Epistatic selection and coadaptation in the Prf resistance complex of wild tomato

Infection, Genetics and Evolution

Volumn 27, Issue , 2014, Pages 456-471

  Grzeskowiak, Lukasz ^a,b   Stephan, Wolfgang ^a   Rose, Laura E ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^b RESEARCH AND INNOVATION CENTRE   (Italy)

^c HEINRICH HEINE UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Coadaptation; Crop improvement; Disease resistance; Host parasite interactions; Pto; Solanum peruvianum

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; AMINO ACID SUBSTITUTION; AMINO TERMINAL SEQUENCE; ARTICLE; COADAPTATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CRYSTAL STRUCTURE; DNA SEQUENCE; EPISTATIC SELECTION; FEN GENE; GENE; GENE AMPLIFICATION; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENE LOCUS; GENE MAPPING; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; NONHUMAN; POPULATION DIFFERENTIATION; PRF GENE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; PTO GENE; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; TOMATO; WILD PLANT; CHEMICAL STRUCTURE; CHEMISTRY; GENETIC EPIGENESIS; GENETIC VARIATION; GENETICS; GENOTYPE; METABOLISM; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN DOMAIN; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM;

BACTERIAL PROTEIN; PRF PROTEIN, LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; VEGETABLE PROTEIN;

ADAPTATION, BIOLOGICAL; BACTERIAL PROTEINS; EPIGENESIS, GENETIC; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOTYPE; LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PLANT PROTEINS; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN INTERACTION DOMAINS AND MOTIFS; SELECTION, GENETIC;

