Early reading development

The SAGE Handbook of Early Childhood Literacy, Second Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 379-394

  Wyse, Dominic ^a   Goswami, Usha ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b ST JOHN S COLLEGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84950276887     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781446247518.n22     Document Type: Chapter

References (58)

1. Allington, R. (2010). 'Recent federal education policy in the United States', in D.Wyse, R.Andrews, and J.Hoffman (Eds), The Routledge International Handbook of English, Language and Literacy Teaching. (pp. 496-507). London: Routledge.
2. Australian Government DEST (Department of Education Science and Training) (2005). Teaching Reading. Report and Recommendations. National Enquiry into the Teaching of Literacy. Barton, Australia: Department of Education, Science and Training.
3. Berndt, R.S., Reggia, J.A., and Mitchum, C.C. (1987). 'Empirically derived probabilities for grapheme-to-phoneme correspondences in English', Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 19: 1-9. doi:10.3758/BF03207663 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03207663
4. Bissex, G. (1980). Gnys at Wrk: A Child Learns to Read and Write. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5. Bradley, L. and Bryant, P.E. (1983). 'Categorising sounds and learning to read: A causal connection', Nature, 310: 419-21.
6. Brown, G.D.A. and Deavers, R.P. (1999). 'Units of analysis in nonword reading: Evidence from children and adults', Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 73(3): 208-42. doi:10.1006/jecp.1999.2502 http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jecp.1999.2502
7. Bryant, P.E., Bradley, L., MacLean, M., and Crossland, J. (1989). 'Nursery rhymes, phonological skills and reading', Journal of Child Language, 16: 407-28. doi:10.1017/S0305000900010485 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0305000900010485
8. Camilli, G., Vargas, S., and Yurecko, M. (2003). 'Teaching children to read: The fragile link between science and federal education policy', Education Policy Analysis Archives, 11(15). Retrieved 1 March 2006, from http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v11n15/
9. Chukovsky, K. (1963). From Two to Five. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
10. Cummins, J. (2007). 'Pedagogies for the poor? Realigning reading instruction for low-income students with scientifically based reading instruction', Educational Researcher, 36(9): 564-72. doi:10.3102/0013189X07313156 http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/0013189X07313156
11. Davis, S. (1989). 'On a non-argument for the rhyme', Journal of Linguistics, 25(1): 211-17. doi:10.1017/S0022226700012159 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0022226700012159
12. De Cara, B., and Goswami, U. (2002). 'Statistical analysis of similarity relations among spoken words: Evidence for the special status of rimes in English', Behavioural Research Methods and Instrumentation, 34(3): 416-23. doi:10.3758/BF03195470 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03195470
13. Echols, C. (1996). 'A role for stress in early speech segmentation', in J.L.Morgan and K.Demuth (Eds), Bootstrapping from Speech to Grammar in Early Acquisition. (pp. 151-70). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
14. Ellis, S. (2007). 'Policy and research: Lessons from the Clackmannanshire synthetic phonics initiative', Journal of Early Childhood Literacy, 7(3): 281-97. doi:10.1177/1468798407083660 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1468798407083660
15. Ellis, N.C. and Hooper, A.M. (2001). 'Why learning to read is easier in Welsh than in English: Orthographic transparency effects evinced with frequency-matched tests', Applied Psycholinguistics, 22: 571-99.
