Does dietary mitigation of enteric methane production affect rumen function and animal productivity in dairy cows?

PLoS ONE

Volumn 10, Issue 10, 2015, Pages

  Veneman, Jolien B ^a,b   Muetzel, Stefan ^c   Hart, Kenton J ^b   Faulkner, Catherine L ^b   Moorby, Jon M ^b   Perdok, Hink B ^a   Newbold, Charles J ^b  

^a Quality and Regulatory   (Netherlands)

^b ABERYSTWYTH UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c AGRESEARCH GRASSLANDS   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HYDROGEN; LINSEED OIL; METHANE; NITRATE; NITRIC ACID DERIVATIVE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DAIRY CATTLE; DIET SUPPLEMENTATION; DIETARY INTAKE; GAS DIFFUSION; GASTROINTESTINAL TRACT FUNCTION; LACTATION; MICROBIAL POPULATION DYNAMICS; MICROBIOME; NEXT GENERATION SEQUENCING; NONHUMAN; POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; POPULATION ABUNDANCE; PREVOTELLA; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RUMINANT STOMACH; ANIMAL; ARCHAEON; BACTERIUM; BIOSYNTHESIS; BOVINE; DAIRYING; DIET; DRUG EFFECTS; MICROBIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; RUMEN;

ANIMALS; ARCHAEA; BACTERIA; CATTLE; DAIRYING; DIET; LINSEED OIL; METHANE; NITRATES; RUMEN;

