Watching eyes on potential litter can reduce littering: Evidence fromtwo field experiments

PeerJ

Volumn 2015, Issue 12, 2015, Pages

  Bateson, Melissa ^a   Robinson, Rebecca ^a   Abayomi Cole, Tim ^a   Greenlees, Josh ^a   O'Connor, Abby ^a   Nettle, Daniel ^a  

^a NEWCASTLE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Antisocial behaviour,Watching eyes; Cooperation; Interventions; Littering; Natural surveillance

Indexed keywords

ANTISOCIAL BEHAVIOR; ARTICLE; HUMAN; MEDICAL LITERATURE; NEEDLE LITTER; SOCIAL ACCEPTANCE;

EID: 84951171822     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21678359     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.1443     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Baillon A, Selim A, Van Dolder D. 2013. On the social nature of eyes: the effect of social cues in interaction and individual choice tasks. Evolution and Human Behavior 34:146-154 DOI 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2012.12.001.
2. Bateson M, Callow L, Holmes JR, Redmond Roche ML, Nettle D. 2013. Do images of "watching eyes" induce behaviour that is more pro-social or more normative? A field experiment on littering. PLoS ONE 8:e82055 DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0082055.
3. Bateson M, Nettle D, Roberts G. 2006. Cues of being watched enhance cooperation in a real-world setting. Biology Letters 2:412-414 DOI 10.1098/rsbl.2006.0509.
4. Burnham TC, Hare B. 2007. Engineering human cooperation. Does involuntary neural activation increase public goods contributions? Human Nature 18:88-108 DOI 10.1007/s12110-007-9012-2.
5. Cialdini RB, Reno RR, Kallgren CA. 1990. A focus theory of normative conduct: recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 58:1015-1026 DOI 10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.1015.
6. Cohen J. 1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
7. Ekström M. 2012. Do watching eyes affect charitable giving? Evidence from a field experiment. Experimental Economics 15:530-546 DOI 10.1007/s10683-011-9312-6.
8. Ernest-Jones M, Nettle D, Bateson M. 2011. Effects of eye images on everyday cooperative behavior: a field experiment. Evolution and Human Behavior 32:172-178 DOI 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.10.006.
9. Francey D, Bergmuller R. 2012. Images of eyes enhance investments in a real-life public good. PLoS ONE 7:e37397 DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0037397.
10. Haley KJ, Fessler DMT. 2005. Nobody's watching? Subtle cues affect generosity in an anonymous economic game. Evolution and Human Behavior 26:245-256 DOI 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2005.01.002.
11. Huffman KT, Grossnickle WF, Cope JG, Huffman KP. 1995. Litter reduction: a review and integration of the literature. Environment and Behavior 27:153-183 DOI 10.1177/0013916595272003.
12. Jacob J. 1961. The death and life of great american cities. New York: Random House.
13. Keizer K, Lindenberg S, Steg L. 2008. The spreading of disorder. Science 322:1681-1685 DOI 10.1126/science.1161405.
14. Keller J, Pfattheicher S. 2011. Vigilant self-regulation, cues of being watched and cooperativeness. European Journal of Personality 25:363-372 DOI 10.1002/per.797.
15. Kraft-Todd G, Yoeli E, Bhanot S, Rand D. 2015. Promoting cooperation in the field. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences 3:96-101 DOI 10.1016/j.cobeha.2015.02.006.
16. Kraus RM, Freedman JL, Whitcup M. 1978. Field and laboratory studies of littering. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 14:109-122 DOI 10.1016/0022-1031(78)90064-1.
17. Nettle D, Harper Z, Kidson A, Stone R, Penton-Voak IS, Bateson M. 2012. The watching eyes effect in the Dictator Game: it's not how much you give, it's being seen to give something. Evolution and Human Behavior 34:35-40 DOI 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2012.08.004.
18. Nettle D, Nott K, Bateson M. 2012. 'Cycle thieves, we are watching you': impact of a simple signage intervention against bicycle theft. PLoS ONE 7:e51738 DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0051738.
19. Oda R, Niwa Y, Honma A, Hiraishi K. 2011. An eye-like painting enhances the expectation of a good reputation. Evolution and Human Behavior 32:166-171 DOI 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2010.11.002.
20. Pfattheicher S, Keller J. 2015. The watching eyes phenomenon: the role of a sense of being seen and public self-awareness. European Journal of Social Psychology 45:560-566 DOI 10.1002/ejsp.2122.
21. Powell KL, Roberts G, Nettle D. 2012. Eye images increase charitable donations: evidence from an opportunistic field experiment in a supermarket. Ethology 118:1096-1101 DOI 10.1111/eth.12011.
22. R Core Development Team. 2013. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: The R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
23. Rigdon M, Ishii K, Watabe M, Kitayama S. 2009.Minimal social cues in the dictator game. Journal of Economic Psychology 30:358-367 DOI 10.1016/j.joep.2009.02.002.
24. Rothkirch M, Madipakkam AR, Rehn E, Sterzer P. 2015. Making eye contact without awareness. Cognition 143:108-114 DOI 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.06.012.
25. Schultz PW, Bator RJ, Large LB, Bruni CM, Tabanico JJ. 2011. Littering in context: personal and environmental predictors of littering behavior. Environment and Behavior 45:35-59 DOI 10.1177/0013916511412179.
26. Sparks A, Barclay P. 2013. Eye images increase generosity, but not for long: the limited effect of a false cue. Evolution and Human Behavior 34:317-322 DOI 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2013.05.001.
27. Weaver R. 2015. Littering in context(s): using a quasi-natural experiment to explore geographic influences on antisocial behavior. Applied Geography 57:142-153 DOI 10.1016/j.apgeog.2015.01.001.
28. Wever R, Van Onselen L, Silvester S, Boks C. 2010. Influence of packaging design on littering and waste behaviour. Packaging and Technology and Science 23:253-266.