Structure-activity relationship models for hazard assessment and risk management of engineered nanomaterials

Procedia Engineering

Volumn 102, Issue , 2015, Pages 1500-1510

  Oksel, Ceyda ^a   Ma, Cai Y ^a   Wang, Xue Z ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEEDS   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

In silico; Nano QSAR; Nanomaterial; Nanotoxicity; QSAR; Risk reduction

Indexed keywords

BIOACTIVITY; BIOHAZARDS; COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY; COST EFFECTIVENESS; FORECASTING; HAZARDS; NANOSTRUCTURED MATERIALS; RISK MANAGEMENT; STRUCTURES (BUILT OBJECTS);

IN-SILICO; NANO-QSAR; NANOTOXICITY; QSAR; RISK REDUCTIONS;

RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 84950103412     PISSN: 18777058     EISSN: 18777058     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2015.01.284     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. C. Sayes, and I. Ivanov Comparative Study of Predictive Computational Models for Nanoparticle-Induced Cytotoxicity Risk Analysis 30 2010 1723 1734
2. D. Fourches, D. Pu, C. Tassa, R. Weissleder, S.Y. Shaw, R.J. Mumper, and A. Tropsha Quantitative Nanostructure- Activity Relationship Modeling Acs Nano 4 2010 5703 5712
3. T. Puzyn, B. Rasulev, A. Gajewicz, X. Hu, T.P. Dasari, A. Michalkova, H.-M. Hwang, A. Toropov, D. Leszczynska, and J. Leszczynski Using nano-QSAR to predict the cytotoxicity of metal oxide nanoparticles Nature nanotechnology 6 2011 175 178
4. V.C. Epa, F.R. Burden, C. Tassa, R. Weissleder, S. Shaw, and D.A. Winkler Modeling Biological Activities of Nanoparticles Nano letters 12 2012 5808 5812
5. X.Z. Wang, Y. Yang, R. Li, C. Mcguinnes, J. Adamson, I.L. Megson, and K. Donaldson Principal component and causal analysis of structural and acute in vitro toxicity data for nanoparticles Nanotoxicology 8 2014 465 476
6. R. Liu, H.Y. Zhang, Z.X. Ji, R. Rallo, T. Xia, C.H. Chang, A. Nel, and Y. Cohen Development of Structure-Activity Relationship for Metal Oxide Nanoparticles Nanoscale 2013
7. K.P. Singh, and S. Gupta Nano-QSAR modeling for predicting biological activity of diverse nanomaterials RSC Advances 4 2014 13215 13230
8. S.A. Gallegos, E. Burello, and A. Worth Review of Computational approaches for predicting the physicochemical and biological properties of nanoparticles, in EUR - Scientific and Technical Research Reports European Commission 2009
9. E. Burello, and A.P. Worth QSAR modeling of nanomaterials Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Nanomedicine and Nanobiotechnology 3 2011 298 306
10. Y. Cohen, R. Rallo, R. Liu, and H.H. Liu In Silico Analysis of Nanomaterials Hazard and Risk Accounts of chemical research 46 2012 802 812
11. T. Puzyn, D. Leszczynska, and J. Leszczynski Toward the Development of "Nano-QSARs": Advances and Challenges Small 5 2009 2494 2509
12. D. Fourches, D. Pu, and A. Tropsha Exploring quantitative nanostructure-activity relationships (QNAR) modeling as a tool for predicting biological effects of manufactured nanoparticles Combinatorial Chemistry & High Throughput Screening 14 2011 217 225
13. D.A. Winkler, E. Mombelli, A. Pietroiusti, L. Tran, A. Worth, B. Fadeel, and M.J. McCall Applying quantitative structure-activity relationship approaches to nanotoxicology: current status and future potential Toxicology 2012
14. S.Y. Paik, D.M. Zalk, and P. Swuste Application of a pilot control banding tool for risk level assessment and control of nanoparticle exposures Annals of Occupational Hygiene 52 2008 419 428
15. D.M. Zalk, S.Y. Paik, and P. Swuste Evaluating the control banding nanotool: a qualitative risk assessment method for controlling nanoparticle exposures Journal of Nanoparticle Research 11 2009 1685 1704
16. D. Brouwer Exposure to manufactured nanoparticles in different workplaces Toxicology 269 2010 120 127
17. P. Schulte, V. Murashov, R. Zumwalde, E. Kuempel, and C. Geraci Occupational exposure limits for nanomaterials: state of the art Journal of Nanoparticle Research 12 2010 1971 1987
18. D.H. Brouwer Control banding approaches for nanomaterials Annals of occupational hygiene 56 2012 506 514