Writing quality peer reviews of research manuscripts

Journal of Teaching in Physical Education

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 700-715

  Ward, Phillip ^a   Graber, Kim C ^b   van der Mars, Hans ^c  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^c Arizona State Polytechnic Campus ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Manuscript review; Reviewing ethics; Reviewing guidelines

Indexed keywords

EID: 84951014859     PISSN: 02735024     EISSN: 15432769     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1123/jtpe.2014-0158     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Academy of Management (2014). Reviewer Resources. Retrieved May 1, 2014, from http:// aom.org/Publications/AMJ/Reviewer-Resources.aspx
2. American Psychological Association. (2009). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th ed.). Washington, DC: Author.
3. Becher, T., & Trowler, P.R. (2001). Academic tribes and territories (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford Univerity Press.
4. Benos, D.J., Kirk, K.L., & Hall, J.E. (2003). How to review a paper. Advances in Physiology Education, 27(3), 47-52. doi:10.1152/advan.00057.2002
5. Dodds, P. (2005). PETE women's experiences of being mentored into postsecondary faculty positions. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 24, 344-367.
6. Drotar, D. (2009). Editorial: How to write effective reviews for the Journal of Pediatric Psychology. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 34, 113-117. doi:10.1093/jpepsy/jsn142
7. Fischman, M. (2014). The importance of peer review: Thoughts on Knudson, Morrow, and Thomas (2014). Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 85, 449-450. doi:10.108 0/02701367.2014.961057
8. Knudson, D.V., Morrow, J.R., Jr., & Thomas, J.R. (2014). Advancing kinesiology through improved peer review. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 85, 127-135. doi: 10.1080/02701367.2014.898117
9. Koonin, E.V., Landweber, L.F., & Lipman, D.J. (2006). A community experiment with fully open and published peer review. Biology Direct, 1(1), 1. doi:10.1186/1745-6150-1-1
10. Lovejoy, T.I., Revebson, T.A., & France, C.R. (2011). Reviewing manuscripts for peer-review journals: A primer for novice and seasoned reviewers. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 42, 1-13. doi:10.1007/s12160-011-9269-x
11. Moher, D., & Jadad, A.R. (2003). How to peer review a manuscript. In F. Godlee & T. Jefferson (Eds.), Peer review in the health sciences (pp. 183-190). London: BMJ Books.
12. Orgtheory.net. (2013, August 15). The editors speak: what makes a good review. Retrieved March 3, 2014, from http://orgtheory.wordpress.com/2011/05/31/the-editors-speakwhat- makes-a-good-review/
13. Rockwell, S. Office of Research Integrity. Yale University (2005). Ethics of peer review: A guide for manuscript reviewers. Retrieved March 3, 2014, from http://ori.hhs.gov/ sites/default/files/prethics.pdf
14. Rojewski, J.W., & Domenico, D.M. (2004). The art and politics of peer review. Journal of Career and Technical Education, 20(2), 41-53.
15. Sense About Science. (2004). Peer Review and the acceptance of new scientific ideas. London: Author. Retrieved July 16, 2014, from http://www.senseaboutscience.org/ data/files/resources/17/peerReview.pdf
16. Silverman, S., Kulinna, P.H., & Phillips, S.R. (2014). Physical education pedagogy faculty perceptions of journal quality. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 33, 134-154. doi:10.1123/jtpe.2013-0052
17. Sonnert, G. (1995). What makes a good scientist? Determinants of peer evaluation among biologists. Social Studies of Science, 25(1), 35-55. doi:10.1177/030631295025001003
18. Spigt, M., & Arts, I.C. (2010). How to review a manuscript. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63, 1385-1390. doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.09.001
19. Tone. 2014. In Merriam-Webster.com. Retrieved November 8, 2014, from http://www. merriam-webster.com/dictionary/tone.
20. Ward, P., & Ko, B. (2006). Publication trends in the Journal of Teaching in Physical Education 1981-2003. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 25, 266-280.
21. Ward, P., Parker, M., Sutherland, S., & Sinclair, C. (2011). A critical examination of the curriculum of physical education teacher education doctoral programs. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 30, 145-156.