Evolution of screen-detected small (6-9 mm) polyps after a 3-year surveillance interval: Assessment of growth with CT colonography compared with histopathology

American Journal of Gastroenterology

Volumn 110, Issue 12, 2015, Pages 1682-1690

  Nolthenius, Charlotte J Tutein ^a,b   Boellaard, Thierry N ^a   De Haan, Margriet C ^c   Nio, C Yung ^a   Thomeer, Maarten G J ^d   Bipat, Shandra ^a   Montauban Van Swijndregt, Alexander D ^b   Van De Vijver, Marc J ^a   Biermann, Katharina ^d   Kuipers, Ernst J ^d   Dekker, Evelien ^a   Stoker, Jaap ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b Onze Lieve Vrouwe Gasthuis ^*  (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^d ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MEGLUMINE IOXITALAMATE PLUS SODIUM IOXITALAMATE;

ADENOMA; ADVANCED CANCER; AGED; ARTICLE; ASCENDING COLON; CECUM POLYP; COLON POLYP; COLONOSCOPY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY SCANNER; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DESCENDING COLON; DESCENDING COLON POLYP; DIAGNOSTIC TEST ACCURACY STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DISEASE SURVEILLANCE; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTESTINE POLYP; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MASS SCREENING; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RECTUM ADENOMA; RECTUM POLYP; SIGMOID POLYP; TRANSVERSE COLON; TRANSVERSE COLON POLYP; TUMOR GROWTH; VOLUMETRY; ADULT; CELL TRANSFORMATION; COLON TUMOR; DISEASE COURSE; HEALTH SURVEY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; RADIOGRAPHY; TIME FACTOR;

ADENOMA; ADULT; AGED; CELL TRANSFORMATION, NEOPLASTIC; COLONIC NEOPLASMS; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; DISEASE PROGRESSION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POPULATION SURVEILLANCE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84951569175     PISSN: 00029270     EISSN: 15720241     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/ajg.2015.340     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Winawer SJ, Zauber AG. The advanced adenoma as the primary target of screening. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2002; 12: 1-9
2. Zalis ME, Barish MA, Choi JR, et al. CT colonography reporting and data system: A consensus proposal. Radiology 2005; 236: 3-9
3. Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ. Characteristics of advanced adenomas detected at CT colonographic screening: implications for appropriate polyp size thresholds for polypectomy versus surveillance. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2007; 188: 940-4
4. Lieberman D, Moravec M, Holub J, et al. Polyp size and advanced histology in patients undergoing colonoscopy screening: implications for CT colonography. Gastroenterology 2008; 135: 1100-5
5. Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH. Colorectal cancer screening with CT colonography: key concepts regarding polyp prevalence, size, histology, morphology, and natural history. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009; 193: 40-6
6. Hassan C, Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, et al. Systematic review: distribution of advanced neoplasia according to polyp size at screening colonoscopy. Aliment Pharmacol Ther 2010; 31: 210-7
7. Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, Pooler BD, et al. Assessment of volumetric growth rates of small colorectal polyps with CT colonography: A longitudinal study of natural history. Lancet Oncol 2013; 14: 711-20
8. Pickhardt PJ, Lehman VT, Winter TC, et al. Polyp volume versus linear size measurements at CT colonography: Implications for noninvasive surveillance of unresected colorectal lesions. Am J Roentgenol 2006; 186: 1605-10
9. Dachman AH, Zalis ME. Quality and consistency in CT colonography and research reporting. Radiology 2004; 230: 319-23
10. De Wijkerslooth TR, De Haan MC, Stoop EM, et al. Study protocol: population screening for colorectal cancer by colonoscopy or CT colonography: A randomized controlled trial. BMC Gastroenterol 2010; 10: 47
11. Liedenbaum MH, Denters MJ, Zijta FM, et al. Reducing the oral contrast dose in CT colonography: evaluation of faecal tagging quality and patient acceptance. Clin Radiol 2011; 66: 30-7
12. Stoop EM, De Haan MC, De Wijkerslooth TR, et al. Participation and yield of colonoscopy versus non-cathartic CT colonography in population-based screening for colorectal cancer: A randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol 2012; 13: 55-64
13. De Haan MC, Nio CY, Th omeer M, et al. Comparing the diagnostic yields of technologists and radiologists in an invitational colorectal cancer screening program performed with CT colonography. Radiology 2012; 264: 771-8
14. Liedenbaum MH, De Vries AH, Halligan S, et al. CT colonography polyp matching: diff erences between experienced readers. Eur Radiol 2009; 19: 1723-30
15. De Haan MC, Boellaard TN, Bossuyt PM, et al. Colon distension, perceived burden and side-eff ects of CT-colonography for screening using hyoscine butylbromide or glucagon hydrochloride as bowel relaxant. Eur J Radiol 2012; 81: e910-6
16. Schlemper RJ, Riddell RH, Kato Y, et al. The Vienna classifi cation of gastrointestinal epithelial neoplasia. Gut 2000; 47: 251-5
17. Altman DG. Practical Statistics for Medical Research Chapman & Hall/CRC: Boca Raton, FL, 1999
18. Bethea E, Nwawka OK, Dachman AH. Comparison of polyp size and volume at CT colonography: implications for follow-up CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009; 193: 1561-7
19. Atkin WS, Edwards R, Kralj-Hans I, et al. Once-only fl exible sigmoidoscopy screening in prevention of colorectal cancer: A multi-centre randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2010; 375: 1624-33
20. Hofstad B, Vatn MH, Andersen SN, et al. Growth of colorectal polyps: redetection and evaluation of unresected polyps for a period of three years. Gut 1996; 39: 449-56
21. Bersentes K, Fennerty MB, Sampliner RE, et al. Lack of spontaneous regression of tubular adenomas in two years of follow-up. Am J Gastroenterol 1997; 92: 1117-20
22. Loeve F, Boer R, Zauber AG, et al. National Polyp Study data: evidence for regression of adenomas. Int J Cancer 2004; 111: 633-9
23. Hoff G, Foerster A, Vatn MH, et al. Epidemiology of polyps in the rectum and colon. Recovery and evaluation of unresected polyps 2 years aft er detection. Scand J Gastroenterol 1986; 21: 853-62
24. Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: A joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. CA Cancer J Clin 2008; 58: 130-60
25. Spada C, Stoker J, Alarcon O, et al. Clinical indications for computed tomographic colonography: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy(ESGE and European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR Guideline. Endoscopy 2014; 46: 897-915
26. Yeshwant SC, Summers RM, Yao J, et al. Polyps: linear and volumetric measurement at CT colonography. Radiology 2006; 241: 802-11
27. Burling D, Halligan S, Altman DG, et al. Polyp measurement and size categorisation by CT colonography: effect of observer experience in a multi-centre setting. Eur Radiol 2006; 16: 1737-44
28. De Vries AH, Bipat S, Dekker E, et al. Polyp measurement based on CT colonography and colonoscopy: variability and systematic diff erences. Eur Radiol 2010; 20: 1404-13
29. Barancin C, Pickhardt PJ, Kim DH, et al. Prospective blinded comparison of polyp size on computed tomography colonography and endoscopic colonoscopy. Clin Gastroenterol 2011; 9: 443-5