A comparison of methods for whole-genome QTL mapping using dense markers in four livestock species

Genetics Selection Evolution

Volumn 47, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Legarra, Andres ^a   Croiseau, Pascal ^b   Sanchez, Marie Pierre ^b   Teyssèdre, Simon ^a,c   Sallé, Guillaume ^d,e   Allais, Sophie ^f,g,h   Fritz, Sébastien ⁱ   Moreno, Carole Rénée ^a   Ricard, Anne ^b,j   Elsen, Jean Michel ^a  

^a UMR1388 GenPhySE   (France)

^b UMR1313 GÉNÉTIQUE ANIMALE ET BIOLOGIE INTÉGRATIVE   (France)

^c RAGT R2n Le Bourg ^*  (France)

^d UR1282   (France)

^e UNIVERSITÉ DE TOURS   (France)

^f AGROCAMPUS OUEST   (France)

^g CEMAGREF   (France)

^h UNIVERSITÉ EUROPÉENNE DE BRETAGNE   (France)

ⁱ UNCEIA   (France)

^j Exmes   (France)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY ASSESSMENT; CHROMOSOME; GENETIC MARKER; GENOME; GENOTYPE; LIVESTOCK; MAPPING; POLYMORPHISM; RELATEDNESS; SIMULATION; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

BOS; EQUIDAE; OVIS ARIES; SUIDAE;

GENETIC MARKER;

ANIMAL; BAYES THEOREM; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BOVINE; CHROMOSOME MAP; COMPARATIVE STUDY; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENETIC LINKAGE; GENETIC MARKER; GENETICS; GENOME; GENOTYPE; HAPLOTYPE; HORSE; LIVESTOCK; PHENOTYPE; PIG; PROCEDURES; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; SHEEP; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM;

ANIMALS; BAYES THEOREM; CATTLE; CHROMOSOME MAPPING; GENETIC LINKAGE; GENETIC MARKERS; GENOME; GENOTYPE; HAPLOTYPES; HORSES; LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; LIVESTOCK; MODELS, GENETIC; PHENOTYPE; POLYMORPHISM, SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; SHEEP; SUS SCROFA;

