Mapping the social work research agenda

The SAGE Handbook of Social Work

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 387-407

  Gredig, Daniel ^a   Shaw, Ian ^b   Sommerfeld, Peter ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES AND ARTS NORTHWESTERN SWITZERLAND   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84949844161     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4135/9781446247648.n26     Document Type: Chapter

References (88)

1. Abbott, A. (1988). The system of professions: An essay on the division of expert labor. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
2. Abbott, A. (1995). Boundaries of social work, or social work of boundaries? Social Service Review, 69(4), 545-562. doi:10.1086/604148 http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/604148
3. Argyris, C., Putnam, R., and McLain Smith, D. (1990). Action science. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
4. Arthur, B. (2008). Cutting the dash: Experiences of mental health and employment. Journal of Public Mental Health, 7(4), 51-59. doi:10.1108/17465729200800029 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17465729200800029
5. Beresford, P. (2007). The role of service user research in generating knowledge-based health and social care: From conflict to contribution. Evidence and Policy, 3(3), 329-341. doi:10.1332/174426407781738074 http://dx.doi.org/10.1332/174426407781738074
6. Boaz, A., and Blewett, J. (2010). Providing objective, impartial evidence for decision making and public accountability. In I.Shaw, Briar-Lawson, K., Orme, J., and Ruckdeschel, R. (Eds), Sage Handbook of Social Work Research. London: Sage, pp. 37-48. doi:10.4135/9780857021106 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9780857021106
7. Chelimsky, E. (2006). The purposes of evaluation in a democratic society. In I.Shaw, Greene, J.C., and Mark, M.M. (Eds), Sage Handbook of Evaluation. London: Sage, pp. 33-55.
8. Creswell, J.W. (1994). Reseach design: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. London: Sage.
9. Dewe, B., Ferchhoff, W., Scherr, A., and Stüwe, G. (1993). Professionelles soziales Handeln: Soziale Arbeit im Spannungsfeld zwischen Theorie und Praxis. Weinheim, München: Juventa.
10. Dick, B. (2007). Action research as an enhancement of natural problem solving. International Journal of Action Research, 3(1and2), 149-167.
11. Diekmann, A. (1995). Empirische Sozialforschung: Grundlagen, Methoden, Anwendungen. Reinbek b. Hamburg: Rowohlt.
12. Eisner, E. (1991). The enlightened eye: Qualitative inquiry and the enhancement of educational practice. New York: Macmillan.
13. Frankham, J. (2009). Partnership research: A review of approaches and challenges in conducting research in partnership with service users. In N.C.F.R. Methods (eds), Retrieved January 10, 2010 from http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/778/1/Frankham_May_09.pdf
14. Fraser, M.W., Richman, J.M., Galinski, M.J., and Day, S.H. (2009). Intervention research: Developing social programs. New York: Oxford University Press.
15. Friedrichs, J. (1990). Methoden empirischer Sozialforschung. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.
16. Gambrill, E. (1999). Evidence-based practice: An alternative to authority-based practice. Families in Society: The Journal of Con temporary Social Services, 80(4), 341-350.
17. Glasby, J., and Beresford, P. (2007). In whose interests? Local research ethics committees and service user research. Ethics and Social Welfare, 2(3), 282-292. doi:10.1080/17496530701602816 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17496530701602816
18. Gredig, D. (2011). From research to practice: Research-based intervention development in social work. Developing practice through cooperative knowledge production. European Journal of Social Work, 14(1), 53-70. doi:10.1080/13691457.2010.516624 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2010.516624
19. Gredig, D., and Marsh, J.C. (2010). Improving intervention and practice. In I.Shaw, Briar-Lawson, K., Orme, J., and Ruckdeschel, R. (Eds), Sage handbook of social work research. London: Sage, pp. 64-82. doi:10.4135/9780857021106 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9780857021106
20. Gredig, D., and Sommerfeld, P. (2008). New proposals for generating and exploiting solution-oriented knowledge. Journal Research on Social Work Practice, 18(4), 292-300. doi:10.1177/1049731507302265 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1049731507302265
21. Guba, E.G. (1990). The alternative paradigm dialog. In E.G.Guba (Ed.), The paradigm dialog. Newbury Park: Sage, pp. 17-30.
