Practice research: What it is and its place in the social work profession

European Journal of Social Work

Volumn 14, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 545-562

  Pain, Helen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Literature Review; Practice Research; Professional Practice

Indexed keywords

EID: 84855440100     PISSN: 13691457     EISSN: 14682664     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13691457.2010.490062     Document Type: Review

References (105)

1. Antle, B. J. and Regehr, C. 2003. Beyond individual rights and freedoms: metaethics in social work research. Social Work, 48(1): 135-144.
2. Atkinson, D. 2005. Research as social work: participatory research in learning disability. British Journal of Social Work, 35(4): 425-434.
3. Barry, M. 2000. The mentor/monitor debate in criminal justice: "what works" for offenders. British Journal of Social Work, 30(5): 575-595.
4. Bein, A. and Allen, K. 1999. Hand in glove? It fits better than you think. Social Work, 44(3): 274-277.
5. Bond, M. and Jones, J. 1995. Research in practice: promoting the dialogue. Social Work Education, 14(2): 85-101.
6. British Association of Social Workers 2002 British Association of Social Workers Birmingham Code of Ethics [online] Available at: http://www.basw.co.uk, accessed 2 Aug. 2008.
7. Brown L. & Loveridge L. 1999 Venture Press Birmingham The politics of joint agency-university research in The Politics of Social Work Research and Evaluation Broad B. 159 - 170
8. Clark A. Kjorholt A. T. & Moss P. 2005 Beyond Listening The Policy Press Bristol
9. Comer, E., Meier, A. and Galinsky, M. 2004. Development of innovative group work practice: using the intervention research paradigm. Social Work, 49(2): 250-260.
10. Cooper, B. 2001. Constructivism in social work: towards a participative practice viability. British Journal of Social Work, 31(5): 721-738.
11. Coughlan, F. J. and Collins, K. J. 2001. Participatory developmental research-a working model. International Social Work, 44(4): 505-518.
12. Coulton, C. 2005. The place of community in social work practice research: conceptual and methodological developments. Social Work Research, 29(2): 73-86.
13. Coy, M. 2006. This morning I'm a researcher, this afternoon I'm an outreach worker: ethical dilemmas in practitioner research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 9(5): 419-431.
14. Craig, G. 2002. Making the links between practice research and policy: the Northern Fells Rural Project. SCCD News, 31: 10-13.
15. Davis, T. D. 2006. Practice evaluation in social work: theorizing practitioner preference. Smith College Studies in Social Work, 76(3): 67-92.
16. Davison, J. 2004. Dilemmas in research: issues of vulnerability and disempowerment for the social worker/researcher. Journal of Social Work Practice, 18(3): 379-393.
17. D'Cruz H. 2000 5 Social work research as knowledge/power in practice Sociological Research Online no. 1, U86-U104, [online] Available at: http://www.socresonline.org.uk/5/1/contents.html, accessed 12 Jun. 2009.
18. D'Cruz, H. and Jones, M. 2004. Social Work Research: Ethical and Political Contexts, London: Sage.
19. Department of Health 2005 Research Governance Framework for Health and Social Care, 2nd edn Department of Health London
20. Doornbos A. et al. 2008 From fairytales to spherecards: towards a new research methodology for improving knowledge productivity Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative Social Research 9 no. 2, Art. 48.
21. Durham, A. 2002. Developing a sensitive practitioner research methodology for studying the impact of child sexual abuse. British Journal of Social Work, 32(4): 429-442.
22. Dziegielewski, S. F., Wodarski, J. and Feit, M. 2005. Social service research: efficacy, necessity and effectiveness. Journal of Social Service Research, 32(1): 1-16.
23. Epstein, I. 2001. Using available clinical information in practice-based research: mining for silver while dreaming of gold. Social Work in Health Care, 33(3/4): 15-32.
24. Fisher, M. 2002. The role of service users in problem formulation and technical aspects of social research. Social Work Education, 21(3): 305-312.