EID: 84924157110     PISSN: 0999193X     EISSN: 12979686     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12711-015-0087-7     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Yu J, Pressoir G, Briggs WH, Bi IV, Yamasaki M, Doebley JF, et al. A unified mixed-model method for association mapping that accounts for multiple levels of relatedness. Nat Genet. 2006;38:203-8.
2. Price AL, Patterson NJ, Plenge RM, Weinblatt ME, Shadick NA, Reich D. Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet. 2006;38:904-9.
3. Kang HM, Sul JH, Zaitlen NA, Kong S-Y, Freimer NB, Sabatti C, et al. Variance component model to account for sample structure in genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet. 2010;42:348-54.
4. Geyer CJ. Practical Markov Chain Monte Carlo. Stat Sci. 1992;7:473-83.
5. Browning SR, Thompson EA. Detecting rare variant associations by identityby-descent mapping in case-control studies. Genetics. 2012;190:1521-31.
6. Meuwissen THE, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics. 2001;157:1819-29.
7. Xu S. Estimating polygenic effects using markers of the entire genome. Genetics. 2003;163:789-801.
8. Yi N, Xu S. Bayesian LASSO for quantitative trait loci mapping. Genetics. 2008;179:1045-55.
9. Sahana G, Guldbrandtsen B, Janss L, Lund MS. Comparison of association mapping methods in a complex pedigreed population. Genet Epidemiol. 2010;34:455-62.
10. Druet T, Fritz S, Boussaha M, Ben-Jemaa S, Guillaume F, Derbala D, et al. Fine mapping of quantitative trait loci affecting female fertility in dairy cattle on BTA03 using a dense single-nucleotide polymorphism map. Genetics. 2008;178:2227-35.
11. Teyssèdre S, Elsen J-M, Ricard A. Statistical distributions of test statistics used for quantitative trait association mapping in structured populations. Genet Sel Evol. 2012;44:32.
12. Zhou X, Stephens M. Genome-wide efficient mixed-model analysis for association studies. Nat Genet. 2012;44:821-4.
13. Habier D, Fernando RL, Kizilkaya K, Garrick DJ. Extension of the Bayesian alphabet for genomic selection. BMC Bioinformatics. 2011;12:186.
14. Van Raden PM, Wiggans GR. Derivation, calculation, and use of national animal model information. J Dairy Sci. 1991;74:2737-46.
15. Allais S, Levéziel H, Payet-Duprat N, Hocquette J, Lepetit J, Rousset S, et al. The two mutations, Q204X and nt821, of the myostatin gene affect carcass and meat quality in young heterozygous bulls of French beef breeds. J Anim Sci. 2010;88:446-54.
16. Bishop SC, Morris CA. Genetics of disease resistance in sheep and goats. Small Ruminant Res. 2007;70:48-59.
17. Salle G, Jacquiet P, Gruner L, Cortet J, Sauve C, Prevot F, et al. A genome scan for QTL affecting resistance to Haemonchus contortus in sheep. J Anim Sci. 2012;90:4690-705.
18. Teyssèdre S, Dupuis MC, Guérin G, Schibler L, Denoix JM, Elsen JM, et al. Genome-wide association studies for osteochondrosis in French Trotter horses. J Anim Sci. 2012;90:45-53.
19. Sanchez MP, Tribout T, Iannuccelli N, Bouffaud M, Servin B, Tenghe A, Dehais P, Muller D, Del Schneider MP, Mercat MJ, Rogel-Gaillard C, Milan D, Bidanel JP, Gilbert H. A genome-wide association study of production traits in a commercial population of Large White pigs: evidence of haplotypes affecting meat quality. Genet Sel Evol 2014, 46:12.
20. Meuwissen THE, Karlsen A, Lien S, Olsaker I, Goddard ME. Fine mapping of a quantitative trait locus for twinning rate using combined linkage and linkage disequilibrium mapping. Genetics. 2002;161:373-9.
21. Druet T, Georges M. A hidden Markov model combining linkage and linkage disequilibrium information for haplotype reconstruction and quantitative trait locus fine mapping. Genetics. 2010;184:789-98.
22. Visscher PM. A note on the asymptotic distribution of likelihood ratio tests to test variance components. Twin Res Hum Genet. 2006;9:490-5.
23. Grisart B, Coppieters W, Farnir F, Karim L, Ford C, Berzi P, et al. Positiona candidate cloning of a QTL in dairy cattle: identification of a missense mutation in the bovine DGAT1 gene with major effect on milk yield and composition. Genome Res. 2002;12:222-31
24. Van Raden PM. Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. J Dairy Sci. 2008;91:4414-23.
25. Misztal I, Tsuruta S, Strabel T, Auvray B, Druet T, Lee DH. BLUPF90 and related programs (BGF90). In Proceedings of the 7th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production: 19-23 August 2002. Montpellier. CD-ROM Communication No 28-07;2002.
26. Hoggart CJ, Whittaker JC, De Iorio M, Balding DJ. Simultaneous analysis of all SNPs in genome-wide and re-sequencing association studies. PLoS Genet. 2008;4:e1000130.
27. Kass RE, Raftery AE. Bayes factors. J Am Stat Assoc. 1995;90:773-95
28. Wakefield J. Bayes factors for genome-wide association studies: comparison with P-values. Genet Epidemiol. 2009;33:79-86.
29. Legarra A, Ricardi A, Filangi O. GS3: Genomic selection, Gibbs sampling, Gauss-Seidel (and BayesCpi): [http://genotoul.toulouse.inra.fr/~alegarra] 2011
30. Sorensen D, Gianola D. Likelihood, bayesian and MCMC methods in quantitative genetics. New York: Springer-Verlag; 2002.
31. Boddicker N, Waide EH, Rowland RR, Lunney JK, Garrick DJ, Reecy JM, et al. Evidence for a major QTL associated with host response to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus challenge. J Anim Sci 2012;90:1733-46.
32. Vidal O, Noguera JL, Amills M, Varona L, Gil M, Jiménez N. Identification of carcass and meat quality quantitative trait loci in a Landrace pig population selected for growth and leanness. J Anim Sci. 2005;83:293-300.
33. Harrell FE, Davis C. A new distribution-free quantile estimator. Biometrika. 1982;69:635-40.
34. Institute S. SAS/STAT 9.3 user's guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute; 2011
35. Sham PC, Purcell SM. Statistical power and significance testing in large-scale genetic studies. Nat Rev Genet. 2014;15:335-46.