22. Hammersley, M. (1995). The politics of social research. London: Sage.
23. Hill, A., and Shaw, I. (2011). Social work and ICT. London: Sage.
24. Hornstein, W. (1998). Erziehungswissenschaftliche Forschung und Sozialpädagogik. In T.Rauschenbach and Thole, W. (Eds), Sozialpädagogische Forschung: Gegenstand und Funktionen, Bereiche und Methoden. Weinheim, München: Juventa, pp. 47-80.
25. Hüttemann, M., and Sommerfeld, P. (2007). Forschungsbasierte Praxis: Professionalisierung durch kooperative Wissensbildung. In P.Sommerfeld and Hüttemann, M. (Eds), Evidenzbasierte Soziale Arbeit. Nutzung von Forschung in der Praxis. Baltmannsweiler: Schneider Verlag Hohengehren, pp. 40-57.
26. Jacob, M.C. (1992). Science and politics in the late twentieth century. Social Research, 59(3), 487-503.
27. Jakob, G., and Von Wensierski, H.-J. (Eds) (1997). Rekonstruktive Sozialpädagogik. Weinheim, München: Juventa.
28. Kirk, S., and Reid, W. (2002). Science and social work. New York: Columbia University Press.
29. Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In I.Lakatos and Musgrave, A. (Eds). Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30. Lengermann, P., and Niebrugge, G. (2007). Thrice told: Narratives of sociology’s relation to social work. In C.Calhoun (Ed.), Sociology in America: A history. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press, pp. 63-114.
31. Lorenz, W. (2007). Practising history: Memory and contemporary professional practice. International Social Work, 50(5), 597-612. doi:10.1177/0020872807079918 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0020872807079918
32. Lubove, R. (1965). The professional altruist. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
33. Lüders, C., and Rauschenbach, T. (2001). Sozialpädagogische Forschung. In H.-U.Otto and Thiersch, H. (Eds), Handbuch der Sozialarbeit/Sozialpädagogik (2nd ed.). Neuwied, Kriftel: Luchterhand, pp. 562-575.
34. Maier, K. (2009). Für eine integrative praktische Wissenschaft Soziale Arbeit. In E.Mührel and Birgmeier, B. (Eds), Die Sozialarbeitswissenschaft und ihre Theorie(n), Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften, pp. 41-52. doi:10.1007/978-3-531-91699-6_4 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-531-91699-6_4
35. Mallinson, S., Popay, J., Elliott, E., Bennett, S., Bostock, L., Gatrell, A., et al. (2003). Historical data for health inequalities research. Sociology 37(4), 771-780. doi:10.1177/00380385030374008 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00380385030374008
36. Mayes, D. (2010). When it pays to be bi-polar. Mental Health and Social Inclusion, 14(1), 20-23. doi:10.5042/mhsi.2010.0066 http://dx.doi.org/10.5042/mhsi.2010.0066
37. McLaughlin, H. (2006). Understanding social work research. London: Sage.
38. McLaughlin, H. (2009). Service user research in health and social care. London: Sage.
39. McLaughlin, H. (2010). Keeping service user involvement in research honest. British Journal of Social Work, 40(5), 1591-1608. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bcp064 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcp064
40. Miethe, I. (2007). Rekonstruktion und Intervention: Zur Geschichte und Funktion eines schwierigen und innovativen Verhältnisses. In I.Miehte, Fischer, W., Giebeler, C., Goblirsch, M., and Riemann, G. (Eds), Rekonstruktion und Intervention. Interdisziplinäre Beiträge zur rekonstruktiven Sozialarbeitsforschung. Opladen: Barbara Budrich, pp. 9-33.
41. Miller, E. (2006). Challenges and strategies in collaborative working with service user researchers: reflections from the academic researcher. Research Policy and Planning, 24(3), 197-208.
42. Mullen, E.J., Bellamy, J.L., and Bledsoe, S.E. (2007). Evidenzbasierte Praxis in der Sozialen Arbeit. In P.Sommerfeld and Hüttemann, M. (Eds), Evidenzbasierte Soziale Arbeit. Nutzung von Forschung in der Praxis. Baltmannsweiler: Schneider Verlag Hohengehren, pp. 10-25.
