Environmental conflict analysis using an integrated grey clustering and entropy-weight method: A case study of a mining project in Peru

Environmental Modelling and Software

Volumn 77, Issue , 2016, Pages 108-121

  Delgado, Alexi ^a,b   Romero, I ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE VALÈNCIA   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSIDAD DE CIENCIAS Y HUMANIDADES   (Peru)

Author keywords

Entropy weight method; Environmental conflict; Grey clustering method; Mining project; Social impact

Indexed keywords

ENTROPY; POTABLE WATER;

ENTROPY WEIGHT METHOD; ENVIRONMENTAL CONFLICT; GREY CLUSTERING; MINING PROJECTS; SOCIAL IMPACT;

ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL EFFECTS;

CLUSTER ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; FUZZY MATHEMATICS; INTEGRATED APPROACH; MINING; PROJECT ASSESSMENT; QUESTIONNAIRE SURVEY; RURAL POPULATION; SOCIAL IMPACT; SPECIALIST; STAKEHOLDER; URBAN POPULATION; WELFARE REFORM;

PERU;

EID: 84951264353     PISSN: 13648152     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsoft.2015.12.011     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Al-Mutairi M., Hipel K., Kamel M. Fuzzy preferences in conflicts. J. Syst. Sci. Syst. Eng. 2008, 17:257-276.
2. Arun E. Towards a shared systems model of stakeholders in environmental conflict. Int. Trans. Oper. Res. 2008, 15:239-253.
3. Augustsson A., Filipsson M., Öberg T., Bergbäck B. Climate change - an uncertainty factor in risk analysis of contaminated land. Sci. Total Environ. 2011, 409:4693-4700.
4. Aznar J., Guijarro F. Nuevos Métodos De Valoración, Modelos Multicriterio 2012, (Universitat Politèctica de València, Valencia). 2ed.
5. Barrow C.J. How is environmental conflict addressed by SIA?. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2010, 30:293-301.
6. Baykasoglu A., Gölcük I. Development of a novel multiple-attribute decision making model via fuzzy cognitive maps and hierarchical fuzzy TOPSIS. Inf. Sci. 2015, 301:75-98.
7. Bindu C., Padmaja M., Chandulal J.A. Evaluating web sites based on GHAP. Int. J. Comput. Sci. Eng. 2010, 2:674-679.
8. Bolin B., Collins T., Darby K. Fate of the verde: water, environmental conflict, and the politics of scale in Arizona's central highlands. Geoforum 2008, 39:1494-1511.
9. Cao C., Slobounov S. Application of a novel measure of EEG non-stationarity as Shannon-entropy of the peak frequency shifting for detecting residual abnormalities in concussed individuals. Int. J. Clin. Neuropsyc. 2011, 122:1314-1321.
10. Celendín libre Lagoon "El perol", cajamarca-perú Retrieved from. https://celendinlibre.files.wordpress.com/2011/10/laguna-perol.jpg.
11. Chang Z., Qisen Z. The assessment of the social, economic, and environmental impacts of expressway construction projects based on the DFGF Algorithm., management and service Science. MASS '09. Int. Conf. Wuhan 2009, 1-5.
12. Chen S., Leng Y., Mao B., Liu S. Integrated weight-based multi-criteria evaluation on transfer in large transport terminals: a case study of the Beijing south railway Station. Transp. Res. A-Pol 2014, 66:13-26.
13. Comercio El Enfrentamiento en cajamarca deja un consejero regional herido Retrieved from. http://elcomercio.pe/peru/cajamarca/enfrentamiento-conga-deja-consejero-regional-herido-noticia-1808009?ref=flujo_tags_322786&ft=nota_3&e=titulo.
14. Corbetta P. Metodología y Técnicas de Investigación Social 2007, McGRAW-HILL, Madrid.
15. Correia D. The sustained yield forest management act and the roots of environmental conflict in Northern New Mexico. Geoforum 2007, 38:1040-1051.
16. De Echave J., Diez A. Más allá de Conga. Red Peruana por una Globalización con Equidad - RedGE, Lima - Perú 2013.
17. Deng J. Generation functions of grey systems. Fuzzy Math. 1985, 5:11-22.
18. Fagbote E.O., Olanipekun E.O., Uyi H.S. Water quality index of the ground water of bitumen deposit impacted farm settlements using entropy weighted method. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 11:127-138.
19. Fontaine G. The effects of energy co-governance in Peru. Energy Policy 2010, 38:2234-2244.
20. Franks D.M., Vanclay F. Social impact management plans: innovation in corporate and public policy. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2013, 43:40-48.
21. Griewald Y., Rauschmayer F. Exploring an environmental conflict from a capability perspective. Ecol. Econ. 2014, 100:30-39.
22. Grufides Observatorio de conflictos Cajamarca, conflicto minero Conga Retrieved from. http://www.grufides.org/sites/default/files//Documentos/fichas_casos/CONFLICTO%20MINERO%20CONGA.pdf.
23. Hamilton S.H., ElSawah S., Guillaume J.H., Jakeman A.J., Pierce S.A. Integrated assessment and modelling: overview and synthesis of salient dimensions. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2015, 64:215-229.
24. Heidari Bafroui H., Ohadi A. Application of wavelet energy and Shannon entropy for feature extraction in gearbox fault detection under varying speed conditions. Neurocomputing 2014, 133:437-445.
25. INEI Inst. Nac. Estadística Inform. del Perú 2014, 2014. Retrieved from. http://www.inei.gob.pe/.
