum, Bradley R ^a,b  

^a ROTMAN RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

fMRI; Motor cortex; MVPA; Place of articulation; Speech perception

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; BRAIN MAPPING; CHILD; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MOTOR CORTEX; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PHONETICS; PHYSIOLOGY; SPEECH PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADULT; AGED; BRAIN MAPPING; CHILD; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MOTOR CORTEX; PHONETICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84951965450     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13423-015-0988-z     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Agnew, Z. K., McGettigan, C., & Scott, S. K. (2011). Discriminating between auditory and motor cortical responses to speech and nonspeech mouth sounds. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 23(12), 4038–4047. doi:10.1162/jocn_a_00106
2. Arsenault, J. S., & Buchsbaum, B. R. (2015). Distributed neural representations of phonological features during speech perception. Journal of Neuroscience, 35(2), 634–642. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2454-14.2015
3. Avants, B. B., Epstein, C. L., Grossman, M., & Gee, J. C. (2008). Symmetric diffeomorphic image registration with cross-correlation: Evaluating automated labeling of elderly and neurodegenerative brain. Medical Image Analysis, 12(1), 26–41.
4. Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B (Methodological), 57(1), 289–300.
5. Burton, M. W., Small, S. L., & Blumstein, S. E. (2000). The role of segmentation in phonological processing: An fMRI investigation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(4), 679–690. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10936919
6. Chevillet, M. A., Jiang, X., Rauschecker, J. P., & Riesenhuber, M. (2013). Automatic phoneme category selectivity in the dorsal auditory stream. Journal of Neuroscience, 33(12), 5208–5215. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1870-12.2013
7. Chun, H., & Keles, S. (2007). Sparse partial least squares for simultaneous dimension reduction and variable selection. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 72(1), 3–25.
8. Correia, J. M., Jansma, B., & Bonte, M. (2015). Decoding articulatory features from fMRI responses in dorsal speech regions. The Journal of Neuroscience, 35(45), 15015–15025.
9. Cox, R. W. (1996). AFNI: Software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Computers and Biomedical Research, 29(3), 162–173. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8812068
10. D’Ausilio, A., Pulvermüller, F., Salmas, P., Bufalari, I., Begliomini, C., & Fadiga, L. (2009). The motor somatotopy of speech perception. Current Biology: CB, 19(5), 381–385. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2009.01.017
11. Dale, A. M., Fischl, B., & Sereno, M. I. (1999). Cortical surface-based analysis I. Segmentation and surface reconstruction. NeuroImage, 194, 179–194.
12. Destrieux, C., Fischl, B., Dale, A., & Halgren, E. (2010). Automatic parcellation of human cortical gyri and sulci using standard anatomical nomenclature. NeuroImage, 53(1), 1–15. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.06.010
13. Du, Y., Buchsbaum, B. R., Grady, C. L., & Alain, C. (2014). Noise differentially impacts phoneme representations in the auditory and speech motor systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(19), 7126–7131. doi:10.1073/pnas.1318738111
14. Dubno, J. R., & Schaefer, A. B. (1992). Comparison of frequency selectivity and consonant recognition among hearing-impaired and masked normal-hearing listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 91(4 Pt. 1), 2110–2121. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1597602
15. Galantucci, B., Fowler, C. A., & Turvey, M. T. (2006). The motor theory of speech perception reviewed. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(3), 361–377.
16. Hervais-Adelman, A. G., Carlyon, R. P., Johnsrude, I. S., & Davis, M. H. (2012). Brain regions recruited for the effortful comprehension of noise-vocoded words. Language & Cognitive Processes, 27(7/8), 1145–1166. doi:10.1080/01690965.2012.662280
17. Krieger-Redwood, K., Gaskell, M. G., Lindsay, S., Jefferies, E. (2013). The selective role of premotor cortex in speech perception: A contribution to phoneme judgements but not speech comprehension. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 2179–2188. doi:10.1162/jocn
18. Kriegeskorte, N. (2011). Pattern-information analysis: From stimulus decoding to computational-model testing. NeuroImage, 56(2), 411–421. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.01.061
19. Lawyer, L., & Corina, D. (2014). An investigation of place and voice features using fMRI-adaptation. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 27(1), 18–30. doi:10.1016/j.jneuroling.2013.07.001
20. Liberman, A. M. (1957). Some results of research on speech perception. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 29(1), 117–123.
21. Liberman, A. M., Cooper, F. S., Shankweiler, D. P., & Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1967). Perception of the speech code. Psychological Review, 74(6), 431–461.
22. Liberman, A. M., & Mattingly, I. G. (1985). The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition, 21(1), 1–36.
23. Mesgarani, N., Cheung, C., Johnson, K., & Chang, E. F. (2014). Phonetic feature encoding in human superior temporal gyrus. Science, 343(6174), 1006–1010. doi:10.1126/science.1245994
24. Möttönen, R., Van de Ven, G. M., & Watkins, K. E. (2014). Attention fine-tunes auditory–motor processing of speech. The Journal of Neuroscience, 34(11), 4064–4069. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2214-13.2014
25. Möttönen, R., & Watkins, K. E. (2009). Motor representations of articulators contribute to categorical perception of speech sounds. The Journal of Neuroscience, 29(31), 9819–9825. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.6018-08.2009
26. Norman, K. A., Polyn, S. M., Detre, G. J., & Haxby, J. V. (2006). Beyond mind-reading: Multi-voxel pattern analysis of fMRI data. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10(9), 424–430.
27. Osnes, B., Hugdahl, K., & Specht, K. (2011). Effective connectivity analysis demonstrates involvement of premotor cortex during speech perception. NeuroImage, 54(3), 2437–2445. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.09.078
28. Pulvermüller, F., Huss, M., Kherif, F., Moscoso del Prado Martin, F., Hauk, O., & Shtyrov, Y. (2006). Motor cortex maps articulatory features of speech sounds. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103(20), 7865–7870. doi:10.1073/pnas.0509989103
29. Rouder, J. N., Speckman, P. L., Sun, D., Morey, R. D., & Iverson, G. (2009). Bayesian t tests for accepting and rejecting the null hypothesis. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16(2), 225–237. doi:10.3758/PBR.16.2.225
30. Schomers, M. R., Kirilina, E., Weigand, A., Bajbouj, M., Pulvermüller, F. (2014). Causal influence of articulatory motor cortex on comprehending single spoken words: TMS evidence. Cerebral Cortex, 1–9. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhu274
31. Scott, S. K., McGettigan, C., & Eisner, F. (2009). A little more conversation, a little less action: Candidate roles for the motor cortex in speech perception. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10, 295–302.
32. Stasenko, A., Bonn, C., Teghipco, A., Garcea, F. E., Sweet, C., Dombovy, M., … Mahon, B. Z. (2015). A causal test of the motor theory of speech perception: a case of impaired speech production and spared speech perception. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 32(2), 38–57. doi:10.1080/02643294.2015.1035702
33. St-Laurent, M., Abdi, H., Buchsbaum, B. R. (2015). Distributed patterns of reactivation predict vividness of recollection. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 1–10. doi:10.1162/jocn
34. Stokes, M., Thompson, R., Cusack, R., & Duncan, J. (2009). Top-down activation of shape-specific population codes in visual cortex during mental imagery. Journal of Neuroscience, 29(2009), 1565–1572. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4657-08.2009