43. Nokes, P. (1967). The professional task in welfare practice. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
44. Oevermann, U. (1996). Theoretische Skizze einer revidierten Theorie professionalisierten Handelns. In A.Combe and Helsper, W. (Eds), Pädagogische Professionalität. Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp, pp. 70-182.
45. Otto, H.-U. (1971). Zum Verhältnis von systematisiertem Wissen und praktischem Handeln in der Sozialarbeit. In H.-U.Otto and Utermann, K. (Eds), Sozialarbeit als Beruf: Auf dem Weg zur Professionalisierung?München: Juventa.
46. Pain, H. (2011). Practice research: what it is and its place in the social work profession. European Journal of Social Work, 14(4), 545-562. doi:10.1080/13691457.2010.490062 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2010.490062
47. Palmer, D. (2009). 'No one knows like we do': The narratives of mental health service users trained as researchers. Journal of Public Mental Health, 8(4), 18-28. doi:10.1108/17465729200900024 http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17465729200900024
48. Palshaugen, O. (2007). On the diversity of action research. International Journal of Action Research, 3(1and2), 9-14.
49. Parton, N., and Kirk, S. (2010). The nature and purposes of social work. In I.Shaw, Briar-Lawson, K., Orme, J., and Ruckdeschel, R. (Eds), Sage handbook of social work research. London: Sage, pp. 23-36. doi:10.4135/9780857021106 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9780857021106
50. Petzold, H.G. (2008). Evolutionäres Denken und Entwicklungsdynamiken im Feld der Psychotherapie. Integrative Therapie, 4, 353-396.
51. Phillips, D.C. (1990a). Postpositivistic science: myths and realities. In E.G.Guba (Ed.), The paradigm dialog. Newbury Park: Sage, pp. 31-45.
52. Phillips, D.C. (1990b). Subjectivity and objectivity: An objective inquiry. In E.Eisner and Peshkin, A. (Eds), Qualitative inquiry in education. New York: Teachers College, Columbia University, pp. 19-37.
53. Piaget, J. (1974). Abriss der genetischen Epistemologie (Org.: 1970, Paris ed.). Olten: Walter Verlag.
54. Platt, J. (1996). A history of sociological research methods in America, 1920-1960. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
55. Plessner, H. (1975). Die Stufen des Organischen und der Mensch: Einleitung in die philosophische Anthropologie. Berlin: W. De Gruyter. doi:10.1515/9783110845341 http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783110845341
56. Popkewitz, T.S. (1990). Whose future? Whose past? In E.G.Guba (Ed.), The paradigm dialog. Newbury Park: Sage, pp. 46-66.
57. Powell, J., and Ramos, B. (2010). The practice of social work research. In I.Shaw, Briar-Lawson, K., Orme, J. and Ruckdeschel, R. (Eds), Sage handbook of social work research. London: Sage. 231-245. doi:10.4135/9780857021106 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9780857021106
58. Reason, P. (1994). (ed.), Participation in human inquiry. London: Sage.
59. Reason, P., and Bradbury, H. (2002). Sage handbook of action research. London: Sage.
60. Reid, W., and Zettergren, P. (1999). A perspective on empirical practice. In I.Shaw and Lishman, J. (Eds), Evaluation and social work practice. London: Sage, pp. 41-62. doi:10.4135/9781446218075 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781446218075
61. Reid, W.J. (1994). The empirical practice movement. Social Service Review, 68(2), 165-184. doi:10.1086/604045 http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/604045
62. Reissman, C., and Quinney, L. (2005). Narrative in social work: A critical review. Qualitative Social Work, 4(3), 391-412. doi:10.1177/1473325005058643 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1473325005058643
63. Richards, L. (2005). Handling qualitative data: A practical guide. London: Sage.
64. Richmond, M. (1917). Social diagnosis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
65. Romm, N. (1995). Knowing as an intervention. Systems Practice, 8(2), 137-167. doi:10.1007/BF02253410 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02253410
66. Romm, N. (1996). Inquiry-and-Intervention in systems planning: Probing methodological rationalities. World Futures, 47, 25-36. doi:10.1080/02604027.1996.9972584 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02604027.1996.9972584
67. Rothman, J., and Thomas, E. (1994). Intervention research. New York: The Haworth Press.
68. Saurama, E., and Tukiala, A.-K. (2009). The alternative story: The quest for practice research. Paper presented at the conference Research and Social Work in Urban /Areas held at Antwerp, Belgium, September 24-26.
