Integrated weight-based multi-criteria evaluation on transfer in large transport terminals: A case study of the Beijing South Railway Station

Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice

Volumn 66, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 13-26

  Chen, Shaokuan ^a   Leng, Yan ^a,b   Mao, Baohua ^a   Liu, Shuang ^a  

^a BEIJING JIAOTONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Integrated weights; Large transport terminals; Multi criteria evaluation; Transfer

Indexed keywords

RAILROAD STATIONS;

BEIJING SOUTH RAILWAY STATIONS; INTEGRATED WEIGHTS; MULTI-CRITERIA EVALUATION; SUBJECTIVE PERCEPTIONS; TECHNIQUE FOR ORDER PREFERENCE BY SIMILARITY TO IDEAL SOLUTIONS; TRANSFER; TRANSFER PERFORMANCE; TRANSPORT TERMINALS;

RAILROADS;

DEMAND ANALYSIS; MULTICRITERIA ANALYSIS; PERCEPTION; TRANSPORTATION SYSTEM; URBAN TRANSPORT;

BEIJING [CHINA]; CHINA;

EID: 84901370012     PISSN: 09658564     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2014.04.015     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Abascal E., Garcia L.I., Mallor F. Tracking customer portfolio composition: a factor analysis approach. Appl. Stochastic Models Bus. Ind. 2010, 26(5):535-550.
2. Bastani P., Heywood J.B., Hope C. The effect of uncertainty on US transport-related GHG emissions and fuel consumption out to 2050. Transp. Res. Part A 2012, 46(3):517-548.
3. Benitez J.M., Martin J.C., Roman C. Using fuzzy number for measuring quality of service in the hotel industry. Tour. Manage. 2007, 28(2):544-555.
4. Chen M.F., Tzeng G.H. Combining grey relation and TOPSIS concepts for selecting an expatriate host country. Math. Computer Modell. 2004, 40(13):1473-1490.
5. Chen Y., Li K.W., Liu S.F. An OWA-TOPSIS method for multiple criteria decision analysis. Expert Syst. Appl. 2011, 38(5):5205-5211.
6. Choi T.N.Y., Chan D.W.M., Chan A.P.C. Perceived benefits of applying Pay for Safety Scheme (PFSS) in construction - a factor analysis approach. Saf. Sci. 2011, 49(6):813-823.
7. Chu A.T.W., Kalaba R.E., Spingarn K. A comparison of two methods for determining the weights of belonging to fuzzy sets. J. Optim. Theory Appl. 1979, 27(4):531-538.
8. Correia A.R., Wirasinghe S.C., de Barros A.G. Overall level of service measures for airport passenger terminals. Transp. Res. Part A 2008, 42(2):330-346.
9. Dalkey N.C. The Delphi Method: An Experimental Study of Group Opinion 1969, RAND Corporation, Santa Monica, CA.
10. De Barros A.G., Somasundaraswaran A.K., Wirasinghe S.C. Evaluation of level of service for transfer passengers at airports. J. Air Transp. Manage. 2007, 13(5):293-298.
11. Deng H., Yeh C.H., Willis R.J. Inter-company comparison using modified TOPSIS with objective weights. Comput. Oper. Res. 2000, 27(10):963-973.
12. Ertugrul I., Karakasoglu N. Performance evaluation of Turkish cement firms with fuzzy analytic hierarchy process and TOPSIS methods. Expert Syst. Appl. 2009, 36(1):702-715.
13. Garcia-Cascales M.S., Lamata M.T. On rank reversal and TOPSIS method. Math. Computer Modell. 2012, 56(5-6):123-132.
14. Gass S.I. Model world: the great debate: MAUT versus AHP. Interfaces 2005, 35(4):308-312.
15. Golan A., Judge G., Miller D. Maximum Entropy Econometrics: Robust Estimation with Limited Data 1996, John, Wiley and Sons, New York.
16. Guo S.X., Yu L., Chen X.M., Zhang Y. Modelling waiting time for passengers transferring from rail to buses. Transp. Plann. Technol. 2011, 34(8):795-809.
