The internet and political involvement in 1996 and 2000

Society Online: The Internet in Context

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 103-120

  Rice, Ronald E ^a   Katz, James E ^a  

^a State University of New Jersey   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84951094831     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781452229560.n7     Document Type: Chapter

References (40)

1. America Online. (2000). American Online/Roper Starch Cyberstudy 2000 (Roper No. CNT375). Dulles, VA: Author.
2. Baym, N. K. (1995). The emergence of community in computer-mediated communication. In S. G.Jones (Ed.), Cybersociety: Computer-mediated communication and community (pp. 138-163). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
3. Bimber, B. (2002). Information technology and the "new"politics. [Online]. Retrieved April 11, 2002, from http://www.itas.fzk.de/e-society/preprints/egovernance/bimber.pdf.
4. Browning, G. (2002). Electronic democracy: Using the internet to transform American politics. Medford, NJ: CyberAge Books.
5. Carpini, M. X. D. (1996). Voters, candidates, and campaigns in the new information age: An overview and assessment. Harvard International Journal of Press/Politics, 1, 36-56. doi:10.1177/1081180X96001004005 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1081180X96001004005
6. Davis, R. (1999). The web of politics: The internet's impact on the American political system. New York: Oxford University Press.
7. de Sola Poole, I. (1983). Technologies of freedom. Cambridge, MA: Belknap.
8. Fisher, R. J., & Katz, J. E. (2000). Social desirability bias of the validity of self-reported values. Psychology and Marketing, 17(2), 105-120. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(200002)17:2<105::AID-MAR3>3.0.CO;2-9 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/%28SICI%291520-6793%28200002%2917:2%3C105::AID-MAR3%3E3.0.CO;2-9
9. Gronlund, A. (Ed.). (2002). Electronic government: Design, applications, and management. Hershey, PA: Idea Group Publishing.
10. Grossman, L. K. (1995). The electronic republic: Reshaping democracy in the information age. New York: Viking/Penguin.
11. Hague, B., & Loader, B. (Eds.). (1999). Digital democracy: Discourse and decision making in the information age. New York: Routledge.
12. Kapor, M. (1993, July-August). Where is the digital highway really heading? Wired, pp. 53-59, 94.
13. Katz, J., & Aspden, P. (1997a). Motivations for and barriers to internet usage: Results of a national public opinion survey. Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, 7(3), 170-188. doi:10.1108/10662249710171814 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/10662249710171814
14. Katz, J., & Aspden, P. (1997b). Motives, hurdles, and dropouts: Who is on and off the internet and why. Communications of the ACM, 40(4), 97-102. doi:10.1145/248448.248464 http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/248448.248464
15. Katz, J., & Aspden, P. (1997c). A nation of strangers. Communications of the ACM, 40(12), 81-86. doi:10.1145/265563.265575 http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/265563.265575
16. Katz, J., & Aspden, P. (1998). Internet dropouts in the USA: The invisible group. Telecommunications Policy, 22, 327-339. doi:10.1016/S0308-5961(98)00013-5 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0308-5961%2898%2900013-5
17. Katz, J., Aspden, P., & Reich, W (1997, September). Elections and electrons: A national public opinion survey on the role of cyberspace and mass media in political opinion formation during the 1996 election. Paper presented at the 25th annual Telecommunications Policy Research Conference, Arlington, VA.
18. Katz, J. E., & Rice, R. E. (2002). Social consequences of internet use: Access, involvement, and interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Katz, J. E., Rice, R. E., & Aspden, P. (2001). The internet, 1995-2000: Access, civic involvement, and social interaction. American Behavioral Scientist, 45, 404-419.
20. Kraut, R., Lundmark, V., Patterson, M., Kiesler, S., Mukopadhyay, T, & Scherlis, W (1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist, 53, 1017-1031. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.53.9.1017 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.53.9.1017
21. McConnaughey, J. (2001, June). Taking the measure of the digital divide: Net effects of research and policy (summary of results of the U.S. Department of Commerce in 2000). Paper presented to Web workshop, Department of Sociology, University of Maryland.
22. Norris, P. (2001). Digital divide: Civic engagement, information poverty, and the internet worldwide. New York: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9781139164887 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139164887
23. Pew Internet and American Life Project. (2000). Internet election news audience seeks convenience, familiar names. [Online]. Retrieved April 22, 2003, from http://www.pewinternet.org/reports/pdfs/prc_politics_report.pdf.
24. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone. New York: Simon & Schuster.
25. Rash, W (1997). Politics on the nets: Wiring the political process. New York: Freeman.
26. Rice, R. E. (1987a). Computer-mediated communication and organizational innovation. Journal of Communication, 37, 65-94. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1987.tb01009.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1987.tb01009.x
27. Rice, R. E. (1987b). New patterns of social structure in an information society. In J.Schement & L.Lievrouw (Eds.), Competing visions, complex realities: Social aspects of the information society (pp. 107-120). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
28. Rice, R. E. (2001). The internet and health communication: A framework of experiences. In R. E.Rice & J. E.Katz (Eds.), The internet and health communication: Experiences and expectations (pp. 5-46). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781452233277 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781452233277
29. Rice, R. E. (2002). Primary issues in internet use: Access, civic and community involvement, and social interaction and expression. In L.Lievrouw & S.Livingstone (Eds.), Handbook of new media (pp. 105-129). London: Sage. doi:10.4135/9781446211304 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446211304
30. Selnow, G. W (1994). High-tech campaigns: Computer technology in political communication. New York: Praeger.
31. Starobin, P. (1996, June 25). On the square. National Journal, pp. 1145-1149.
32. Syntopia Project. (2002). [Online]. Retrieved April 22, 2003, from http://www.scils.rutgers.edu/~rrice/syntopia.htm.
33. Turkle, S. (1996). Virtuality and its discontents: Searching for community in cyberspace. The American Prospect, 24, 50-57.
34. U.S. Bureau of the Census. (2001). Table A-2: Reported voting and registration by region. [Online]. Retrieved April 21, 2002, from http://www.census.gov/population/socdemo/voting.
35. Walsh, E., Gazala, M., & Ham, C. (2001). The truth about the digital divide. In B.Compaine (Ed.), The digital divide: Facing a crisis or creating a myth? (pp. 279-284). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
36. Wellman, B., & Haythornthwaite, C. (Eds.). (2002). The internet in everyday life. Oxford, UK: Blackwell. doi:10.1002/9780470774298 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470774298
37. White, C. S. (1997). Citizen participation and the internet: Prospects for civic deliberation in the information age. Social Studies, 88, 23-28. doi:10.1080/00377999709603741 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00377999709603741
38. Winders, W (1999). The roller coaster of class conflict: Class segments, mass mobilization, and voter turnout in the U.S., 1840-1996. Social Forces, 77, 833-862.
39. Wresch, W (2002). Disconnected: Haves and have-nots in the information age. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
40. Wynn, E., & Katz, J. (1997). Hyperbole over cyberspace: Self-presentation and social boundaries in internet home pages and discourse. The Information Society, 13, 297-329. doi:10.1080/019722497129043 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/019722497129043