16. Frith, U., Wimmer, H., and Landerl, K. (1998). 'Differences in phonological recoding in German-and English-speaking children', Scientific Studies of Reading, 2(1): 31-54. doi:10.1207/s1532799xssr0201_2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0201_2
17. Goody, J., and Watt, I. (1963). The consequences of literacy', Comparative Studies in Society and History, 5(3): 304-45. doi:10.1017/S0010417500001730 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0010417500001730
18. Goswami, U., Gombert, J.E., and de Barrera, L.F. (1998). 'Children's orthographic representations and linguistic transparency: Nonsense word reading in English, French, and Spanish', Applied Psycholinguistics, 19(1): 19-52. doi:10.1017/S0142716400010560 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400010560
19. Goswami, U., Ziegler, J.C., Dalton, L., and Schneider, W. (2001). 'Pseudohomophone effects and phonological recoding procedures in reading development in English and German', Journal of Memory & Language, 45(4): 648-64. doi:10.1006/jmla.2001.2790 http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2001.2790
20. Goswami, U., Ziegler, J.C., Dalton, L., and Schneider, W. (2003). 'Nonword reading across orthographies: How flexible is the choice of reading units?' Applied Psycholinguistics, 24: 235-47.
21. Gouch, K. and Lambirth, A. (2008). Understanding Phonics and the Teaching of Reading: Critical Perspectives. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill/Open University Press.
22. Hanley, J.R., Masterson, J., Spencer, L.H., and Evans, D. (2004). 'How long do the advantages of learning a transparent orthography last? An investigation of the reading skills and reading impairment of Welsh children at 10 years of age', Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57(8): 1393-410.
23. Harris, R. (1986). The Origin of Writing. London: Duckworth.
24. Harste, J.C., Woodward, V.A., and Burke, C.L. (1984). Language Stories and Literacy Lessons. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann Educational Books.
25. Ho, C.S.-H. and Bryant, P. (1997). 'Phonological skills are important in learning to read Chinese', Developmental Psychology, 33: 946-51. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.33.6.946 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.33.6.946
26. Johnston, R. and Watson, J. (2005). The Effects of Synthetic Phonics Teaching of Reading and Spelling attainment: A Seven Year Longitudinal Study. Retrieved 10 December, 2006, from http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Resource/Doc/36496/0023582.pdf
27. Kershner, R. and Howard, J. (2006). The Psychology of Education Review, 30(2): 1-60.
28. Landerl, K. (2000). 'Influences of orthographic consistency and reading instruction on the development of nonword reading skills', European Journal of Psychology of Education, 15: 239-57. doi:10.1007/BF03173177 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF03173177
29. Lanksheare, C. and Knobel, M. (2006). New Literacies: Everyday Practices and Classroom Learning. Maidenhead: Open University Press. doi:10.1080/14681369900200068 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14681369900200068
30. Levy, R. (2009). 'Children's perceptions of reading and the use of reading scheme texts', Cambridge Journal of Education, 39(3): 361-77. doi:10.1080/03057640903103769 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03057640903103769
31. Lewis, M. and Ellis, S. (Eds). (2006). Phonics: Practice Research and Policy. London: Paul Chapman Publishing.
32. Liberman, I.Y., Shankweiler, D., Fischer, F.W., and Carter, B. (1974). 'Explicit syllable and phoneme segmentation in the young child', Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 18: 201-12. doi:10.1016/0022-0965(74)90101-5 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965%2874%2990101-5
33. Marsh, J. (2003). 'One way traffic? Connections between literacy practices at home and in the nursery', British Educational Research Journal, 29(3) 370-82.
34. Meek, M. (1988). How Texts Teach what Readers Learn. Stroud: Thimble Press.
35. Michael, I. (1984). 'Early evidence for whole word methods', in G.Brooks and A.K.Pugh (Eds), Studies in the History of Reading. Reading: Centre for the Teaching of Reading, University of Reading.
36. Moss, G. and Huxford, L. (2007). 'Exploring literacy policy making from the inside out', in L.Saunders (Ed.), Educational Research and Policy-Making: Exploring the Border Country between Research and Policy. London: Routledge.
37. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching Children to Read: An Evidence-Based Assessment of the Scientific Research Literature on Reading and its Implications for Reading Instruction: Reports of the Subgroups.
38. NIH Publication no. 00-4754. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.
39. New London Group (1996). 'A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures', Harvard Educational Review, 66(1): 60-93.