17. Guo Z., Wilson N.H.M. Assessing the cost of transfer inconvenience in public transport systems: a case study of the London Underground. Transp. Res. Part A 2011, 45(2):91-104.
18. Ho C.T.B., Wu D.D. Online banking performance evaluation using data envelopment analysis and principal component analysis. Comput. Oper. Res. 2009, 36(6):1835-1842.
19. Hsu S.C. Determinants of passenger transfer waiting time at multi-modal connecting stations. Transp. Res. Part E 2010, 46(3):404-413.
20. Huang, Y.S., Yan, Y., Ji, Y.J., 2008. Optimization of supply chain partner based on VIKOR method and G1 method. In: Proceedings of 2008 International Seminar on Future Biomedical Information Engineering, Wuhan, China, pp. 172-175.
21. Hwang C.L., Yoon K.P. Multiple Attributes Decision Making Methods and Applications 1981, Springer, Berlin.
22. Integrated Transportation Research Centre of China (ITRCC), 2010. Energy Consumption, Emissions and Their Comparison among Different Transport Modes. Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing, China.
23. Janic M. Multicriteria evaluation of high-speed rail, transrapid maglev and air passenger transport in Europe. Transp. Plann. Technol. 2003, 26(6):491-512.
24. Jara-Diaz S.R., Gschwender A., Ortega M. Is public transport based on transfers optimal? A theoretical investigation. Transp. Res. Part B 2012, 46(7):808-816.
25. Joshua I., Adli M., Mark G. Modeling funding allocation problems via ahp-fuzzy topsis. Int. J. Innov. Comput. Inform. Control 2012, 8(5A):3329-3340.
26. Kämpke T. Sensitivity analysis for assessing preferentially independent order relations. Comput. Oper. Res. 1996, 23(12):1119-1130.
27. Kumar A., Sokhansanj S., Flynn P.C. Development of a multicriteria assessment model for ranking biomass feedstock collection and transportation systems. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2006, 129(1):71-87.
28. Li J., Yue Z.Q., Wong S.C. Performance evaluation of signalized urban intersections under mixed traffic conditions by gray system theory. J. Transp. Eng. 2004, 130(1):113-121.
29. Li P.Y., Wu J.H., Qian H. Groundwater quality assessment based on rough sets attribute reduction and TOPSIS method in a semi-arid area, China. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2012, 184(8):4841-4854.
30. Liu P.D., Zhang X. Research on the supplier selection of a supply chain based on entropy weight and improved ELECTRE-III method. Int. J. Prod. Res. 2011, 49(3):637-646.
31. Ma J., Fan Z.P., Huang L.H. A subjective and objective integrated approach to determine attribute weights. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 1999, 112(2):397-404.
32. Mateus R., Ferreira J.A., Carreira J. Multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA): central Porto high-speed railway station. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2008, 187(1):1-18.
33. Mon D.L., Cheng C.H., Lin J.C. Evaluating weapon system using fuzzy analytic hierarchy process based on entropy weight. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 1994, 62(2):127-134.
34. Nealer R., Matthews H.S., Hendrickson C. Assessing the energy and greenhouse gas emissions mitigation effectiveness of potential US modal freight policies. Transp. Res. Part A 2012, 46(3):588-601.
35. Pai T.Y., Hanaki K., Ho H.H., Hsieh C.M. Using grey system theory to evaluate transportation effects on air quality trends in Japan. Transp. Res. Part D 2007, 12(3):158-166.
36. Pan, Y.H., Zhang, F.M., Guo, Y.J., Dong, F.F., 2010. The interval estimation order relation analysis method and its application. IEEE International Conference on Management and Service Science, August 24-26, Wuhan, China, pp. 1-4.
