The impact of the 2009/2010 enhancement of cigarette health warning labels in Uruguay: Longitudinal findings from the International Tobacco Control (ITC) Uruguay survey

Tobacco Control

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 89-95

  Gravely, Shannon ^a   Fong, Geoffrey T ^a,b   Driezen, Pete ^a   McNally, Mary ^a   Thrasher, James F ^c   Thompson, Mary E ^a   Boado, Marcelo ^d   Bianco, Eduardo ^e   Borland, Ron ^f   Hammond, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

^b ONTARIO INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RESEARCH   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSIDAD DE LA REPÚBLICA   (Uruguay)

^e Centro de Investigacion para la Epidemia Del Tabaquismo   (Uruguay)

^f CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY CENTRE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; CITY; CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PROBABILITY SAMPLE; SMOKING; THINKING; TOBACCO; URUGUAY; ADOLESCENT; ADVERSE EFFECTS; AGED; FEMALE; HUMAN; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PACKAGING; PREVENTION AND CONTROL; TIME FACTOR;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PRODUCT LABELING; SMOKING; TIME FACTORS; TOBACCO; URUGUAY;

EID: 84950277876     PISSN: 09644563     EISSN: 14683318     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2014-051742     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Fong GT, Hammond D, Hitchman SC. The impact of graphic pictures on the effectiveness of tobacco health warnings. Bull World Health Organ 2009; 87: 640-3.
2. Hammond D. Health warning messages on tobacco products: a review. Tob Control 2011; 20: 327-37.
3. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Methods for evaluating tobacco control policies. International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) Handbooks of cancer prevention, tobacco control. Vol 12, Lyon, France, Geneva: WHO Press, 2008.
4. Borland R, Yong HH, Wilson N, et al. How reactions to cigarette packet health warnings influence quitting: findings from the ITC four-country survey. Addiction 2009; 104: 669-75.
5. Thrasher JF, Rousu MC, Hammond D, et al. Estimating the impact of pictorial health warnings and "plain" cigarette packaging: evidence from experimental auctions among adult smokers in the United States. Health Policy 2011; 102: 41-8.
6. Partos TR, Borland R, Yong H, et al. Cigarette packet warning labels can prevent relapse: findings from the International Tobacco Control 4-Country policy evaluation cohort study. Tob Control 2012; 22: e43-50.
7. Environics Research Group. The health effects of tobacco and health warning messages on cigarette packages-Survey of youth: wave 12 surveys. Prepared for Health Canada. 2007.
8. Createc. Effects of modified packaging through increasing the size of warnings on cigarette packages: quantitative study of Canadian adult smokers and vulnerable non-smokers. HC POR-07-47. Ottawa: Health Canada, 2008. http: //epe. lac-bac. gc. ca/100/200/301/pwgsc-tpsgc/por-ef/health/2008/254-07a-e/report. pdf (accessed 23 Sep 2014).
9. Hoek J, Gendall P, Gifford H, et al. Tobacco branding, plain packaging, pictorial warnings, and symbolic consumption. Qual Health Res 2012; 22: 630-9.
10. Yong HH, Fong GT, Driezen P, et al. Adult smokers' reactions to pictorial health warning labels on cigarette packs in Thailand and moderating effects of type of cigarette smoked: findings from the international tobacco control southeast Asia survey. Nicotine Tob Res 2013; 15: 1339-47.
11. Thrasher JF, Villalobos V, Szklo A, et al. Assessing the impact of cigarette package health warning labels: a cross-country comparison in Brazil, Uruguay and Mexico. Salud Publica Mex 2010; 52(Suppl 2): S206-15.
12. Thrasher JF, Perez-Hernandez R, Arillo-Santillan E, et al. Impact of cigarette package health warnings with pictures in Mexico: results from a survey of smokers in Guadalajara. Salud Publica Mex 2012; 54: 254-63.
13. Fathelrahman AI, Li L, Borland R, et al. Stronger pack warnings predict quitting more than weaker ones: finding from the ITC Malaysia and Thailand surveys. Tob Induc Dis 2013; 11: 20.
14. Global Adult Tobacco Survey (GATS). Fact Sheet Uruguay. 2009. http: //www. who. int/tobacco/surveillance/fact_sheet_of_gats_uruguay_2010. pdf (accessed 23 Sep 2014).
15. World Health Organization. Guidelines for implementation of Article 11 of the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (packaging and labelling of tobacco products). http: //www. who. int/fctc/guidelines/adopted/article_11/en/index. html (accessed 23 Sep 2014).
16. Tobacco Tactics. Philip Morris vs the Government of Uruguay. http: //www. tobaccotactics. org/index. php/Philip_Morris_vs_the_Government_of_Uruguay (accessed 23 Sep 2014).
17. Philip Morris International. Health Warning Labels. http: //www. pmi. com/eng/ tobacco_regulation/regulating_tobacco/pages/health_warning_labels. aspx (accessed 23 Sep 2014).
18. Thompson ME, Boudreau C, Driezen P. Incorporating time-in-sample in longitudinal survey models. Needs. Statistics Canada 2005; Session 12(2005). http: //www. itcproject. org/files/Thompson_et_al. _2005. _Incorporating_timeinsample_in_ longetudinal_survey_ABSTRACT. pdf (accessed 23 Sep 2014).
19. Stead M, Moodie C, Angus K, et al. Is consumer response to plain/standardised tobacco packaging consistent with framework convention on tobacco control guidelines? A systematic review of quantitative studies. PLoS One 2013; 8: e75919.
20. Environics Research Group. Testing the size of cigarette package health warnings: an online survey of Canadians study 1 2011; prepared for: Canadian Cancer Society.
21. Environics Research Group. Testing the size of cigarette package health warnings: an online survey of Canadians study 2 2011; prepared for: Canadian Cancer Society.
22. Bansal-Travers M, Hammond D, Smith P, et al. The impact of cigarette pack design, descriptors, and warning labels on risk perception in the U.S. Am J Prev Med 2011; 40: 674-82.
23. Hoek J, Wong C, Gendall P, et al. Effects of dissuasive packaging on young adult smokers. Tob Control 2011; 20: 183-8.
24. Hammond D. Proposed cigarette product warning labels. 2011; Docket No. FDA-2010-N-0568. http: //www. macleans. ca/wp-content/uploads/2011/06/ hammond-fda-submission-main-report. pdf (accessed 23 Sep 2014).
25. Canadian Cardiovascular Society. Cigarette package health warnings. International status report. 3rd edn. http: //www. ensp. org/node/817 (accessed 23 Sep 2014).
26. Hammond D, Thrasher J, Reid JL, et al. Perceived effectiveness of pictorial health warnings among Mexican youth and adults: a population-level intervention with potential to reduce tobacco-related inequities. Cancer Causes Control 2012; 23 (Suppl 1): 57-67.
27. Thrasher JF, Carpenter MJ, Andrews JO, et al. Cigarette warning label policy alternatives and smoking-related health disparities. Am J Prev Med 2012; 43: 590-600.
28. Thrasher JF, Reynales-Shigematsu LM, Lazcano-Ponce E, et al. Cigarette labeling policies in Latin America and the Caribbean: progress and obstacles. Salud Publica Mex 2010; 52: S233-43.
29. Cameron LD, Pepper JK, Brewer NT. Responses of young adults to graphic warning labels for cigarette packages. Tob Control 2015; 24: e14-e22.
30. Thrasher JF, Hammond D, Fong GT, et al. Smokers' reactions to cigarette package warnings with graphic imagery and with only text: a comparison between Mexico and Canada. Salud Publica Mex 2007; 49(Suppl 2): S233-40.