The political sciences of European integration: Disciplinary history and EU studies

Handbook of European Union Politics

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 5-30

  Rosamond, Ben ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84950268007     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781848607903.n1     Document Type: Chapter

References (129)

1. Anderson, J. J.’The state of the (European) Union: from the singular event to general theories’ World Politics 47 (3) 441-65. (1995)doi:10.1017/S0043887100016452 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0043887100016452
2. Andreatta, F.(2005) ’Theory and the European Union’s international relations’, in C.Hill and M.Smith (eds), International Relations and the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 18-38.
3. Appadurai, A.(1996) Modernity at Large: Cultural Dimensions of Globalization. Minneapolis, University of Minnesota Press.
4. Bailey, D. J.’Governance or the crisis of governmentality? Applying critical state theory at the European level’ Journal of European Public Policy 13 (1) 16-33. (2006)doi:10.1080/13501760500380692 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13501760500380692
5. Bates, R. E.’Letter from the President: area studies and the discipline’ APSA-CP Newsletter of the APSA Organized Section in Comparative Politics 7 (1) 1-2. (1996)
6. Bates, R., Greif, A., Levi, M., Rosenthal, J.-L. and Weingast, B.(1998) Analytical Narratives. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
7. Begg, I., Peterson, J.’Editorial’ Journal of Common Market Studies 37 (1) 1-12. (1999)
8. Börzel, T. (ed.) (2006) The Disparity of European Integration: Revisiting Neofunctionalism in Honour of Ernst B. Haas. London: Routledge.
9. Bulmer, S., Scott, A.’Editorial’ Journal of Common Market Studies 29 (6) 573-4. (1991)
10. Calhoun, C.’European studies: always already there and still in formation’ Comparative European Politics 1 (1) 5-20. (2003)doi:10.1057/palgrave.cep.6110004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.cep.6110004
11. Caporaso, J. A.’Toward a normal science of regional integration’ Journal of European Public Policy 6 (1) 160-4. (1999)
12. Checkel, J. T.’From meta-to substantive theory? Social constructivism and the study of Europe’ European Union Politics 2 (2) 219-28. (2001a)doi:10.1177/1465116501002002004 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1465116501002002004
13. Checkel, J. T.’Constructivism and integration theory: crash landing or safe arrival?’ European Union Politics 2 (2) 240-5. (2001b)
14. Christiansen, T., Jørgensen, K. E.’The Amsterdam process: a structurationist perspective on EU treaty making’ European Integration Online Papers 3 (10) (1999) Available online at: http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/1999-001a.htm, accessed 7 September 2006.
15. Christiansen, T., Jørgensen, K. E. and Wiener, A.(2001) ’Introduction’, in T.Christiansen, K. E.Jørgensen and A.Wiener (eds), The Social Construction of Europe. London: Sage. pp. 1-19. doi:10.4135/9781446221105 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446221105
16. Cini, M.’The "state of the art" in EU studies: from politics to interdisciplinarity (and back again?)’ Politics 26 (1) 38-46. (2006)doi:10.1111/j.1467-9256.2006.00249.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9256.2006.00249.x
17. Cohn, J.’Irrational exuberance. When did political science forget about politics?’ The New Republic, 25 October 25-31. (1999)
18. Collini, S., Winch, D. and Burrow, J.W(1983) That noble science of politics: a study in nineteenth century intellectual history. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511559365 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511559365
19. De Vree, J. K.(1972) Political Integration: The Formation of Theory and its Problems. The Hague: Mouton.
20. Diez, T. and Wiener, A.(2004) ’Introducing the mosaic of integration theory’, in A.Wiener and T.Diez (eds) European Integration Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 1-21.
21. Dinan, D.(2006) ’The historiography of European integration’, in D.Dinan (ed.), Origins and Evolution of the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 297-324.
22. Dowding, K.’Institutional research on the European Union: a critical review’ European Union Politics 1 (1) 125-44. (2000)doi:10.1177/1465116500001001006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1465116500001001006
23. Dryzek, J. S.(2002) ’A pox on perestroika, a hex on hegemony: toward a critical political science’, Annual Conference of the American Political Science Association, Boston, MA, 29 August-1 September.