25. Fisher, M., Francis, J. and Fischer, C. 2007. Social Care Research Capacity Consultation, Report 16 in Using Knowledge in Social Care, London: Social Care Institute for Excellence.
26. Fook, J. 1996. The Reflective Researcher: Social Workers' Theories of Practice Research, St. Leonards, NSW, Australia: Allen & Unwin.
27. Fook J 2001 Identifying expert social work in Qualitative Research in Social Work I. Shaw & N. Gould Sage London pp. 116 - 131.
28. Fook, J. 2003. Social work research in Australia. Social Work Education, 22(1): 45-57.
29. Fook J. 2004 What professionals need from research in Social Work and Evidence Based Practice Smith D. Jessica Kingsley London pp. 29 - 46.
30. Fox, M., Martin, P. and Green, G. 2007. Doing Practitioner Research, London: Sage.
31. Fraser, D. M. 1997. Ethical dilemmas and practical problems for the practitioner-researcher. Educational Action Research, 5(1): 161-171.
32. Fuller, R. and Petch, A. 1995. Practitioner Research: The Reflexive Social Worker, Buckingham: Open University Press.
33. Gardner, F. 2000. Design evaluation: illuminating social work practice for better outcomes. Social Work, 45(2): 176-182.
34. General Social Care Council 2002 Codes of Practice GSCC London.
35. Gibbs, L. and Gambrill, E. 2002. Evidence-based practice: counterarguments to objections. Research on Social Work Practice, 12(3): 452-476.
36. Hammersley, M. 2003. Social research today: some dilemmas and distinctions. Qualitative Social Work, 2(1): 25-44.
37. Healy, K. 2001. Participatory action research and social work-a critical appraisal. International Social Work, 44(1): 93-105.
38. Hewitt, J. 2007. Ethical components of researcher-researched relationships in qualitative interviewing. Qualitative Health Research, 17(8): 1149-1159.
39. Involve 2009 Guidelines [online] Available at: http://www.invo.org.uk/Publication_Guidelines.asp, accessed 12 Jun. 2009.
40. Jackson, A., Frederico, M. and Black, C. 2009. Exploring outcomes in a therapeutic service response to the emotional and mental health needs of children who have experienced abuse and neglect in Victoria, Australia. Child and Family Social Work, 14(2): 198-212.
41. Jarvis, P. 1999. The Practitioner-Researcher, San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
42. Jarvis, P. and Gibson, S. 1997. The Teacher Practitioner and Mentor in Nursing, Midwifery, Health Visiting and the Social Services, Cheltenham: Stanley Thomas.
43. Jokinen A. Juhila K. & Pösö T. 1999 Constructing Social Work Practices Ashgate Aldershot
44. Joubert, L. 2006. Academic-practice partnerships in practice research: a cultural shift for health social workers. Social Work in Health Care, 43(2-3): 151-162.
45. JUC SWEC 2006 A Social Work Research Strategy in Higher Education 2006-2020 Social Care Workforce Research Unit, the International Policy Institute, Kings College London London
46. Juliusdottir, S. and Karlsson, T. 2007. Some indications for professional development in social work: a study of theoretical interest and attitudes towards research among Icelandic social workers. European Journal of Social Work, 10(1): 21-37.
47. Kanuha, V. K. 2000. "Being" native versus "going native": conducting social work research as an insider. Social Work, 45(5): 439-447.
48. Karvinen-Niinikoski, S. 2005. Research orientation and expertise in social work-challenges for social work education. European Journal of Social Work, 8(3): 259-271.
49. Kazi, M. A. F. 2000. Contemporary perspectives in the evaluation of practice. British Journal of Social Work, 30(6): 755-768.
50. Kiik, R. 2005. The Estonian experience-how to inspire social work students to undertake research?. European Journal of Social Work, 8(3): 329-334.
51. Labonte-Roset, C. 2007. Status and special features of social work research within the canon of the social sciences and humanities: open and hidden asymmetries. European Journal of Social Work, 10(3): 417-421.
52. Lawler, J. and Bilson, A. 2004. Towards a more reflexive research aware practice: the influence and potential of professional and team culture. Social Work & Social Sciences Review, 11(1): 52-69.
53. Lee, M. and Saunders, K. 2004. Oak trees from acorns? An evaluation of local bursaries in primary care. Primary Health Care Research & Development, 5(2): 93-95.