26. Ji Y., Huang G.H., Sun W. Risk assessment of hydropower stations through an integrated fuzzy entropy-weight multiple criteria decision making method: a case study of the Xiangxi River. Expert Syst. Appl. 2015, 42:5380-5389.
27. Karjalainen T.P., Järvikoski T. Negotiating river ecosystems: impact assessment and conflict mediation in the cases of hydro-power construction. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2010, 30:319-327.
28. Kemper J., Schilke O., Reimann M., Wang X., Brettel M. Competition-motivated corporate social responsibility. J. Bus. Res. 2013, 66:1954-1963.
29. Knight Piésold Estudio de Impacto Ambiental. Proyecto Conga. Minera Yanacocha S.R.L.. Perú 2010.
30. Kou G., Sun Q., Peng Y. An entropy-weighted clustering method for environmental pollution assessment in China. New State of MCDM in the 21st Century 2011, 177-188. Springer, Berlin. Y. Shi, S. Wang, G. Kou, J. Wallenius (Eds.).
31. Leng Y., Kou C., Zhou N., Li Q., Liang Y., Xu Z., Chen S. Evaluation on transfer efficiency at integrated transport terminals through multilevel grey evaluation. Procedia - Soc. Behav. Sci. 2012, 43:587-594.
32. Li C., Chen K., Xiang X. An integrated framework for effective safety management evaluation: application of an improved grey clustering measurement. Expert Syst. Appl. 2015, 42(13):5541-5553. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2015.02.053.
33. Liu S., Lin Y. Grey systems: theory and applications 2010, Springer, Berlin.
34. Luyet V., Schlaepfer R., Parlange M.B., Buttler A. A framework to implement stakeholder participation in environmental projects. J. Environ. Manag. 2012, 111:213-219.
35. Madani K., Rouhani O., Mirchi A., Gholizadeh S. A negotiation support system for resolving an international trans-boundary natural resource conflict. Environ. Modell. Softw 2014, 51:240-249.
36. o 2011, 1-2011. (Perú).
37. Prenzel P.V., Vanclay F. How social impact assessment can contribute to conflict management. Environ. Impact Assess. Rev. 2014, 45:30-37.
38. Red verde Water conflict on the "Quinua" channel Retrieved from. http://caballeroredverde.blogspot.com.es/2011/09/usuario-de-canal-quinua-marchan-en.html.
39. Sánchez W. ¿Por qué el proyecto conga es inviable?. Univ. Nac. Cajamarca 2011, (Perú), (Retrieved from http://slideplayer.es/slide/4378756/).
40. Saqalli M., Thiriot S., Amblard F. Investigating social conflicts linked to water resources though agent-based modelling. NATO Sci. Peace Secur. Ser. 2010, 75:142-157.
41. Shannon C.E., Weaver W. The Mathematical Theory of Communication 1947, The University of Illinois Press, Urbana.
42. Shemshadi A., Shirazi H., Toreihi M., Tarokh M.J. A fuzzy VIKOR method for supplier selection based on entropy measure for objective weighting. Expert Syst. Appl. 2011, 38:12160-12167.
43. Silva-Macher J.C., Farrell K.N. The flow/fund model of Conga: exploring the anatomy of environmental conflicts at the Andes-Amazon commodity frontier. Environ. Dev. Sustain 2014, 16:747-768.
44. Srivastav R., Simonovic S. An analytical procedure for multi-site, multi-season streamflow generation using maximum entropy bootstrapping. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2014, 59:59-75.
45. Wang T., Lee H. Developing a fuzzy TOPSIS approach based on subjective weights and objective weights. Expert Syst. Appl. 2009, 36:8980-8985.
46. Warnaars X.S. Why be poor when we can be rich? constructing responsible mining in El Pangui. Ecuad. Resour. Policy 2012, 37:223-232.
47. Wei J., Zhou L., Wang F., Wu D. Work safety evaluation in Mainland China using grey theory. Appl. Math. Model 2015, 39:924-933.
48. Wikimedia Commons File: Peru_-_(template).Svg 2014, Retrieved from. http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Departamento_de_Cajamarca%20-%20mediaviewer/File:Peru_-_Cajamarca_Department_(locator_maphttp://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Departamento_de_Cajamarca#mediaviewer/File:Peru_-_Cajamarca_Department_(locator_map).svg.
49. Wittmer H., Rauschmayer F., Klauer B. How to select instruments for the resolution of environmental conflicts?. Land Use Policy 2006, 23:1-9.
50. Xie M., Yang Y. Cost risk assessment of construction projects based on entropy- weighted matter-element model. Adv. Mat. Res. 2011, 168-170:2402-2405.
51. Yang J., Ryan C., Zhang L. Social conflict in communities impacted by tourism. Tour. Manag. 2013, 35:82-93.
52. Zadeh L.A. Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 1965, 8:338-353.
53. Zeleny M. Multiple Criteria Decision Making 1996, Springer, New York.
54. Zhang L.N., Wu F.P., Jia P. Grey evaluation model based on reformative triangular whitenization weight function and its application in water rights allocation system. Open Cybern. Syst. J. 2013, 7:1-10.
55. Zhang Y., Ni J., Liu J., Jian L. Grey evaluation empirical study based on center-point triangular whitenization weight function of Jiangsu province industrial technology innovation strategy alliance. Grey Syst. Theory Appl. 2014, 4:124-136.
56. Zitnick L., Kanade T. Maximum entropy for collaborative filtering. In ACM Proceedings of the 20th Conference on Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence 2004, 636-643.