24. Fearon, J. and Wendt, A.(2002) ’Rationalism v constructivism: a skeptical view’, in W.Carlsnaes, T.Risse and B. A.Simmons (eds), Handbook of International Relations. London: Sage. pp. 52-72. doi:10.4135/9781848608290 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781848608290
25. Fuller, S.(2003) Kuhn vs. Popper: the Struggle for the Soul of Science. London: Icon Books.
26. Geyer, R.’European integration, the problem of complexity and the revision of theory’ Journal of Common Market Studies 41 (1) 15-35. (2003)
27. Gunnell, J. G.’Political science on the cusp: recovering a discipline’s past’ American Political Science Review 99 (4) 597-609. (2005)
28. Hass, E. B.(1958) The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social and Economic Forces, 1950-1957. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
29. Haas, E. B.(1968) The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social and Economic Forces, 1950-1957, 2nd edn. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
30. Haas, E. B.(1975) ’The obsolescence of regional integration theory’, Working paper, Berkeley: Institute of International Studies.
31. Haas, E. B.’Turbulent fields and the study of regional integration’ International Organization 30 (2) 173-212. (1976)doi:10.1017/S0020818300018245 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300018245
32. Haas, E. B.(2001) ’Does constructivism subsume neofunctionalism?’, in T.Christiansen, K. E.Jørgensen and A.Wiener (eds), The Social Construction of Europe. London: Sage. pp. 22-31. doi:10.4135/9781446221105 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446221105
33. Haas, E. B.(2004) ’Introduction: institutionalism or constructivism?’, in The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social and Economic Forces, 1950-1957, 3rd edn. Notre Dame, IN: University of Notre Dame Press. pp. xiii-lvi.
34. Haas, E. B., Schmitter, P. C.’Economics and differential patterns of integration: projections about unity in Latin America’ International Organization 18 (4) 705-37. (1964)doi:10.1017/S0020818300025297 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300025297
35. Hancock, M. D.’The study of Europe in the United States: the Makins Report’ ECSA Review 12 (1) (1999) Available online at: http://aei.pitt.edu/57/01/makinsforum.htm, accessed 7 September 2006.
36. Hansen, R. D.’European integration: reflections on a decade of theoretical efforts’ World Politics 21 (2) 242-71. (1969)doi:10.2307/2009822 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2009822
37. Hay, C.(2002) Political Analysis: A Critical Introduction. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
38. Hix, S.’The study of the European Community: the challenge to comparative politics’ West European Politics 17 (1) 1-30. (1994)doi:10.1080/01402389408424999 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01402389408424999
39. Hix, S.’IR, CP and the EU: a rejoinder to Hurrell and Menon’ West European Politics 19 (4) 802-4. (1996)doi:10.1080/01402389608425166 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01402389608425166
40. Hix, S.’The study of the European Union II: the "new governance" agenda and its rival’ Journal of European Public Policy 5 (1) 38-65. (1998)doi:10.1080/13501768880000031 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13501768880000031
41. Hix, S.(2005) The Political System of the European Union, 2nd edn. Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
42. Hoffmann, S.’Obstinate or obsolete? The fate of the nation-state and the case of Western Europe’ Daedalus 95 (3) 862-915. (1966)
43. Hoffmann, S.(1989) ’A retrospective’, in J.Kruzel and J. N.Rosenau (eds), Journeys Through World Politics: Autobiographical Reflections of Thirty-four Academic Travelers. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
44. Hoffmann, S.(1995) The European Sisyphus: Essays on Europe, 1964-1994. Boulder, CO: Westview.
45. Hooghe, L.(2001) The European Commission and the Integration of Europe: Images of Governance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
46. Hooghe, L., Marks, G.’Unravelling the central state, but how? Types of multi-level governance’ American Political Science Review 97 (2) 233-43. (2003)
47. Inglehart, R.’An end to European integration’ American Political Science Review 61 (1) 91-106. (1967)
48. Johnson, C.’Preconception vs. observation, or the contributions of rational choice and area studies to contemporary political science’ PS: Political Science and Politics 30 (June) 170-4. (1997)doi:10.2307/420486 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/420486
49. Jupille, J.(2006) ’Knowing Europe: metatheory and methodology in European Union studies’, in M.Cini and A. K.Bourne (eds), Palgrave Advances in European Union Studies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 209-33.
50. Jupille, J., Caporaso, J. A.’Institutionalism and the European Union: beyond internationalism and comparative politics’ Annual Review of Political Science 2 429-44. (1999)doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.429 http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.2.1.429
51. Jørgensen, K. E.’Continental IR theory: the best kept secret’ European Journal of International Relations 6 (1) 9-42. (2000)
52. Jørgensen, K. E.(2004) ’European foreign policy: conceptualising the domain’, in W.Carlsnaes, H.Sjursen and B.White (eds), Contemporary European Foreign Policy. London: Sage. pp. 32-56. doi:10.4135/9781446215883 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446215883
53. Kaiser, K.’L Europe des Savants: European integration and the social sciences’ Journal of Common Market Studies 4 (1) 36-47. (1965)
54. Kaiser, K.(2006) ’From state to society? The historiography of European integration’, in M.Cini and A. K.Bourne (eds), Palgrave Advances in European Union Studies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 190-208.