54. Lykes M. B. 2001 Sage London Creative arts and photography in participatory action research in Guatemala in Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice Reason P. & Bradbury H. 363 - 371
55. Lyons, K. 2000. The place of research in social work education. British Journal of Social Work, 30(4): 433-447.
56. MacDonald, G. 1997. Social work research: the state we're in. Journal of Interprofessional Care, 11(1): 57-65.
57. Matthies, A.-L. 2005. Between science, practice and politics: practice research as a defining approach of social work research. European Journal of Social Work, 8(3): 273-278.
58. McCoyd, J. L. M. and Shdaimah, C. S. 2007. Revisiting the benefits debate: does qualitative social work research produce salubrious effects?. Social Work, 52(4): 340-349.
59. McCracken, S. G. and Marsh, J. C. 2008. Practitioner expertise in evidence-based practice decision making. Research on Social Work Practice, 18(4): 301-310.
60. McCrystal, P. 2000. Developing the social work researcher through a practitioner research training programme. Social Work Education, 19(4): 361-373.
61. McCrystal, P. and Godfrey, A. 2001. Developing a researcher-practitioner partnership for the effective evaluation of professional social work training. Social Work Education, 20(5): 539-549.
62. McDermott, F. 2005. Researching groupwork: outsider and insider perspectives. Groupwork, 15(1): 90-108.
63. Mendenhall, A. N. 2007. Switching hats: transitioning from the role of clinician to the role of researcher in social work doctoral education. Journal of Teaching in Social Work, 27(3-4): 273-290.
64. Miller, K. 2007. Preliminary Report on Practice-related Research Survey, Dundee: Scottish Institute for Excellence in Social Work Education.
65. Milton, P. 2000. Mind the gap! Translating practice problems into research questions in an evaluation of a welfare programme. European Journal of Social Work, 3(1): 25-28.
66. Moffatt, K., George, U., Lee, B. and McGrath, S. 2005. Community practice researchers as reflective learners. British Journal of Social Work, 35(1): 89-104.
67. Mullen, E. J. 2002. Problem formulation in practitioner and researcher partnerships: a decade of experience at the Center for the Study of Social Work Practice. Social Work Education, 21(3): 323-336.
68. Office of Deputy Prime Minister 2005 Office of Deputy Prime Minister London Best Value Performance Indicators [online] Available at: http://www.communities.gov.uk/documents/localgovernment/pdf/134864.pdf, accessed 20 Aug. 2008.
69. Ohmer, M. L. and Korr, W. S. 2006. The effectiveness of community practice interventions: a review of the literature. Research on Social Work Practice, 16(2): 132-145.
70. O'Neill, C., Cleak, H., Brown, G. and Goodman, H. 1999. "Getting started, getting feedback, and getting finished"... practice research in action. Australian Social Work, 52(2): 27-34.
71. Padgett, D. 1998. Does the glove really fit? Qualitative research and clinical social work practice. Social Work, 43(4): 373-381.
72. Parton, N. 2000. Some thoughts on the relationship between theory and practice in and for social work. British Journal of Social Work, 30(4): 449-463.
73. Parton, N. 2008. Changes in the form of knowledge in social work: from the "social" to the "informational"?. British Journal of Social Work, 38(2): 253-269.
74. Peake, K. and Epstein, I. 2004. Theoretical and practical imperatives for reflective social work organization in health and mental health: the place of practice-based research. Social Work in Mental Health, 3(1/2): 23-37.
75. Peile, C. 1994. Theory, practice, research: casual acquaintances or a seamless whole?. Australian Social Work, 47(2): 17-23.
76. Plath, D. 2006. Evidence-based practice: current issues and future directions. Australian Social Work, 59(1): 56-72.
77. Powell, J. 2002. The changing conditions of social work research. British Journal of Social Work, 32(1): 17-33.
78. Powell, J. 2005. "Value talk" in social work research: reflection, rhetoric and reality. European Journal of Social Work, 8(1): 21-37.
79. Powell, J. 2007. Promoting older people's voices-the contribution of social work to inter-disciplinary research. Social Work in Health Care, 44(1-2): 111-126.