EID: 84951908310     PISSN: 15671348     EISSN: 15677257     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.meegid.2014.06.019     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Arunyawat U., Stephan W., Staedler T. Using multilocus sequence data to assess population structure, natural selection, and linkage disequilibrium in wild tomatoes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 2007, 24:2310-2322.
2. Balmuth A., Rathjen J.P. Genetic and molecular requirements for function of the Pto/Prf effector recognition complex in tomato and Nicotiana benthamiana. Plant J. 2007, 51:978-990.
3. Beaumont M.A., Nichols R.A. Evaluating loci for use in the genetic analysis of population structure. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 1996, 263:1619-1626.
4. Bernal A.J., Pan Q.L., Pollack J., Rose L., Kozik A., et al. Functional analysis of the plant disease resistance gene Pto using DNA shuffling. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280:23073-23083.
5. Black W.C., Krafsur E.S. A FORTRAN program for the calculation and analysis of two-locus linkage disequilibrium coefficients. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1985, 70:491-496.
6. Bomblies K. Too much of a good thing? Hybrid necrosis as a by-product of plant immune system diversification. Botany 2009, 87:1013-1022.
7. Boyes D.C., Nasrallah J.B. Physical linkage of the SLG and SRK genes at the self-incompatibility locus of Brassica oleracea. Mol. Gen. Genet. 1993, 236:369-373.
8. Brown A.H.D., Feldman M.W. Population structure of multilocus associations. PNAS 1981, 78:5913-5916.
9. Chang J.H., Tai Y.-S., Bernal A.J., Lavelle D.T., Staskawicz B.J., Michelmore R.W. Functional analysis of the Pto resistance gene family in tomato and the identification of a minor resistance determinant in a susceptible haplotype. Mol. Plant Microbe. Interact. 2002, 15:281-291.
10. Chen H., Zou Y., Shang Y., Lin H., Wang Y., et al. Firefly luciferase complementation imaging assay for protein-protein interactions in plants. Plant Physiol. 2008, 146:368-376.
11. Chetelat R.T., Pertuze R.A., Faundez L., Graham E.B., Jones C.M. Distribution, ecology and reproductive biology of wild tomatoes and related nightshades from the Atacama Desert region of northern Chile. Euphytica 2009, 167:77-93.
12. Cockerham C.C., Weir B.S. Digenic descent measures for finite populations. Genet. Res. 1977, 30:121-147.
13. Dekker J.P., Fodor A., Aldrich R.W., Yellen G. A perturbation-based method for calculating explicit likelihood of evolutionary co-variance in multiple sequence alignments. Bioinformatics 2004, 20:1565-1572.
14. DeLano W.L. The PyMOL Molecular Graphics System 2008, DeLano Scientific LLC, Palo Alto, CA.
15. Dong J., Xiao F., Fan F., Gu L., Cang H., et al. Crystal structure of the complex between Pseudomonas effector AvrPtoB and the tomato Pto kinase reveals both a shared and a unique interface compared with AvrPto-Pto. Plant Cell 2009, 21:1846-1859.
16. Doyle J.J., Doyle J.L. A rapid DNA isolation procedure from small quantities of fresh leaf tissues. Phytochem. Bull. 1987, 19:11-15.
17. Du X., Miao M., Ma X., Liu Y., Kuhl J.C., Martin G.B., Xiao F. Plant programmed cell death caused by an autoactive form of Prf is suppressed by co-expression of the Prf LRR domain. Mol. Plant 2012, 5:1058-1067.
18. Excoffier L., Laval G., Balding D. Gametic phase estimation over large genomic regions using an adaptive window approach. Hum. Genomics 2003, 1:7-19.
19. Excoffier L., Lischer H.E.L. Arlequin suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol. Ecol. Res. 2010, 10:564-567.
20. Flint J., Bond J., Rees D.C., Boyce A.J., Roberts-Thompson J.M., et al. Minisatellite mutational processes reduce Fst estimates. Hum. Genetics 1999, 105:567-576.
21. Foll M., Gaggiotti O. A genome-scan method to identify selected loci appropriate for both dominant and codominant markers: a bayesian perspective. Genetics 2008, 180:977-993.
22. Frederick R.D., Thilmony R.L., Sessa G., Martin G.B. Recognition specificity for the bacterial avirulence protein AvrPto is determined by Thr-204 in the activation loop of the tomato Pto kinase. Mol. Cell 1998, 2:241-245.
23. Garnier-Gere P., Dillmann C. A computer program for testing pairwise linkage disequilibria in subdivided populations. J. Hered. 1992, 83:239.
24. Gutierrez J.R., Balmuth A.L., Ntoukakis V., Mucyn T.S., Gimenez-Ibanez S., Jones A.M., et al. Prf immune complexes of tomato are oligomeric and contain multiple Pto-like kinases that diversify effector recognition. Plant J. 2010, 61:507-518.
25. Hanks S.K., Hunter T. The eukaryotic protein kinase superfamily: kinase (catalytic) domain structure and classification. FASEB J. 1995, 9:576-596.
26. Hill W.G., Weir B.S. Variances and covariances of squared linkage disequilibria in finite populations. Theor. Popul. Biol. 1988, 33:54-78.
27. Hoerger A.C., Ilyas M., Stephan W., Tellier A., van der Hoorn R.A.L., Rose L.R. Balancing selection at the tomato RCR3 guardee gene family maintains variation in strength of pathogen defense. PLoS Gene. 2012, 8:e1002813.
28. Hudson R.R. Two-locus sampling distributions and their application. Genetics 2001, 159:1805-1817.
29. Jeffreys H. Theory of Probability 1961, Oxford University Press. third ed.
30. Jia Y., Loh Y.T., Zhou J., Martin G.B. Alleles of Pto and Fen occur in bacterial speck-susceptible and fenthion-insensitive tomato cultivars and encode active protein kinases. Plant Cell 1997, 9:61-73.
31. Kelly J.K. A test of neutrality based on interlocus associations. Genetics 1997, 146:1197-1206.
32. Kimura M. The role of compensatory neutral mutations in molecular evolution. J. Genet. 1985, 64:7-19.
33. Kud J., Zhao Z., Du X., Liu Y., Zhao Y., Xiao F. SGT1 interacts with the Prf resistance protein and is required for Prf accumulation and Prf-mediated defense signalling. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2013, 431:501-505.
34. Lewontin R. The Genetic Basis of Evolutionary Change 1974, Columbia University Press, NY.
35. Librado P., Rozas J. DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 2009, 25:1451-1452.