EID: 84949944125     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140282     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Gerber PJ, Steinfeld H, Henderson B, Mottet A, Opio C, Dijkman J, et al. Tackling climate change through livestock-A global assessment of emissions and mitigation opportunities. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO). Rome, 2013.
2. Hristov A, Oh J, Lee C, Meinen R, Montes F, Ott T, et al. Mitigation of greenhouse gas emissions in livestock production-a review of technical options for non-CO2 emissions. 2013. Available: http://www.fao. org/docrep/018/i3288e/i3288e.pdf
3. Mitsumori M, Shinkai T, Takenaka A, Enishi O, Higuchi K, Kobayashi Y, et al. Responses in digestion, rumen fermentation and microbial populations to inhibition of methane formation by a halogenated methane analogue. British Journal of Nutrition. 2012; 108:482-491. doi: 10.1017/S0007114511005794 PMID: 22059589
4. Morgavi DP, Forano E, Martin C, Newbold CJ. Microbial ecosystem and methanogenesis in ruminants. Animal. 2010; 4:1024-1036. doi: 10.1017/S1751731110000546 PMID: 22444607
5. Nayak D. Saetnan E, Cheng K, Wang W, Koslowski F, Cheng Y-F, et al Management opportunities to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions from Chinese agriculture, Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment 2015; 209: 108-124
6. Hook SE, Wright A-DG, McBride BW. Methanogens: methane producers of the rumen and mitigation strategies. Archaea. 2010; 945785. doi: 10.1155/2010/945785 PMID: 21253540
7. Bruning-Fann CS, Kaneene JB. The effects of nitrate, nitrite and N-nitroso compounds on human health: a review. Vet Hum Toxicol. 1993; 35:521-38. PMID: 8303822
8. ISO. Animal feeding stuffs. Determination of fat content. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization; 1999.
9. ISO. Animal feeding stuffs. Determination of starch content. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization for Standardization; 2000.
10. van Zijderveld SM, Gerrits WJ, Apajalahti JA, Newbold JR, Dijkstra J, Leng RA, et al. Nitrate and sulfate: Effective alternative hydrogen sinks for mitigation of ruminal methane production in sheep. J Dairy Sci.; 93:5856-5866. doi: 10.3168/jds.2010-3281 PMID: 21094759
11. Pinares-Patiño CS, Hunt C, Martin RJ, West JW, Lovejoy P, Waghorn GC. New Zealand Ruminant Methane Maesurement Centre, AgResearch, Palmerston North In: Pinares-Patiño CS, Waghorn GC, editors. Technical Manual on Respiration Chamber Designs. New Zealand: Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry; 2012. pp. 9-28.
12. Hart KJ, Yáñez-Ruiz DR, Martín-García AI, Newbold CJ. Sheep Methane Chambers at Aberystwyth University (UK) and CSIC (Spain). In: Pinares-Patiño CS, Waghorn GC, editors. Technical Manual on Respiration Chamber Designs. New Zealand: Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry: 2012. pp. 77-88.
13. Wang M, Sun XZ, Janssen PH, Tang SX, Tan ZL. Responses of methane production and fermentation pathways to the increased dissolved hydrogen concentration generated by eight substrates in in vitro ruminal cultures. Animal Feed Science and Technology. 2014; 194:1-11.
14. de la Fuente G, Belanche A, Girwood SE, Pinloche E, Wilkinson T, Newbold CJ. Pros and Cons of Ion-Torrent Next Generation Sequencing versus Terminal Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism T-RFLP for Studying the Rumen Bacterial Community. PLOS ONE. 2014; 9(7):e101435. doi: 10.1371/ journal.pone.0101435 PMID: 25051490
15. Miranda KM, Espey MG, Wink DA. A Rapid, Simple Spectrophotometric Method for Simultaneous Detection of Nitrate and Nitrite. Nitric Oxide. 2001; 5:62-71. PMID: 11178938
16. SkѤvanová E, Worgan HJ, Pinloche E, Marounek M, Newbold CJ, McEwan NR. Changes in the bacterial population of the caecum and stomach of the rabbit in response to addition of dietary caprylic acid. Veterinary Microbiology. 2010; 144;334-9. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2010.01.013 PMID: 20181443
17. Belanche A, de la Fuente G, Newbold CJ. Effect of progressive inoculation of Fauna-Free sheep with Holotrich protozoa and Total-Fauna on rumen fermentation, microbial diversity and methane emissions FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2015; 91: doi: 10.1093/femsec/fiu026
18. Dhanasekaran S, Doherty TM, Kenneth J. Comparison of different standards for real-time PCR-based absolute quantification. Journal of Immunological Methods. 2010; 354:34-39. doi: 10.1016/j.jim.2010. 01.004 PMID: 20109462
19. Edgar RC. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics. 2010; 26:2460-2461. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq461 PMID: 20709691
20. Wang Q, Garrity GM, Tiedje JM, Cole JR. Naïve Bayesian Classifier for Rapid Assignment of rRNA Sequences into the New Bacterial Taxonomy. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2007; 73: 5261-5267. PMID: 17586664
21. Seedorf H, Kittelmann S, Henderson G, Janssen PH. RIM-DB: a taxonomic framework for community structure analysis of methanogenic archaea from the rumen and other intestinal environments. PeerJ. 2014; 2:e494. doi: 10.7717/peerj.494 PMID: 25165621
22. th rev. Washington, DC National Academic Science,; 2001.
23. Patra AK. The effect of dietary fats on methane emissions, and its other effects on digestibility, rumen fermentation and lactation performance in cattle: A meta-analysis. Livestock Science. 2013; 155:244-54.
24. Appuhamy JADRN, Strathe AB, Jayasundara S, Wagner-Riddle C, Dijkstra J, France J, et al. Antimethanogenic effects of monensin in dairy and beef cattle: A meta-analysis. Journal of Dairy Science. 2013; 96:5161-73. doi: 10.3168/jds.2012-5923 PMID: 23769353
25. Eugène M, Massé D, Chiquette J, Benchaar C. Meta-analysis on the effects of lipid supplementation on methane production in lactating dairy cows. Canadian Journal of Animal Science. 2008; 88: 331-7.