80. Quick, L., Forsyth, K. and Melton, J. 2007. From graduate to reflective practice scholar. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 70(11): 471-474.
81. Regehr, C., Stern, S. and Shlonsky, A. 2007. Operationalizing evidence-based practice. Research on Social Work Practice, 17(3): 408-416.
82. Reid, W. J., Kenaley, B. D. and Colvin, J. 2004. Do some interventions work better than others?-A review of comparative social work experiments. Social Work Research, 28(2): 71-81.
83. Reimer, B., Sawka, E. and James, D. 2005. Improving research transfer in the addictions field: a perspective from Canada. Substance Use & Misuse, 40(11): 1707-1720.
84. Rex, S. and Gelsthorpe, L. 2002. The role of community service in reducing offending: evaluating pathfinder projects in the UK. Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 41(4): 311-325.
85. Rock, B. D. and Cooper, M. 2000. Social work in primary care: a demonstration student unit utilizing practice research. Social Work in Health Care, 31(1): 1-17.
86. Rosen, A., Proctor, E. and Staudt, M. 1999. Social work research and the quest for effective practice. Social Work Research, 23(1): 4-14.
87. Ryan, V. 2007. Filial therapy: helping children and new carers to form secure attachment relationships. British Journal of Social Work, 37(4): 643-657.
88. Salisbury Forum Group 2009 University of Southampton Southampton Practice Research: The Salisbury Statement [online] Available at: http://www.socsci.soton.ac.uk/spring/salisbury, accessed 12 Jun. 2009.
89. Scott, D. 1997. Ethical issues in practice research: a case study. Australian Social Work, 50(4): 41-45.
90. Shaw, I. 2005. Practitioner research: evidence or critique?. British Journal of Social Work, 35(8): 1231-1248.
91. Shaw, I. 2007. Is social work research distinctive?. Social Work Education, 26(7): 659-669.
92. Shaw I. & Gould N. 2001 Qualitative Research in Social Work Sage London
93. Sixsmith, J. 2004. Young men's health and group participation: participatory research gone wrong?. Clinical Psychology, 43(1): 13-18.
94. Social Care Institute for Excellence 2009 Social Care Institute for Excellence London Social Care Online [online] Available at: http://www.scie-socialcareonline.org.uk/, accessed 12 Jun. 2009.
95. Social Services Inspectorate and Audit Commission 2002 Getting the Best from Best Value Department of Health London
96. SPRING 2010 University of Southampton Southampton Southampton Practice Research Initiative Network Group [online] Available at: http://www.soton.ac.uk/spring/, accessed 21 Apr. 2010.
97. Talentia Union of Professional Social Workers 2007 Talentia Union of Professional Social Workers Helsinki Ethical Guidelines for Social Welfare Professionals [online] Available at: http://www.talentia.fi/files/4599_EthicalguidelinesbyTalentia.pdf, accessed 12 Jun. 2009.
98. Thomas, N. and O'Kane, C. 2000. Discovering what children think: connections between research and practice. British Journal of Social Work, 30(6): 819-835.
99. Tsang, A. K. T. 2000. Bridging the gap between clinical practice and research: an integrated practice-oriented model. Journal of Social Service Research, 26(4): 69-90.
100. Wade, K. and Neuman, K. 2007. Practice-based research: changing the professional culture and language of social work. Social Work in Health Care, 44(4): 49-64.
101. Wadsworth Y. 2001 The mirror, the magnifying glass, the compass and the map: facilitating Participatory Action Research in Handbook of Action Research P. Reason & H. Bradbury Sage London pp. 420 - 432.
102. Wang, C. C., Wu, K., Zhan, W. and Carovano, K. 1998. Photovoice as a participatory health promotion strategy. Health Promotion International, 13(1): 75-86.
103. White S. 2001 Auto-ethnography as reflexive inquiry: the research act as self-surveillance in Qualitative Research in Social Work I. Shaw & N. Gould Sage London pp. 100 - 115
104. Williams, V., St Quintin, P. and Hoadley, S. 2006. "Take your partners": reflections on a partnership project in learning disability research. Action Research, 4(3): 295-314.
105. Zlotnik, J. L., Biegel, D. E. and Solt, B. E. 2002. The Institute for the Advancement of Social Work Research: strengthening social work research in practice and policy. Research on Social Work Practice, 12(2): 318-337.