Polyp measurement based on CT colonography and colonoscopy: Variability and systematic differences

European Radiology

Volumn 20, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1404-1413

  De Vries, Ayso H ^a   Bipat, Shandra ^a   Dekker, Evelien ^a   Liedenbaum, Marjolein H ^a   Florie, Jasper ^a   Fockens, Paul ^a   Van Der Kraan, Roel ^b   Mathus Vliegen, Elizabeth M ^a   Reitsma, Johannes B ^a   Truyen, Roel ^b   Vos, Frans M ^a   Zwinderman, Aeilko H ^a   Stoker, Jaap ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^b PHILIPS HEALTHCARE   (United States)

Author keywords

2D; 3D; Cancer; Colon; Colonoscopy; CT colonography; Measurement

Indexed keywords

IODINATED CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COLON POLYP; COLONOSCOPY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; FEMALE; FORCEPS; HUMAN; MALE; MEASUREMENT; MECHANICAL PROBE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL MODEL; TUMOR VOLUME;

AGED; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; COLONOSCOPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 77952094641     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-009-1683-0     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. S Halligan DG Altman SA Taylor, et al. 2005 CT colonography in the detection of colorectal polyps and cancer: systematic review, meta-analysis, and proposed minimum data set for study level reporting Radiology 237 893 904 10.1148/radiol.2373050176 16304111 (Pubitemid 41636379)
2. RE van Gelder E Birnie J Florie, et al. 2004 CT colonography and colonoscopy: assessment of patient preference in a 5-week follow-up study Radiology 233 328 337 10.1148/radiol.2331031208 15358854 (Pubitemid 39423788)
3. ME Zalis MA Barish JR Choi, et al. 2005 CT colonography reporting and data system: a consensus proposal Radiology 236 3 9 10.1148/radiol.2361041926 15987959 (Pubitemid 40853289)
4. EG McFarland B Levin DA Lieberman, et al. 2008 Revised colorectal screening guidelines: joint effort of the American Cancer Society, U.S. Multisociety Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and American College of Radiology Radiology 248 717 720 10.1148/radiol.2483080842 18710970
5. WS Atkin BC Morson J Cuzick 1992 Long-term risk of colorectal cancer after excision of rectosigmoid adenomas N Engl J Med 326 658 662 1:STN:280:DyaK387ktVClsw%3D%3D 1736104
6. MJ O'Brien SJ Winawer AG Zauber, et al. 1990 The National Polyp Study. Patient and polyp characteristics associated with high-grade dysplasia in colorectal adenomas Gastroenterology 98 371 379 2403953
7. DH Kim PJ Pickhardt AJ Taylor, et al. 1997 CT colonography versus colonoscopy for the detection of advanced neoplasia N Engl J Med 357 1403 1412 10.1056/NEJMoa070543
8. SH Park EK Choi SS Lee, et al. 2007 Polyp measurement reliability, accuracy, and discrepancy: optical colonoscopy versus CT colonography with pig colonic specimens Radiology 244 157 164 10.1148/radiol.2441060794 17507724 (Pubitemid 46981970)
9. S Punwani S Halligan P Irving, et al. 2008 Measurement of colonic polyps by radiologists and endoscopists: who is most accurate? Eur Radiol 18 874 881 10.1007/s00330-007-0830-8 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1c3jvFSltA%3D%3D 18176807
10. D Burling S Halligan S Taylor, et al. 2006 Polyp measurement using CT colonography: agreement with colonoscopy and effect of viewing conditions on interobserver and intraobserver agreement AJR Am J Roentgenol 186 1597 1604 10.2214/AJR.05.0171 16714648 (Pubitemid 46112522)
11. JY Jeong MJ Kim SS Kim 2008 Manual and automated polyp measurement comparison of CT colonography with optical colonoscopy Acad Radiol 15 231 239 10.1016/j.acra.2007.10.006 18206622
12. PJ Pickhardt AD Lee EG McFarland AJ Taylor 2005 Linear polyp measurement at CT colonography: in vitro and in vivo comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional displays Radiology 236 872 878 10.1148/radiol.2363041534 16118167 (Pubitemid 41170850)
13. C van Wijk J Florie CY Nio, et al. 2008 Protrusion method for automated estimation of polyp size on CT colonography AJR Am J Roentgenol 190 1279 1285 10.2214/AJR.07.2865 1:STN:280:DC%2BD1c3mvFersQ%3D%3D 18430844 (Pubitemid 351684912)
14. MH Liedenbaum AF van Rijn AH de Vries, et al. 2009 Using CT colonography as a triage technique after a positive faecal occult blood test in colorectal cancer screening Gut 58 1242 1249 10.1136/gut.2009.176867 1:STN:280: DC%2BD1Mrksl2gtw%3D%3D 19625276
15. AH de Vries S Jensch MH Liedenbaum, et al. 2009 Does a computer-aided detection algorithm in a second read paradigm enhance the performance of experienced computed tomography colonography readers in a population of increased risk? Eur Radiol 19 941 950 10.1007/s00330-008-1215-3 18982331
16. JM Bland DG Altman 1986 Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement Lancet 1 307 310 1:STN:280:DyaL287hslWqsQ%3D%3D 2868172
17. MF Quinn 1989 Relation of observer agreement to accuracy according to a two-receiver signal detection model of diagnosis Med Decis Mak 9 196 206 10.1177/0272989X8900900308 1:STN:280:DyaL1MzktlGhug%3D%3D
18. H Akaike 2008 A new look at the statistical model identification IEEE Trans Automat Contr 19 716 723 10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705
19. [No authors listed] (2003) The Paris endoscopic classification of superficial neoplastic lesions: esophagus, stomach, and colon: November 30 to December 1, 2002. Gastrointest Endosc 58:S3-43
20. N Gopalswamy VN Shenoy U Choudhry, et al. 1997 Is in vivo measurement of size of polyps during colonoscopy accurate? Gastrointest Endosc 46 497 502 10.1016/S0016-5107(97)70003-8 1:STN:280:DyaK1c%2FpsVejtg%3D%3D 9434215
21. TG Morales RE Sampliner HS Garewal MB Fennerty M Aickin 1996 The difference in colon polyp size before and after removal Gastrointest Endosc 43 25 28 1:STN:280:DyaK2s%2FlvFCqsA%3D%3D 8903813
22. RE Schoen LD Gerber C Margulies 1997 The pathologic measurement of polyp size is preferable to the endoscopic estimate Gastrointest Endosc 46 492 496 10.1016/S0016-5107(97)70002-6 1:STN:280:DyaK1c%2FpsVejsQ%3D%3D 9434214
23. MB Fennerty J Davidson SS Emerson RE Sampliner LJ Hixson HS Garewal 1993 Are endoscopic measurements of colonic polyps reliable? Am J Gastroenterol 88 496 500 1:STN:280:DyaK3s3ivVSiug%3D%3D 8470627
24. C Margulies B Krevsky MF Catalano 1994 How accurate are endoscopic estimates of size? Gastrointest Endosc 40 174 177 1:STN:280:DyaK2c3otlOqtQ%3D%3D 8013817
25. SH Park EK Choi SS Lee, et al. 2008 Linear polyp measurement at CT colonography: 3D endoluminal measurement with optimized surface-rendering threshold value and automated measurement Radiology 246 157 167 10.1148/radiol.2453061930 18033755 (Pubitemid 350305039)