55. Katzenstein, P., Keohane, R. O., Krasner, S.’International Organization and the study of world politics’ International Organization 52 (4) 645-85. (1998)
56. Keeler, J. S.’Mapping EU studies: the evolution from boutique to boom field 1960-2001’ Journal of Common Market Studies 43 (3) 551-82. (2005)
57. Keohane, R. O.’International institutions: two traditions’ International Studies Quarterly 32 (4) 379-96. (1988)doi:10.2307/2600589 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2600589
58. King, G., Keohane, R. O. and Verba, S.(1994) Designing Social Inquiry: Scientific Inference in Quantitative Research. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
59. Kitzinger, U.’Editorial’ Journal of Common Market Studies 1 (1) v-vi. (1962a)
60. Kitzinger, U.’The state of the literature in 1960’ Journal of Common Market Studies 1 (2) 187-93. (1962b)
61. Kreisler, H.(2000) ’Science and progress in international relations: conversation with Ernst B. Haas’, October 30. Available online at: http://globetrotter.berkeley.edu/people/Haas/haas-con0.html, accessed 19 October 2004.
62. Kuhn, T.(1996) [1962] The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
63. Lieshout, R. H., Segers, M. L. L., van der Vleuten, A. M.’De Gaulle, Moravcsik and The Choice for Europe’ Journal of Cold War Studies 6 (4) 89-139. (2004)doi:10.1162/1520397042350900 http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/1520397042350900
64. Lindberg, L. N.’Decision-making and integration in the European Community’ International Organization 19 (1) 56-80. (1965)doi:10.1017/S0020818300002423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300002423
65. Lindberg, L. N.’Integration as a source of stress on the European Community system’ International Organization 20 (2) 233-66. (1966)doi:10.1017/S0020818300005087 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300005087
66. Lindberg, L. N.’The European Community as a political system: notes toward the construction of a model’ Journal of Common Market Studies 5 (4) 344-88. (1967)
67. Lindberg, L. N. and Scheingold, S. A.(1970) Europe’s Would-Be Polity: Patterns of Change in the European Community. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
68. Lindberg, L. N. and Scheingold, S. A. (eds) (1971) Regional Integration: Theory and Research. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
69. Lubomudrov, A. Y.(2002) ’Perestroika, epistemology, and discipline: redefinitions of a political science’, Portland State University, mimeo.
70. Lustick, I. S.’The disciplines of political science: studying the culture of rational choice as a case in point’ PS: Political Science and Politics 30 (June) 175-9. (1997)doi:10.2307/420487 http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/420487
71. Mancias, P.(1987) A History and Philosophy of the Social Sciences. Oxford: Blackwell.
72. Manners, I.’Europaian studies’ Journal of Contemporary European Studies 11 (1) 67-83. (2003)doi:10.1080/14782800305479 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14782800305479
73. Marks, G., Hooghe, L., Blank, K.’European integration from the 1980s: statecentric v. multi-level governance’ Journal of Common Market Studies 34 (3) 341-78. (1996a)
74. Marks, G., Nielsen, F., Ray, L. and Salk, J.(1996b) ’Competencies, cracks and conflicts: regional mobilization in the European Union’, in G.Marks, F. W.Scharpf, P. C.Schmitter and W.Steeck (eds), Governance in the European Union. London, Sage. pp. 40-63.
75. McLean, I.’Two analytic narratives about the history of the EU’ European Union Politics 4 (4) 499-506. (2003)doi:10.1177/146511650344006 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/146511650344006
76. Mearsheimer, J. J.(2001) ’Methodological parochialism vs. methodological pluralism’, Annual Conference of the American Political Science Association, San Francisco, CA, 31 August.
77. Milner, H. V.’Rationalizing politics: the emerging synthesis of international, American and comparative politics’ International Organization 52 (4) 759-86. (1998)doi:10.1162/002081898550743 http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/002081898550743
78. Milward, A. S.(1992) The European Rescue of the Nation-State. London: Routledge.
79. Milward, A. S. and Sørensen, V.(1993) ’Interdependence or integration? A national choice’, in A. S.Milward, F. M.B. Lynch, F.Romero, R.Ranieri and V.Sørensen (eds), The Frontier of National Sovereignty: History and Theory 1945-1992. London: Routledge. pp. 1-32.