40. Perry, P., Amadeo, C., Fletcher, M., and Walker, E. (2010). Instinct or Reason: How Education Policy is Made and How we Might Make it Better. Reading: Cf BT Education Trust.
41. Port, R. (2007). 'How are words stored in memory? Beyond phones and phonemes', New Ideas in Psychology, 25: 143-70. doi:10.1016/j.newideapsych.2007.02.001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.newideapsych.2007.02.001
42. Rose, J. (2006). Independent Review of the Teaching of Early Reading. Nottingham: Df ES Publications.
43. Rosenblatt, L. (1985). 'Viewpoints: Transaction versus interaction: A terminological rescue operation', Research in the Teaching of English, 19(1): 96-107.
44. Sawyer, W. (2010). 'English teaching in Australia and New Zealand', in D.Wyse, R.Andrews, and J.Hoffman (Eds), The Routledge International Handbook of English, Language and Literacy Teaching, (pp. 508-517). London: Routledge.
45. Seymour, P.H.K., Aro, M., and Erskine, J.M. (2003). 'Foundation literacy acquisition in European orthographies', British Journal of Psychology, 94: 143-74. doi:10.1348/000712603321661859 http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/000712603321661859
46. Share, D.L. (1995). 'Phonological recoding and self-teaching: Sine qua non of reading acquisition', Cognition, 55(2): 151-218. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(94)00645-2 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0010-0277%2894%2900645-2
47. Spencer, L.H. and Hanley, J.R. (2003). 'Effects of orthographic transparency on reading and phoneme awareness in children learning to read in Wales', British Journal of Psychology, 94(1): 1-28. doi:10.1348/000712603762842075 http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/000712603762842075
48. Street, B. (2003). 'What's "new" in new literacy studies? Critical approaches to literacy in theory and practice', Current Issues in Comparative Education, 5(2): 1-14.
49. Treiman, R. and Zukowski, A. (1991). 'Levels of phonological awareness', in S.Brady and D.Shankweiler (Eds), Phonological Processes in Literacy. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
50. Wells, G. (1986). The Meaning Makers: Children Learning Language and Using Language to Learn. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
51. Wigfield, A. and Guthrie, J. (1997). 'Relations of children's motivation for reading to the amount and breadth of their reading', Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(3): 420-32. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.89.3.420 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.89.3.420
52. Wyse, D. (2010). 'Contextualised phonics teaching', in K.Hall, U.Goswami, C.Harrison, S.Ellis, and J.Soler (Eds), Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Learning to Read: Culture, Cognition and Pedagogy. London: Routledge.
53. Wyse, D. (2011). 'The control of language or the language of control? Primary teachers' knowledge in the context of policy', in S.Ellis and E.McCarthy (Eds), Applied Linguistics and the Primary School. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
54. Wyse, D. and Goswami, U. (2008). 'Synthetic phonics and the teaching of reading', British Educational Research Journal, 34(6): 691-710. doi:10.1080/01411920802268912 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01411920802268912
55. Wyse, D. and Styles, M. (2007). 'Synthetic phonics and the teaching of reading: The debate surrounding England's "Rose report"', Literacy, 41(1): 35-42. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9345.2007.00455.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9345.2007.00455.x
56. Wyse, D., Andrews, R., and Hoffman, J. (Eds). (2010). The Routledge International Handbook of English, Language, and Literacy Teaching. London: Routledge.
57. Ziegler, J.C. and Goswami, U. (2005). 'Reading acquisition, developmental dyslexia, and skilled reading across languages: A psycholinguistic grain size theory', Psychological Bulletin, 131(1): 3-29. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.3 http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.1.3
58. Ziegler, J.C., Stone, G.O., and Jacobs, A.M. (1997). 'What is the pronunciation for-ough and the spelling for u/? A database for computing feedforward and feedback consistency in English', Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 29(4): 600-18. doi:10.3758/BF03210615 http://dx.doi.org/10.3758/BF03210615