26. Grainger C, Beauchemin KA. Can enteric methane emissions from ruminants be lowered without lowering their production? Animal Feed Science and Technology. 2011; 166:308-320.
27. Martin B, Morgavi DP, Doreau M. Methane mitigation in ruminants: from microbe to the farm scale. Animal. 2010; 4:351-365. doi: 10.1017/S1751731109990620 PMID: 22443940
28. Glasser F, Ferlay A, Chilliard Y. Oilseed Lipid Supplements and Fatty Acid Composition of Cow Milk: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Dairy Science. 2008; 91:4687-4703. doi: 10.3168/jds.2008-0987 PMID: 19038946
29. Bauman DE, Griinari JM. Nutritional Regulation of Milk Fat Synthesis. Annual Review of Nutrition. 2003; 23:203-227. PMID: 12626693
30. Hulshof R, Berndt A, Gerrits W, Dijkstra J, van Zijderveld S, Newbold J, et al. Dietary nitrate supplementation reduces methane emission in beef cattle fed sugarcane-based diets. Journal of Animal Science. 2012; 90;2317-2323. doi: 10.2527/jas.2011-4209 PMID: 22287674
31. Nolan J, Hegarty R, Hegarty J, Godwin I, Woodgate R. Effects of dietary nitrate on fermentation, methane production and digesta kinetics in sheep. Animal Production Science. 2010; 50:801-806.
32. van Zijderveld SM, Gerrits WJJ, Dijkstra J, Newbold JR, Hulshof RBA, Perdok HB. Persistency of methane mitigation by dietary nitrate supplementation in dairy cows. Journal of Dairy Science. 2011; 94:4028-4038. doi: 10.3168/jds.2011-4236 PMID: 21787938
33. Farra PA, Satter LD. Manipulation of the Ruminal Fermentation. III. Effect of Nitrate on Ruminal Volatile Fatty Acid Production and Milk Composition. Journal of Dairy Science. 1971; 54:1018-1024.
34. Ungerfeld EM, Kohn RA. The role of thermodynamics in the control of ruminal fermentation. In: Sejrsen K, Hvelplund T, Nielsen MO, editors. Ruminant physiology: digestion, metabolism and impact of nutrition on gene expression, immunology and stress. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen Academic Publishers; 2006. pp. 55-86.
35. St-Pierre B, Wright A-DG. Diversity of gut methanogens in herbivorous animals. animal. 2013; 7:49-56. doi: 10.1017/S1751731112000912 PMID: 22717175
36. Kittelmann S, Seedorf H, Walters WA, Clemente JC, Knight R, Gordon JI, et al. Simultaneous Amplicon Sequencing to Explore Co-Occurrence Patterns of Bacterial, Archaeal and Eukaryotic Microorganisms in Rumen Microbial Communities. PLOS ONE. 2013; 8(2):e47879. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047879 PMID: 23408926
37. Janssen PH, Kirs M. Structure of the Archaeal Community of the Rumen. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 2008; 74:3619-3625. doi: 10.1128/AEM.02812-07 PMID: 18424540
38. Allison M, Reddy C, Cook H. The effects of nitrate and nitrite on VFA and CH4 production by ruminal microbes. Journal of Animal Science. 1981; 53(S1):391.
39. Iwamoto M, Asanuma N, Hino T. Ability of Selenomonas ruminantium, Veillonella parvula, and Wolinella succinogenes to Reduce Nitrate and Nitrite with Special Reference to the Suppression of Ruminal Methanogenesis. Anaerobe. 2002; 8:209-215.
40. Henderson G, Cox F, Kittelmann S, Miri VH, Zethof M, Noel SJ, et al. Effect of DNA Extraction Methods and Sampling Techniques on the Apparent Structure of Cow and Sheep Rumen Microbial Communities. PLOS ONE. 2013; 8(9):e74787. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0074787 PMID: 24040342
41. Kim M, Morrison M, Yu Z. Status of the phylogenetic diversity census of ruminal microbiomes. FEMS Microbiology Ecology. 2011; 76:49-63. doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6941.2010.01029.x PMID: 21223325
42. Patra AK, Yu Z. Effective reduction of enteric methane production by a combination of nitrate and saponin without adverse effect on feed degradability, fermentation, or bacterial and archaeal communities of the rumen. Bioresource Technology. 2013; 148:352-360. doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.08.140 PMID: 24063817
43. Avgustin G, Wallace RJ, Flint HJ. Phenotypic Diversity among Ruminal Isolates of Prevotella ruminicola: Proposal of Prevotella brevis sp. nov., Prevotella bryantii sp. nov., and Prevotella albensis sp. nov. and Redefinition of Prevotella ruminicola. International Journal of Systematic Bacteriology. 1997; 47:284-288. PMID: 9103611
44. Purushe J, Fouts DE, Morrison M, White BA, Mackie RI, Coutinho PM, et al. Comparative genome analysis of Prevotella ruminicola and Prevotella bryantii: insights into their environmental niche. Microbial Ecology. 2010; 60:721-729. doi: 10.1007/s00248-010-9692-8 PMID: 20585943
45. Wolin MJ, Miller TL, Stewart CS, editors. Microbe-microbe interactions. New York, NY: Blackie Academic and Professional; 1997.
46. Strobel HJ. Vitamin B12-dependent propionate production by the ruminal bacterium Prevotella ruminicola 23. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 1992; 58:2331-2333. PMID: 1637169
47. Lin M, Guo W, Meng Q, Stevenson D, Weimer P, Schaefer D. Changes in rumen bacterial community composition in steers in response to dietary nitrate. Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology. 2013; 97:8719-8727. doi: 10.1007/s00253-013-5143-z PMID: 23955503
48. Petri RM, Schwaiger T, Penner GB, Beauchemin KA, Forster RJ, et al. (2013) Characterization of the Core Rumen Microbiome in Cattle during Transition from Forage to Concentrate as Well as during and after an Acidotic Challenge. PLOS ONE 8(12): e83424. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0083424 PMID: 24391765
49. Kim M, Yu Z Quantitative comparisons of select cultured anduncultured microbial populations in the rumen of cattle fed different diets. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology 2012, 3:28 Available: http://www.jasbsci.com/content/3/1/28 doi: 10.1186/2049-1891-3-28 PMID: 22958370
50. Wallace RJ, Rooke JA, Duthie C-A, Hyslop JJ, Ross DW, McKain N, et al. Archaeal abundance in postmortem ruminal digesta may help predict methane emissions from beef cattle. Sci Rep. 2014; 4:5892. doi: 10.1038/srep05892 PMID: 25081098