NAM: Association studies in multiple populations

Bioinformatics

Volumn 31, Issue 23, 2015, Pages 3862-3864

  Xavier, Alencar ^a   Xu, Shizhong ^b   Muir, William M ^a   Rainey, Katy Martin ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; BAYES THEOREM; COMPUTER PROGRAM; GENETIC LINKAGE; GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION STUDY; PROCEDURES; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ALGORITHMS; BAYES THEOREM; GENETIC LINKAGE; GENOME-WIDE ASSOCIATION STUDY; LINEAR MODELS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84950240744     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv448     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. de Roos, A.P.W. et al. (2008). Linkage disequilibrium and persistence of phase in Holstein-Friesian, Jersey and Angus cattle. Genetics, 179, 1503-1512.
2. Forneris, N.S. et al. (2015). Quality control of genotypes using heritability estimates of gene content at the marker. Genetics, 199, 675-681.
3. Kang, H.M. et al. (2008). Efficient control of population structure in model organism association mapping. Genetics, 178, 1709-1723.
4. Kang, H.M. et al. (2010). Variance component model to account for sample structure in genome-wide association studies. Nat. Genet., 42, 348-354.
5. Legarra, A. et al. (2015). A comparison of methods for whole-genome QTL mapping using dense markers in four livestock species. Gen. Sel. Evol., 47, 6.
6. Lin, M. et al. (2003). A general statistical framework for mapping quantitative trait loci in nonmodel systems: issue for characterizing linkage phases. Genetics, 165, 901-913.
7. Lipka, A.E. et al. (2012). GAPIT: genome association and prediction integrated tool. Bioinformatics, 28, 2397-2399.
8. Pritchard, J.K. et al. (2000). Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics, 155, 945-959.
9. Robinson, G.K. (1991). That BLUP is a good thing: the estimation of random effects. Stat. Sci., 6, 15-32.
10. Segura, V. et al. (2012). An efficient multi-locus mixed-model approach for genome-wide association studies in structured populations. Nat. Genet., 44, 825-830.
11. Sorensen, D. and Gianola, D. (2002). Likelihood, Bayesian, and MCMC Methods in Quantitative Genetics. Springer Science & Business Media, New York.
12. Stekhoven, D.J. and Buhlmann, P. (2012). MissForest: non-parametric missing value imputation for mixed-TPE data. Bioinformatics, 28, 112-118.
13. Svishcheva, G.R. et al. (2012). Rapid variance components-based method for whole-genome association analysis. Nat. Genet., 44, 1166-1170.
14. Wang, Q. (2015). An empirical Bayes method for genome-wide association studies. In Plant and Animal Genome XXXII. W799/Statistical Genomics.
15. Weir, B.S. and Cockerham, C.C. (1984). Estimating F-statistics for the analysis of population structure. Evolution, 38, 1358-1370.
16. Wientjes, Y.C. et al. (2013). The effect of linkage disequilibrium and family relationships on the reliability of genomic prediction. Genetics, 193, 621-631.
17. Xu, S. and Atchley, W.R. (1995). A random model approach to interval mapping of quantitative trait loci. Genetics, 141, 1189-1197.
18. Yang, J. et al. (2014). Advantages and pitfalls in the application of mixedmodel association methods. Nat. Genet., 46, 100-106.
19. Yu, J. et al. (2006). A unified mixed-model method for association mapping that accounts for multiple levels of relatedness. Nat. Genet., 38, 203-208.
20. Yu, J. et al. (2008). Genetic design and statistical power of nested association mapping in maize. Genetics, 178, 539-551.
21. Zhang, Z. et al. (2010). Mixed linear model approach adapted for genomewide association studies. Nat. Genet., 42, 355-360.
22. Zhou, X. and Stephens, M. (2012). Genome-wide efficient mixed-model analysis for association studies. Nat. Genet., 44, 821-824.