Satellite images for monitoring mangrove cover changes in a fast growing economic region in southern Peninsular Malaysia

Remote Sensing

Volumn 7, Issue 11, 2015, Pages 14360-14385

  Kanniah, Kasturi Devi ^a   Sheikhi, Afsaneh ^a   Cracknell, Arthur P ^b   Goh, Hong Ching ^c   Tan, Kian Pang ^a   Ho, Chin Siong ^a   Rasli, Fateen Nabilla ^a  

^a UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA   (Malaysia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DUNDEE   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MALAYA   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Iskandar Malaysia; Land cover change; Mangroves; Maximum likelihood classifier; Remote sensing; Support vector machine

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION; LAND USE; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD; SATELLITE IMAGERY; SATELLITES; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINES;

DIGITAL CLASSIFICATION; LAND-COVER CHANGE; LANDSAT SATELLITE IMAGES; MALAYSIA; MANGROVES; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD CLASSIFICATIONS; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD CLASSIFIERS; SUPPORT VECTOR MACHINE TECHNIQUES;

REMOTE SENSING;

EID: 84950139450     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20724292     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3390/rs71114360     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Giri, C.; Ochieng, E.; Tieszen, L.L.; Zhu, Z.; Singh, A.; Loveland, T.; Masek, J.; Duke, N. Status and distribution of mangrove forests of the world using earth observation satellite data. Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 2011, 20, 154-159.
2. Spalding, M.; Kainuma, M.; Collins, L. World Atlas of Mangroves, 2nd ed.; Earthscan: London, UK, 2010; p. 350.
3. Dittmar, T.; Hertkorn, N.; Kattner, G.; Lara, R.J. Mangroves, a major source of dissolved organic carbon to the oceans. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycle 2006, 20, doi:10.1029/2005GB002570.
4. Donato, D.C.; Kauffman, J.B.; Murdiyarso, D.; Kurnianto, S.; Stidham, M.; Kanninen, M. Mangroves among the most carbon-rich forests in the tropics. Nat. Geosci. 2011, 4, 293-297.
5. Hamdan, O.; Aziz, H.K.; Hasmadi, I.M. L-band ALOS PALSAR for biomass estimation of Matang mangroves, Malaysia. Remote Sens. Environ. 2014, 155, 69-78.
6. Cornforth, W.A.; Fatoyinbo, T.E.; Freemantle, T.P.; Pettorelli, N. Advanced land observing satellite phased array type L-band SAR (ALOS PALSAR) to inform the conservation of mangroves: Sundarbans as a case study. Remote Sens. 2013, 5, 224-237.
7. Mubarak, H.T.; Azian, M. Mangroves ecosystem. In Status of Mangroves in Peninsular Malaysia; Omar, M., Aziz, K., Shamsudin, I., Raja Barizian, R.S., Eds.; Forest Research Institute Malaysia: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2012; pp. 11-30.
8. FAO. The World's Mangroves 1980-2005. A Thematic Study Prepared in the Framework of the Global Forest Resources Assessment 2005; UN FAO: Rome, Italy, 2007; p. 153.
9. Omar, H. Mangroves threats and changes. In Status of Mangroves in Peninsular Malaysia; Omar, M., Aziz, K., Shamsudin, I., Raja Barizian, R.S., Eds.; Forest Research Institute Malaysia: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2012; pp. 89-110.
10. Polidoro, B.A.; Carpenter, K.E.; Collins, L.; Duke, N.C.; Ellison, A.M.; Ellison, J.C.; Farnsworth, E.J.; Fernando, E.S.; Kathiresan, K.; Koedam, N.E. The loss of species: Mangrove extinction risk and geographic areas of global concern. PLoS ONE 2010, 5, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0010095.
11. Kuenzer, C.; Bluemel, A.; Gebhardt, S.; Quoc, T.V.; Dech, S. Remote sensing of mangrove ecosystems: A review. Remote Sens. 2011, 3, 878-928.
12. Azian, M.; Mubarak, H.T. Functions and values of mangroves. In Status of Mangroves in Peninsular Malaysia; Omar, M., Aziz, K., Shamsudin, I., Raja Barizian, R.S., Eds.; Forest Research Institute Malaysia: Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2012; pp. 12-25.
13. Benfield, S.L.; Guzman, H.M.; Mair, J.M. Temporal mangrove dynamics in relation to coastal development in Pacific Panama. J. Environ. Manag. 2005, 76, 263-276.
14. Manson, F.; Loneragan, N.; Phinn, S. Spatial and temporal variation in distribution of mangroves in Moreton bay, subtropical Australia: A comparison of pattern metrics and change detection analyses based on aerial photographs. Estuar. Coast. Shelf Sci. 2003, 57, 653-666.
15. Fromard, F.; Vega, C.; Proisy, C. Half a century of dynamic coastal change affecting mangrove shorelines of French Guiana. A case study based on remote sensing data analyses and field surveys. Mar. Geol. 2004, 208, 265-280.