80. Moravcsik, A.’Does the European Union represent an n of 1?’ ECSA Review 10 (3) (1997) Available online at: http://www.eustudies.org/N1debate.htm, accessed 15 March 2006
81. Moravcsik, A.(1998) The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
82. Moravcsik, A.’The Choice for Europe-Current commentary and future research; a response to James Caporaso, Fritz Scharpf and Helen Wallace’ Journal of European Public Policy 6 (1) 168-79. (1999a)
83. Moravcsik, A.’The future of European integration studies: social theory or social science?’ Millennium: Journal of International Studies 28 (2) 371-91. (1999b)doi:10.1177/03058298990280020301 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03058298990280020301
84. Moravcsik, A.’Bringing constructivist integration theory out of the clouds: has it landed yet?’ European Union Politics 2 (2) 226-40. (2001a)
85. Moravcsik, A.(2001b) ’Constructivism and European integration: a critique’, in T.Christiansen, K. E.Jørgensen and A.Wiener (eds), The Social Construction of Europe. London: Sage. pp. 176-88. doi:10.4135/9781446221105 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446221105
86. Moravcsik, A.’The European constitutional compromise and the neofunctionalist legacy’ Journal of European Public Policy 12 (2) 349-86. (2005)doi:10.1080/13501760500044215 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13501760500044215
87. Murphy, C. N., Nelson, D. R.’International political economy: a tale of two heterodoxies’ British Journal of Politics and International Relations 3 (3) 393-412. (2001)
88. Murray, A. J. H.(1997) Reconstructing Realism: Between Power Politics and Cosmopolitan Ethics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
89. Pahre, R.’Formal theory and case-study methods in EU studies’ European Union Politics 6 (1) 113-43. (2005)doi:10.1177/1465116505049610 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1465116505049610
90. Paterson, W. E., Rollo, J.’Editorial’ Journal of Common Market Studies 42 (1) 1-4. (2004)
91. Pollack, M. A.(2005a) ’Theorizing EU policymaking’, in H.Wallace, W.Wallace and M. A.Pollack (eds), Policy-Making in the European Union, 5th edn. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 13-48.
92. Pollack, M. A.’Theorizing the European Union: international organization, domestic polity or experiment in new governance?’ Annual Review of Political Science 8 357-98. (2005b)doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.8.082103.104858 http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.8.082103.104858
93. Richardson, J., Lindley, R.’Editorial’ Journal of European Public Policy 1 (1) 1-7. (1994)doi:10.1080/13501769408406944 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13501769408406944
94. Rosamond, B.(2000) Theories of European Integration. Basingstoke and New York: Macmillan and St. Martin’s Press.
95. Rosamond, B.’The Uniting of Europe and the foundation of EU studies: revisiting the neofunctionalism of Ernst B. Haas’ Journal of European Public Policy 12 (2) 237-54. (2005)doi:10.1080/13501760500043928 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13501760500043928
96. Rosenthal, G. G.’The study of Europe in the United States: the Makins Report’ ECSA Review 12 (1) (1999) Available online at: http://aei.pitt.edu/57/01/makinsforum.htm, accessed 7 September 2006.
97. Ruggie, J. G.’Territoriality and beyond: problematizing modernity in international relations’ International Organization 47 (1) 139-74. (1993)doi:10.1017/S0020818300004732 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0020818300004732
98. Ruggie, J. J., Katzenstein, P. J., Keohane, R. O., Schmitter, P. C.’Transformations in world politics: the intellectual contributions of Ernst B. Haas’ Annual Review of Political Science 8 271-96. (2005)doi:10.1146/annurev.polisci.8.082103.104843 http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.8.082103.104843
99. Rumford, C., Murray, P.’Globalization and the limitations of European integration studies: interdisciplinary considerations’ Journal of Contemporary European Studies 11 (1) 85-93. (2003)doi:10.1080/14782800305484 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14782800305484
100. Sandholtz, W. and Stone, Sweet A. (eds) (1998) European Integration and Supranational Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/0198294646.001.0001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/0198294646.001.0001
101. Schimmelfennig, F.(2004) ’Liberal intergovernmentalism’, in A.Wiener and T.Diez (eds), European Integration Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 75-94.
102. Schmidt, B. C.(1998) The Political Discourse of Anarchy: a Disciplinary History of International Relations. Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
103. Schmidt, B. C.(2002) ’On the history and historiography of international relations’, in W.Carlsnaes, T.Risse and B. A.Simmons (eds), Handbook of International Relation. London: Sage. pp. 3-22doi:10.4135/9781848608290 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781848608290.