37. Safaei Mohamadabadi H., Tichkowsky G., Kumar A. Development of a multi-criteria assessment model for ranking of renewable and non-renewable transportation fuel vehicles. Energy 2009, 34(1):112-125.
38. Shafahi Y., Khani A. A practical model for transfer optimization in a transit network: model formulations and solutions. Transp. Res. Part A 2010, 44(6):377-389.
39. Shemshadi A., Shirazi H., Toreihi M., Tarokh M.J. A fuzzy VIKOR method for supplier selection based on entropy measure for objective weighting. Expert Syst. Appl. 2011, 38(10):12160-12167.
40. Sheu J.B. Dynamic relief-demand management for emergency logistics operations under large-scale disasters. Transp. Res. Part E 2010, 46(1):1-17.
41. Shih H.S., Shyur H.Y., Lee E.S. An extension of TOPSIS for group decision making. Math. Computer Modell. 2007, 45(7):801-813.
42. Sinha K.C., Patidar V., Li Z.Z., Labi S., Thompson P.D. Establishing the weights of performance criteria: case studies in transportation facility management. J. Transp. Eng. 2009, 135(9):619-631.
43. Sun L.S., Rong J., Yao L.Y., Xu H., Liu H.C. Entropy-based estimation of transfers in a terminal. Transp. Plann. Technol. 2012, 35(3):303-315.
44. Teodorović D. Multicriteria ranking of air shuttle alternatives. Transp. Res. Part B 1985, 19(1):63-72.
45. Tudela A., Akiki N., Cisternas R. Comparing the output of cost benefit and multi-criteria analysis. Transp. Res. Part A 2006, 40(5):414-423.
46. Tung C.T., Lee Y.J. The innovative performance evaluation model of grey factor analysis: a case study of listed biotechnology corporations in Taiwan. Expert Syst. Appl. 2010, 37(10):7844-7851.
47. Wang T.C., Lee H.D. Developing a fuzzy TOPSIS approach based on subjective weights and objective weights. Expert Syst. Appl. 2009, 36(5):8980-8985.
48. Wang Y.J. Applying FMCDM to evaluate financial performance of domestic airlines in Taiwan. Expert Syst. Appl. 2007, 34(3):1837-1845.
49. Wang Y.M., Elhag T.M.S. Fuzzy TOPSIS method based on alpha level sets with an application to bridge risk assessment. Expert Syst. Appl. 2006, 31(2):309-319.
50. Wu F.C., Chyu C.C. Optimization of correlated multiple quality characteristics robust design using principal component analysis. J. Manuf. Syst. 2004, 23(2):134-143.
51. Wu Y.X., Su H.T., Aihemaitijiang R. Application of combining weights method on schemes optimization for water-saving irrigation project. J. Water Resour. Water Eng. 2009, 20(3):105-110.
52. Xu G., Yang Y.P., Lu S.Y., Li L., Song X.N. Comprehensive evaluation of coal-fired power plants based on grey relational analysis and analytic hierarchy process. Energy Policy 2011, 39(5):2343-2351.
53. Yang Z.L., Bonsall S., Wang J. Approximate TOPSIS for vessel selection under uncertain environment. Expert Syst. Appl. 2011, 38(12):14523-14534.
54. Zeleny M. Multiple Criteria Decision Making 1996, Springer, New York.
55. Zhai L.Y., Khoo L.P., Zhong Z.W. Design concept evaluation in product development using rough sets and grey relation analysis. Expert Syst. Appl. 2009, 36(3):7072-7079.
56. Zhao F., Zeng X. Optimization of transit route network, vehicle headways and timetables for large-scale transit networks. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2008, 186(2):841-855.
57. Zubaryeva A., Thiel C., Zaccarelli N., Barbone E., Mercier A. Spatial multi-criteria assessment of potential lead markets for electrified vehicles in Europe. Transp. Res. Part A 2012, 46(9):1477-1489.