16. Giri, C.; Long, J.; Abbas, S.; Murali, R.M.; Qamer, F.M.; Pengra, B.; Thau, D. Distribution and dynamics of mangrove forests of South Asia. J. Environ. Manag. 2015, 148, 101-111.
17. Kamal, M.; Phinn, S. Hyperspectral data for mangrove species mapping: A comparison of pixel-based and object-based approach. Remote Sens. 2011, 3, 2222-2242.
18. Sulong, I.; Mohd-Lokman, H.; Mohd-Tarmizi, K.; Ismail, A. Mangrove mapping using Landsat imagery and aerial photographs: Kemaman district, Terengganu, Malaysia. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2002, 4, 135-152.
19. Satyanarayana, B.; Mohamad, K.A.; Idris, I.F.; Husain, M.-L.; Dahdouh-Guebas, F. Assessment of mangrove vegetation based on remote sensing and ground-truth measurements at Tumpat, Kelantan delta, east coast of Peninsular Malaysia. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2011, 32, 1635-1650.
20. Liu, Z.; Li, J.; Lim, B.; Seng, C.; Inbaraj, S. Object-based classification for mangrove with VHR remotely sensed image. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Geoinformatics, Remotely Sensed Data and Information, Nanjing, China, 25-27 May 2007.
21. Kanniah, K.D.; Lau, A.M.S.; Rasib, A. Per-pixel and sub-pixel classifications of high-resolution satellite data for mangrove species mapping. Appl. GIS 2007, 3, 1-22.
22. Pourebrahim, S.; Hadipour, M.; Mokhtar, M.B. Impact assessment of rapid development on land use changes in coastal areas; case of Kuala Langat district, Malaysia. Environ. Dev. Sustain. 2014, 17, 1003-1016.
23. Hamzah, K.A.; Omar, H.; Ibrahim, S.; Harun, I. Digital change detection of mangrove forest in Selangor using remote sensing and geographic information system (GIS). Malays. For. 2009, 72, 61-69.
24. Khuzaimah, Z.; Ismail, M.H.; Mansor, S. Mangrove changes analysis by remote sensing and evaluation of ecosystem service value in Sungai Merbok's mangrove forest reserve, Peninsular Malaysia. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Proceedings of the 13th International Conference in Computational Science and Its Applications-ICCSA. Part II, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam, 24-27 June 2013; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2013; pp. 611-622.
25. Aisyah, A.; Shahrul, A.; Zulfahmie, M.; Mastura, S.S.; Mokhtar, J. Deforestation analysis in Selangor, Malaysia between 1989 and 2011. J. Trop. For. Sci. 2015, 27, 3-12.
26. Azian, M.; Ismail Adnan, A.; Mohd Hasmadi, I. The use of remote sensing for monitoring spatial and temporal changes in mangrove management. Malays. For. 2009, 72, 15-22.
27. Hamdan, O.; Khairunnisa, M.; Ammar, A.; Hasmadi, I.M.; Aziz, H.K. Mangrove carbon stock assessment by optical satellite imagery. J. Trop. For. Sci. 2013, 25, 554-565.
28. Jahari, M.; Khairunniza-Bejo, S.; Shariff, A.R.M.; Shafri, H.Z.M. Change detection studies in Matang mangrove forest area, Perak. Pertanika J. Sci. Technol. 2011, 19, 307-327.
29. Suratman, M.N.; Ahmad, S. Multi temporal Landsat TM for monitoring mangrove changes in Pulau Indah, Malaysia. In Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE Business, Engineering and Industrial Applications (ISBEIA) Symposium, Bandung, Indonesia, 23-26 September 2012; pp. 163-168.
30. Roslani, M.; Mustapha, M.; Lihan, T.; Juliana, W.W. Applicability of Rapideye satellite imagery in mapping mangrove vegetation species at Matang mangrove forest reserve, Perak, Malaysia. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 7, 123-136.
31. Kanniah, K.D. Mapping mangrove species using Worldview-2 satellite data. In Proceedings of the 2013, 34th Asian Conference on Remote Sensing, Bali, Indonesia, 20-24 October 2013; pp. 2668-2674.
32. USGS Earth Explorer. Available online: http://earthexplorer.usgs.gov/(accessed on 5 February 2014)
33. NASA. Landsat 7 Science Data Users Handbook. Available online: http://landsathandbook. gsfc.nasa.gov/pdfs/Landsat7_Handbook.pdf (accessed on 14 February 2014).
34. Sobrino, J.A.; Jiménez-Muñoz, J.C.; Paolini, L. Land surface temperature retrieval from Landsat TM 5. Remote Sens. Environ. 2004, 90, 434-440.
35. Franya, G.; Cracknell, A. A simple cloud masking approach using NOAA AVHRR daytime data for tropical areas. Int. J. Remote Sens. 1995, 16, 1697-1705.
36. Song, C.; Woodcock, C.E.; Seto, K.C.; Lenney, M.P.; Macomber, S.A. Classification and change detection using Landsat TM data: When and how to correct atmospheric effects? Remote Sens. Environ. 2001, 75, 230-244.