104. Schmidt, S. K.’Only an agenda setter? The European Commission’s power over the Council of Ministers’ European Union Politics 1 (1) 37-62. (2000)doi:10.1177/1465116500001001003 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1465116500001001003
105. Schmitter, P. C.(2004) ’Neo-neo-functionalism?’, in A.Wiener and T.Diez (eds), European Integration Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 45-74.
106. Schneider, G. and Aspinwall, M.(2001) ’Moving beyond outworn debates: a new institutionalist research agenda’, in M.Aspinwall and G.Schneider (eds), The Rules of Integration: Institutionalist Approaches to the Study of Europe. Manchester: Manchester University Press. pp. 177-87.
107. Schneider, G., Gabel, M., Hix, S.’European Union Politics Editorial statement’ European Union Politics 1 (1) 5-8. (2000)doi:10.1177/1465116500001001001 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1465116500001001001
108. Shaw, J. and More, G. (eds) (1995) New Legal Dynamics of European Union. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
109. Smith, S.(2000a) ’International theory and European integration’, in M.Kelstrup and M. C.Williams (eds) International Relations Theory and the Politics of European Integration: Power, Security and Community. London: Routledge. pp. 33-56.
110. Smith, S.’The discipline of international relations: still an American social science?’ British Journal of Politics and International Relations 2 (3) 374-402. (2000b)
111. Smith, S.’Singing our world into existence: international relations theory and September 11’ International Studies Quarterly 48 (3) 499-515. (2004)doi:10.1111/j.0020-8833.2004.t01-1-00312.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0020-8833.2004.t01-1-00312.x
112. Tsoukalis, L.’Editorial’ Journal of Common Market Studies 18 (3) 215-6. (1980)
113. van Kersbergen, K., van Waarden, F.’"Governance" as a bridge between disciplines: cross disciplinary inspiration regarding shifts in governance and problems of governability, accountability and legitimacy’ European Journal of Political Research 43 (2) 143-71. (2004)doi:10.1111/j.1475-6765.2004.00149.x http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2004.00149.x
114. Verdun, A.(2005) ’An American/European divide in European integration studies: bridging the gap with international political economy (IPE)’, in E.Jones and A.Verdun (eds), The Political Economy of European Integration: Theory and Analysis. London: Routledge. pp. 11-38.
115. Wagner, P., Wittrock, B. and Whitley, R. (eds) (1991) Discourses on Society: The Shaping of the Social Scientific Disciplines. Dordrecht: Kluwer. doi:10.1007/978-0-585-29174-1 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-0-585-29174-1
116. Wallace, H.’Studying contemporary Europe’ British Journal of Politics and International Relations 2 (1) 95-113. (2000)
117. Wallace, H.(2002) ’Europeanisation and globalisation: complementary or contradictory trends?’, in S.Breslin, C.Hughes, N.Phillips and B.Rosamond (eds), New Regionalisms in the Global Political Economy: Theories and Cases. London: Routledge. pp. 137-49. doi:10.4324/9780203361672_chapter_9 http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203361672_chapter_9
118. Weiler, J. H. H.’The transformation of Europe’ Yale Law Journal 100 (8) 2405-83. (1991)
119. Wendt, A.(1999) Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511612183 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511612183
120. Wendt, A.’Driving with the rearview mirror: on the rational science of institutional design’ International Organization 55 (4) 1019-49. (2001)doi:10.1162/002081801317193682 http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/002081801317193682
121. Wessels, W.(2006) ’Cleavages, controversies and convergence in European Union studies’, in M.Cini and A. K.Bourne (eds), Palgrave Advances in European Union Studies. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. pp. 233-46.
122. White, B.(2001) Understanding European Foreign Policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
123. White, J. P. J.’Theory guiding practice: the neofunctionalists and the Hallstein EEC Commission’ Journal of European Integration History 9 (1) 111-31. (2003)
124. Whitley, R.(1984) The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
125. Wiener, A. and Diez, T.(2004) ’Taking stock of integration theory’, in A.Wiener and T.Diez (eds), European Integration Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press. pp. 237-48.
126. Williams, M. C.(2005) The Realist Tradition and the Limits of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511491771 http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491771
127. Wincott, D.’Institutional interaction and European integration: towards an everyday critique of liberal intergovernmentalism’ Journal of Common Market Studies 33 (4) 597-609. (1995)
128. Wæver, O.’The sociology of a not so international discipline: American and European developments in international relations’ International Organization 52 (4) 687-727. (1998)
129. Wæver, O.(2003) ’The structure of the IR discipline: a proto-comparative analysis’, Annual Convention of the International Studies Association, Portland, OR, 25 February-1 March.