Quality control of genotypes using heritability estimates of gene content at the marker

Genetics

Volumn 199, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 675-681

  Forneris, Natalia S ^a,f   Legarra, Andres ^b,c   Vitezica, Zulma G ^b,c   Tsuruta, Shogo ^d   Aguilar, Ignacio ^e   Misztal, Ignacy ^d   Cantet, Rodolfo J C ^a,f  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE BUENOS AIRES   (Argentina)

^b UMR1388 GenPhySE   (France)

^c UNIVERSITÉ DE TOULOUSE   (France)

^d UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^e INSTITUTO NACIONAL DE INVESTIGACIÓN AGROPECUARIA INIA   (Uruguay)

^f Facultad de Ciencias Naturales e Instituto M Lillo   (Argentina)

Author keywords

Gene content; Genomic selection; GenPred; Quality control; REML; Shared data resource; SNP

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; ARTICLE; EFFECTIVE POPULATION SIZE; GENE FREQUENCY; GENETIC MARKER; GENOTYPE; GENOTYPING TECHNIQUE; HERITABILITY; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD METHOD; MUTATION RATE; NONHUMAN; NULL HYPOTHESIS; PIG FARMING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; ANIMAL; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; DNA MICROARRAY; GENOMICS; HUMAN; PEDIGREE; PIG; PROCEDURES; STANDARDS; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

ANIMALIA;

GENETIC MARKER;

ANIMALS; GENETIC MARKERS; GENOMICS; GENOTYPING TECHNIQUES; HUMANS; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MODELS, GENETIC; OLIGONUCLEOTIDE ARRAY SEQUENCE ANALYSIS; PEDIGREE; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; QUALITY CONTROL; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SUS SCROFA;

EID: 84924943366     PISSN: 00166731     EISSN: 19432631     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.114.173559     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Aguilar, I., I. Misztal, S. Tsuruta, A. Legarra, and H. Wang, 2014 PREGSF90–POSTGSF90: computational tools for the implementation of single-step genomic selection and genome-wide association with ungenotyped individuals in BLUPF90 programs, in Proceedings of the 10th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, poster 680.
2. American Society of Animal Science, Champaign, IL. Almasy, L., and J. Blangero, 1998 Multipoint quantitative-trait linkage analysis in general pedigrees. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 62: 1198–1211.
3. Cheung, C. Y., E. A. Thompson, and E.M. Wijsman, 2014 Detection of Mendelian consistent genotyping errors in pedigrees. Genet. Epidemiol. 38: 291–299.
4. Cleveland, M. A., J. M. Hickey, and S. Forni, 2012 A common dataset for genomic analysis of livestock populations. G3 2: 429–435.
5. Cockerham, C. C., 1969 Variance of gene frequencies. Evolution 23: 72–84.
6. Falconer, D. S., and T. F. C. Mackay, 1996 Introduction to quantitative genetics, Longman, New York.
7. Gengler, N., P. Mayeres, and M. Szydlowski, 2007 A simple method to approximate gene content in large pedigree populations: application to the myostatin gene in dual-purpose Belgian Blue cattle. Animal 1: 21–28.
8. Hayes, B., 2011 Technical note: efficient parentage assignment and pedigree reconstruction with dense single nucleotide polymorphism data. J. Dairy Sci. 94: 2114–2117.
9. Henderson, C. R., 1976 A simple method for computing the inverse of a numerator relationship matrix used in prediction of breeding values. Biometrics 32: 69–83.
10. Henderson, C. R., 1977 Best linear unbiased prediction of breeding values not in the model for records. J. Dairy Sci. 60: 783–787.
11. Hickey, J. M., J. Crossa, R. Babu, and G. de los Campos, 2012 Factors affecting the accuracy of genotype imputation in populations from several maize breeding programs. Crop Sci. 52: 654–663.
12. LeRoy, P., J. M. Elsen, H. Gilbert, C. R. Moreno, A. Legarra et al., 2013 QTLMap 0.9.6 user’s manual. Available at: http://www.inra.fr/qtlmap
13. McPeek, M. S., X. Wu, and C. Ober, 2004 Best linear unbiased allele-frequency estimation in complex pedigrees. Biometrics 60: 359–367.
14. Misztal, I., S. Tsuruta, T. Strabel, B. Auvray, T. Druet et al., 2002 BLUPF90 and related programs (BGF90), CD-ROM, Communication No. 28–07, 7th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Montpellier, France.
15. Patterson, H., and R. Thompson, 1971 Recovery of inter-block information when block sizes are unequal. Biometrika 58: 545–554.
16. Quaas, R. L., 1988 Additive genetic model with groups and relationships. J. Dairy Sci. 71: 1338–1345.
17. Ramos, A. M., R. P. Crooijmans, N. A. Affara, A. J. Amaral, A. L. Archibald et al., 2009 Design of a high density SNP genotyping assay in the pig using SNPs identified and characterized by next generation sequencing technology. PLoS ONE 4: e6524.
18. Sargolzaei, M., and F. S. Schenkel, 2009 QMSim: a large-scale genome simulator for livestock. Bioinformatics 25: 680–681.
19. Searle, S. R., G. Casella, and C. E. McCulloch, 1992 Variance components, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
20. Self, S. G., and K.-Y. Liang, 1987 Asymptotic properties of maximum likelihood estimators and likelihood ratio tests under nonstandard conditions. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 82: 605–610.
21. Toro, M. Á., L. A. García-Cortés, and A. Legarra, 2011 A note on the rationale for estimating genealogical coancestry from molecular markers. Genet. Sel. Evol. 43: 1–10.
22. VanRaden, P. M., 2008 Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. J. Dairy Sci. 91: 4414–4423.
23. VanRaden, P., T. Cooper, G. Wiggans, J. O’Connell, and L. Bacheller, 2013 Confirmation and discovery of maternal grandsires and great-grandsires in dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 96: 1874–1879.
24. Visscher, P. M., 2006 A note on the asymptotic distribution of likelihood ratio tests to test variance components. Twin Res. Hum. Genet. 9: 490–495.
25. Wang, C., D. Habier, B. Peiris, A. Wolc, A. Kranis et al., 2013 Accuracy of genomic prediction using an evenly spaced, low-density single nucleotide polymorphism panel in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 92: 1712–1723.
26. Wang, H., I. Misztal, and A. Legarra, 2014 Differences between genomic-based and pedigree-based relationships in a chicken population, as a function of quality control and pedigree links among individuals. J. Anim. Breed. Genet. 131: 445–451.
27. Wiggans, G. R., T. A. Cooper, P. M. VanRaden, K. M. Olson, and M. E. Tooker, 2012 Use of the Illumina Bovine3K BeadChip in dairy genomic evaluation. J. Dairy Sci. 95: 1552–1558.
28. Wiggans, G. R., T. S. Sonstegard, P. M. VanRaden, L. K. Matukumalli, R. D. Schnabel et al., 2009 Selection of single-nucleotide polymorphisms and quality of genotypes used in genomic evaluation of dairy cattle in the United States and Canada. J. Dairy Sci. 92: 3431–3436.