69. Schnurr, S. (2005). Evidenz ohne Reflexivität? Zur Debatte um Evidenzbasierte Praxis in der Sozialen Arbeit. Zeitschrift Forschung und Wissenschaft Soziale Arbeit, 5(2), 19-31.
70. Schweppe, C., and Graßhoff, G. (2006). Rekonstruktive Sozialpädagogik und sozialpädagogisches Handeln. In T.Badawia, Luckas, H., and Müller, H. (Eds), Das Soziale gestalten. Über Mögliches und Unmögliches der Sozialpädagogik. Wiesbaden: VS Verlag, pp. 185-198.
71. Shaw, I. (2007). Is social work research distinctive? Social Work Education, 26(7), 659-669. doi:10.1080/02615470601129834 http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02615470601129834
72. Shaw, I. (2010). Logics, qualities and quality of social work research. In I.Shaw, Briar-Lawson, K., Orme, J., and Ruckdschel, R. (Eds), Sage handbook of social work research. London: Sage, pp. 246-263. doi:10.4135/9780857021106 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9780857021106
73. Shaw, I. (2011). Evaluating in practice (2nd ed.). Aldershot, Hants: Ashgate Publishing.
74. Shaw, I., and Norton, M. (2007). Kinds and quality of social work research in higher education. London: Social Care Institute for Excellence.
75. Shaw, I., Arksey, H., and Mullender, A. (2006). Recognizing social work. British Journal of Social Work, 36(2), 227-246. doi:10.1093/bjsw/bch251 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bch251
76. Shaw, I., Briar-Lawson, K., Orme, J., and Ruckdeschel, R. (2010). Mapping social work research: Pasts, presents and futures. In I.Shaw, Briar-Lawson, K., Orme, J., and Ruckdeschel, R. (Eds), Sage handbook of social work research. London: Sage, pp. 1-20. doi:10.4135/9780857021106 http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9780857021106
77. Sidler, N. (2004). Sinn und Nutzen einer Sozialarbeitswissenschaft: Eine Streitschrift. Freiburg i. Br.: Lambertus.
78. Sommerfeld, P. (1998). Spezifische Sozialarbeitsforschung: Ein Resümee zu den dargestellten Forschungsprojekten. In E.Steinert, Sticher-Gil, B., SommerfeldP., and Maier, K. (Eds), Sozialarbeitsforschung: was sie ist und leistet. Freiburg i. Br.: Lambertus, pp. 182-192.
79. Stern, E. (2006). Contextual challenges for evaluation practice. In I.Shaw, Greene, J.C., and Mark, M.M. (Eds), Sage handbook of evaluation. London: Sage, pp. 292-314.
80. The Salisbury Statement (2009). Retrieved January 10, 2010 from http://www.socsci.soton.ac.uk/spring/salisbury/The_Salisbury_Statement_on_practice_research_May_2009.pdf.
81. Thiersch, H., and Rauschenbach, T. (1984). Sozialpädagogik/Sozialarbeit: Theorie und Entwicklung. In H.Eyferth, OttoH.-U., and Thiersch, H. (Eds), Handbuch zur Sozialarbeit/Sozialpädagogik. Neuwied: Luchterhand, pp. 984-1016.
82. Thyer, B. (1989). First principles of practice research. British Journal of Social Work, 19(4), 309-323. doi:10.1093/bjsw/19.4.309 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/19.4.309
83. Thyer, B.A. (2008). The quest for evidence-based practice? We are all positivists Journal Research on Social Work Practice, 18(4), 339-345. doi:10.1177/1049731507313998 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1049731507313998
84. Timms, N. (1968). The language of social casework. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
85. Weizsäcker, C.F. v. (1992). Zeit und Wissen. München: Hanser Verlag.
86. Wilding, P. (1982). Professional power and social welfare. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
87. Witkin, S.L. (2000). Writing social work. Social Work Education, 45(5), 389-394.
88. Witkin, S.L. (2001). Reading social work. Social Work Education, 46(1), 5-8.