International theory and European integration

International Relations Theory and the Politics of European Integration: Power, Security and Community

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 33-56

  Smith, Steve ^a  

^a ABERYSTWYTH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84991564175     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203187807-2     Document Type: Chapter

References (59)

1. Adler, E. (1997) ‘Seizing the Middle Ground: Constructivism in World Politics’, European Journal of International Relations vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 319-63.
2. Baldwin, D. (ed.) (1993) Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate, New York: Columbia University Press.
3. Baylis, J. and Smith, S. (eds) (1997) The Globalisation of World Politics, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Booth, K. and Smith, S. (eds) (1995) International Relations Theory Today, Cambridge: Polity Press.
5. Christiansen, T. (1997) ‘Reconstructing European Space: From Territorial Politics to Multilevel Governance’, in K.E. Jorgensen (ed.) Refective Approaches to European Governance, Houndmills: Macmillan pp. 51-68.
6. Finnemore, M. (1996) National Interests in International Society, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
7. Fioretos, K.O. (1997) ‘The Anatomy of Autonomy: Interdependence, Domestic Balances of Power, and European Integration’, Review of International Studies vol. 23, no. 3 (July 1997), pp. 293-320.
8. Goldstein, J. and Keohane, R. (1993) ‘Ideas and Foreign Policy: An Analytical Framework’, in J. Goldstein and R. Keohane (eds) Ideas and Foreign Policy: Beliefs, Institutions and Political Change, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
9. Grieco (1988) ‘Anarchy and the Limits of Co-operation: A Realist Critique of the Newest Liberal Institutionalism’, International Organization vol. 42, no. 3 (Summer 1988), pp. 485-507.
10. Grieco (1990) Co-operation Among Nations: Europe, American and Non-Tariff Barriers to Trade, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
11. Grieco (1993a) ‘Understanding the Problem of International Co-operation: The Limits of Neo-liberal Institutionalism and the Future of Realist Theory’, in D.A. Baldwin (ed.) Neo-realism and Neo-liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 301-39.
12. Grieco (1993b) ‘The Relative Gains Problem for International Co-operation’, American Political Science Review vol. 87, no. 3 (September 1993), pp. 729-43.
13. Grieco (1995) ‘The Maastricht Treaty, Economic and Monetary Union and the Neorealist Research Programme’, Review of International Studies vol. 21, no. 1 (January 1995), pp. 21-40.
14. Grieco (1996) ‘State Interests and Institutional Rule Trajectories: A Neorealist Inter-pretation of the Maastricht Treaty and European Monetary Union’, Security Studies vol. 5, no. 3 (Spring 1996), pp. 261-305.
15. Haas, E. (1958) The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social and Economic Forces, 1950-1957, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
16. Haas, E. (1964) Beyond the Nation-State: Functionalism and International Organiza-tion, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
17. Hindess, B. (1996) Discourses of Power: From Hobbes to Foucault, Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
18. Hollis, M. and Smith, S. (1990) Explaining and Understanding International Relations, Oxford: Clarendon Press.
19. Jachtenfuchs, M. (1997) ‘Conceptualizing European Governance’, in K.E. Jorgensen (ed.) Refective Approaches to European Governance, Houndmills: Macmillan, pp. 39-50.
20. Jorgensen, K.E. (1997a), ‘Introduction: Approaching European Governance’, in K.E. Jorgensen (ed.) Refective Approaches to European Governance, Hound-mills: Macmillan.
21. Jorgensen, K.E. (ed.) (1997b) Reflective Approaches to European Governance, Houndmills: Macmillan.
22. Jorgensen, K.E. (1998) The Aarhus-Norsminde Papers: Constructivism, International Rela-tions and European Studies, Aarhus: Department of Political Science, University of Aarhus Press.
23. Kaelberer, M. (1997) ‘Hegemony, Dominance or Leadership? Explaining Germany’s Role in European Monetary Co-operation’, European Journal of International Relations vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 35-60.
24. Katzenstein, P. (ed.) (1996a) The Culture ofNational Security: Norms and Identity in World Politics, New York: Columbia University Press.
25. Katzenstein, P. (ed.) (1996b) Culture, Norms and National Security: Police and Military in Post-war Japan, Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
26. Keohane, R. (1993) ‘Institutionalist Theory and the Realist Challenge After the Cold War’, in D.A. Baldwin (ed.) Neo-realism and Neo-liberalism: The Contemporary Debate, New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 269-300.
27. Keohane, R. and Hoffman, S. (1991) ‘Institutional Change in Europe in the 1980s’, in R. Keohane and S. Hoffman (eds) The New European Community Decision-making and Institutional Change, Oxford: Westview Press, pp. 1-39.
28. Keohane, R. and Martin, L. (1995) ‘The Promise of Institutionalist Theory’, International Security vol. 20, no. 1 (Summer 1995), pp. 39-51.