36. Loh Y.T., Martin G.B. The Pto bacterial resistance gene and the Fen insecticide sensitivity gene encode functional protein kinases with serine/threonine specificity. Plant Physiol. 1995, 108:1735-1739.
37. Martin G.B., Brommonschenkel S.H., Chunwongse J., Frary A., Ganal M.W., et al. Map-based cloning of a protein kinase gene conferring disease resistance in tomato. Science 1993, 262:1432-1436.
38. Martin G.B., Frary A., Wu T.Y., Brommonschenkel S., Chunwongse J., et al. A member of the tomato Pto gene family confers sensitivity to fenthion resulting in rapid cell death. Plant Cell 1994, 6:1543-1552.
39. McVean G., Awadalla P., Fearnhead P. A coalescent-based method for detecting and estimating recombination rates from gene sequences. Genetics 2002, 160:1231-1241.
40. Mucyn T.S., Clemente A., Andriotis V.M.E., Balmuth A.L., Oldroyd G.E.D., et al. The tomato NBARC-LRR protein Prf interacts with Pto kinase in vivo to regulate specific plant immunity. Plant Cell 2006, 18:2792-2806.
41. Mucyn T.S., Wu A.-J., Balmuth A.L., Arasteh J.M., Rathjen J.P. Regulation of tomato Prf by Pto-like protein kinases. Mol. Plant Microbe. Interact. 2009, 22:391-401.
42. Ntoukakis V., Mucyn T.S., Gimenez-Ibanez S., Chapman H.C., Gutierrez J.R., et al. Host inhibition of a bacterial virulence effector triggers immunity to infection. Science 2009, 324:784-787.
43. Ntoukakis V., Balmuth A.L., Mucyn T.S., Gutierrez J.R., Jones A.M.E., et al. The tomato Prf complex is a molecular trap for bacterial effectors based on Pto transphosphorylation. PLoS Pathog. 2013, 9:e1003123.
44. Ohta T. Linkage disequilibrium due to random genetic drift in finite subdivided populations. PNAS 1982, 79:1940-1944.
45. Ohta T. Linkage disequilibrium with the island model. Genetics 1982, 101:139-155.
46. Rathjen J.P., Chang J.H., Staskawicz B.J., Michelmore R.W. Constitutively active Pto induces a Prf-dependent hypersensitive response in the absence of avrPto. EMBO 1999, 18:3232-3240.
47. Rose, L.E., 2002. Dissertation: the population genetics and functional analysis of the Pto disease resistance gene in Lycopersicon spp. and the RPP13 gene in Arabidopsis thaliana. University of California, Davis.
48. Rose L.E., Bittner-Eddy P.D., Langley C.H., Holub E.B., Michelmore R.W., Beynon J.L. The maintenance of extreme amino acid diversity at the disease resistance gene, RPP13, in Arabidopsis thaliana. Genetics 2004, 166:1517-1527.
49. Rose L.E., Langley C.H., Bernal A.J., Michelmore R.W. Natural variation in the Pto pathogen resistance gene within species of wild tomato (Lycopersicon). I. Functional analysis of Pto alleles. Genetics 2005, 171:345-357.
50. Rose L.E., Michelmore R.W., Langley C.H. Natural variation in the Pto disease resistance gene within species of wild tomato (Lycopersicon). II. Population genetics of Pto. Genetics 2007, 175:1307-1319.
51. Rose L.E., Grzeskowiak L., Hoerger A., Groth M., Stephan W. Targets of selection in a disease resistance network in wild tomatoes. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2011, 12:921-927.
52. Rose L.E., Atwell S., Grant M., Holub E.B. Parallel loss-of-function at the RPM1 bacterial resistance locus in Arabidopsis thaliana. Front. Plant Sci. 2012, 3.
53. Rosebrock T.C., Zeng L., Brady J.J., Abramovitch R.B., Xiao F., Martin G.B. A bacterial E3 ubiquitin ligase targets a host protein kinase to disrupt plant immunity. Nature 2007, 448:370-375.
54. Salmeron J., Oldroyd G., Rommens C., Scofield S., Kim H.-S., et al. Tomato Prf is a member of the leucine-rich repeat class of plant disease resistance genes and lies embedded within the Pto kinase gene cluster. Cell 1996, 86:123-133.
55. Scofield S.R., Tobias C.M., Rathjen J.P., Chang J.H., Lavelle D.T., et al. Molecular basis of gene-for-gene specificity in bacterial speck disease of tomato. Science 1996, 274:2063-2065.
56. Sessa G., Martin G.B. Signal recognition and transduction mediated by the tomato Pto kinase: a paradigm of innate immunity in plants. Microbes Infect. 2000, 2:1591-1597.
57. Song W.Y., Wang G.L., Chen L.L., Kim H.S., Pi L.Y., et al. A receptor kinase-like protein encoded by the rice disease resistance gene, Xa21. Science 1995, 270:1804-1806.
58. Staedler T., Arunyawat U., Stephan W. Population genetics of speciation in two closely related wild tomatoes (Solanum Section Lycopersicon). Genetics 2008, 178:339-350.
59. Tajima F. Statistical method for testing the neutral mutation hypothesis by DNA polymorphism. Genetics 1989, 123:585-595.
60. Takasaki T., Hatakeyama K., Suzuki G., Watanabe M., Isogai A., Hinata K. The S receptor kinase determines self-incompatibility in Brassica stigma. Nature 2000, 403:913-916.
61. Tang X., Frederick R.D., Zhou J., Halterman D.A., Jia Y., Martin G.B. Initiation of plant disease resistance by physical interaction of AvrPto and Pto kinase. Science 1996, 274:2060-2063.
62. Tanksley S.D., Ganal M.W., Prince J.P., De Vicente M.C., Bonierbale M.W., et al. High density molecular linkage maps of the tomato and potato genomes. Genetics 1992, 132:1141-1160.
63. Weir B.S., Cockerham C.C. Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution 1984, 38:1358-1370.
64. Weir B.S. Inferences about linkage disequilibrium. Biometrics 1979, 35:235-254.
65. Weir B.S. Genetic Data Analysis II 1996, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
66. Whittam T.S., Ochman H., Selander R.K. Geographic components of linkage disequilibrium in natural populations of Escherichia coli. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1983, 1:67-83.
67. Wright S. Breeding structure of populations in relation to speciation. Am. Nat. 1940, 74:232-248.
68. Wu A.-J., Andriotis V.M.E., Durrant M.C., Rathjen J.P. A patch of surface-exposed residues mediates negative regulation of immune signaling by tomato Pto kinase. Plant Cell 2004, 16:2809-2821.
69. Xing W., Zou Y., Liu Q., Liu J., Luo X., et al. The structural basis for activation of plant immunity by bacterial effector protein AvrPto. Nature 2007, 449:243-247.
70. Zaykin D.V., Pudovkin A., Weir B.S. Correlation-based inference for linkage disequilibrium with multiple alleles. Genetics 2008, 180:533-545.
71. Zhang Y. I-TASSER server for protein 3D structure prediction. BMC Bioinformatics 2008, 9:40.