37. Coburn, C.; Roberts, A. A multiscale texture analysis procedure for improved forest stand classification. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2004, 25, 4287-4308.
38. Li, C.; Wang, J.; Wang, L.; Hu, L.; Gong, P. Comparison of classification algorithms and training sample sizes in urban land classification with Landsat thematic mapper imagery. Remote Sens. 2014, 6, 964-983.
39. Mountrakis, G.; Im, J.; Ogole, C. Support vector machines in remote sensing: A review. ISPRS J. Photogramm. 2011, 66, 247-259.
40. Atkinson, P.M.; Lewis, P. Geostatistical classification for remote sensing, an introduction. Comput. Geosci. 2000, 26, 361-371.
41. Chapelle, O.; Haffner, P.; Vapnik, V.N. Support vector machines for histogram-based image classification. IEEE Trans. Neural Netw. 1999, 10, 1055-1064.
42. Congalton, R.G. A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sens. Environ. 1991, 37, 35-46.
43. Pal, M.; Mather, P. Support vector machines for classification in remote sensing. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2005, 26, 1007-1011.
44. Dixon, B.; Candade, N. Multispectral Landuse classification using neural networks and support vector machines: One or the other, or both? Int. J. Remote Sens. 2008, 29, 1185-1206.
45. Karimi, Y.; Prasher, S.; Patel, R.; Kim, S. Application of support vector machine technology for weed and nitrogen stress detection in corn. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2006, 51, 99-109.
46. Melgani, F.; Bruzzone, L. Classification of hyperspectral remote sensing images with support vector machines. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2004, 42, 1778-1790.
47. Huang, X.; Zhang, L.; Wang, L. Evaluation of morphological texture features for mangrove forest mapping and species discrimination using multispectral IKONOS imagery. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens.2009, 6, 393-397.
48. Heumann, B.W. An object-based classification of mangroves using a hybrid decision tree-Support vector machine approach. Remote Sens. 2011, 3, 2440-2460.
49. Heumann, B.W. Satellite remote sensing of mangrove forests: Recent advances and future opportunities. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 2011, 35, 87-108.
50. Paneque-Gálvez, J.; Mas, J.-F.; Moré, G.; Cristóbal, J.; Orta-Martínez, M.; Luz, A.C.; Guèze, M.; Macía, M.J.; Reyes-García, V. Enhanced land use/cover classification of heterogeneous tropical landscapes using support vector machines and textural homogeneity. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. 2013, 23, 372-383.
51. Jia, K.; Wei, X.; Gu, X.; Yao, Y.; Xie, X.; Li, B. Land cover classification using Landsat 8 operational land imager data in Beijing, China. Geocarto Int. 2014, 29, 941-951.
52. Huang, C.; Davis, L.; Townshend, J. An assessment of support vector machines for land cover classification. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2002, 23, 725-749.
53. Petropoulos, G.P.; Kalaitzidis, C.; Vadrevu, K.P. Support vector machines and object-based classification for obtaining land-use/cover cartography from hyperion hyperspectral imagery. Comput. Geosci. 2012, 41, 99-107.
54. Otukei, J.; Blaschke, T. Land cover change assessment using decision trees, support vector machines and maximum likelihood classification algorithms. Int. J. Appl. Earth Obs. Geoinf. 2010, 12, S27-S31.
55. Gil, A.; Lobo, A.; Abadi, M.; Silva, L.; Calado, H. Mapping invasive woody plants in azores protected areas by using very high-resolution multispectral imagery. Eur. J. Remote Sens. 2013, 46, 289-304.
56. Zhang, P.; Lv, Z.; Shi, W. Object-based spatial feature for classification of very high resolution remote sensing images. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2013, 10, 1572-1576.
57. Zhang, H.; Shi, W.; Liu, K. Fuzzy-topology-integrated support vector machine for remotely sensed image classification. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 2012, 50, 850-862.
58. Man, Q.; Guo, H.; Dong, P.; Liu, G.; Shi, R. Support vector machines and maximum likelihood classification for obtaining land use classification from Hyperspectral imagery. In Proceedings of the International Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), Québec, Canada, 2014; pp. 2878-2881.
59. Low, S.K. DEIA Report Lacks Scientific Data, Says Environmental Activist. Available online: http://www.thesundaily.my/news/1288544 (accessed on 7 January 2015).
60. Awang, N.A.; Jusoh, W.H.W.; Hamid, M.R.A. Coastal erosion at Tanjong Piai, Johor, Malaysia. Coast. Mar. Sci. 2014, 71, 122-130.
61. Kathiresan, K.; Rajendran, N. Coastal mangrove forests mitigated Tsunami. Estuar. Coast. Mar. Sci. 2005, 65, 601-606.