29. Keohane, R. and Nye, J. (1993) ‘Introduction: The End of the Cold War in Europe’, in R.O. Keohane, J.S. Nye and S. Hoffman (eds) After the Cold War: International Institutions and State Strategies in Europe 1989-91, London: Harvard University Press, pp. 1-19.
30. Krasner, S.D. (1991) ‘Global Communications and National Power: Life on the Pareto Frontier’, World Politics vol. 43 (April 1991), pp. 336-66.
31. Larsen, H. (1997) Foreign Policy and Discourse Analysis: France, Britain and Europe, London: Routledge.
32. Lindberg, L. (1963) The Political Dynamics of European Economic Integration, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
33. Lindberg, L. and Scheingold, S. (1970) Europe’s Would-Be Polity: Patterns of Change in the European Community, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
34. Lindberg, L. and Scheingold, S. (1971) Regional Integration: Theory and Research, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
35. Mastanduno, M. (1991) ‘Do Relative Gains Matter? America’s Response to Japanese Industrial Policy’, International Security vol. 16, no. 1 (Summer 1991), pp. 73-113.
36. Mearsheimer, J. (1990a) ‘Back to the Future: Instability in Europe After the Cold War’, International Security vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 5-56.
37. Mearsheimer, J. (1990b) ‘Correspondence. Back to the Future, Part II: International Relations Theory and Post-Cold War Europe’, International Security vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 191-9.
38. Mearsheimer, J. (1995a) ‘The False Promise of International Institutions’, International Security vol. 19, no. 3, pp. 5-49.
39. Mearsheimer, J. (1995b) ‘A Realist Reply’, International Security vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 82-93.
40. Mitrany, D. (1966) A Working Peace System, Chicago: Quadrangle Books.
41. Moravcsik, A. (1991) ‘Negotiating the Single European Act: National Interests and Conventional Statecraft in the European Community’, International Organization vol. 45, no. 1 (Winter 1991), pp. 19-56.
42. Moravcsik, A. (1993a) ‘Preferences and Power in the European Community: A Liberal Inter-governmentalist Approach’, Journal of Common Market Studies vol. 31, no. 4 (December 1993), pp. 473-524.
43. Moravcsik, A. (1993b) ‘Integrating International and Domestic Theories of International Bargaining’, in P.B. Evans, H.K. Jacobson and R.D. Putnam (eds) Double-Edged Diplomacy International Bargaining and Domestic Politics, London: University of California Press, pp. 3-42.
44. Moravcsik, A. (1994) ‘Why the European Community Strengthens the State: Domestic Politics and International Co-operation’, paper presented at the Conference of Europeanists, Chicago, IL, April 1994.
45. Moravcsik, A. (1995) ‘Liberal Intergovernmentalism and Integration: A Rejoinder’, Journal of Common Market Studies vol. 33, no. 4 (December 1995), pp. 611-28.
46. Pentland, C. (1973) International Theory and European Integration, London: Faber and Faber.
47. Powell, R. (1993a) ‘Absolute and Relative Gains in International Relations Theory’, in D.A. Baldwin (ed.) Neo-realism and Neo-liberalism, New York: Columbia University Press, pp. 269-300.
48. Powell, R. (1993b) ‘Guns, Butter and Anarchy’, American Political Science Review vol. 87, no. 1 (March 1993), pp. 115-32.
49. Smith, S. (1995) ‘The Self-Images of a Discipline: A Genealogy of International Relations Theory’, in K. Booth and S. Smith (eds) International Relations Theory Today, Cambridge: Polity Press, pp. 1-37.
50. Smith, S. (1996) ‘Positivism and Beyond’, in S. Smith, K. Booth and M. Zalewski (eds) International Theory: Positivism and Beyond, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 11-44.
51. Smith, S. (1997) ‘New Approaches’, in J. Baylis and S. Smith (eds) The Globalisation of World Politics, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 165-90.
52. Smith, S., Booth, K. and Zalewski, M. (eds) (1996) International Theory: Positivism and Beyond, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53. Snidal, D. (1991) ‘Relative Gains and the Pattern of International Co-operation’, American Political Science Review vol. 85 (September 1991), pp. 701-26.
54. Wsever, O. (1996) ‘The Rise and Fall of the Inter-Paradigm Debate’, in S. Smith, K. Booth and M. Zalewski (eds) International Theory: Positivism and Beyond, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
55. Waltz, K. (1979) Theory of International Politics, New York: McGraw-Hill.
56. Wendt, A. (1994) ‘Collective Identity Formation and the International State’, American Political Science Review vol. 88, no. 2 (June 1994), pp. 383-96.
57. Wincott, D. (1995) ‘Institutional Interaction and European Integration: Towards an Everyday Critique of Liberal Intergovernmentalism’, Journal of Common Market Studies vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 597-609, see p. 601.
58. Wind, M. (1996) Europe Towards a Post-Hobbesian Order? A Constructivist Theory of European Integration, Florence: Robert Schuman Centre.
59. Wind, M. (1997) ‘Rediscovering Institutions: A Reflectivist Critique of Rational Insti-tutionalism’, in K.E. Jorgensen (ed.) Reflective Approaches to European Governance, Houndmills: Macmillan, pp. 15-35.